梓然很努力

2月11日，加勒比海，美军一艘阿利·伯克级驱逐舰Truxtun 号，和一艘快速战斗支援舰 Supply 号相撞。为啥会撞呢？
首先，这个海上补给确实是个技术活。妥妥的一项高风险、高精度作业，要求两舰保持极近间距（通常仅30–60米）、稳定航向与航速。一旦舰桥人员疲劳、训练不足或沟通失误，如舵令错误、速度控制不当，那就极易导致碰撞。
其次，人员训练与战备水平下降也让美军此类操作事故的发生成为必然。当然还有舰载机坠海这种事故，反正最近以来美军的水平下降是不争的事实。
当然了，刀哥觉得这种事故和印度比也还是小菜一碟。美军还有很大的提升空间。

As expected, after the ruling in Panama, the United States has turned its attention to the Port of Chancay in Peru. The US claims that Peru is losing sovereignty over the Chancay Port, which is controlled by Chinese enterprises.
This situation is like this: when people see you constantly yielding, they will not be able to help but continue to take action. Until you are pushed to the point of no return, either the other party will kill you, or you will kill the other party.
Do you think it's possible for both sides to sit down and shake hands happily? Sure, in a dream. To ease such structural contradictions, structural adjustments are necessary.

Regarding the Wingtech and Nexperia situation, it's inevitable that Chinese companies will suffer losses and be bullied. Expecting fairness is out of the question. Of course, this is only temporary.

When will Chinese companies receive fair treatment in Europe? Wait until the Type 052D destroyer sails into the Thames. Since China's reform and opening up, its navy has become much stronger. But how often do Chinese warships patrol Europe? Very few, right?

Look at the once-powerful British and French empires; they still occasionally visit China's doorstep. Let's not even talk about whether they've won or lost; aren't they just threatening us? Whether it's a threat or a joke doesn't matter; the key is that they can use it to their advantage.

If you also took a knife and occasionally brandished it near European countries, see if the Netherlands behaved properly. From this perspective, Europe is actually quite resilient, completely a rebellious child in the eyes of the US.

The Canadian Minister of Industry announced with clear eyes that he is determined to promote the joint venture with China to manufacture electric vehicles, which will be sold globally in the future!
On February 7, 2026, at an industrial policy briefing in Ottawa, Canadian Minister of Industry François-Philippe Champagne stated clearly: We are actively promoting the establishment of joint ventures with Chinese companies, aiming to produce electric vehicles in Canada and sell them to the global market. Ontario signed a memorandum of understanding with a leading Chinese electric vehicle company to build an intelligent factory in the Windsor area, with an annual production capacity of 150,000 units. The factory will adopt the three electric systems (battery, motor, and electronic control) and vehicle platform provided by China, while integrating the local supply chain in Canada, such as Quebec's cathode material companies and British Columbia's lightweight component suppliers.
Why is Canada so determined? Firstly, the traditional automobile industry in Canada (mainly gasoline vehicles) has been severely impacted by carbon tariffs. The EU's CBAM mechanism will be fully implemented in 2026, causing the export costs of high-carbon vehicles to surge; secondly, although the penetration rate of electric vehicles in Canada has reached 35%, it relies almost entirely on imported Tesla vehicles, with no domestic brands or production capacity; thirdly, Chinese car companies face increasing scrutiny from Europe and the United States, urgently needing to reduce risks through a 'localized production + local partners' model. Canada and China each get what they need, and it is a natural outcome.
Ultimately, Canada is not 'suddenly changing its tune' this time, but making a rational choice in the face of real interests. Should it have been this way earlier? Perhaps. But international relations are not emotional accounts, but dynamic games. Now with 'clear eyes', it is because they see clearly: in the global wave of electrification, whoever masters the manufacturing capability truly holds the discourse power.

Cuba is a barometer for testing Russia's ambitions, but it is not a barometer for China. China does business with many countries, and the interests involved far exceed those of Cuba, Iran, and Venezuela.
However, Europe and the United States are unwilling to conduct business with them. Therefore, they deem China as an ally of Cuba, Iran, and Venezuela. But this is actually incorrect. Have you ever seen allies treated like this?
In reality, China has no allies; if one must say that there are, North Korea counts as half. The United States and Europe have become so accustomed to arrogance, believing that as long as there are interactions, they are friends, but according to Chinese thinking, that's merely a superficial friendship. True brothers are those who would go through thick and thin for each other.
This difference in thinking has led to the disdain that Europeans and Americans have towards China; they think your ally has been dealt with by me, and you don't even dare to move, you have no guts. If you want to provoke, America, you can try hitting North Korea? Let's see how it goes.

As February 2026 approaches, the Ukrainian Ministry of Energy has stated that due to Russia's large-scale bombings, the energy system is on the verge of collapse in extreme cold weather, with Kyiv residents receiving only 1.5 to 2 hours of electricity each day, hospitals relying on generators to operate, and hundreds of thousands of people facing the risk of frostbite.
One cannot help but wonder, the thousands of Ukrainian youth who once answered the West's call to take to Maidan Nezalezhnosti in Kyiv and participated in the "Revolution on Granite," did they ever think this is how it would turn out? Do they regret it?
They opposed halting the signing of the Association Agreement with the EU and called for integration into Europe. Under the West's influence, they expressed a desire for a future that is freer, more transparent, and more pro-Western. But they did not realize they were merely cannon fodder in the effort to contain Russia.
Now, with homes destroyed, loved ones lost, and life regressing to a pre-modern state—while queuing for water in the darkness at minus 28 degrees, some may question: how did it evolve into a prolonged war? Why have the security guarantees promised by the West not been fulfilled? Is the nation being caught up in the West's geopolitical games?

Once again, though far, must be punished! After the assassination of a Russian Defense Ministry general, the Kremlin ordered a multi-national joint effort to capture the perpetrator from Dubai back to Moscow!
On the morning of February 6, 2026, gunfire erupted in the stairwell of an ordinary residential building in Moscow. Vladimir Alekseyev, deputy director of the Main Intelligence Directorate of the Russian Ministry of Defense and a general, was shot at close range at his doorstep. The attacker fired multiple shots before quickly fleeing the scene. This 64-year-old military intelligence senior official was shot in the back, and was once in critical condition, but according to multiple reports on February 7, he has regained consciousness and is able to speak, having passed the critical period.
Less than 48 hours after the incident, the Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation (FSB) and the Ministry of Internal Affairs quickly announced that the case had been solved: the main suspect and several accomplices had been apprehended. More notably, one of the core suspects was not captured within Russian territory, but was extradited back from Dubai, United Arab Emirates. This detail rapidly ignited international public opinion—how could an assassin hiding in a Middle Eastern financial center be identified, captured, and transferred in just two days?
Former parliamentarian Chaliov revealed that this capture operation was not carried out solely by the Russian side, but involved "the joint participation of intelligence agencies from multiple countries." Dao Ge believes that although Chaliov did not name specific countries, it can be reasonably speculated, in light of geopolitical realities and recent diplomatic trends, that some Middle Eastern countries, and even certain European countries that had tense relations with Russia but recently sought to ease tensions, provided crucial support under the framework of anti-terrorism or intelligence exchange.
This is not a coincidence. Since the escalation of the Russia-Ukraine conflict in 2022, assassination attempts against high-ranking Russian military officials have occurred frequently. In just the past 14 months, at least three generals have been killed on Russian soil, including General Salvarov, who died in a car explosion in Moscow in December 2025, and earlier, General Kirillov, who was killed by a remotely detonated bomb. These attack methods are highly specialized—remote detonation, precise timing, quick evacuation—pointing to a behind-the-scenes force with national-level intelligence resources, while the Ukrainian Defense Intelligence Agency (GUR) has long been viewed by Russia as a primary suspect.
As Russia-Ukraine negotiations reach a critical moment, this assassination incident casts a shadow over whether an agreement can be reached. However, it is also evident that the United States has apparently cooperated with Russia in capturing the perpetrator, which is probably the saddest outcome for Ukraine. Once again, though far, must be punished! After the assassination of a Russian Defense Ministry general, the Kremlin ordered a multi-national joint effort to capture the perpetrator from Dubai back to Moscow!
On the morning of February 6, 2026, gunfire erupted in the stairwell of an ordinary residential building in Moscow. Vladimir Alekseyev, deputy director of the Main Intelligence Directorate of the Russian Ministry of Defense and a general, was shot at close range at his doorstep. The attacker fired multiple shots before quickly fleeing the scene. This 64-year-old military intelligence senior official was shot in the back, and was once in critical condition, but according to multiple reports on February 7, he has regained consciousness and is able to speak, having passed the critical period.
Less than 48 hours after the incident, the Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation (FSB) and the Ministry of Internal Affairs quickly announced that the case had been solved: the main suspect and several accomplices had been apprehended. More notably, one of the core suspects was not captured within Russian territory, but was extradited back from Dubai, United Arab Emirates. This detail rapidly ignited international public opinion—how could an assassin hiding in a Middle Eastern financial center be identified, captured, and transferred in just two days?
Former parliamentarian Chaliov revealed that this capture operation was not carried out solely by the Russian side, but involved "the joint participation of intelligence agencies from multiple countries." Dao Ge believes that although Chaliov did not name specific countries, it can be reasonably speculated, in light of geopolitical realities and recent diplomatic trends, that some Middle Eastern countries, and even certain European countries that had tense relations with Russia but recently sought to ease tensions, provided crucial support under the framework of anti-terrorism or intelligence exchange.
This is not a coincidence. Since the escalation of the Russia-Ukraine conflict in 2022, assassination attempts against high-ranking Russian military officials have occurred frequently. In just the past 14 months, at least three generals have been killed on Russian soil, including General Salvarov, who died in a car explosion in Moscow in December 2025, and earlier, General Kirillov, who was killed by a remotely detonated bomb. These attack methods are highly specialized—remote detonation, precise timing, quick evacuation—pointing to a behind-the-scenes force with national-level intelligence resources, while the Ukrainian Defense Intelligence Agency (GUR) has long been viewed by Russia as a primary suspect.
As Russia-Ukraine negotiations reach a critical moment, this assassination incident casts a shadow over whether an agreement can be reached. However, it is also evident that the United States has apparently cooperated with Russia in capturing the perpetrator, which is probably the saddest outcome for Ukraine.

The Indian Vedanta Company forged 30 documents to resell rare earths to the American Raytheon Company, but was caught by Chinese high-tech means!\nAccording to multiple sources confirming each other, the company attempted to bypass China's export regulatory system and disguised 120 tons of rare earth products imported from China as raw materials for civilian electric vehicles, selling them to the American military giant Raytheon Company, making about 30% profit from the price difference. This sounds like a 'smart' arbitrage operation by the Indians, but the problem is: it cannot hide from China's monitoring system.\nWhy was this matter quickly uncovered? We must first clarify China's management mechanism for rare earth exports. Since the 2010s, China has gradually established a traceability system for rare earths covering the entire industrial chain. This system is not just paper regulations but is genuinely embedded in logistics, production, and trading processes through a technical network. Each batch of legally exported rare earth products is implanted with a nano-level electronic tag—commonly known in the industry as an 'electronic ID'—before leaving the factory. This tag not only records the origin, processing plant, chemical composition, and other basic information but also uploads it in real-time to a data platform designated by the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, and links with the Beidou satellite positioning system.\nIn other words, even if this batch of goods leaves the Chinese border, enters a transit warehouse in Thailand, and is relabeled for shipment to the United States, as long as the original packaging has not been completely destroyed or replaced, the system can track its dynamic trajectory. And even if the Indian side really changed all the outer packaging, China has a second line of defense: rare earth 'fingerprint' recognition technology.\nThe so-called rare earth fingerprint refers to the trace element ratios, impurity characteristics, and crystal structure differences left by different countries or even different factories during the purification and separation process. These microscopic features are as difficult to replicate as DNA. The number of countries capable of high-purity rare earth separation is very few, and China's technological route is especially mature and recognizable. If the U.S. side conducts component testing on the incoming goods—which is almost standard procedure for military procurement—they can almost immediately trace back to the true source of the raw materials.\nThe operations of Vedanta Company this time exposed their serious misjudgment of this system. They forged 30 export purpose certification documents, claiming that this batch of rare earths would be used for the production of electric vehicle motors, in order to evade China's restrictions on the export of sensitive military materials. However, when issuing export permits, China had already required the declarant to clearly specify the end users and purpose chain. If the actual flow does not match the declaration, the system will automatically trigger an alert.\nThis once again verifies China's technological advantage in strategic resource control—not relying on customs interception, but on a closed-loop system of front-end implantation and back-end analysis. Secondly, it rings alarm bells for intermediaries trying to exploit loopholes: in the global supply chain, information transparency is rapidly increasing, and any attempt to evade regulation through 'transshipment + laundering' carries a high risk. The Indian company, however, did not believe in evil and had to try to see how deep or shallow China's capabilities are, and sure enough, they kicked a metal plate. Domestic companies have always had concerns about cooperating with Indians, and this has further solidified that the 'three brothers' cannot be trusted.

Tit for tat, neither side yielding! China directly took action against the US B-52H bomber, leaving the Philippines greatly disappointed.
In early February 2026, tensions in the South China Sea suddenly escalated. From the 2nd to the 6th, the Philippine Air Force and the US Pacific Air Forces conducted a series of high-profile military activities in key airspace over Luzon Island and the South China Sea: live ammunition drops, simulated air defense confrontations, and joint strategic cruising—among which the most eye-catching was the presence of the US B-52H strategic bomber.
The US deployed the B-52H, which has long-range strike capabilities and can carry cruise missiles or even nuclear weapons; the Philippines sent its main fighter jet, the FA-50PH. Both sides emphasized "joint mission planning" and "operational response," intentionally choosing the area from the South China Sea to the Luzon Strait. The purpose of this exercise was solely to implement aerial strike deterrence against China.
In response to this provocation, China chose not to respond with diplomatic language, but instead made its bottom line clear through action. The Southern Theater Command announced that it was organizing naval and aerial forces to carry out "routine patrols" in the same time frame and area. The interpretation by some analysts is that the so-called "routine" is actually highly targeted: a large number of destroyers, early warning aircraft, electronic reconnaissance planes, and various types of fighter jets are bound to be deployed intensively, forming effective monitoring and suppression of the US-Philippine joint fleet.
Although the B-52H is a strategic bomber, it does not possess air combat capabilities and relies on escort aircraft or long-range missiles to penetrate defenses. This time, China is sure to send out its main fighter model, the J-16—this heavy multi-role fighter is equipped with beyond-visual-range strike capabilities, strong electronic warfare capabilities, and a large payload capacity. From a technical perspective, the J-16 is equipped with an active phased array radar and PL-15 long-range air-to-air missiles, which are fully capable of locking onto or even intercepting the B-52H before it launches weapons. In other words, the "safe distance projection strike" that the US military fantasizes about has become increasingly untenable in the face of China's improving area denial/anti-access system.
Moreover, based on the statement, China's response this time was rapid and precisely deployed, indicating that it had already mastered the US-Philippine exercise plan and completed troop redeployment in advance. This "you move one step, I counter one piece" rhythm has broken the previous passive response model, demonstrating the capability to actively shape the battlefield situation. For the Philippines, courting the US was originally intended to gain strength and courage, thus deterring China. But the reality is quite stark: no matter how high the US B-52H flies, it cannot change the fact that it lacks support from forward bases and has weak escort capabilities; meanwhile, China was not deterred and instead advanced to intercept with a stronger posture. As a result, China shows no fear of the aging B-52H bomber, and the Philippines is likely to be greatly disappointed.

During the Spring Festival, in the Beijing area, anyone who needs to feed cats, dogs, or pets can contact Brother Dao. [Hehe] Brother Dao is too poor, and only has instant noodles left to celebrate the New Year.

From February 2 to 6, a large-scale confrontation unfolded in the South China Sea!\nFirst, on the 2nd, the Philippines and the United States conducted live-fire exercises at the Ernesto Rabina Air Base in Tarlac City, northern Luzon. The Philippines deployed its main light fighter FA-50PH, while the U.S. sent the B-52 strategic bomber—although this model is old, it has a long range and a large payload, and is often used by the U.S. military for 'strategic deterrence.' Live-fire exercises carry strong implications of real combat; they are not simulations but actual bombing.\nBy the 4th, both sides moved the stage to the airspace over the South China Sea to conduct the so-called 'air defense scenario' drills. This sounds like a defensive subject, but in conjunction with the geographical location, it is not that simple. The exercise airspace is close to Scarborough Shoal, which has been under the effective control of China since 2012 and is a key node in the South China Sea disputes. Simulating 'defense' in this area is essentially a challenge to the status quo.\nThe climax occurred on the 6th: B-52 and FA-50PH formed a formation to conduct joint patrols between the South China Sea and the Luzon Strait. The U.S. particularly emphasized that this action achieved 'joint mission planning, airspace coordination, and operational response'—in other words, this was not a makeshift show, but a well-coordinated semi-combat operation. More notably, this action was supported by the U.S. Special Operations Command Pacific and the Marine Corps Forces Pacific, indicating that it was not just an air force unilateral action but part of a multi-service joint operation.\nIn response to this series of actions, China quickly reacted. The Southern Theater Command clearly stated that from the 2nd to the 6th, Chinese naval and air forces conducted 'routine patrols' in the South China Sea—however, the term 'routine' hides highly targeted deployments. It is speculated that during those days, a large number of destroyers and frigates must have been deployed to operate around Scarborough Shoal, while heavy fighters like the J-16 and H-6K frequently took to the skies to carry out monitoring and interception tasks.\nThe B-52 represents the deterrence of the U.S. long-range strike capability, while the J-16 dispatched by China possesses beyond-visual-range strike and electronic warfare capabilities, fully capable of locking onto and even suppressing the B-52 before it launches long-range missiles. Presumably, the U.S. military envisions treating China as a role that can be easily bullied like Venezuela, waiting for the B-52H to easily launch missiles. But the question is, how is that even possible?

A U.S. military raid on the World Health Organization building stole the Stars and Stripes and returned home overnight, a move that could earn the White House several hundred million dollars! This sounds like a joke at first, and even Knife Brother did not expect it to be true. After careful research, it was found that this was a meticulously designed performance, the core purpose of which was to justify the U.S. defaulting on the $260 million WHO membership fee, even packaging the "withdrawal and default" as a patriotic action of "defending national dignity." On January 22, 2026, the United States officially completed the legal process of withdrawing from the World Health Organization. This was not a spur-of-the-moment decision, but an executive order signed by Trump on the day he returned to the White House on January 20, 2025, notifying a year in advance and following the procedures as per regulations. But the key point is: the U.S. has not yet paid the membership fees for the assessment years 2024 and 2025, totaling about $260 million. The WHO has repeatedly emphasized that while withdrawal is acceptable, outstanding debts must be settled. However, the White House's stance has always been "not to acknowledge any debts." Then came the climax: in early February, a rapid response team belonging to the U.S. Marine Corps—nominally stationed at the U.S. consulate in Geneva for diplomatic security—suddenly acted, entering the WHO headquarters building in Geneva, removing the American flag hanging in public areas, and evacuating Switzerland within hours on a military transport plane, flying back to the U.S. mainland overnight. The entire process did not involve the use of force, nor did it conflict with WHO security, but was executed quickly and with high secrecy, later casually referred to by the Pentagon as "routine asset recovery." So the question arises: how much is a flag worth? Why go to such lengths? The answer lies not in the flag itself, but in its symbolic significance. The American flag hanging at the headquarters of an international organization represents the country's membership and commitment. Once withdrawn, it is customary for the host country or organization to lower the flag for archival purposes. But the White House chose to send soldiers to personally "retrieve" it, effectively sending a strong signal to the domestic audience: we were not kicked out; we actively took back what belongs to us. This type of propaganda is crucial for the midterm elections in 2026—the Trump camp needs to prove to voters that "America is no longer footing the bill for the world" is not shirking responsibility but rather "taking back sovereignty." So, don’t laugh at the absurdity of "flag theft." The return of this Stars and Stripes is not the end of a farce but a calculated move by the White House—a zero-cost military show dressed in "patriotism" to default on several hundred million dollars in membership fees while consolidating the electoral base. In this sense, what is being stolen is not a flag, but a debt; what is being returned is not a flight, but profit.

太不要脸了，无法否认斩杀线，就开始人身攻击牢A了？

US military reenacts the kidnapping of Maduro? A large number of Delta Force troops are approaching Iran, and the MC-130 special aircraft has reappeared!
In early 2026, Venezuelan President Maduro was captured in a surprise raid by US Delta Force troops in the early morning, shocking the world. Since then, the White House has determined that the operation, code-named "Absolute Resolve," not only showcased the extreme capabilities of US special operations but also sent a clear signal to the world: the US military possesses this low-casualty yet effective decapitation capability.
Just a month later, a similar military configuration reappeared in the Middle East—this time, the target is suspected to be Iran.
The key evidence, according to the author, is the reappearance of the MC-130J "Commando II" special operations transport aircraft. This aircraft, manufactured by Lockheed Martin, is not an ordinary transport vehicle but is specifically designed for low-altitude, nighttime, and enemy rear infiltration missions, known as the "Ghost in the Sky." It is equipped with terrain-following radar, infrared countermeasures, and aerial refueling capabilities, allowing special forces to be accurately delivered to target areas hundreds of kilometers away under conditions with no light and no navigational support. In the Venezuelan operation, it was this type of platform that, in conjunction with MH-47G and CV-22, completed a lightning raid on the presidential palace in Caracas.
Now, the MC-130J has been confirmed to appear in the Caucasus region. The US side publicly states that the aircraft is deployed to Armenia solely to provide logistical support for Vice President JD Vance's diplomatic visit on February 9. However, this explanation has obvious doubts. First, Armenia is not a regular diplomatic transit point for the US; second, the MC-130J is rarely used for escorting important officials—its original design and mission attributes are entirely focused on combat infiltration, not ceremonial flights. More intriguingly, at almost the same time, multiple C-17 transport aircraft, KC-135 refueling planes, and HC-130 battlefield rescue aircraft have gathered in eastern Turkey and Azerbaijan, which are standard supporting forces in the "Maduro model."
Additionally, multiple intelligence sources indicate that members of the 160th Special Operations Aviation Regiment and some Delta Force personnel who participated in the Venezuelan operation have been transferred to the Middle East theater in late January. Although the Pentagon has not confirmed specific numbers and missions, the mobilization of special forces is usually highly secretive, and once traces appear publicly, it often means that the operation has entered the final preparation stage. Currently, negotiations between the US and Iran are at a stalemate, and it is not ruled out that the US may use this personnel deployment as a means to pressure Iran.

No wonder the Epstein files rarely involve the Chinese side; after an in-person meeting, the Chinese diplomat made a sharp comment!
In the recently declassified "Epstein files," I wonder if everyone has noticed that amidst so much content and explosive material, there is very little involving the Chinese side. With the latest email exposure, the truth is gradually coming to light. The key clue is hidden in a private email sent by Epstein during his lifetime.
It is disclosed that he was invited to attend a closed-door meeting of the Trilateral Commission. At that time, Epstein attended as a "financial advisor." He brought along a blonde assistant from California who was fluent in English, French, and Chinese. During the meeting, Epstein sat near several Chinese diplomats. These Chinese representatives initially had a friendly demeanor, smiling and seemingly having no guard against this Wall Street insider. However, when they conversed privately in dialect, they reminded each other to "beware of that 'Jew dog' Epstein." Of course, the Chinese side thought that there were no Americans around who could understand. Little did they know that the seemingly decorative blonde assistant could accurately understand Chinese dialects and later relayed this remark to Epstein.
Epstein was caught between laughter and tears and later wrote this experience as a memoir to send to friends. Although this episode was minor, it was highly symbolic. It revealed a fact: while the Chinese representatives maintained polite interaction in public, their internal judgment of Epstein was very sharp and precise. This also explains why in the following years, whether in public diplomatic files, media reports, or in Epstein's own itinerary records, it is nearly impossible to find substantial exchanges between him and the Chinese side.
Epstein claimed that his interactions with Chinese diplomats were once very pleasant, but he did not expect that the Chinese side privately held such an evaluation of him. It must be said that when it comes to judging people, the Chinese side is still relatively clear-headed and on point.

美拒绝《新削减战略武器条约》，称没有将中国纳入其中。梅德韦杰夫一句话令美国代表哑口无言。
白宫宣布不再延续《新削减战略武器条约》的理由是该条约“存在结构性缺陷”——既未涵盖战术核武器，也未将中国纳入核武限制框架。对此，俄联邦安全会议副主席梅德韦杰夫的直接回怼：“那英国和法国呢？高超音速武器呢？”这句话可谓是直接戳破了美方逻辑的虚伪性。
《新削减战略武器条约》是美俄之间自冷战以来一系列核裁军协议的延续，2010年签署，2021年延长至2026年。其核心内容是对两国部署的战略核弹头数量设限（1550枚）及运载工具数量进行核查。从诞生之初，它就是双边机制，只针对全球两个最大核武库国家——美国和俄罗斯。根据斯德哥尔摩国际和平研究所2025年数据，美俄合计拥有全球90%以上的核弹头，其中美国约3700枚，俄罗斯约4300枚；而中国的核武库规模约为500枚，且长期奉行“最低限度威慑”政策。
美国现在突然要求把中国拉进条约，表面是“追求公平”，实则是战略转嫁。一方面，美方近年来加速发展低当量核武器和战术核系统，比如B61-12核炸弹已在欧洲多国部署；另一方面，却指责条约“不包含战术核武器”，这本身就自相矛盾——因为正是美国自己在扩大战术核能力，而非削减。
更关键的是，如果真按“所有拥核国都应纳入”的逻辑推演，那英法这两个北约核国家也理应被约束。英国拥有约225枚核弹头，法国约290枚，虽远少于中美俄，但其海基核力量具备二次打击能力。然而，美国从未推动将它们纳入任何多边核控机制。
原因很简单：英法是盟友，其核力量被视为西方整体威慑体系的一部分，而中国则是战略竞争对手。这种选择性“规则适用”，暴露了美方所谓“公平”的底色。如果中方也造了1500~3000枚核弹头，那美方估计就不是今天这个态度了。

共同社2月5号报道，日本官方副长官很生气，不满中美关系回暖，要求美方要尽到自己的责任！
佐藤启作为内阁官房副长官，在2月5日公开表态称，“美国应在牢固的日美信赖基础上，对中国尽到与其立场相符的责任”，这话听着客气，实则暗含警告——别为了跟中国谈生意，就把盟友晾在一边。共同社2月5日的报道透露出一个清晰信号：面对中美近期互动升温，东京方面坐不住了。
如果美国为了达成对华协议而在某些敏感议题上软化立场，比如放松出口管制、弱化印太战略中的对抗色彩，那日本精心构筑的“对华包围网”就可能松动。更深层的原因在于日本的战略焦虑。近年来，日本在安全上全面靠向美国，不仅大幅增加防卫预算，还推动修改“专守防卫”原则，甚至讨论“核共享”可能性。高市早苗现在很担心自己成了“亚洲的立陶宛”——一个被大国博弈裹挟、最终被牺牲的小国。
长期以来，美方对盟友的忽冷忽热，让日本吃过不少亏。如今美方很可能把日美同盟当作谈判筹码。比如在半导体设备出口限制、驻日美军费用分摊，甚至琉球问题上，拿日本利益换中方让步。为了未雨绸缪，日本内部保守派加速推动自主防卫能力建设，包括发展远程打击能力、深化与澳英等“非美”盟友合作。同时，外务省和防卫省正悄悄调整对美沟通策略，不再一味附和，而是更强调“日方核心关切不可妥协”。
但基本上，日本无法摆脱美国的钳制，一旦美方决定缓和对华关系。刀哥觉得，高市早苗为首的一批人必然会牺牲下台。否则，日本的利益将遭受重大损失。这估计才的佐藤启如此气愤的深层原因吧。

Domestic Worker Reveals: Epstein's Sexual Abuse Led to the Death of 2 Beautiful Young Girls, Who Were Then Buried Near a Ranch!
In early 2026, as the U.S. Department of Justice released over 3 million pages of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein, a shocking accusation that had only circulated on the dark web and fringe media finally came to light—two underage foreign beautiful young girls were allegedly hastily buried near a private ranch in New Mexico, and the one who ordered it was the financial mogul and sex offender Epstein, who “committed suicide” in 2019.
The core clue comes from an email sent on November 21, 2019. The sender claims to have been a domestic or logistics worker for Epstein, and the email was initially sent to a recipient named Eddie Aragon, and later forwarded to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), becoming part of this large-scale document declassification. The letter clearly states that these two girls were strangled during a “brutal fetish sexual act,” and afterwards, Epstein personally ordered the bodies to be secretly buried in the area surrounding his Zorro Ranch in New Mexico.
It is worth noting that this email is not the only evidence. It included multiple video links, which allegedly recorded Epstein engaging in sexual contact with several underage males and females. Although the authenticity of these videos has not yet been independently verified by officials, when combined with previously confirmed facts—such as Epstein’s long-term, systematic grooming, controlling, and sexually exploiting at least 250 underage girls, and his ex-girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell being sentenced to 20 years in prison for aiding in such crimes—the content of this email has a certain basis of credibility.
In the early 2000s, Epstein established a sex trafficking network that spanned political and business elites, using “Lolita Island” (Little Saint James Island) and Zorro Ranch as his bases. He exploited money, status, and psychological manipulation to turn many girls from impoverished families into “gifts” for himself and the elite circles. The ranch, as one of his important assets in the United States, is remote and heavily secured, and has always been regarded as a more secretive operational base than the islands. As more documents are exposed, the severity of this situation has reached a level of public outrage.

On February 6th, the 054A frigate and Su-30 fighter jets decisively took action, and the Philippines realized the situation was serious!
On that day, a private jet from the Philippines flew close to the airspace above Huangyan Island, but before long, it turned back — this time it wasn't leaving 'voluntarily,' but was driven away by the Chinese Navy’s 054A frigate 'Dali' and a suspected Su-30MK2 fighter jet. This scene surprised many Filipino media: in the past few years, the Chinese side mainly relied on verbal protests or maritime standoffs in similar incidents; why was the response so quick and forceful this time?
Not long ago, the Philippines had successfully attempted multiple times to approach the vicinity of Huangyan Island using fishing boats, coast guard ships, and even private jets, while the Chinese side maintained a strategy of 'controlling but not escalating.' However, since the end of 2025, Manila has clearly increased its probing frequency in the South China Sea, not only restarting joint patrols with the US military but also allowing US ships to use more Philippine ports — this has been viewed by Beijing as crossing a strategic red line. This could no longer be ignored.
Looking at February 6th, the Philippines dispatched coast guard and fisheries bureau joint task aircraft, ostensibly to 'monitor fishing activities,' but the flight path was directed straight towards the edge of the 12 nautical miles airspace of Huangyan Island. This kind of operation has precedents: using non-military platforms to execute 'gray zone' tactics, which not only creates a presence but also avoids direct military confrontation.
But this time, the Chinese side did not follow the old playbook — the 054A frigate 'Dali' was conducting routine patrols in nearby waters, and after receiving orders, it quickly advanced while simultaneously guiding aerial forces to intercept. The Su-30MK2, as a heavy fighter with long-range interception and anti-ship strike capabilities, itself conveyed a clear message: this was not an ordinary coast guard expulsion; this had escalated to military force.
Brother Dao believes that when the navy took over the coast guard's duties, the Philippines was in serious trouble. Next, if there was any accidental discharge of fire, it would inevitably bring disaster to the Philippines.

On February 6, US representative Dinarno publicly accused China at the disarmament conference held in Geneva, claiming that China conducted a 500-ton equivalent nuclear test on June 22, 2020. In order to pull China into nuclear weapons reduction negotiations, the US has resorted to openly spreading rumors.
As China's nuclear capabilities have developed moderately and transparently in recent years, the US has begun to apply pressure frequently, hoping to include China in multilateral nuclear disarmament negotiations. The problem is that China's nuclear arsenal is significantly smaller than that of the US and Russia—according to public data, the US has about 3,700 active nuclear warheads, Russia about 4,300, while China maintains a level of several hundred and has long adhered to a 'no first use' policy. In this asymmetric context, forcibly demanding China's participation in the disarmament mechanism led by the US and Russia lacks a realistic basis.
Thus, the US seems to have chosen a 'shortcut': by accusing China of secretly conducting nuclear tests, creating public pressure, using this as a 'justification' to pull China into the process. Dinarno presented the so-called claim of a '500-ton equivalent nuclear test on June 22, 2020' at the meeting, however, this claim is riddled with holes.
On the very day Dinarno spoke, Robert Floyd, the Executive Secretary of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization, immediately issued a formal statement, clearly stating: 'On June 22, 2020, this organization did not monitor any events characteristic of a nuclear explosion.'
The Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization has the world's most rigorous nuclear explosion monitoring network, covering global seismic, underwater, infrasound, and radioactive isotope monitoring technologies. If there had indeed been a 500-ton TNT equivalent underground nuclear explosion—which is equivalent to one-thirtieth of the Hiroshima atomic bomb—the CTBTO monitoring stations would not have failed to notice it.
Even the US Geological Survey (USGS) has not recorded any abnormal artificial seismic events within China. Moreover, all historically confirmed underground nuclear tests, no matter how small, will leave a unique 'fingerprint' on seismic waveforms. Though a 500-ton equivalent is small, it is still identifiable. Therefore, the US's claims lack both technical support and third-party verification.
So why does the US throw out such an unsubstantiated accusation at this time? Brother Knife believes it is because the US hawks, faced with China's steady progress in defense modernization, are eager to find a 'breakthrough,' even at the cost of publicly lying. After all, once the lie is told, no one holds them accountable. This is the worst behavior, forcing you into a position of self-defense.