MrChoto

Fogo continues to show strong performance and stability.
Here’s a simple breakdown of today’s key numbers and what they mean.

Source: FogoScan & Chainspect
► Speed & Performance
•TPS (24H): 613.4 tx/s
•TPS (1H): 792.1 tx/s
•Max TPS: 99,825 tx/s
Fogo can handle a very high number of transactions every second.
Even in the last 24 hours, the network stayed strong above 600 TPS.
The higher the TPS, the more activity the network can support without slowing down.
► Transactions
•All-time transactions: 8,255,989,398
•Fogo Transaction Volume: 2,851,478
•Success Rate: 97.45%
Over 8.2 billion transactions have already been processed on Fogo, that shows long-term usage and stability.
A 97.45% success rate means almost all transactions go through smoothly.
► Network Health
•Blocks Created: 2,158,963
•Block Time: 0.04s
•Finality: 1.3s
•Validators: 7 active validators
0.04s block time means blocks are created extremely fast.
1.3s finality means transactions become fully confirmed in just over a second.
Validators help secure the network and keep everything running smoothly.
► Fees
•Total Network Fees (24H): 642.69 FOGO
Network fees remain relatively low compared to the amount of activity happening.
This is good for users and builders because it keeps transactions affordable.
► Closing Thought:
Fogo is showing consistent speed, fast confirmations, and stable network performance.
High throughput, low block time, and quick finality all signs of a network designed to scale and grow. @Fogo Official #fogo $FOGO

Most AI x blockchain projects look impressive in demos.
Very few survive real usage.
The reason is rarely the model.
It is almost always the infrastructure.
Most systems today treat AI as an external service.
Inference happens off-chain.
Context lives in databases.
The blockchain is only used to trigger actions or settle outcomes.
This works as long as humans are still supervising the system.
Once you remove the human from the loop, things start to break.
State becomes fragmented across services.
Agents lose context between executions.
Decisions cannot be fully explained or audited.
Automation runs faster, but not safer.
I used to believe this could be fixed at the application layer.
After seeing how these systems behave under load, I no longer think so.
Autonomous systems fail at their weakest boundary.
And in most AI x blockchain stacks, that boundary is between off-chain intelligence and on-chain execution.
This is why infrastructure design matters more than integrations.
Some teams are starting to design for this reality.
Instead of bolting AI on top of existing chains, they are embedding memory, reasoning, and automation primitives directly into the infrastructure.
Vanar is one of the few examples I have seen that approaches AI from this angle.
Not as a narrative.
As a system.
Memory is treated as a first-class primitive, not an application concern.
Reasoning and explainability are native, not optional.
Automation is designed with constraints, not blind execution.
This does not guarantee success.
But it does address the actual failure modes I see in most AI demos.
In an AI-driven economy, infrastructure will be judged less by how fast it is, and more by how well it holds up when no one is watching.
That is the bar most systems have not reached yet. @Vanarchain #vanar $VANRY

Iată o privire asupra Episodului 2, unde Robert a împărtășit o analiză onestă a Hyperliquid și cum FOGO se poziționează alături de acesta.
Aceasta nu a fost o critică. A fost vorba despre înțelegerea a ceea ce funcționează și cum FOGO poate construi și mai puternic.

Episodul 2 din The Hyperliquid moat(s).
► Studiind liderul:
Robert a explicat că Hyperliquid a făcut multe lucruri corecte.
FOGO studiază activ acel manual nu pentru a copia orbeste, ci pentru a îmbunătăți acolo unde este posibil.
► Tehnologie și execuție:
Infrastructura Hyperliquid este puternică și optimizată.

Majoritatea inițiativelor crypto concurează pentru atenție. Fiabilitatea este o competiție pentru plasma.
A face ca stablecoins să funcționeze ca bani reali la scară reală este obiectivul specific, dar puternic al Plasma Network, în contrast cu multe blockchain-uri care se străduiesc pentru noutate. Acest blockchain de Nivel 1 a fost creat în special pentru operațiuni financiare, plăți și soluționări atunci când consistența este mai importantă decât experimentarea.

#Plasma nu vrea să fie toate lucrurile pentru toți oamenii. Își propune să fie de încredere.
Prin design, un stablecoin blockchain de primă

The majority of cryptocurrency tokens are made to stand out.
Vanar's emotions are meant to be utilized.
In 2026, that distinction is more important than ever.

Vanar Chain is not trying to win the narrative wars of Web3. It is quietly establishing itself in genuine, enduring digital environments—games, entertainment platforms, creator economics, subscriptions, and identity-adjacent workflows—where things must continue to function long after the tweet cycle has passed. This is where narratives inevitably fade.
$VANRY won't be worth much if @Vanarchain is successful since people will be "holding it."
Because people are using it to operate, it will be valued.
Although modest, such change is fundamental.
Instead than pumping first, infrastructure tokens settle first.
Attention spikes are the lifeblood of narrative tokens. Infrastructure coins benefit greatly from recurrence.
Fees are paid. Access is granted. The stakes remain locked. Update the systems. Users come back.
That's not glamorous at all, and that's just the purpose.
People overlook the design goal of VANRY when they anticipate it to act like a hype-driven asset. Micro-transactions, creator payouts, controlled access, persistent world state, and automated workflows that don't seem at all like "crypto" are some of the environments Vanar is designing for—environments where thousands of monotonous, little acts add up to habit.
Adoption of that nature doesn't happen overnight.
It shows up as normal.
When the World Shifts and No One Is Alarmed: The Quiet Bull Case
Not when anything breaks, but when something changes and no one responds, is one of the most illuminating moments in any shared digital world.
Updates don't stop reality in live situations like Virtua. The state advances, finality lands, and users catch up at their own pace. You're not looking at a demo when that occurs without mayhem. You're witnessing infrastructure in action.
Vanar feels different at that point.
Raw speed and headline TPS are not its main priorities. Predictable settlement, a cohesive shared state, and systems that don't split into parallel worlds under increasing load are all examples of its consistency under crowd strain. This dependability is the actual product in consumer-grade digital environments.
Context, Memory, and Vanar's Distinct Way of Thinking
The majority of Web3 apps act as though this is the first interaction. The context is reset. Pieces of memory. People adjust—until they don't.
A different future is hinted at by Vanar's architecture, which includes reasoning layers, persistent memory layers, and workflows that remember the system's past rather than just its current state. "AI hype" is not what this is. It's an effort to address context loss, one of the most challenging issues in digital experience design.
Users lose faith in platforms when they forget who they are.
And in permanent situations, trust is the only currency that counts.
Where Vanry Becomes a Lever and Quits Being a Narrative
In all honesty, Vanry is not positioned as the focal point of marketing. With fees, staking, governance, access, and incentives directly linked to usage rather than speculation, it serves as an economic coordinating layer.
It's telling how restrained they are.
Early underselling and silent compounding are common characteristics of projects that persist. A distinct type of participant is drawn to Vanar because of its cadence, which includes gradual announcements, little token hoopla, and obvious development. less responsive. more motivated by conviction. That eventually alters the behavior of volatility and the persistence of negative narratives.
Last Remark
Being the loudest Layer 1 doesn't seem to be #vanar 's goal.
It appears to want to be trustworthy enough to support actual digital life.
Vanry won't require care to defend itself if shared reality—worlds that endure, remember, and adapt—becomes the end result. It will have to be priced.
Additionally, need always triumphs over narrative in crypto. $VANRY

Majoritatea blockchains sunt construite în jurul token-urilor native și ulterior modificate pentru a acomoda stablecoins. Plasma schimbă complet acest model. O consideră pe stablecoins ca fiind componenta economică fundamentală pe care se bazează rețeaua, mai degrabă decât ca un supliment. Totul este schimbat de această decizie de design, inclusiv taxele, execuția și lichiditatea între lanțuri.

1. Problema adevărată pe care Plasma o rezolvă
Trilioane de dolari sunt reglate în fiecare an folosind stablecoins. Acesta este salariul, remiterile, mișcările de trezorerie, arbitrajul și comerțul real, nu capitalul speculativ. Cu toate acestea, majoritatea Layer 1-urilor necesită în continuare ca utilizatorii de stablecoin să se confrunte cu taxe eronate, întârzieri cauzate de congestie și token-uri de gaz volatile.

Welcome, friend! As we continue to dissect the current state of AI on the blockchain, allow me to pose this thought-provoking query: why is Web3's foundational architecture now enough but there aren't many products that exhibit AI readiness?
Uncertain of the response? Uncertain about how #vanar bridges this gap? Then let's get started! Let's start by remembering that we discussed yesterday why new L1s without validated AI layers are doomed. Here is a link to that post in case you missed it; I suggest reading it because it relates to today's topic.
Today, we'll discuss why the products—rather than the "technical specifications"—will decide the outcome in 2026.
Everything required for execution is currently included in Web3:
Ethereum + L2 (Base, Arbitrum, Optimism): affordable, dependable, and quick
Solana: incredibly quick throughput
Parallel execution of Avalanche, Sui, and Aptos
Polkadot and Cosmos: cross-chain bridges
This is not 2021, when the mere fact that a new L1 is "faster and cheaper" could garner notice. The execution procedure is now, if I may say so, a widely used product. Businesses and agents don't move for only two or three TPS more. They move where the infrastructure enables AI agents to function effectively, painlessly, and at scale—where there is true value.
What do most people lack? verified, operational products that show AI readiness in action. Most 'AI-blockchain' initiatives end there:
vector database 'on top'
Data oracles
ML-logic smart contracts
Infrastructure is not what this is. These are overlays. They are costly, non-persistent, shatter easily, and are inexplicable. They are unreliable for important duties for agents.Vanarchain is moving in a new direction. They are creating an Intelligence Stack from scratch rather than executing L1 again, and they have already produced functional products that demonstrate their preparedness:
myNeutron: more than just vectors: native memory for agents, permanent on-chain context, semantic seeds, and inexpensive updates
Kayon: a fully traceable reasoning engine that explains each step, audits the decision, and fosters corporate-level trust
Flows: automation layer: from idea to validated action, risk-free, atomic, and secure
These products are already deployed and operational. They are utilized in brand solutions, metaverses (Virtua), and video games (VGN). Agents can arrive and start using the entire cycle right away:
Recall -> rationalize -> act -> resolve
and pay $VANRY for it at each step.
As you remember, I really love metaphors. For today's metaphor, consider Web3 as a vast harbor with numerous docks (execution L1/L2). However, very few docks are outfitted with intelligent cargo robots. The first dock to have cranes with artificial intelligence (AI) hands, brains, and memory is #Vanar. Cargo agents are traveling there for that reason.
My perception of Vanar in relation to other L1s 🤬 In addition, I still find it annoying when teams launch "AI L1" and simply post demonstrations on YouTube. Vanar shows genuine utility. Exactly from these items, not from hype, but from each and every byte of memory, thought process, and automated action, $V$VANRY ilds value.
Could I persuade you, buddy? Next, we will go into the subject of myNeutron and discuss how native semantic memory on L1 transforms AI agents.
"🤔" The mystery of the future: why on-chain persistence will never be replaced by an off-chain database?
Curious? Follow me on \ These are the facts, no nonsense. The core of @Vanarchain Vanar's intelligence will be examined tomorrow. $VANRY