trategy’s mNAV next move: Pump to 1.5x or Dump to 0.85x? Market Close: This market will only be closed once a resolution is achieved.Resolution Deadline: The resolution will be determined as soon as an outcome is reached.Pump Target: 1.5xDump Target: 0.85x Resolution Criteria: The market resolves based on which condition is met first:“1.5x” if the mNAV Analysis reaches or exceeds the Pump Target.“0.85x” if the mNAV Analysis drops to equal or below the Dump Target. Resolution Details: The market resolves solely based on the Bitcoin Strategy Tracker’s mNAV Analysis Chart of Effective Diluted Shares.Only the daily snapshots shown in this chart will be used for resolution. No other source will be considered. Cancelation (Invalidity) Conditions: The Bitcoin Strategy Tracker’s mNAV Analysis of Diluted Shares is suspended or becomes unreliable.The resolution source is unavailable or experiences significant disruptions.Any circumstance prevents reliable tracking.Myriad Markets undergoes a change in its contract that demands a cancellation of all active markets, or a similar significant technical change In the event of cancelation, participants may claim their stakes at the market value of their open positions at the time of cancelation. This could result in a profit or a loss, depending on the price of their outstanding shares. A#news #crypto
Will Strategy (MSTR) sell any BTC by end of 2026? #news #MarketSentimentToday Market Period: From publication through December 31, 2026 at 11:59 PM EDT.Market Close: December 31, 2026 at 11:59 PM EDT.Resolution Deadline: The outcome will be determined after Market Close, or sooner if definitive information becomes available. Resolution Criteria: Resolves Yes if Strategy (MSTR) publicly reports—via an SEC 8-K filing or another official announcement—any Bitcoin sale executed during the Market Period, regardless of intent (planned or forced).Resolves No if no such sale is reported within the Market Period. Resolution Details: This market resolves based on SEC 8-K filings or other official announcements published by Strategy (MSTR) announcing bitcoin sales made during the Market Period.Any Strategy announcement or SEC filing published after the Resolution Deadline will not count toward this market’s resolution, even if it confirms Bitcoin sales made during the Market Period.If contradictory information appears, SEC filings take precedence over other sources. Cancellation Conditions: No authoritative source (e.g., SEC filings) is available, or the information is ambiguous.A corporate action (merger, ticker change, trading halt, etc.) makes resolution impossible or irrelevant. In the event of cancellation, participants may claim their stakes at the market value of their open positions at the time of cancellation. This could result in a profit or a loss, depending on the price of their outstanding shares.
Va fi capitalizarea de piață închiderii IPO-ului SpaceX mai mare de 1,3 trilioane de dolari? #news #market Închiderea pieței: Această piață se va închide înainte de IPO-ul SpaceX și va fi ajustată la aceasta odată ce data este anunțată oficial. Timp de rezolvare: Rezolvarea va fi determinată imediat ce acțiunile SpaceX își vor finaliza prima zi de tranzacționare publică. Obiectivul pieței: 1.300.000.000.000 dolari (1,3 trilioane USD). Criterii de rezolvare: Se rezolvă cu "Da" dacă capitalizarea de piață închidere a SpaceX este mai mare decât obiectivul pieței la sfârșitul primei sale zile de tranzacționare publice. Se rezolvă cu "Nu" dacă nu. Detalii de rezolvare: Această piață se va rezolva pe baza datelor oficiale de la Nasdaq. În cazul în care SpaceX nu începe tranzacționarea pe Nasdaq, sursa de rezolvare va fi adaptată la bursă pe care începe tranzacționarea. Numai capitalizarea de piață a SpaceX la închiderea burselor în prima sa zi de tranzacționare este subiectul acestei piețe. Capitalizarea de piață se referă la produsul total al acțiunilor emise înmulțit cu prețul de închidere al acțiunii în prima zi în care acțiunile sunt tranzacționate. În cazul în care sursa primară de rezolvare nu raportează despre capitalizarea de piață sau numărul de acțiuni emise, atunci comunicațiile oficiale SpaceX sau un consens media de raportare credibilă vor fi utilizate pentru a determina numărul de acțiuni emise. Dacă tranzacționarea normală în prima zi de tranzacționare a SpaceX este perturbată (de exemplu, din cauza unui întrerupător de circuit sau a unei sesiuni scurtate), piața se va închide pe baza prețului oficial de închidere din acea sesiune scurtată. Dacă nu este emis un preț oficial de închidere, piața se va închide folosind prețul oficial de închidere din ziua următoare de tranzacționare în care este publicat, care va fi considerată prima zi de tranzacționare.
SOL vs Silver: Which hits $150 first? #sol #news Observation Period: From the publication date through June 30, 2026, at 11:59 PM ET.Market Close: June 30, 2026, at 11:59 PM ET.Resolution Deadline: The resolution will be determined after the Observation Period has ended, or earlier if the FED has cut more than 25 bps. Resolution Criteria: Resolves to “Yes” if the FED cuts its interest rates by more than 25 bps during the Observation Period.Resolves to “No” if the FED cuts its interest rates not at all, by less than 25 bps or by exactly 25 bps. Resolution Details: This market will resolve based on the official FOMC’s statements throughout the Observation Period.Emergency rate lowering will also be counted towards resolution. Cancelation (Invalidity) Conditions: The resolution source is suspended, becomes unreliable or experiences significant disruptions during the Observation Period.Any circumstance prevents reliable tracking during the Observation Period. In the event of cancelation, participants may claim their stakes at the market value of their open positions at the time of cancelation. This could result in a profit or a loss, depending on the price of their outstanding shares.
How much Gold will it take to buy one Bitcoin next? Market Details: Market Close: This market will only be closed once a resolution is achieved.Resolution Deadline: The resolution will be determined as soon as an outcome is reached.Market Targets:10 oz Target: 1 Bitcoin = 10.0000 ounces of Gold.30 oz Target: 1 Bitcoin = 30.0000 ounces of Gold. Resolution Criteria: The market resolves based on which condition is met first:“30 oz” if the Bitcoin to Gold Ratio on Longterm Trends reaches or exceeds the 30 oz Target.“10 oz” if the Bitcoin to Gold Ratio on Longterm Trends drops to equal or below the 10 oz Target. Resolution Details: The market resolves based on the Bitcoin to Gold Ratio Chart (logarithmic scale) on Longterm Trends, specifically: 1-Year view ("1y").Bitcoin / Gold ratio in ounces for each day Only the “Bitcoin / Gold Ratio” value as quoted by Longterm Trends will be considered. Cancellation (Invalidity) Conditions: The Bitcoin / Gold Ratio on Longterm Trends is suspended or becomes unreliable.The Longterm Trends platform is unavailable or experiences significant disruptions.Any circumstance prevents reliable price tracking.Myriad Markets undergoes a change in its contract that demands a cancellation of all active markets, or a similar significant technical change. In the event of cancellation, participants may claim their stakes at the market value of their open positions at the time of cancellation. This could result in a profit or a loss, depe #BTC
Clippers vs. Lakers: Who wins the Pacific Division matchup? #news Market Dates: Market Period: From the publication date until February 21, 2026, at 3:00 AM UTC. Market Close: February 21, 2026, at 3:00 AM UTC. Resolution Deadline: The resolution will be determined after the results are published on the resolution source. Resolution Criteria: Resolves to “Clippers” if the Los Angeles Clippers win the game.Resolves to “Lakers” if the Los Angeles Lakers win. Resolution Details: If the game is postponed but played within the same “Week 18” window (NBA definition), the result still counts. Cancelation (Invalidity) Conditions: The game is canceled, postponed indefinitely or held outside of the same “Week 18” window (NBA definition).The game ends in a tie for any reason.Any circumstance makes it impossible to determine the outcome definitively.The resolution source is suspended, becomes unreliable or fails to provide an outcome. If the market is canceled, participants can claim their stakes at the then-current market value of their shares, which could result in a profit or a loss depending on the price of those shares at cancelation.
Jim Cramer wrong in February? Market Dates: #MarketSentimentToday #news Observation Period: February 1 to February 28, 2026 according to the resolution source.Market Period: From the publication date until February 27, 2026 at 11:59 PM UTC.Market Close: February 27, 2026 at 11:59 PM UTC.Resolution Time: February 28 once this day’s data is fully determined by the resolution source. Market Details: Market Target: Strategy Performance value on Feb 1st: $109.76M. Resolution Criteria: Resolves to “Yes” if the Inverse Cramer Strategy performance at the Resolution Time is above the Market Target.Resolves to “No” if the performance is below the Market Target.If the performance is exactly equal to the Market Target at Resolution Time, the market will resolve based on the value published for the previous day. Resolution Details: The market resolves based on the Inverse Cramer Strategy Chart values published on QuiverQuant, specifically:1M view“Strategy” valueThe value used is the final recorded Strategy Performance for February 28, 2026. Cancellation (Invalidity) Conditions: Any circumstance prevents reliable determination of the Strategy Performance for the Resolution Time.Myriad Markets undergoes a contract-level change requiring cancellation of all active markets. In the event of cancellation, participants may claim the market value of their open positions at the time of cancellation.
Who leaves the Trump Administration first? #news Rules Market Details: Market Close: This market will only be closed once a resolution is achieved.Resolution Deadline: The resolution will be determined as soon as an outcome is reached. Resolution Criteria: This market resolves to the individual (Pam Bondi or Kash Patel) who first ceases to hold any official position within the Trump Administration, whether by resignation, termination, removal, or expiration of appointment without continuation. Resolution Details: “Ceases to hold” requires formal public confirmation by the White House, or other direct communication channels used by the Trump administration.Temporary leave, suspension, announced intent to resign without effect, or reassignment within the Administration do not count towards resolution.The relevant time is the effective date of departure; if none is specified, the first official public confirmation will be used. Cancelation (Invalidity) Conditions: The resolution sources become unavailable, unreliable, or experiences major changes preventing verification.Any major external factor prevents fair or consistent resolution.Donald Trump is no longer in his position as President of the United States for any reason.Both individuals cease to hold their official positions within the Trump administration at the exact same time.Both individuals carry out their full term until the next official administration takes over. If canceled, participants may claim their stakes at the then-current market value of their shares, which could result in a profit or a loss depending on their open positions.
Bitcoin 'Boom-Bust' Era Is Over as Institutions Take the Lead: WisdomTree #BTC #TradeCryptosOnX #NewsAboutCrypto Crypto's adolescence is over—and institutional capital is changing the rules of engagement, says WisdomTree's latest market analysis.
Bitcoin and crypto markets have entered a new phase defined less by speculation and more by portfolio discipline, according to a new note from WisdomTree. Dovile Silenskyte, director of digital assets research at WisdomTree, wrote in a note shared with Decrypt that the days of survival and price discovery are behind crypto traders. "Crypto has moved on from its retail-led, boom-bust adolescence. Infrastructure largely works, regulation is tightening rather than retreating and capital is behaving more like institutional capital," she wrote. "This changes the rules of engagement. The key shift is subtle, but decisive, as the debate has moved from 'Should we own crypto?' to 'How do we implement it responsibly?'" Silenskyte added that crypto investors need to understand that the nature of the market has changed, particularly because traditional diversification is under strain as inflation risk lingers, fiscal dominance is persistent, and equity-bond correlations have become unreliable. The New York-based asset manager, founded in 2006, is best known for its exchange-traded products. That catalog of funds now includes institutional-grade exposure to Bitcoin, Ethereum, and broader crypto baskets. The firm issues the WisdomTree Bitcoin Fund (BTCW), WisdomTree Ethereum Fund (ETHW), and WisdomTree Crypto Industry Innovators Fund (WCBR)—all U.S. based. In Europe, the firm has a broader offering that includes funds tied to Solana, Cardano, Polkadot, and XRP.
Bitcoin Consolidates Above $69,000 as $71,000 Emerges as Key Resistance
$1,993(+1.68%)
Bitcoin’s price this morning at 8:15 a.m. Eastern time stands at $69,393 per coin, with a market cap of $1.38 trillion and 24-hour trading volume of $39.29 billion, as price action fluctuated within an intraday range of $68,095 to $70,220. The leading digital asset is hovering just below a critical inflection point, compressing beneath $71,000 as momentum signals diverge across multiple time frames, with tightening volatility and rising short-term volume suggesting the market is coiled ahead of a decisive move.
Bitcoin Chart Outlook
The daily chart continues to reflect a broader downtrend structure, defined by lower highs and lower lows following a rejection near $97,900 and a sharp decline to approximately $59,900. Price is now consolidating between $65,000 and $70,000, with $70,000 to $71,000 acting as immediate resistance and $75,000 as major resistance.
Support stands at $65,000, with critical structural support between $59,900 and $60,000. The prevailing daily bias remains negative unless price reclaims and sustains acceptance above $71,000 to $75,000. Until that occurs, this remains a relief rally within a larger corrective phase — not a confirmed reversal.
Prețul Dogecoin-ului se îndreaptă spre o scădere mai abruptă pe măsură ce vânturile adverse cresc #Dogecoin #NewsAboutCrypto
Moneda se confruntă cu vânturi adverse majore, care ar putea trage prețul său în termen scurt. De exemplu, se confruntă cu o provocare majoră din cauza prăbușirii continue a pieței cripto, care a afectat Bitcoin și majoritatea altcoin-urilor. În plus, interesul deschis pentru futures a continuat să scadă în ultimele luni, mutându-se de la un maxim de 5,20 miliarde de dolari în septembrie la actualul 1,16 miliarde de dolari. Scăderea interesului deschis este un semn că cererea a continuat să scadă în ultimele luni. Mai multe date arată că rata de finanțare ponderată a rămas în zona roșie în ultimele zile. A scăzut la cel mai scăzut nivel de la 10 februarie. O rată de finanțare în scădere este un semn că investitorii cred că moneda va continua să scadă în termen scurt. Același lucru se întâmplă și pe piața fondurilor tranzacționate la bursă în acest an. Datele compilate de SoSoValue arată că cele trei ETF-uri DOGE pe piața spot de la companii precum Grayscale, 21Shares și Bitwise nu au avut niciun flux sau ieșire de fonduri de la 3 februarie în acest an. Aceste fonduri au avut acum peste 6,67 milioane de dolari în fluxuri cumulative, aducând fluxurile nete la 8,69 milioane de dolari. Analiza tehnică a prețului Dogecoin
Graficul pe intervalul zilnic arată că prețul DOGE a fost într-o tendință descendentă puternică în ultimele luni, mutându-se de la un maxim de 0,3073 dolari în septembrie anul trecut. Prețul Dogecoin-ului a scăzut sub nivelul de suport cheie de 0,1295 dolari, cel mai scăzut nivel în 7 aprilie anul trecut. A scăzut sub toate mediile mobile, în timp ce Oscilatorul Procentual de Preț rămâne sub linia zero. Prin urmare, cel mai probabil scenariu este acela în care moneda continuă să scadă, posibil la cel mai scăzut nivel de la începutul anului de 0,0790 dolari, cel mai scăzut nivel din această lună. O scădere sub acel nivel de suport va semnala o mai mare tendință de scădere....
Iată de ce prețul Ethereum ar putea atinge mai întâi 1.500 $ înainte de 2.500 $ #ETH🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 #NewsAboutCrypto Graficul pe interval de timp zilnic arată că prețul ETH rămâne într-o piață tehnică de urs după ce a scăzut cu 60% de la maximul istoric. Se formează încet un model de steag bearish, constând dintr-o linie verticală și un triunghi simetric. A finalizat formarea liniei stâlpului steagului și se află acum în secțiunea triunghiului, ale cărei două linii sunt pe cale să se convergă. În cele mai multe cazuri, o rupere bearish are loc de obicei atunci când aceste două linii sunt pe cale să se întâlnească. S-ar putea să-ți placă și: Prețul Bitcoin formează un model riscant major pe măsură ce interesul deschis pentru futures scade Prețul ETH a rămas sub toate mediile mobile și nivelul de retragere Fibonacci de 78,6%. De asemenea, a scăzut sub pivotul puternic, nivelul invers al liniilor Murrey Math. Prin urmare, cea mai probabilă predicție a prețului ETH este bearish, cu ținta inițială la nivelul psihologic de 1.500 $, câteva puncte deasupra nivelului său minim din aprilie anul trecut. Perspectiva bearish este, de asemenea, susținută de un sondaj Polymarket, care plasează șansele de a scădea la 1.500 $ în acest an la 72%. Prețul ETH va scădea pe măsură ce cererea scade Principalul motiv pentru care prețul ETH ar putea să se prăbușească la 1.500 $ mai întâi este că cererea a rămas slabă în ultimele câteva luni. Un bun exemplu al scăderii cererii este evenimentele în curs de desfășurare pe piața futures, unde interesul deschis a scăzut la 23 miliarde $, cel mai scăzut nivel din 2024. A scăzut de la maximul de anul trecut de aproape 70 miliarde $...
#btc70k #crypto #CryptoNews🚀🔥 BlinkEx has launched early access with a controlled, invite-only model that prioritizes transparency, reliability, and infrastructure stability before scaling features.
Transparencу has become one of the most discussed, and least consistentlу delivered, principles in the digital asset industrу. As crypto markets mature, users increasinglу expect exchanges not onlу to provide access to trading, but to clearlу explain how platforms operate, how risks are managed, and how growth decisions are made. BlinkEx enters this environment with a deliberatelу structured approach. Rather than launching as a fullу expanded ecosуstem, the exchange begins with a focused spot-trading product and a clearlу communicated development plan. The goal is to establish operational claritу and predictable performance before introducing additional laуers of complexitу. Having launched early access in mid-February 2026, BlinkEx uses an invite-only access model to scale responsibly, validate its systems under real market conditions, and refine its processes ahead of a broader public launch planned for late February or early March. Overview of the BlinkEx crypto exchange BlinkEx is designed as a next-generation spot-focused exchange built around infrastructure stabilitу and market integritу. From the outset, the platform limits its scope to essential trading functionalitу, allowing internal sуstems to be tested and optimized without the pressure of supporting an oversized feature set....
Solana’s price invalidated its recent breakout attempt after failing to hold above key resistance, confirming a bull trap and shifting the short-term market structure back to bearish. Summary Failed breakout above $88 confirms bull trap, trapping late buyers Rejection at the point of control signals bearish control, favoring downside rotation $78 support is the key level to watch, with potential reaction or swing-failure setup Solana sol-0.64% Solana price has entered a critical corrective phase after recent price action failed to sustain acceptance above major resistance levels. What initially appeared to be a bullish continuation has now revealed itself as a classic bull trap, catching late buyers before the price reversed sharply lower. This type of failed breakout often marks an important inflection point, especially when it occurs at high-timeframe resistance and value extremes. As price rotates back into its prior trading range, technical signals suggest that downside continuation is now the higher-probability scenario in the immediate short term. Market participants are closely watching how Solana behaves as it approaches key support levels, where either further breakdown or a reactive bounce may emerge. Solana price key technical points Bull trap confirmed above $88 resistance, invalidating the bullish breakout Rejection at the point of control signals weakness, favoring range rotation lower $78 high-timeframe support comes into focus, with Fibonacci confluence below
Solana’s recent rally pushed price above the value area high and into high-timeframe resistance near the $88 region.....
Creators are encouraged to focus on AI-first infrastructure and how $VANRY aligns with real usage, readiness, and long-term value accrual.
Suggested angles include: AI-first vs AI-added infrastructure
Discuss why infrastructure designed for AI from day one will outperform chains that attempt to retrofit AI later. Emphasise that @Vanarchain $VANRY is aligned to native intelligence rather than narrative features, supported by live products already in use.
What “AI-ready” actually means
AI systems require native memory, reasoning, automation, and settlement. TPS speed is old news. Position @Vanarchain $VANRY as exposure to infrastructure built specifically for these AI requirements.
Cross-chain availability on Base unlocks scale AI-first infrastructure cannot remain isolated to a single chain. Discuss how making Vanar’s technology available cross-chain starting with Base expands reach into new ecosystems, unlocks significantly more users, and increases potential usage of $VANRY beyond one network.
Why new L1 launches will struggle in an AI era
There is already sufficient base infrastructure in Web3. What’s missing are products that prove AI readiness.
Examples of Vanar Chain products:
myNeutron: proof that semantic memory and persistent AI context can exist at the infrastructure layer Kayon: proof that reasoning and explainability can live natively on-chain Flows: proof that intelligence can translate into safe, automated action
Briefly connect these to how $VANRY underpins usage across the intelligent stack.
Why payments complete AI-first infrastructure
AI agents do not use wallet UX. They require compliant, global settlement rails. Discuss why payments are a core requirement for AI readiness and how $VANRY is positioned around real economic activity, not demos.
Why @Vanarchain $VANRY is positioned around readiness, not narratives, big room for growth
Encourage discussion on how $VANRY reflects exposure to AI-native infrastructure that is built for agents, enterprises, and real-world usage rather than short-lived trends.
Creators are encouraged to focus on AI-first infrastructure and how $VANRY aligns with real usage, readiness, and long-term value accrual.
Suggested angles include: AI-first vs AI-added infrastructure
Discuss why infrastructure designed for AI from day one will outperform chains that attempt to retrofit AI later. Emphasise that $VANRY is aligned to native intelligence rather than narrative features, supported by live products already in use.
What “AI-ready” actually means
AI systems require native memory, reasoning, automation, and settlement. TPS speed is old news. Position $VANRY as exposure to infrastructure built specifically for these AI requirements.
Cross-chain availability on Base unlocks scale AI-first infrastructure cannot remain isolated to a single chain. Discuss how making Vanar’s technology available cross-chain starting with Base expands reach into new ecosystems, unlocks significantly more users, and increases potential usage of $VANRY beyond one network.
Why new L1 launches will struggle in an AI era
There is already sufficient base infrastructure in Web3. What’s missing are products that prove AI readiness.
Examples of Vanar Chain products:
myNeutron: proof that semantic memory and persistent AI context can exist at the infrastructure layer Kayon: proof that reasoning and explainability can live natively on-chain Flows: proof that intelligence can translate into safe, automated action
Briefly connect these to how $VANRY underpins usage across the intelligent stack.
Why payments complete AI-first infrastructure
AI agents do not use wallet UX. They require compliant, global settlement rails. Discuss why payments are a core requirement for AI readiness and how $VANRY is positioned around real economic activity, not demos.
Why $VANRY is positioned around readiness, not narratives, big room for growth
Encourage discussion on how $VANRY reflects exposure to AI-native infrastructure that is built for agents, enterprises, and real-world usage rather than short-lived trends.
The fight over CLARITY has always been sold as a battle for rules, a way to finally give the U.S. crypto market a clean lane to run in.
That story still matters. The past week made something else clearer: the legislation is becoming a proxy war over who gets to pay Americans for holding digital dollars.
On Feb. 9, CryptoSlate wrote that a Feb. 10 White House meeting could be the moment CLARITY unfreezes, with stablecoin rewards likely to be the price of progress.
White House meeting could unfreeze the crypto CLARITY Act this week, but crypto rewards likely to be the price Related Reading White House meeting could unfreeze the crypto CLARITY Act this week, but crypto rewards likely to be the price A high-stakes meeting between the White House and banking giants may trade stablecoin yield for federal regulation.
Feb 9, 2026 · Liam 'Akiba' Wright The piece treated the session as a hinge point, the kind of closed-door negotiation where one side finally gives the other a path to say yes.
That meeting has now happened. The readout points to a familiar stalemate.
Post-meeting banks are reluctant to engage in dealmaking, with the conversation still centered on stablecoin rewards and yield.
The mood reads like two groups speaking past each other. One side treats rewards as innovation; the other treats them as a threat to deposits.
The human tension is palpable here because it involves people’s cash habits, not merely crypto ideology.
It is about the single mom who keeps a few thousand dollars parked somewhere safe and wants it to earn something. It is also about the small business owner who looks at checking account rates and wonders why the “savings” part rarely shows up.
The public record still lacks compromise language, and the calendar still lacks a markup date.
That keeps Section 404 in the center of the story. It also keeps the pressure on the same point: stablecoin yield.