mrizwan2636

$BTC $ETH $BNB
🇺🇸 The White House is organizing talks between crypto companies and big banks to decide how stablecoins should be regulated in the U.S. — especially whether stablecoins can pay interest or rewards to holders. �
Crypto Economy +1
🔑 Main Issue
Crypto firms want stablecoins to be able to give yields or rewards to users (like interest). �
Crypto Economy
Banks are pushing back, saying this could pull money out of traditional bank deposits and harm financial stability. �
Crypto Economy
Because of this disagreement, stablecoin regulation laws (like the CLARITY Act) are stuck in Congress. �
Crypto Economy
📉 Latest Outcome
The White House talks recently ended without a deal, and both sides have been asked to try to find a compromise by the end of February 2026. �
Bingx Exchange
🧠 Simple Summary
The White House is trying to help make stablecoin laws in the U.S.
Right now, banks and crypto firms disagree mainly about interest on stablecoins.
No agreement yet — so final rules are still being worked on. �

What it is: Binance offers TSLA Perpetual Futures as a tokenized stock contract (price follows Tesla stock).
Account: Open a Binance account and enable Futures.
Search: Go to Futures → Search “TSLA” (e.g., TSLAUSDT).
Margin: Choose USDT-M Futures and select Cross or Isolated margin.
Leverage: Set leverage (keep it low if you’re new).
Trade:
Long → if you expect TSLA price to go up
Short → if you expect TSLA price to go down
Risk tools: Always use Stop-Loss & Take-Profit.
Market hours: TSLA futures trade 24/7, unlike the US stock market.
#USTechFundFlows #USRetailSalesMissForecast #WhaleDeRiskETH #GoldSilverRally #BinanceBitcoinSAFUFund

Here’s a **clear summary of what Binance founder Changpeng Zhao (CZ) really said about a potential crypto “super cycle” in 2026 — based on multiple reliable news sources: �
Binance +2
Yahoo Finance
Decrypt
Bitcoin Supercycle Coming In 2026, Says CZ, As Analysts Warn Silver Highs May Face Drawbacks
Binance Founder CZ Projects Bitcoin Supercycle for 2026, Denies Trump Relationship
January 27
January 27
🧠 What CZ actually said
1. CZ talked about a possible Bitcoin supercycle in 2026.
At the World Economic Forum (CNBC interview), CZ said he believes that 2026 could be a “super cycle” year for Bitcoin — meaning a longer-lasting, stronger upward trend that breaks from the familiar four-year boom/bust pattern. �
Decrypt
He did not give specific price targets, but expressed confidence that, over the long term (5-10 years), prices generally tend to rise. �
Decrypt
2. The reasoning behind it:
CZ pointed to regulatory support in the U.S. and other countries and growing institutional adoption as reasons that Bitcoin might not follow its old four-year cycle but instead enter a broader upward phase. �
TradingView
He also emphasized that he personally holds Bitcoin and Binance’s BNB token, and that he avoids short-term trading. �
TradingView
📉 Confusion & alternative interpretations
Some media stories have interpreted his words differently — for example:
3. Some outlets claimed he “canceled” the super cycle.
A few headlines said CZ backtracked on his supercycle prediction after market volatility, suggesting decreased confidence. �
CCN.com
However, CZ himself later clarified that he was not canceling the idea — he simply became more cautious and stressed that no one can predict markets perfectly. �
Holder
4. CZ also responded to related market rumors.
He denied that Binance or he personally caused recent price drops or sold large amounts of Bitcoin. �
thenewscrypto.com
He clarified that recent statements about “buy and hold” investing were not meant as broad financial advice and do not mean every coin will rebound. �
Cryptonews
🔍 What does “super cycle” mean here?
In CZ’s context, a super cycle isn’t a guaranteed event — it refers to a possible structural change in how the crypto market moves:
Instead of short bursts tied mainly to Bitcoin’s halving events, an extended period of growth could come from institutional inflows, clearer rules, and broader adoption. �
BTCC
📌 Key takeaways
✅ CZ suggested a super cycle may happen in 2026. �
➡️ He did not provide exact price predictions. �
⚠️ Some media spun his remarks differently (e.g., canceled cycle), but CZ denied giving up on the idea. �
⚠️ His comments are opinions, not financial advice — markets remain volatile and unpredictable.

$TRUMP
BREAKING: Trump Admits His Fed Pick Was a Mistake And Why This Matters More Than the Quote Itself
President Donald Trump just made one of the most revealing economic statements he’s made in years.
He openly said that choosing Jerome Powell as Federal Reserve Chair in 2017 was a mistake and that he should have selected Kevin Warsh instead. Trump didn’t stop there. He went further, saying he believes Warsh could help grow the U.S. economy by as much as 15% through different monetary policies.
This isn’t just political regret.
It’s a window into how power, money, and economic philosophy collide at the highest level.
To understand why this matters, you have to understand what the Federal Reserve actually controls — and what kind of Fed chair shapes outcomes.
The Fed doesn’t just “set rates.” It controls liquidity, credit conditions, risk appetite, and indirectly the speed at which the economy expands or contracts. When the Fed tightens, borrowing becomes expensive, growth slows, and asset prices compress. When it loosens, capital flows, risk-taking increases, and growth accelerates. Over time, these decisions compound.
Trump’s frustration with Powell has always centered on this exact point.
During Trump’s presidency, Powell prioritized inflation control and Fed independence over aggressive growth. Rates were raised. Liquidity tightened. Markets wobbled. Trump wanted a Fed chair who would actively support expansion, asset prices, and growth momentum — especially during periods when inflation was not yet a threat.
Kevin Warsh represents a very different philosophy.
Warsh is widely seen as more skeptical of excessive tightening and more aware of how monetary policy spills into asset markets, employment, and long-term competitiveness. While he isn’t reckless, his framework leans toward growth-first thinking — particularly when inflation pressures are manageable.
When Trump says Warsh could help grow the economy by 15%, he’s not talking about magic. He’s talking about policy posture.
Lower and more flexible rates reduce the cost of capital. Businesses invest more. Consumers borrow more. Asset values rise. Confidence improves. When confidence improves, velocity increases — money moves faster through the system. That’s how economies accelerate.
But there’s a trade-off.
Powell represents caution. Warsh represents acceleration.
Powell’s approach is designed to protect credibility, prevent overheating, and avoid long-term instability — even if that means sacrificing short-term growth. Warsh’s approach, as Trump sees it, would be more willing to push the system harder to unlock growth and competitiveness, especially in a global environment where other countries are actively stimulating their economies.
This debate is not new. It’s the oldest argument in central banking:
stability vs. growth.
What makes Trump’s statement important is timing.
Markets are already sensitive to rate cuts, inflation trends, and political pressure on monetary policy. When a former and potentially future president openly criticizes his Fed chair pick and promotes an alternative vision, it starts shaping expectations — even before any actual policy changes happen.
Markets don’t wait for elections.
They price narratives early.
If investors begin to believe that future leadership could push for a more growth-oriented Fed, they start adjusting risk exposure, asset allocation, and long-term assumptions. That affects equities, bonds, real estate, and even crypto.
There’s also a learning lesson here for anyone watching from the outside.
Central bank appointments matter more than almost any single economic decision a president makes. Tax cuts come and go. Spending bills expire. But monetary policy compounds silently over years. One appointment can shape an entire economic cycle.

Trump admitting this mistake is essentially admitting that personnel decisions can outweigh ideology.

You can promise growth, but if the institution controlling liquidity doesn’t align with that goal, the system resists you.

This is also why Trump’s confidence in Warsh is so strong. From his perspective, the U.S. economy underperformed its potential because monetary brakes were applied too early and too hard. Whether that belief is correct is debatable — but the framework behind it is coherent.

Growth isn’t just about innovation.

It’s about access to capital.

And capital flows where policy allows it to flow.

The deeper takeaway isn’t about Powell versus Warsh. It’s about how fragile economic outcomes are to leadership philosophy. Two qualified economists, two radically different outcomes — not because one is smarter, but because one is more cautious.

As investors, builders, or observers, this is the real lesson:

Macro outcomes are driven by incentives, not intentions.

Trump’s statement is a reminder that central banks aren’t neutral forces of nature. They are guided by people, beliefs, and risk tolerance. Change the person, and you often change the trajectory.

Whether or not Trump ever gets the chance to make that appointment again, the message is already out there: the next phase of U.S. economic policy could look very different.

And markets are already paying attention.

The real question now is not whether Powell was a mistake

It’s whether the next Fed era, whoever leads it, will prioritize restraint… or growth.

Because that decision doesn’t just shape charts.

It shapes lives, businesses, and th
e next decade of the economy.
$BTC
#TRUMP #donalTrump #UK #USIranStandoff #BitcoinGoogleSearchesSurge