Binance Square

Aesthetic_Meow

image
Verified Creator
Live in a dream life. Want to learn trading. Make some new friends. X:- @RasulLikhy
Open Trade
High-Frequency Trader
2.9 Years
657 Following
35.7K+ Followers
34.3K+ Liked
1.1K+ Shared
Posts
Portfolio
·
--
Bullish
·
--
Bullish
Habibies, $ESP exploded 🚀 +215%! Crazy pump—if momentum stays, moon vibes 🌕; if not, careful pullback 👀 {spot}(ESPUSDT)
Habibies, $ESP exploded 🚀 +215%! Crazy pump—if momentum stays, moon vibes 🌕; if not, careful pullback 👀
·
--
Bullish
#CZAMAonBinanceSquare Habibies… I won't pretend I'm calm right now. Just 30 minutes left until I meet Changpeng Zhao. Yes… CZ. I've watched his interviews, read his tweets, and followed his journey through wild bull runs and frightening crashes. I've seen decisions made that changed the lives of millions of traders — including mine. And now, I'm about to be in the same room with him. It feels unreal. My mind is racing. What should I say first? Should I mention how Binance Square has helped creators grow? Should I simply say thank you? Or should I just smile and try not to appear nervous? 😅 It's odd how someone you've only seen on a screen can feel so familiar. Yet, meeting in person makes it all tangible. This isn't just about meeting a founder. It's about meeting someone who shaped the direction of this entire industry. I'm excited. A little nervous. Mostly thankful. Thirty minutes left… and my heart is already in "bull run mode." 🚀 #CZAMAonBinanceSquare #Binance
#CZAMAonBinanceSquare
Habibies… I won't pretend I'm calm right now.

Just 30 minutes left until I meet Changpeng Zhao. Yes… CZ.

I've watched his interviews, read his tweets, and followed his journey through wild bull runs and frightening crashes. I've seen decisions made that changed the lives of millions of traders — including mine. And now, I'm about to be in the same room with him. It feels unreal.

My mind is racing.
What should I say first?
Should I mention how Binance Square has helped creators grow?
Should I simply say thank you?
Or should I just smile and try not to appear nervous? 😅

It's odd how someone you've only seen on a screen can feel so familiar. Yet, meeting in person makes it all tangible. This isn't just about meeting a founder. It's about meeting someone who shaped the direction of this entire industry.

I'm excited. A little nervous. Mostly thankful.
Thirty minutes left… and my heart is already in "bull run mode." 🚀
#CZAMAonBinanceSquare #Binance
XPLUSDT
Opening Long
Unrealized PNL
+17.00%
A Practical L1 for Stablecoin SettlementMost blockchains boast capability. Plasma aims for something more functional: dependability—the kind that supports payments without users needing to think like traders. This difference is important because stablecoins have become crypto's most widely used currency. People use stablecoins because they move value in familiar terms, not because they enjoy block explorers. Yet, the underlying systems often feel makeshift: a separate gas token is required, confirmations involve a waiting game, and "settlement" means actively overseeing it rather than simply trusting it. Plasma's core idea is straightforward: treat stablecoins as the primary element, not an accessory on a general-purpose chain. This focus on the protocol level results in a stablecoin-first contract suite built to provide developers with better defaults—fee-free transfers, stablecoin-based gas, and other payment-focused features—without forcing every team to create their own unique infrastructure. Plasma Familiarity Where It Matters Practical infrastructure should minimize redundant work. Plasma's design is built for full EVM compatibility and uses a Reth-based execution client, keeping the development environment consistent with what Ethereum developers already use—their tools, methods, and expectations. This is more about speed to market than an ideological stance: payment teams generally want fewer new concepts, not more. Finality as a Feature, Not an Option The claim of "stablecoin settlement" becomes significant when considering finality. Plasma's PlasmaBFT is a pipelined, Rust implementation of Fast HotStuff, designed to maintain BFT safety while speeding up the commit process and reducing latency. While the technical details are complex, the goal is simple: shorten the time between something appearing confirmed and being irreversibly settled. In business, this gap leads to disputes, delays, and awkward checkout experiences. Stablecoin-Native Gas: Eliminating the Hassle One of Plasma's most practical decisions is treating gas fees as a primary user experience issue. Plasma uses a protocol-operated EIP-4337 paymaster system that allows users to pay fees with approved ERC-20 tokens—often stablecoins—removing the need to acquire a separate token just to make a transaction. Additionally, Plasma offers fee-free USD₮ transfers through a relayer API that exclusively supports direct USD₮ transfers, with measures in place to prevent misuse. This is what "practical" means: fewer steps between a user and a dollar transfer. Why Neutrality Influences the Design As stablecoins grow, settlement becomes a question of resilience as much as performance. Plasma's system overview outlines a design that combines its EVM + PlasmaBFT core with a trust-minimized Bitcoin bridge. Discussions about the ecosystem often highlight Bitcoin anchoring as a way to ensure neutrality and resistance to censorship. Whether you agree with the choices made, the reasoning is clear: payment systems should remain stable under pressure, not just in calm markets. The Practical Test A practical L1 for stablecoin settlement isn't about being exciting. It's about being predictable: developers can launch products without learning an entirely new system, users can pay without needing extra tokens, and businesses can consider "paid" as a final status—not an uncertain one. Plasma's design—EVM consistency through Reth, payment-focused finality via PlasmaBFT, and stablecoin-centric features like paymasters and fee-free USD₮ transfers—appears to be an effort to make stablecoin settlement straightforward, dependable, and widely accessible. This is not a step backward. This is the objective. @Plasma #plasma $XPL {spot}(XPLUSDT)

A Practical L1 for Stablecoin Settlement

Most blockchains boast capability. Plasma aims for something more functional: dependability—the kind that supports payments without users needing to think like traders.
This difference is important because stablecoins have become crypto's most widely used currency. People use stablecoins because they move value in familiar terms, not because they enjoy block explorers. Yet, the underlying systems often feel makeshift: a separate gas token is required, confirmations involve a waiting game, and "settlement" means actively overseeing it rather than simply trusting it.
Plasma's core idea is straightforward: treat stablecoins as the primary element, not an accessory on a general-purpose chain. This focus on the protocol level results in a stablecoin-first contract suite built to provide developers with better defaults—fee-free transfers, stablecoin-based gas, and other payment-focused features—without forcing every team to create their own unique infrastructure.
Plasma
Familiarity Where It Matters
Practical infrastructure should minimize redundant work. Plasma's design is built for full EVM compatibility and uses a Reth-based execution client, keeping the development environment consistent with what Ethereum developers already use—their tools, methods, and expectations.
This is more about speed to market than an ideological stance: payment teams generally want fewer new concepts, not more.
Finality as a Feature, Not an Option
The claim of "stablecoin settlement" becomes significant when considering finality. Plasma's PlasmaBFT is a pipelined, Rust implementation of Fast HotStuff, designed to maintain BFT safety while speeding up the commit process and reducing latency.
While the technical details are complex, the goal is simple: shorten the time between something appearing confirmed and being irreversibly settled. In business, this gap leads to disputes, delays, and awkward checkout experiences.
Stablecoin-Native Gas: Eliminating the Hassle
One of Plasma's most practical decisions is treating gas fees as a primary user experience issue.
Plasma uses a protocol-operated EIP-4337 paymaster system that allows users to pay fees with approved ERC-20 tokens—often stablecoins—removing the need to acquire a separate token just to make a transaction.
Additionally, Plasma offers fee-free USD₮ transfers through a relayer API that exclusively supports direct USD₮ transfers, with measures in place to prevent misuse.
This is what "practical" means: fewer steps between a user and a dollar transfer.
Why Neutrality Influences the Design
As stablecoins grow, settlement becomes a question of resilience as much as performance. Plasma's system overview outlines a design that combines its EVM + PlasmaBFT core with a trust-minimized Bitcoin bridge. Discussions about the ecosystem often highlight Bitcoin anchoring as a way to ensure neutrality and resistance to censorship.
Whether you agree with the choices made, the reasoning is clear: payment systems should remain stable under pressure, not just in calm markets.
The Practical Test
A practical L1 for stablecoin settlement isn't about being exciting. It's about being predictable: developers can launch products without learning an entirely new system, users can pay without needing extra tokens, and businesses can consider "paid" as a final status—not an uncertain one.
Plasma's design—EVM consistency through Reth, payment-focused finality via PlasmaBFT, and stablecoin-centric features like paymasters and fee-free USD₮ transfers—appears to be an effort to make stablecoin settlement straightforward, dependable, and widely accessible.
This is not a step backward.
This is the objective.
@Plasma #plasma $XPL
·
--
Bullish
·
--
Bullish
Habibies, $SOL slipped to 79😮‍💨 then slowly climbed back near 80.5. If buyers stay strong💪 we push higher📈—otherwise, I’m cautious👀 {spot}(SOLUSDT) {spot}(ETHUSDT) {spot}(BNBUSDT)
Habibies, $SOL slipped to 79😮‍💨 then slowly climbed back near 80.5. If buyers stay strong💪 we push higher📈—otherwise, I’m cautious👀


·
--
Bullish
Habibies, $BNB dipped📉 then bounced🚀 back 615. If it holds strong💪 we push higher📈—if not, I’m eyeing support👀 {spot}(BNBUSDT) {spot}(ETHUSDT) {spot}(BTCUSDT)
Habibies, $BNB dipped📉 then bounced🚀 back 615. If it holds strong💪 we push higher📈—if not, I’m eyeing support👀


·
--
Bullish
Recommendation: Long $XPL Entry: $0.091–$0.094 or $0.087–$0.089 Take Profit: $0.098–$0.102 or $0.110 Stop Loss: $0.084–$0.086 Reason: Strong bullish expansion showing consecutive higher highs and higher lows. The breakout is supported by increasing volume, and pullbacks are small. Buyers are still in control, and the price is likely to continue its upward trend unless it falls back below the breakout structure. #plasma @Plasma
Recommendation: Long $XPL

Entry: $0.091–$0.094 or $0.087–$0.089
Take Profit: $0.098–$0.102 or $0.110
Stop Loss: $0.084–$0.086

Reason: Strong bullish expansion showing consecutive higher highs and higher lows. The breakout is supported by increasing volume, and pullbacks are small. Buyers are still in control, and the price is likely to continue its upward trend unless it falls back below the breakout structure.

#plasma @Plasma
XPLUSDT
Opening Long
Unrealized PNL
+1.00%
·
--
Bullish
No Drama Settlement: Just Done Let me put this as plainly as possible. When I send money, I don't want a whole song and dance. I don't want a countdown. I don't want that knot of anxiety where I'm glued to the screen, wondering, "Okay... is it really finished, or do I need to wait for more confirmations?" Because that's the issue—crypto has conditioned us to hover over payments. Even with stablecoins, what seems like a "simple transfer" can turn into a whole checklist: gas token needed? Network overloaded? How many confirmations? That's not how money should feel. This is why the Plasma concept resonates so strongly with me. Plasma It essentially suggests: stablecoins are already functioning like dollars, so let's treat them as such. Let's build the chain based on that reality. So, features like stablecoin-first gas and gasless USDT transfers aren't just "convenient." They eliminate the small irritations that turn payments into a crypto chore. And when the system is built for swift, certain finality, the entire experience shifts. The ideal settlement isn't thrilling. It's like this: You pay. It's done. You move on. @Plasma #plasma $XPL {spot}(XPLUSDT)
No Drama Settlement: Just Done

Let me put this as plainly as possible.

When I send money, I don't want a whole song and dance. I don't want a countdown. I don't want that knot of anxiety where I'm glued to the screen, wondering, "Okay... is it really finished, or do I need to wait for more confirmations?"

Because that's the issue—crypto has conditioned us to hover over payments. Even with stablecoins, what seems like a "simple transfer" can turn into a whole checklist: gas token needed? Network overloaded? How many confirmations? That's not how money should feel.

This is why the Plasma concept resonates so strongly with me. Plasma
It essentially suggests: stablecoins are already functioning like dollars, so let's treat them as such. Let's build the chain based on that reality.

So, features like stablecoin-first gas and gasless USDT transfers aren't just "convenient." They eliminate the small irritations that turn payments into a crypto chore. And when the system is built for swift, certain finality, the entire experience shifts.

The ideal settlement isn't thrilling.

It's like this:
You pay.
It's done.
You move on.

@Plasma #plasma $XPL
·
--
Bearish
Honey! The $SKY is in earth now😁 When you buy the dip📉, but the dip keeps dipping.📉 {spot}(SKYUSDT)
Honey! The $SKY is in earth now😁
When you buy the dip📉, but the dip keeps dipping.📉
·
--
Bullish
That classic "mountain" pattern on the charts—what goes up must come down, right? 🎢 Looking at this $BERA action, we’re seeing a textbook example of high-volatility trading. If you’re watching this unfold, here’s the breakdown of what just happened: 🚀 The "Moon" Phase The green arrow highlights a massive vertical rally, likely driven by hype or a major liquidity event. Breaking past that $1.00 psychological barrier is usually a huge signal, but notice that long "wick" (the thin line) at the top? That suggests the price touched $1.50+ and was immediately rejected as sellers flooded in. 📉 The Cool-Off The red arrow shows the inevitable correction. After such a parabolic move, early buyers take their profits, leading to the "dump" or retracement we see now. 🎯 Where We Are Now The price is currently hovering around $0.901. The Support Check: We’re looking to see if the price can stay above the previous breakout levels (around $0.60 - $0.80). The Consolidation: The red circle shows the price flattening out. This is where the "tug-of-war" happens between the bulls and the bears to decide the next move. Trading Tip: Vertical climbs are exciting, but they are rarely sustainable. Always watch the Volume bars at the bottom—if the price is dropping and volume is low, it might just be a healthy "breather." If volume is high during a drop, it's time to be cautious. {spot}(BERAUSDT)
That classic "mountain" pattern on the charts—what goes up must come down, right? 🎢

Looking at this $BERA action, we’re seeing a textbook example of high-volatility trading. If you’re watching this unfold, here’s the breakdown of what just happened:

🚀 The "Moon" Phase
The green arrow highlights a massive vertical rally, likely driven by hype or a major liquidity event. Breaking past that $1.00 psychological barrier is usually a huge signal, but notice that long "wick" (the thin line) at the top? That suggests the price touched $1.50+ and was immediately rejected as sellers flooded in.

📉 The Cool-Off
The red arrow shows the inevitable correction. After such a parabolic move, early buyers take their profits, leading to the "dump" or retracement we see now.
🎯 Where We Are Now
The price is currently hovering around $0.901.

The Support Check: We’re looking to see if the price can stay above the previous breakout levels (around $0.60 - $0.80).
The Consolidation: The red circle shows the price flattening out. This is where the "tug-of-war" happens between the bulls and the bears to decide the next move.
Trading Tip: Vertical climbs are exciting, but they are rarely sustainable. Always watch the Volume bars at the bottom—if the price is dropping and volume is low, it might just be a healthy "breather." If volume is high during a drop, it's time to be cautious.
·
--
Bullish
Seeing Binance next to Franklin Templeton feels like a quiet signal: the "two worlds" are learning to share the same tracks. When a major exchange and a major asset manager appear in the same picture, it usually suggests one thing—traditional finance looking into on-chain distribution, and crypto infrastructure developing toward regulated, recognizable products. That doesn’t mean immediate excitement. It signifies steady, practical advancement: custody, compliance, settlement, clarity, and accessibility that can expand beyond initial users. If this path continues to develop, the significant shift won’t be a big announcement—it will be the point when people stop asking why finance is on-chain, and start asking which parts should move first. #Binance #FranklinTempleton #Tokenization
Seeing Binance next to Franklin Templeton feels like a quiet signal: the "two worlds" are learning to share the same tracks.

When a major exchange and a major asset manager appear in the same picture, it usually suggests one thing—traditional finance looking into on-chain distribution, and crypto infrastructure developing toward regulated, recognizable products. That doesn’t mean immediate excitement. It signifies steady, practical advancement: custody, compliance, settlement, clarity, and accessibility that can expand beyond initial users.

If this path continues to develop, the significant shift won’t be a big announcement—it will be the point when people stop asking why finance is on-chain, and start asking which parts should move first.
#Binance #FranklinTempleton #Tokenization
CZ is coming ........
CZ is coming ........
CZ
·
--
AMA tomorrow, in 21 hours or so: here.
·
--
Bearish
The Dollar Rails Crypto Forgot to Build Here’s what I believe crypto truly missed. We created trading, memes, NFTs, all the enjoyable things… but when it comes to sending dollars, it still feels uncomfortably difficult. When I send a stablecoin, my mind immediately starts checking: Do I have the gas token? Did it go through? Should I wait for more confirmations? Money shouldn't feel this way. Money should be straightforward—paid means paid. That's why Plasma makes sense to me. It doesn't aim to be "everything." It aims to provide what stablecoins really need: a settlement layer designed for stablecoin payments. Developers still get the familiar EVM environment (Reth), but the focus moves to the most important moment—finality you can rely on (PlasmaBFT), not just speed you can boast about. And the small details are significant: stablecoin-first gas and even USDT transfers without gas fees. That's the difference between a payment that feels normal… and one that feels like a crypto experiment. Truthfully, the future isn't about more complex systems. It's about dollar systems so easy you forget they exist. @Plasma #plasma $XPL {spot}(XPLUSDT)
The Dollar Rails Crypto Forgot to Build

Here’s what I believe crypto truly missed.
We created trading, memes, NFTs, all the enjoyable things… but when it comes to sending dollars, it still feels uncomfortably difficult. When I send a stablecoin, my mind immediately starts checking: Do I have the gas token? Did it go through? Should I wait for more confirmations? Money shouldn't feel this way. Money should be straightforward—paid means paid.

That's why Plasma makes sense to me. It doesn't aim to be "everything." It aims to provide what stablecoins really need: a settlement layer designed for stablecoin payments. Developers still get the familiar EVM environment (Reth), but the focus moves to the most important moment—finality you can rely on (PlasmaBFT), not just speed you can boast about.

And the small details are significant: stablecoin-first gas and even USDT transfers without gas fees. That's the difference between a payment that feels normal… and one that feels like a crypto experiment.

Truthfully, the future isn't about more complex systems.

It's about dollar systems so easy you forget they exist.

@Plasma #plasma $XPL
NS_Crypto01
·
--
[Replay] 🎙️ Sudden Market Dump | $USD1 $WLFI | Analysis
01 h 35 m 13 s · 469 listens
🎙️ Sudden Market Dump | $USD1 $WLFI | Analysis
background
avatar
End
01 h 35 m 13 s
436
9
7
The End of "Wait for More Confirmations"Let me say this the way I’d explain it to a smart friend who doesn’t have time for crypto drama. That line—“wait for more confirmations”—isn’t just a technical habit. It’s a feeling. You press Send, you see “confirmed,” and yet you still hesitate. Not because you’re impatient… but because you’ve learned that in crypto, “confirmed” can sometimes mean “probably fine, but don’t relax yet.” That tiny doubt is where payments stop feeling like money and start feeling like a risk check. That’s the exact gap Plasma is trying to close. Plasma It’s a Layer-1 built around a simple idea: stablecoins are already being used like dollars, so the chain underneath them should behave like a serious settlement rail—not like an experiment you need to babysit. One reason Plasma feels practical is that it doesn’t force builders into a new world. It keeps the EVM environment familiar and uses Reth, so developers can work with patterns and tools they already trust. Reth That matters because the payments world doesn’t reward novelty—it rewards systems that quietly work every single day. But the bigger point isn’t just familiarity. It’s certainty. Plasma leans on PlasmaBFT and sub-second finality to push toward a “done means done” experience—especially for real-world payments where people don’t want to stand around wondering whether the transaction might get messy. PlasmaBFT If you’re a merchant, you don’t want to do mental math at the checkout counter. You want the payment to feel like cash: once it’s paid, it’s paid. Then there’s the part I think most people feel instantly: stablecoin payments shouldn’t require extra juggling. On many chains, you still need another token for gas, and that turns “send $10” into “wait, do I have the gas token too?” Plasma pushes stablecoin-native design—things like stablecoin-first gas and even gasless USDT transfers—so the act of sending stablecoins doesn’t come with a side quest. And finally, Plasma talks about neutrality through Bitcoin anchoring, aiming to strengthen censorship resistance and trust in the settlement layer. Bitcoin Because if stablecoins are going to be used at scale—by everyday people and serious institutions—the rail underneath them should hold up under pressure, not just during calm market days. So when I say “the end of wait for more confirmations,” I’m really describing a future where you don’t hover over your screen after you send money. No second-guessing. No awkward pauses. No “let’s wait a bit more just in case.” Just one clean feeling: done. @Plasma #plasma $XPL {spot}(XPLUSDT)

The End of "Wait for More Confirmations"

Let me say this the way I’d explain it to a smart friend who doesn’t have time for crypto drama.
That line—“wait for more confirmations”—isn’t just a technical habit. It’s a feeling. You press Send, you see “confirmed,” and yet you still hesitate. Not because you’re impatient… but because you’ve learned that in crypto, “confirmed” can sometimes mean “probably fine, but don’t relax yet.” That tiny doubt is where payments stop feeling like money and start feeling like a risk check.
That’s the exact gap Plasma is trying to close. Plasma
It’s a Layer-1 built around a simple idea: stablecoins are already being used like dollars, so the chain underneath them should behave like a serious settlement rail—not like an experiment you need to babysit.
One reason Plasma feels practical is that it doesn’t force builders into a new world. It keeps the EVM environment familiar and uses Reth, so developers can work with patterns and tools they already trust. Reth
That matters because the payments world doesn’t reward novelty—it rewards systems that quietly work every single day.
But the bigger point isn’t just familiarity. It’s certainty.
Plasma leans on PlasmaBFT and sub-second finality to push toward a “done means done” experience—especially for real-world payments where people don’t want to stand around wondering whether the transaction might get messy. PlasmaBFT
If you’re a merchant, you don’t want to do mental math at the checkout counter. You want the payment to feel like cash: once it’s paid, it’s paid.
Then there’s the part I think most people feel instantly: stablecoin payments shouldn’t require extra juggling. On many chains, you still need another token for gas, and that turns “send $10” into “wait, do I have the gas token too?” Plasma pushes stablecoin-native design—things like stablecoin-first gas and even gasless USDT transfers—so the act of sending stablecoins doesn’t come with a side quest.
And finally, Plasma talks about neutrality through Bitcoin anchoring, aiming to strengthen censorship resistance and trust in the settlement layer. Bitcoin
Because if stablecoins are going to be used at scale—by everyday people and serious institutions—the rail underneath them should hold up under pressure, not just during calm market days.
So when I say “the end of wait for more confirmations,” I’m really describing a future where you don’t hover over your screen after you send money. No second-guessing. No awkward pauses. No “let’s wait a bit more just in case.”
Just one clean feeling: done.

@Plasma #plasma $XPL
😍😍
😍😍
Crypto-Master_1
·
--
[Replay] 🎙️ The $1 Illusion: What Traders Must Watch on USD1 Today
05 h 31 m 15 s · 1.9k listens
·
--
Bullish
#USTechFundFlows US tech fund flows are currently a tug-of-war. Large sums are moving out, while buyers are stepping in during dips. On the "risk-off tech" side, data from EPFR shows technology funds had outflows of about $2.03 billion in the week ending February 6, 2026. Investors were moving their money to other regions and sectors. This rotation is becoming more apparent. Non-tech equity funds attracted $62 billion in early 2026, as the "anything-but-tech" strategy gained traction. However, retail investors are not following the same trend. The iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) reportedly saw net inflows of around $176 million over the past month, with retail buyers showing interest during the software selloff. Even within ETFs, flows can change daily. One recent look showed the XLK with outflows around -$176 million on February 9, 2026. My interpretation is that tech is not "dead" but is being re-priced. Keep an eye on whether these outflows decrease and if the upcoming earnings reports confirm growth beyond the largest tech companies.
#USTechFundFlows
US tech fund flows are currently a tug-of-war. Large sums are moving out, while buyers are stepping in during dips.

On the "risk-off tech" side, data from EPFR shows technology funds had outflows of about $2.03 billion in the week ending February 6, 2026. Investors were moving their money to other regions and sectors.

This rotation is becoming more apparent. Non-tech equity funds attracted $62 billion in early 2026, as the "anything-but-tech" strategy gained traction.

However, retail investors are not following the same trend. The iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) reportedly saw net inflows of around $176 million over the past month, with retail buyers showing interest during the software selloff.

Even within ETFs, flows can change daily. One recent look showed the XLK with outflows around -$176 million on February 9, 2026.

My interpretation is that tech is not "dead" but is being re-priced. Keep an eye on whether these outflows decrease and if the upcoming earnings reports confirm growth beyond the largest tech companies.
Login to explore more contents
Explore the latest crypto news
⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
💬 Interact with your favorite creators
👍 Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs