OG101

باعتباري متداولًا مؤسسيًا، تعلمت ألا أقترض الكثير من الرافعة المالية من البورصة التي كنت أتداول فيها، وأن أكون على حق في أغلب الأحيان أكثر من كوني مخطئًا.

من النادر أن يحظى الشخص بفرصة تجربة الأسواق المالية من خلال عدسة صانع السوق المؤسسي الذي يحقق مئات الملايين من الدولارات في الصفقات الضخمة.
ومع ذلك، كنت في مجال تداول العملات المشفرة منذ عام 2017 عندما كنت طالبًا جديدًا في الكلية. لقد لعبت خلال فقاعة ICO، عندما قمت بتداول العملات البديلة بدلاً من الدراسة للامتحانات النهائية. لقد مررت بصيف التمويل اللامركزي (DeFi) في عام 2020 أثناء كوفيد-19، عندما بدأت لأول مرة في التعرف على مجمعات السيولة. لقد شهدت ارتفاعًا مفاجئًا في عام 2021 أثناء حصولي على أول تدريب داخلي لي في الجانب المؤسسي من التداول، ومررت بانهيار FTX.

The cryptocurrency world is abuzz with HBO’s upcoming documentary about the mysterious creator of Bitcoin, Satoshi Nakamoto. For years, the enigma surrounding Nakamoto’s identity has fascinated both crypto enthusiasts and mainstream audiences. But the burning question is: Does it even matter who Satoshi is, especially in 2024?
This is an opinion editorial published by a guest author.
The Legacy of Satoshi Nakamoto
Satoshi’s primary vision was to develop a peer-to-peer digital currency that would remove the reliance on centralized financial institutions. Through #bitcoin☀️ , he aimed to democratize finance, providing people across the world with a decentralized and transparent financial system. But over a decade later, have we really stayed true to this vision?
Centralized Giants Now Own the Majority of Bitcoin
A glance at the Bitcoin ownership landscape reveals a significant shift from decentralization to centralization. The top Bitcoin holders are dominated by large corporations, exchanges, and even governments. As seen in River Financial’s recent analysis, Coinbase, a centralized exchange, owns over 2 million $BTC , representing more than 10% of the total Bitcoin supply.
Does this centralization go against what Satoshi envisioned? Many would argue it does. Nakamoto’s creation was meant to empower individuals, not multinational corporations or governments. As these entities gain control over more of Bitcoin’s supply, the decentralized nature of the cryptocurrency is increasingly at risk.
Is This What Satoshi Wanted?
There’s a fundamental irony in the fact that Bitcoin, the world’s first decentralized digital currency, is now largely controlled by centralized entities. With big players like Coinbase, Binance, and even the U.S. government holding substantial amounts of Bitcoin, it seems like the decentralization Satoshi envisioned is slowly being eroded.
As the Bitcoin ecosystem matures, one can’t help but wonder if this centralization is an inevitable consequence of Bitcoin’s success. After all, Bitcoin needed mainstream adoption to reach its full potential, but that adoption has come at the cost of the very decentralization that once defined it.
The U.S. Falling Behind in Digital Payments
While Satoshi’s vision for decentralized finance (DeFi) and digital payments continues to flourish globally, the U.S. appears to be lagging behind. Countries like China have rapidly adopted QR code-based payment systems, making digital payments more accessible and efficient for their populations. Meanwhile, the U.S. is entangled in debates around regulation and control, delaying the broader implementation of decentralized financial systems.
Satoshi likely envisioned a future where countries would embrace digital payments to foster financial freedom. Yet, the U.S.’s reluctance to fully adopt cryptocurrency reflects a stark contrast to this vision, leaving Americans with fewer opportunities to benefit from decentralized solutions.
QR Codes: A Precursor to Bitcoin?
Ironically, while Bitcoin and blockchain technology offer revolutionary solutions for digital payments, many countries have already found simpler alternatives. QR code-based payment systems, like those used in China, solve many of the same problems Satoshi aimed to address. These systems are fast, reliable, and, most importantly, widely accepted by both businesses and consumers.
In a sense, digital payments—one of Satoshi’s key goals—have already been solved, albeit through centralized means. But does that mean Bitcoin’s mission has failed? Not necessarily. Bitcoin offers more than just a digital payment system; it offers an escape from centralized control. However, whether that is enough to drive global adoption remains a question for the future.
The Satoshi Obsession: A Distraction from Real Problems?
The continued search for Satoshi’s true identity feels like a misplaced effort. After all, Satoshi’s genius lies not in his persona but in the creation of Bitcoin itself. We may never know who Satoshi is, but does that really matter? The technology speaks for itself, and chasing after the person behind it seems to miss the point.
In 2024, the world faces more significant challenges than uncovering Satoshi’s identity. Instead, we should focus on addressing the obstacles that prevent wider adoption of decentralized technologies. From scalability issues to regulatory uncertainty, these are the real problems that demand attention.
Focus on the Future, Not the Past
As HBO gears up to release its documentary on Satoshi Nakamoto, it’s important to remember that the search for Satoshi is not as important as the future of decentralized technology. Instead of hunting for Satoshi, maybe it’s time to hunt for more use cases—ways that Bitcoin, blockchain, and decentralized finance can solve real-world problems.
In the end, Satoshi’s identity is irrelevant to the continued evolution of cryptocurrency. What matters is how we choose to build on the foundation he laid. Whether through decentralized finance, enhanced digital payment systems, or new applications of blockchain technology, the potential is vast. Let’s not lose sight of it by focusing too much on the past.
What do you think about the upcoming Satoshi reveal on HBO? Share your thoughts and opinions about this subject in the comments section below.