Ali Al-Shami

Most people evaluate Layer-1 the way they evaluate a sports car - speed metrics, shiny upgrades, flashy marketing. But builders don’t think like spectators. They think like operators. Operators typically choose the chain that feels less like a bet and more like infrastructure. This is the quiet advantage that Vanar seems to be building. Away from the original AI-backed narrative and ecosystem positioning, something more practical is taking shape: a network that acts like a service. Something teams can plug into in minutes, test safely, monitor clearly, and launch without concern. It’s not a launch you gamble on - it’s a platform you rely on. There’s an uncomfortable reality in Web3: a chain can have a strong vision, but if developers struggle to connect to it cleanly, it becomes irrelevant. Builders don’t start with philosophy. They start with the basics. What is the RPC endpoint? Is there WebSocket support? What is the chain ID? Is there a usable explorer? Is the testnet stable? Can the team onboard in less than a week? These questions aren’t exciting. They’re operational. Vanar’s documentation addresses these questions head-on. RPC endpoints for the mainnet are defined. WebSocket endpoints are available. Chain IDs are documented. Token symbols are clear. An official explorer is provided. There’s no ambiguity. That may seem small, but it’s not. This is the gap between an exciting concept and a viable platform. Many chains describe themselves as developer-friendly. What really matters is the speed of transition - how quickly a developer moves from hearing about a chain to deploying it. Vanar adopts the well-known rails of EVM. The network configuration is traditional. Adding the chain to wallets like MetaMask follows straightforward steps, including Chainlist support. Joining feels natural, not ceremonial.

$MANTA
Trading near the descending resistance and the Ichimoku cloud on the daily timeframe. It is recommended to enter only after a clean break above both levels. If confirmed, potential upward targets are:
🎯 $0.0923
🎯 $0.1135
🎯 $0.1307
🎯 $0.1479
🎯 $0.1723
🎯 $0.2035
⚠️ Always apply tight stop-loss orders and maintain strict risk management

$KERNEL
About to break above the descending resistance and the daily moving average SMA50. If a breakout occurs, the potential targets for the rise are:
🎯 $0.0831
🎯 $0.0948
🎯 $0.1066
🎯 $0.1234
🎯 $0.1447
⚠️ Always apply tight stop-loss limits and maintain strict risk management.
$KERNEL

$WLD
WLD. I am still watching this thing drip and wondering if the next step is finally upwards? Smart currencies have returned to the spotlight after new headlines about new partnerships in the sector, while, according to the market, WLD faces another wave of interest around supply and regulation. The volatility has awakened again in a key support area.

$JASMY
The descending channel has been broken on the 12-hour timeframe. Consider buying a small position only if the channel is successfully tested. In this case, potential targets are:
🎯 $0.00634
🎯 $0.00691
🎯 $0.00748
🎯 $0.00830
If the test fails, the price may drop back inside the channel and revisit the following support levels:
🛡 $0.00487
🛡 $0.00456
⚠️ Always use a tight stop loss and maintain strict risk management

$HBAR
Trading setup:
A trading signal is seen in HBARUSDT HederaHashgraph (Spot) (4 hours)
Traders can open buy positions now
⬆️ Buy now or buy at 0.0902
⭕️ Stop loss @ 0.083
🔵 Target 1 @ 0.1085
🔵 Target 2 @ 0.1169
🔵 Target 3 @ 0.1335
What are these signals based on?
Classical technical analysis
Price action, candles, Fibonacci

$BTC
The narrative of the fragmentation is that Bitcoin "consolidates" at $70,000. On-chain data indicates that Bitcoin is being distributed. We just hit an "invisible sell wall" driven by three massive structural failures. This is not a buying dip; it’s a rational alleviation triggered by a supply shock of $6.3 billion that the market cannot absorb.

$ENA
ENA is moving within a downward channel on the hourly time frame. It has reached the lower limit and is heading toward a breakout, with a retest of the upper limit expected.
The Relative Strength Index (RSI) shows a downward trend, approaching the lower limit, and a bullish rebound is expected.
There is a major support area in green at 0.1070. The price has risen from this level several times and is expected to rise again.

$RUNE
Markets rarely reward certainty. They reward structure.
On February 03, a year ago, the first Elliott Wave forecast for RUNE was published. It was not a forecast of precise prices or exact dates. It was a structural map. Today, exactly a year later, the chart still respects that broader framework, reinforcing a critical fact about markets: while price cannot be predicted with absolute precision, it can often be anticipated through structure.

$ETH
🧠From a structural perspective, we are still in a downward trend, and the structure of the downward trend remains intact. Therefore, the risk of further decline has not been eliminated. We are currently facing resistance around 2000; be cautious when chasing the price higher!

➡️From a model perspective, a rising wedge has formed here. We generally expect the price to continue to decline according to this model.

$SOL
Current price: ≈ 80$ – 81$ USD
(24 hours: -1% to -3%, range ~$79 low to $82 high | volume: 3.8B$–4.3B$+)
Key factors:
Oversold environment + feeling of abandonment (Long-term sell at 3-year highs)
The network is still shining (959M weekly transactions – all-time high!)
Market risks are decreasing, affecting high-beta altcoins

$BTC
I wrote this indicator in 2014, and it was relatively reliable as a bottom indicator on the weekly chart. There have only been 3 previous times when Bitcoin displayed blue weekly candles (which only occurs when there is a sharp decline and a wide gap between short and long moving averages).
January 12, 2015
December 10, 2018
June 13, 2022
The first and second times identified the bottom. June 13, 2022 was close to the bottom with the actual bottom coming several months later at a price of $15,500.