Elon Musk Tesla 99

Binance Will Support the MANTRA (OM) Token Swap, Redenomination, and Rebranding to MANTRA (MANTRA)
Published on 2026-02-13 15:00

OM/USDC
0.06
+37.6106%
This is a general announcement and marketing communication. Products and services referred to here may not be available in your region.
Fellow Binancians,
Binance will support the MANTRA (OM) token swap, redenomination, and rebranding to MANTRA (MANTRA).
General
TradingAt 2026-03-02 03:00 (UTC), Binance will remove all existing OM spot trading pairs (i.e., OM/USDT, OM/USDC and OM/TRY) and cancel all pending OM spot trading orders.At 2026-03-04 08:00 (UTC), Binance will open trading for the MANTRA/USDT, MANTRA/USDC and MANTRA/TRY trading pairs.Deposits and WithdrawalsAt 2026-03-02 03:30 (UTC), deposits and withdrawals of OM tokens will be suspended. Users should ensure they leave sufficient time for their OM token deposits to be fully processed prior to this time. Deposits of MANTRA tokens will open at 2026-03-04 07:00 (UTC).Binance will make a separate announcement after the event is completed to notify users when withdrawals of MANTRA tokens have opened.After the event is complete, withdrawals of OM tokens will no longer be supported.Binance will handle all technical requirements for users who are involved in this event.Users may refer to the announcement from the project team for more information.
Token Swap and Rebranding
OM tokens will assume the ticker of MANTRA tokens on Binance. All OM tokens will be swapped to MANTRA at a ratio of 1 OM = 4 MANTRA.
Spot
At 2026-02-27 03:00 (UTC),Binance Spot Copy Trading will remove the aforementioned spot trading pairs. After this time, any outstanding spot trading pairs will be moved to the Spot Account. Users are strongly advised to update or cancel their Spot Copy Trading portfolios prior to this time to avoid potential losses.At 2026-03-02 03:00 (UTC), Binance will remove and cease trading on all Spot trading pairs for OM. The exact trading pairs being removed are: OM/USDT, OM/USDC and OM/TRY. All trade orders will be automatically removed after trading ceases in each respective trading pair.Binance will remove Trading Bots services for the aforementioned Spot trading pairs where applicable. Users are strongly advised to update and/or cancel their Trading Bots prior to the cessation of Trading Bots services to avoid any potential losses.Binance will open trading for the MANTRA/USDT, MANTRA/USDC and MANTRA/TRY trading pairs at 2026-03-04 08:00 (UTC).
Futures
Starting from 2026-02-23 08:30 (UTC), users are not allowed to open new positions for the aforementioned contract(s). At 2026-02-23 09:00 (UTC),Binance Futures will close all positions and conduct an automatic settlement on the aforementioned contract(s). The aforementioned contract(s) will be removed after the settlement is complete. Users are advised to close any open positions prior to the settlement time to avoid automatic settlement. Binance Funding Rate Arbitrage Bot will close all arbitrage strategies and conduct an automatic settlement on the OMUSDT symbol(s).During the final hour proceeding the scheduled settlement time of a futures contract, the Futures Insurance Fund will not be utilised to support the liquidation process in respect of that futures contract. Any such liquidation triggered during the final hour will be executed as a single Immediate or Cancel order (“IOCO”), which will be offloaded into the market in one attempt. If, following the execution of the IOCO, the assets remaining available in the user's account are sufficient to meet the required Maintenance Margin (after accounting for realized losses and any applicable Liquidation Clearance Fee), the liquidation will cease. If the IOCO fails to fully reduce the position to a level that satisfies the Margin Maintenance requirements, any unfilled portion of the position will be resolved through the Auto-Deleveraging (ADL) process. Users are strongly advised to actively monitor and manage open positions during the final hour, as this period may be subject to heightened volatility and reduced liquidity.In order to protect users and prevent potential risks in extremely volatile market conditions, Binance Futures may undertake additional protective measures toward the aforementioned contract(s) without further announcements, including but not limited to adjusting the maximum leverage value, position value, and maintenance margin in each margin tier, updating funding rates, such as the interest rate, premium and capped funding rate, changing the constituents of the price index, and using the Last Price Protected mechanism to update the Mark Price. A separate announcement will be made for relisting.
Margin
At 2026-02-14 06:00 (UTC),Binance Margin will suspend Cross Margin and Isolated Margin borrowings on the aforementioned pair(s).At 2026-02-23 10:00 (UTC) (Margin Delisting Time),Binance Margin will remove OM from Cross and Isolated Margin. The OM/USDT, and OM/USDC Cross Margin pairs, and OM/USDT, and OM/USDC Isolated Margin pairs will be removed from Margin. Effective immediately, users will no longer be able to transfer any amount of the aforementioned token(s) via manual transfers and Auto-Transfer Mode for Cross and Isolated Margin into their Margin Accounts. If users hold outstanding liabilities of said token(s), these users may only manually transfer up to the amount of liabilities of that token(s) into their Margin Accounts, less any collateral already available.Binance Margin will close users’ positions, conduct an automatic settlement, and cancel all pending orders on the aforementioned Isolated Margin pair(s), which will then be removed from Isolated Margin.If users hold both collateral and liabilities of the aforementioned token(s) on Cross Margin, the collateral will be used to repay the respective liabilities. If there are remaining collateral or liabilities of the aforementioned token(s), one of two options below will occur:If users only hold the aforementioned token(s) in the form of collateral: If the Collateral Margin Level (CML) is above 2, the aforementioned token(s) will be transferred to users’ Spot Accounts, up to the point when the CML reaches 2. The remaining tokens in their Cross Margin Accounts that are to be removed will then be fully sold. If the CML is below 2, the remaining token(s) in users’ Cross Margin Accounts that are to be removed will be fully sold. If users only hold the aforementioned token(s) in the form of liabilities:If CML is at or above 2, pending orders will not be affected. If the CML is below 2, all pending orders in their Cross Margin Accounts will be canceled. The system will then sell other collateral tokens to buy and fully repay the aforementioned token(s)’ liabilities.Please note that users will not be able to update their positions during the removal process, and they are strongly advised to close their positions and/or transfer their assets from Margin Accounts to Spot Accounts prior to the cessation of margin trading at Margin Delisting Time. Binance will not be responsible for any potential losses.Portfolio Margin users are advised to transfer the aforementioned token(s) out of their Margin Accounts to their Spot Accounts and to top up their margin balances before Margin Delisting Time where applicable. Users should monitor the Unified Maintenance Margin Ratio (uniMMR) closely to avoid any potential liquidation that may result from the removal of the aforementioned token(s) from the Margin Account. All OM balances in the Cross Margin Account under the Portfolio Margin Account will be automatically converted to USDT from Margin Delisting Time. The conversion may take approximately 24 hours or longer. Binance Margin will not be liable for any losses on new positions during this period that may incur due to the conversion of funds. Refer to this FAQ for more information.A separate announcement will be made for relisting.
Loans
At 2026-02-23 07:00 (UTC), Binance Loans (Flexible Rates) and VIP Loan will close all outstanding loan positions for OM (both loanable tokens and collateral tokens will be closed). Users are strongly advised to repay their outstanding OM loans before this time to avoid any potential losses.
Please refer to the Binance Loans (Flexible Rates) and VIP Loan FAQs for more information. More details are also available in the Binance Loans and VIP Loan Terms and Conditions.
Simple Earn 
From 2026-02-27 08:00 (UTC),
Binance Simple Earn will cease support for OM Simple Earn Flexible and Locked Products. Subscriptions will no longer be available. All remaining OM Flexible and Locked Products positions, together with any accrued rewards, will be automatically redeemed to users’ Spot Accounts. Users can choose to redeem their assets from OM Simple Earn Flexible and Locked Products anytime beforehand without deduction of any accrued rewards.
After 2026-03-04 08:00 (UTC), Binance Simple Earn will resubscribe the converted MANTRA assets for Flexible and Locked Products for impacted users, according to the above swap ratio.If there were any changes in the user's OM balance after the redemption, the resubscription will be conducted based on the user’s previous asset allocation ratio between Flexible and Locked Products with different durations with the remaining MANTRA balance.Example: The user has 30 OM in 30-Day Locked Products, 20 OM in 90-Day Locked Products, and 50 OM in Flexible Products.If the user’s total OM balance changes from 100 to 50 before the resubscription, the resubscription amount will be: 15 MANTRA in 30-Day Locked Products, 10 MANTRA in 90-Day Locked Products, 25 MANTRA in Flexible Products.About Locked Products PositionsRewards will be distributed to the user’s Spot Account the day after accrual starts on the new subscriptions (two days after subscription).The duration of the Locked Products will be reset with the new subscription. For example, a OM 30-Day Locked Products position with 7 days till expiry will be reset to 30 days till expiry for the new MANTRA 30-Day Locked Products position.After the resubscription, users can early redeem the MANTRA Locked Products positions before 2026-05-04 08:00 (UTC) without deduction of any accrued rewards.
Binance Pay
At 2026-02-26 08:00 (UTC), Binance will remove OM from the list of supported cryptocurrencies on Binance Pay.
Gift Card
At 2026-03-02 03:00 (UTC),Binance will no longer support the creation of OM Gift Cards.
Users may proceed to redeem any unredeemed OM Gift Cards for OM tokens before this time.
Convert
Binance Convert will remove OM and all associated pairs at 2026-03-02 02:00 (UTC).
Convert Low-Value Assets 
Convert Low-Value Assets will remove OM at 2026-03-01 02:00 (UTC). Users may choose to convert the low-value assets beforehand. 
Buy & Sell Crypto
At 2026-02-20 03:00 (UTC), Buy & Sell Crypto will remove OM and all associated pairs.
Note: There may be discrepancies between this original content in English and any translated versions. Please refer to the original English version for the most accurate information, in case any discrepancies arise.
Thank you for your support!
Binance Team
2026-02-13
Disclaimers:
USDC is an e-money token issued by Circle Internet Financial Europe SAS (https://www.circle.com/). USDC’s whitepaper is available here. You may contact Circle using the following contact information: +33(1)59000130 and EEA-Customer-Support@circle.com. Holders of USDC have a legal claim against Circle SAS as the EU issuer of USDC. These holders are entitled to request redemption of their USDC from Circle SAS. Such redemption will be made at any time and at par value.

Trade on-the-go with Binance’s crypto trading app (iOS/Android)
Find us on 
TelegramWhatsAppXFacebookInstagramDiscord
Binance reserves the right in its sole discretion to amend or cancel this announcement at any time and for any reasons without prior notice.
Disclaimer: Digital asset prices are subject to high market risk and price volatility. The value of your investment may go down or up, and you may not get back the amount invested. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions and Binance is not liable for any losses you may incur. Past performance is not a reliable predictor of future performance. You should only invest in products you are familiar with and where you understand the risks. You should carefully consider your investment experience, financial situation, investment objectives and risk tolerance and consult an independent financial adviser prior to making any investment. This material should not be construed as financial advice. For more information, see our Terms of Use and Risk Warning.

@vanery

Criss*
@bidorder
The Atomic Settlement Paradox
Why Faster Markets May Mean Less Liquidity.
In the rapidly evolving landscape of fintech and digital assets, the industry has rallied around a singular, inevitable goal: T+0, or "Atomic Settlement." From the US equity market’s move to T+1, to the proliferation of stablecoins and RWAs, the consensus is clear: settlement should be instant, final, and programmable.
However, beneath this technological optimism lies a counter-intuitive reality that few are addressing. While T+0 eliminates counterparty credit risk, it inadvertently introduces a massive drag on capital efficiency. This is the Atomic Settlement Paradox: When trades settle instantly, it costs market makers more to keep cash ready, leading them to charge higher fees and offer less liquidity.
The Mechanics of Efficiency: Netting vs. Gross Settlement
To understand this trade-off, one must compare Deferred Net Settlement (DNS) with Real-Time Gross Settlement (RTGS).
In traditional T+2 (and even T+1) architectures, market makers benefit from the power of multilateral netting. A liquidity provider can execute thousands of buy and sell orders throughout the trading day, yet only settle the net difference at the end of the cycle. In this environment, delayed settlement is not a bug. It is a feature. It functions as an implicit, interest-free credit facility that allows a single dollar of balance sheet to support hundreds of dollars in trading volume.
To put this concretely: In a T+2 environment, $1M of capital can support $100M+ in daily volume through netting. In T+0, that same $1M supports exactly $1M.
In a strict T+0 atomic environment, netting is eliminated. Every transaction requires gross settlement. To sell an asset, the inventory must be present at that exact second. To buy an asset, the cash must be pre-funded in the smart contract or the exchange account.
This shift creates a pre-funding constraint. Market makers are forced to fragment their capital across various venues to ensure instant execution. The velocity of capital slows drastically. Consequently, to compensate for this significantly higher inventory cost, market makers must widen their spreads. The technology is faster, but the economic efficiency degrades.
Liquidity Fragmentation and Basis Risk
While tokenization improves the transferability of assets, it has currently resulted in market structures resembling the fragmented global FX markets rather than the centralized equities market
The "onchain" ecosystem is characterized by liquidity fragmentation A tokenized Treasury Bill on Ethereum and a tokenized Treasury Bill on Solana could be legally identical but technically distinct assets. They cannot be netted against each other, nor can they effectively cross-margin without complex bridging.
This forces market makers to maintain redundant inventory across multiple exchanges and protocols to service order flow. This redundancy exacerbates inventory basis risk: the risk that price discrepancies will occur between the time liquidity is sourced and the time it is deployed across disconnected venues.
Legacy Settlement delay: A Feature, Not a Bug
We often criticize legacy financial systems for being slow, viewing the two-day settlement lag as a technological inefficiency. However, from a market microstructure perspective, this delay performs a specific economic function: it acts as a financing mechanism
Delayed settlement effectively functions as an unsecured intraday credit facility provided by the market infrastructure. It allows liquidity providers to turn over the same capital multiple times before the settlement obligations mature. By removing this delay in the name of safety and speed, we are essentially stripping the market of this implicit leverage. We are replacing a credit-based system with a cash-based system, which is inherently more expensive to operate.
The Missing Link: The Capital Efficiency Layer
This brings us to the critical challenge of the transition era. We are moving toward a T+0 world because users demand the user experience (UX) of instant gratification and the safety of trustless settlement. Yet, the economics of market making still require the capital efficiency found in netting regimes.
Technology alone cannot solve this economic friction; only capital can.
To bridge the gap between the efficiency of T+2 and the immediacy of T+0, the market requires a new type of intermediary: a Capital Efficiency Layer. This role must be filled by institutions willing to deploy their Balance Sheet to absorb the inefficiencies of atomic settlement.
These intermediaries act as the principal counterparty. They utilize their own capital to pre-fund the instant settlement that fintechs and users demand, effectively re-introducing the credit that atomic settlement removes. In doing so, they allow fintech operators to offer a T+0 experience without the crippling capital requirements.
Conclusion
The trajectory of finance is moving toward instant settlement.. However, the road to T+0 is not just a software engineering challenge; it is a financial engineering challenge. Without entities willing to bridge the gap with robust credit intermediation, the dream of instant settlement will come at the cost of wider spreads and thinner markets.
In a T+0 environment, liquidity becomes strictly a function of capital availability The pivotal infrastructure providers that can act as the bridge between capital providers and technology operators will define the infrastructure of tomorrow's markets.

@xml
#XMLUSDT
Why Faster Markets May Mean Less Liquidity.
In the rapidly evolving landscape of fintech and digital assets, the industry has rallied around a singular, inevitable goal: T+0, or "Atomic Settlement." From the US equity market’s move to T+1, to the proliferation of stablecoins and RWAs, the consensus is clear: settlement should be instant, final, and programmable.
However, beneath this technological optimism lies a counter-intuitive reality that few are addressing. While T+0 eliminates counterparty credit risk, it inadvertently introduces a massive drag on capital efficiency. This is the Atomic Settlement Paradox: When trades settle instantly, it costs market makers more to keep cash ready, leading them to charge higher fees and offer less liquidity.
The Mechanics of Efficiency: Netting vs. Gross Settlement
To understand this trade-off, one must compare Deferred Net Settlement (DNS) with Real-Time Gross Settlement (RTGS).
In traditional T+2 (and even T+1) architectures, market makers benefit from the power of multilateral netting. A liquidity provider can execute thousands of buy and sell orders throughout the trading day, yet only settle the net difference at the end of the cycle. In this environment, delayed settlement is not a bug. It is a feature. It functions as an implicit, interest-free credit facility that allows a single dollar of balance sheet to support hundreds of dollars in trading volume.
To put this concretely: In a T+2 environment, $1M of capital can support $100M+ in daily volume through netting. In T+0, that same $1M supports exactly $1M.
In a strict T+0 atomic environment, netting is eliminated. Every transaction requires gross settlement. To sell an asset, the inventory must be present at that exact second. To buy an asset, the cash must be pre-funded in the smart contract or the exchange account.
This shift creates a pre-funding constraint. Market makers are forced to fragment their capital across various venues to ensure instant execution. The velocity of capital slows drastically. Consequently, to compensate for this significantly higher inventory cost, market makers must widen their spreads. The technology is faster, but the economic efficiency degrades.
Liquidity Fragmentation and Basis Risk
While tokenization improves the transferability of assets, it has currently resulted in market structures resembling the fragmented global FX markets rather than the centralized equities market
The "onchain" ecosystem is characterized by liquidity fragmentation A tokenized Treasury Bill on Ethereum and a tokenized Treasury Bill on Solana could be legally identical but technically distinct assets. They cannot be netted against each other, nor can they effectively cross-margin without complex bridging.
This forces market makers to maintain redundant inventory across multiple exchanges and protocols to service order flow. This redundancy exacerbates inventory basis risk: the risk that price discrepancies will occur between the time liquidity is sourced and the time it is deployed across disconnected venues.
Legacy Settlement delay: A Feature, Not a Bug
We often criticize legacy financial systems for being slow, viewing the two-day settlement lag as a technological inefficiency. However, from a market microstructure perspective, this delay performs a specific economic function: it acts as a financing mechanism
Delayed settlement effectively functions as an unsecured intraday credit facility provided by the market infrastructure. It allows liquidity providers to turn over the same capital multiple times before the settlement obligations mature. By removing this delay in the name of safety and speed, we are essentially stripping the market of this implicit leverage. We are replacing a credit-based system with a cash-based system, which is inherently more expensive to operate.
The Missing Link: The Capital Efficiency Layer
This brings us to the critical challenge of the transition era. We are moving toward a T+0 world because users demand the user experience (UX) of instant gratification and the safety of trustless settlement. Yet, the economics of market making still require the capital efficiency found in netting regimes.
Technology alone cannot solve this economic friction; only capital can.
To bridge the gap between the efficiency of T+2 and the immediacy of T+0, the market requires a new type of intermediary: a Capital Efficiency Layer. This role must be filled by institutions willing to deploy their Balance Sheet to absorb the inefficiencies of atomic settlement.
These intermediaries act as the principal counterparty. They utilize their own capital to pre-fund the instant settlement that fintechs and users demand, effectively re-introducing the credit that atomic settlement removes. In doing so, they allow fintech operators to offer a T+0 experience without the crippling capital requirements.
Conclusion
The trajectory of finance is moving toward instant settlement.. However, the road to T+0 is not just a software engineering challenge; it is a financial engineering challenge. Without entities willing to bridge the gap with robust credit intermediation, the dream of instant settlement will come at the cost of wider spreads and thinner markets.
In a T+0 environment, liquidity becomes strictly a function of capital availability The pivotal infrastructure providers that can act as the bridge between capital providers and technology operators will define the infrastructure of tomorrow's markets.

تشير كلمة بلازما، التي غالبًا ما تكون خطأ إملائيًا لكلمة بلازما، إلى حالة من المادة. كما توجد كاسم عائلة (تاريخيًا في جنوب داكوتا) أو كخطأ إملائي في سياقات مثل "قلم البلازما" (جهاز تجميل) و"خلايا البلازما" (خلايا الدم البيضاء). وفي بعض الأحيان يتم استخدامها بشكل غير صحيح للإشارة إلى "غشاء البلازما".
معلومات رئيسية تتعلق بالأخطاء الإملائية الشائعة أو السياقات لكلمة "بلازما":
البلازما (حالة المادة): تعتبر الحالة الرابعة من المادة جنبًا إلى جنب مع الصلبة والسائلة والغازية، وغالبًا ما توجد في بيئات عالية الطاقة.
قلم البلازما (جهاز تجميل): جهاز تجميلي يستخدم لشد الجلد، متوفر على منصات مثل علي بابا وداراز.

Follow, post and trade to earn 1,750,000 XPL token rewards from the global leaderboard. To qualify for the leaderboard and reward, you must complete each task type (Post: choose 1) at least once during the event to qualify. Posts involving Red Packets or giveaways will be deemed ineligible. Participants found engaging in suspicious views, interactions, or suspected use of automated bots will be disqualified from the activity. Any modification of previously published posts with high engagement to repurpose them as project submissions will result in disqualification. ** We are updating the leaderboard points logic and the data currently displayed is as of 2026-01-25. All activity and points from 2026-01-26 are still fully recorded and will be reflected when updates resume on 2026-01-28 at 09:00 UTC on a T+2 rolling basis.