😱 $55K marks Bitcoin’s realized price, historically tied to bear market bottoms. Past cycles saw #BTC trade 24,30% below this level before stabilizing. Today, price is still 18% above. When #BTC reaches this area, it usually moves sideways before recovering. #crypto
🟠 Bitcoin: $68,964 ▼1.6% 🔵 Ethereum: $2,016 ▼4.2% • ETH continuă să performeze slab pe măsură ce levierul se desfășoară 🔻 Altcoins sub presiune • Solana: ▼4.3% • Polkadot: ▼3.9% • Avalanche: ▼3.1% • Cardano / Ripple / Polygon: ▼2–3% 🧠 Ce se întâmplă • Deleveraging pe scară largă • Pierderile săptămânale se adâncesc pe întreaga linie • Alts sângerează mai repede decât BTC = semnal clasic de stres
⚠️ Concluzie Până când Bitcoin se stabilizează, riscul de scădere al altcoin-urilor rămâne ridicat. Aceasta este o poziționare + lichiditate, nu o poveste despre un singur token.#BTC #Ethereum #solana #Polkadot #AvalancheAVAX
Cred că $NEO poate, în mod realist, să scadă sub $2. Abia există vreo adevărată inerție sau progres, iar piața este slabă. Capitalizările mari sunt în declin, iar altcoinii sunt de obicei cei mai afectați, așa că $NEO ar putea să cadă puternic.
Nu văd o recuperare puternică. 🚨 #Neo #Crypto #web3
#BTC Market Update: Fear index at extreme 9/100, while $BTC hits $69.6k. Historically, this level of fear can signal a bottom. Smart money is accumulating. 🐺📈 #Bitcoin #Crypto #Macro
#BNB a atins un nou prag, având un câștig de +13,764% din toate timpurile. Ceea ce a început ca un simplu token de schimb s-a transformat încet într-unul dintre cele mai mari active cripto de pe piață. Dacă cineva ar fi investit 1.000 $ la început, acea poziție ar valora astăzi bine peste 130.000 $. #bnb
#BTC UE: Reglementarea piețelor de active cripto (MiCA) este acum pe deplin aplicată în toate statele membre. Conformitatea pentru emitentii de stablecoin și furnizorii de servicii este obligatorie, asigurând standarde de piață uniforme și protecții sporite pentru consumatori în întreaga Uniune Europeană. #BTC
#BTC US Treasury Bond Real Performance ( $IEF Total Return / CPI) vs. BTC Market Cap
NASDAQ:IEF/FRED:CPIAUCSL vs. CRYPTOCAP:BTC
from August 2017
(I have always considered early 2018 to be when the *pace* of crypto adoption peaked, making it a good starting point for analyses like this.)
SoV assets like BTC and Gold thrive when real yields go down, pushing capital that would otherwise be invested in bonds further out on the risk curve.
US Treasury Bond real performance and real yields have consolidated and effectively remained flat since late 2022 (right around when BTC bottomed last cycle). Despite this and the fact that real T-bond performance is down considerably since 2017, BTC made a new ATH during each of its subsequent cycles. This is adoption.
Thanks to Will for the chart inspiration (see qrt). It represents a very insightful high timeframe picture for BTC. He's correct - most of the BTC gains since late 2022 should be attributed to the massive expansion of tradfi access to crypto that was facilitated via the ETFs and DATs.
Then, unfortunately, BTC OG's observed these tradfi inflows climaxing in 2024 and 2025 and have since been exiting. They absolutely nailed the timing b/c ETF inflows have stalled out and DAT mNAVs have collapsed as of late.
This sucks for anyone already fully invested, but it raises the average cost basis among all BTC holders and thus, in theory, raises the price ceiling for when the next wave of demand arrives.
This analysis shows that some of the biggest drivers of demand are either falling interest rates or rising inflation. This is what you want to focus on anticipating.
That being said, the "adoption trade" is likely far from being over. Tradfi institutions take months, years, and even decades to onboard an entirely new and high-risk asset class like crypto. The BTC ETFs went live just two years ago and have been a huge success, holding onto most of their AUM (in coins). There will be much more demand to come. #BTC
#BTC The total crypto market capitalization fell 1.05% to $2.44 trillion. Bitcoin experienced a 24-hour decline of 2.17%, trading at $69,600, while Ethereum fell 2.64% to $2,060.
🚨 The White House is holding a closed door meeting tomorrow to decide the future of the U.S. crypto market structure bill.
The White House wants both sides to reach compromise language by the end of Feb 2026, with stablecoin yield being the main issue blocking the bill.
The House already passed the CLARITY Act on July 17, 2025. Since then, the bill has been stuck because the Senate cannot agree on one question:
Should stablecoin holders be allowed to earn yield?
THE CORE FIGHT IS STABLECOIN YIELD
Banks see yield bearing stablecoins as a direct threat to deposits. Bank trade groups warned that up to $6.6 trillion in community bank deposits could be at risk if the yield loophole stays open.
Their logic is simple: Bank accounts pay very low interest. Crypto platforms can offer 3% or more. So money could move out of banks.
Crypto firms see a yield ban very differently. They say banning yield protects banks and hurts competition. For companies like Coinbase, stablecoins are a major business line.
They made $355M in stablecoin revenue in Q3 2025 alone, and the yearly run rate is heading above $1B. That’s why Brian Armstrong pulled support when the Senate draft tried to tighten yield rules.
The GENIUS Act already banned stablecoin issuers from paying interest. But the real fight now is this: Can exchanges and platforms still share reserve income through rewards and incentives?
Banking groups flagged this loophole back in Aug 2025, and it has now become the single biggest blocker for the full market structure bill.
Here’s where things stand legislatively:
The House passed CLARITY in July 2025.
Senate Banking released its amendment in Jan 2026, but the process stalled after yield language changed and Coinbase pushed back.
Senate Agriculture moved its version forward on Jan 29, 2026 but only along party lines.
So the Senate still does not have one unified bill. Why is the White House stepping in?
Because the Senate is divided and the bill is stuck. So the White House is trying to force a compromise by focusing only on the yield issue, locking final wording, and moving the process forward before election politics take over the calendar.
Without a yield deal, nothing moves. No committee markup. No Senate progress.
Even if it passes committee, it still needs enough votes on the Senate floor and 60 votes if debate gets blocked..The House bill is broader than the Senate versions.
So even if the Senate passes something, both chambers still need to merge texts, most likely through a conference negotiation.
Signing the bill is the easy step. Agreeing on one final version is the hard part.
This is why Feb 10 is not a routine meeting.
The White House is trying to force a deal on the single issue blocking U.S. crypto regulation.
If compromise language is ready by end February, the bill can move forward. If not, delays continue and the market remains stuck in policy uncertainty.