Profilul lui b chain | Binance Square

·

--

Vedeți traducerea

EPSTEIN MENACE TO CRYPTOThe "menace" of the Jeffrey Epstein files to the cryptocurrency industry has moved from internet rumors to documented legal disclosures. In early February 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice released millions of pages of records that detailed Epstein’s attempts to embed himself in the early crypto ecosystem. The core of the "menace" is not just the names involved, but the revelation that a convicted sex offender helped bankroll and influence the foundational infrastructure of the digital asset world. 1. Direct Financial Ties to Giants The files reveal that Epstein was an early, albeit often hidden, investor in some of the industry’s biggest players: Coinbase: Epstein invested $3 million in Coinbase in 2014 (six years after his initial conviction). While he later sold half his stake to Blockchain Capital for $15 million in 2018, the connection has sparked significant PR and regulatory backlash for the exchange. Blockstream: He provided early funding to Blockstream, a major Bitcoin technology firm. This has led to internal industry strife, including calls for the resignation of high-level executives like CEO Adam Back. MIT Digital Currency Initiative: Epstein used "gift funds" to help underwrite the launch of this MIT lab, which became a primary home for Bitcoin Core developers. Critics argue this was an attempt to gain "soft power" over the very code that governs Bitcoin. 2. The "Blackmail Economy" & Crypto Analysts have identified a deeper threat within the 2026 documents regarding the "Blackmail Economy." Parallel Power Systems: The files suggest Epstein viewed cryptocurrency not just as an investment, but as a tool to bypass national sovereignty and establish "borderless, unaccountable private diplomacies." Systemic Leverage: There are concerns that some of the crypto world's "networked tech elites" were part of the same social circles where compromising material was used as leverage. This creates a "trust deficit" for an industry that markets itself on transparency and decentralization. 3. Market and Regulatory Impact The release has coincided with a period of extreme volatility: Price Drop: Bitcoin fell to roughly $63,000 in February 2026, a sharp decline from its 2025 peak of $126,000. While broad market factors played a role, the "Epstein association" has exacerbated investor jitters. Regulatory Scrutiny: Lawmakers are using these ties to argue for stricter "Know Your Customer" (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) laws, pointing to the fact that Epstein’s money moved through these systems even after his 2008 conviction. Summary Note: While industry defenders like Charlotte Fang (Remilia) argue that only "financially unsophisticated" people care about early-stage passive investments, the DOJ files prove Epstein was actively trying to steer the development of the $1.5 trillion blockchain.

EPSTEIN MENACE TO CRYPTO

The "menace" of the Jeffrey Epstein files to the cryptocurrency industry has moved from internet rumors to documented legal disclosures. In early February 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice released millions of pages of records that detailed Epstein’s attempts to embed himself in the early crypto ecosystem.
The core of the "menace" is not just the names involved, but the revelation that a convicted sex offender helped bankroll and influence the foundational infrastructure of the digital asset world.
1. Direct Financial Ties to Giants
The files reveal that Epstein was an early, albeit often hidden, investor in some of the industry’s biggest players:
Coinbase: Epstein invested $3 million in Coinbase in 2014 (six years after his initial conviction). While he later sold half his stake to Blockchain Capital for $15 million in 2018, the connection has sparked significant PR and regulatory backlash for the exchange.
Blockstream: He provided early funding to Blockstream, a major Bitcoin technology firm. This has led to internal industry strife, including calls for the resignation of high-level executives like CEO Adam Back.
MIT Digital Currency Initiative: Epstein used "gift funds" to help underwrite the launch of this MIT lab, which became a primary home for Bitcoin Core developers. Critics argue this was an attempt to gain "soft power" over the very code that governs Bitcoin.
2. The "Blackmail Economy" & Crypto
Analysts have identified a deeper threat within the 2026 documents regarding the "Blackmail Economy."
Parallel Power Systems: The files suggest Epstein viewed cryptocurrency not just as an investment, but as a tool to bypass national sovereignty and establish "borderless, unaccountable private diplomacies."
Systemic Leverage: There are concerns that some of the crypto world's "networked tech elites" were part of the same social circles where compromising material was used as leverage. This creates a "trust deficit" for an industry that markets itself on transparency and decentralization.
3. Market and Regulatory Impact
The release has coincided with a period of extreme volatility:
Price Drop: Bitcoin fell to roughly $63,000 in February 2026, a sharp decline from its 2025 peak of $126,000. While broad market factors played a role, the "Epstein association" has exacerbated investor jitters.
Regulatory Scrutiny: Lawmakers are using these ties to argue for stricter "Know Your Customer" (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) laws, pointing to the fact that Epstein’s money moved through these systems even after his 2008 conviction.
Summary Note: While industry defenders like Charlotte Fang (Remilia) argue that only "financially unsophisticated" people care about early-stage passive investments, the DOJ files prove Epstein was actively trying to steer the development of the $1.5 trillion blockchain.

b chain

EPSTEIN MENACE TO CRYPTO

CRONICILE SHIBA INU

CE S-A ÎNTÂMPLAT CU PIAȚA.

Subiecte în tendințe