Przez jakiś czas ludzie pracowali nad tym, aby technologia blockchain była szybsza, bardziej skalowalna i tańsza w użyciu. Teraz, gdy branża się rozwija, ludzie zaczynają bardziej dbać o coś innego - zachowanie informacji w tajemnicy. Systemy w rzeczywistym świecie muszą być w stanie weryfikować rzeczy, muszą również utrzymywać niektóre rzeczy w tajemnicy. Firmy, instytucje i osoby prywatne nie mogą działać prawidłowo, jeśli wszystko, co robią, jest na zawsze na widoku. Dlatego sieci takie jak Midnight, które koncentrują się na prywatności, zaczynają przyciągać uwagę. Przyszłość blockchaina może nie polegać tylko na przyspieszaniu łańcuchów, może chodzić o tworzenie systemów, które są mądrzejsze i chronią dane, jednocześnie będąc godnymi zaufania. @MidnightNetwork #NIGHT #night $NIGHT
Dlaczego blockchain potrzebuje infrastruktury prywatności, aby iść naprzód
Na początku ludzie mówili o blockchainie jako o sposobie stworzenia systemu, który nie potrzebuje centralnej władzy. Ten system pozwalałby ludziom ufać sobie nawzajem, bez potrzeby korzystania z banków czy instytucji, ponieważ mogliby sami zobaczyć kod i księgi. Wielu ludzi podekscytowało się tym pomysłem, ale teraz, gdy blockchain istnieje już od pewnego czasu, ludzie zaczynają myśleć, że sam decentralizacja to już za mało i następną wielką rzeczą jest uczynienie blockchaina łatwym w użyciu.
Niektóre systemy zawodzą z powodu decyzji. Podejmują wybór i na tym koniec. Inne systemy zawodzą, ponieważ potrzebują dużo czasu na podjęcie decyzji. W miejscach takich jak ROBO pod Fabric Foundation, gdzie wszystko musi działać, czekanie może wpłynąć na wiele zadań i spowolnić cały system. Dobry system, taki jak ten, nie tylko działa szybko. Wie również, jak radzić sobie z czekaniem, zanim stanie się to problemem i nic nie zostanie zrobione. To jest to, co robi silna infrastruktura, zarządza czasem oczekiwania, zanim system stanie w miejscu. @Fabric Foundation #ROBO #robo $ROBO
Sygnał będzie czekał na potwierdzenie. Kolejka będzie przechowywać akcje, aż będzie jasne, co jest najważniejsze. Nie każdy system zawodzi, ponieważ podejmuje decyzję, czasami systemy zawodzą, ponieważ zbyt długo czekają na podjęcie decyzji w środowiskach, w których wszystko działa razem, zadania często zależą od zadań i jeden proces zatrzyma się, aż inny proces zostanie zakończony. Kiedy wiele agentów pracuje razem, czekanie zaczyna powodować problemy. Na dużą skalę czekanie nie wydaje się być dużym problemem. Jedno opóźnienie zatrzyma inne zadanie.
Wielkie porażki nie zdarzają się często. Małe opóźnienia zdarzają się cały czas. W systemach takich jak ROBO w ramach Fabric Foundation prawdziwym problemem nie jest tylko sprawienie, by rzeczy działały, ani zatrzymywanie przerw, które mogą się sumować i powodować duże spowolnienia. Dobre systemy wykrywają opóźnienia. Autonomia nie zawodzi od razu. Najpierw zwalnia, co jest problemem w systemach takich jak ROBO. ROBO w ramach Fabric Foundation musi być monitorowane, aby zapobiegać małym przerwom, ponieważ te przerwy mogą szybko się sumować i powodować poważne problemy. Zdrowe systemy zawsze są czujne na opóźnienia. @Fabric Foundation #ROBO #robo $ROBO
Most systems fail because of mistakes. Complex systems usually slow down because of small delays. A task waits a seconds for confirmation from ROBO. Another process pauses because a dependency for ROBO hasn’t finished yet. A queue for ROBO grows longer than expected. Individually these delays with ROBO look harmless. When hundreds of agents are coordinating work with ROBO prevent small delays start stacking on top of each other with ROBO. What looked like a seconds with ROBO becomes minutes with ROBO. What looked like a pause with ROBO becomes a visible slowdown with ROBO. This is the hidden challenge for systems like ROBO within Fabric Foundation autonomy with ROBO is not about executing tasks with ROBO or it’s about keeping the flow of decisions smooth with ROBO when the system with ROBO becomes busy with ROBO. Healthy systems with ROBO detect delays early with ROBO. They rebalance queues for ROBO adjust priorities for prevent congestion before it spreads with ROBO. Unhealthy systems with ROBO react late to delays with ROBO. By the time someone notices the slowdown with ROBO the system already working harder just to maintain the pace with ROBO. Markets usually celebrate speed with ROBO. Long-term infrastructure focuses on something quieter preventing small delays with ROBO from turning into large problems with ROBO. Because autonomy with ROBO rarely collapses suddenly with ROBO. It usually slows down first with ROBO. @Fabric Foundation #ROBO $ROBO
Blockchain was made to be transparent. Real life systems also need to keep things private. Businesses and institutions and even people like you and me cannot work if every single thing we do is always visible to everyone. That is why we need things like Midnight that help keep our information private. The future of Web3 is not about making sure everything is open it is about making systems where we can verify things and still keep our privacy and that is what Web3 should be, about making sure verification and privacy can work together in Web3. @MidnightNetwork #NIGHT #night $NIGHT
Why Privacy Could Become the Most Valuable Layer in Web3
The early years of blockchain were driven by an idea transparency this idea was really important because it allowed people to see everything that was happening in the system for the time people could use a financial system where every transaction could be checked by anyone. Anyone could look at the ledger make sure the rules were being followed or this made people trust the system without needing an authority. As time went on something interesting started to happen the same thing that made blockchain so good which is transparency also started to show its limitations in public networks people can see all the transactions or they may not know who is making the transactions away but they can figure it out by looking at patterns. For people who just use blockchain sometimes this may not be a deal for businesses and big organizations it can be a serious problem companies do not want others to know what they are doing financially or institutions cannot let people see transaction data even individuals may feel uncomfortable knowing that everything they do financially can be seen by others. This creates a problem for blockchain technology. The system needs to be transparent so people can trust it when people use it in the real world they often need privacy this is starting to change how blockchain is developed of choosing between being completely transparent or completely private some networks are trying to find a way to do both and the goal is to let the network check transactions and make sure the rules are being followed while also keeping information private. In words the blockchain can still make sure everything is valid but it does not need to show all the details. This way of thinking is starting to influence how new blockchain infrastructure is being built. Projects like Midnight Network are exploring ways to keep the integrity of decentralized systems while also protecting peoples privacy. This is really important as blockchain technology becomes more mainstream. If decentralized networks are going to support financial systems they will need to handle sensitive data responsibly. The world is not a public place and digital systems cannot ignore that. Privacy does not make trust weaker. In cases it actually makes trust possible. People are more willing to use systems where their information is protected and their activity is not unnecessarily exposed. This may be one of the important lessons shaping the next generation of blockchain infrastructure. The future of Web3 will likely not be defined by transparency. It will be defined by systems that can combine verification decentralization and privacy in ways that make decentralized technology usable for the world. That is why the direction projects like Midnight are exploring feels worth watching as the ecosystem continues to evolve. Projects like Midnight Network are trying to find a balance between transparency and privacy This balance is necessary for blockchain technology to be used in the world Privacy is not the opposite of transparency rather a necessary part of building trust in decentralized systems. The future of Web3 will depend on finding a way to combine verification, decentralization and privacy. Blockchain technology needs to be able to handle data responsibly in order to be widely adopted. This is why the direction projects like Midnight are exploring is so important. It is not about transparency but about finding a way to make decentralized technology work in the real world. Web3 needs to be able to protect peoples privacy in order to be successful. This is why privacy could become the valuable layer in Web3. @MidnightNetwork #NIGHT #night $NIGHT
Speed is what a lot of people think is the important thing in autonomous systems they want things to happen fast.
They want execution.
Faster responses.
Faster decisions.
When things get complicated being fast is not enough sometimes the smartest thing to do is to wait or this is not something people talk about a lot it is really important for how systems work together and agents are always getting information. New tasks, changes, in what is important and things that are changing.
If they act away every time it can make the system unstable.
If they wait a bit they can get a better idea of what is going on.
That is where system patience comes in.
When we think about ROBO and Fabric Foundation the interesting thing is not just how fast agents can respond it is whether they know when to wait or good autonomous systems know when they do not have all the information of acting right away they wait a little bit to see if they get any more information and this helps them figure out what to do.
If they do not wait they can make a lot of changes.
Tasks get Then stopped.
Resources get moved around a lot.
People have to step in to make things stable.
The system is doing things. It is not doing them well.
Autonomous systems need to find a balance.
If they act slowly things do not get done.
If they act quickly they might have to fix things later.
Good systems learn how to find this balance over time.
They act fast when they are sure what to do they wait when they are not.
A lot of people think speed is the important thing.
The systems that last are the ones that understand that sometimes it is better to wait.
Sometimes the intelligent thing to do is to wait a little bit longer.
ROBO systems are an example of this.
They show us that system patience is really valuable.
Od pewnego czasu ludzie myślą, że jedną z najlepszych rzeczy w blockchainie jest to, że jest on przejrzysty. Każdy może sprawdzić transakcje w blockchainie. Każdy może spojrzeć na księgę, aby zobaczyć, co się dzieje. Każdy może odkryć, jak działa cały system. Im więcej o tym myślę, tym bardziej zdaję sobie sprawę, że coś jest nie tak. Nie zawsze jest dobrym pomysłem mieć całkowitą przejrzystość w realnym świecie, ponieważ firmy muszą być w stanie zachować pewne rzeczy w tajemnicy przed swoimi konkurentami, na przykład swoje plany; jeśli każdy może zobaczyć, co robią, będzie im trudno działać. Instytucje również muszą być w stanie utrzymać informacje w prywatności, nawet zwykli ludzie mogą czuć się dziwnie, jeśli wiedzą, że inni mogą zobaczyć, co kupują i sprzedają. Dlatego ludzie zaczynają rozmawiać o systemach blockchainowych, takich jak Midnight Network, które koncentrują się na prywatności; może przyszłość blockchaina nie polega na wyborze między przejrzystością a prywatnością, może chodzi o znalezienie sposobu na zrównoważenie blockchaina i prywatności, aby blockchain i prywatność mogły współpracować razem. @MidnightNetwork #night $NIGHT
The early vision of blockchain was built around an idea.
Transparency creates trust. Of relying on centralized authorities blockchains allowed anyone to verify what was happening inside the blockchain system. Transactions on the blockchain could be checked by anyone and the rules of the blockchain network were visible to everyone. For people this openness of blockchain felt revolutionary. Over time a more complicated reality started to appear. Transparency of blockchain is powerful it can also create problems. In the financial world privacy exists for a reason. Businesses do not publish every transaction they make on blockchain. Individuals do not broadcast their activity on blockchain to the entire world. Institutions protect data because exposure on blockchain can create risks. Many public blockchains operate in a way where almost everything on blockchain becomes visible. Wallet addresses on blockchain may not immediately reveal identities. Patterns on blockchain can often tell a story. Over time transactions on blockchain can be analyzed connections on blockchain can be mapped and financial behavior on blockchain can become surprisingly easy to track. For early crypto adopters this level of openness on blockchain might have seemed acceptable. For mainstream users companies and institutions it creates a serious barrier to using blockchain. Most organizations cannot operate on blockchain infrastructure where sensitive activity becomes permanently visible on blockchain. Supply chains, business negotiations and financial strategies on blockchain all rely on a degree of confidentiality. Even individuals may hesitate to use blockchain systems where their financial behavior on blockchain can be analyzed by anyone with patience and technical skill. This is why the discussion around privacy in blockchain is becoming increasingly important. Projects like Midnight Network are exploring how blockchain systems can preserve verification while protecting information on blockchain. The goal of blockchain is not to remove trust from the blockchain system. In fact the goal of blockchain is the opposite to maintain trust. The challenge of blockchain is finding ways for networks to verify what needs to be verified on blockchain without revealing information than necessary on blockchain. That distinction may sound small it changes the design philosophy of blockchain infrastructure. Of assuming that everything on blockchain must be visible to everyone new approaches suggest that only the essential proofs on blockchain need to be shared publicly. The network on blockchain can still enforce rules. Maintain integrity on blockchain but it does not need to expose every underlying detail on blockchain. In ways this represents a shift in how we think about digital trust on blockchain. Trust on blockchain does not always require visibility on blockchain. Sometimes it only requires verification on blockchain. If blockchain technology is going to support real-world systems such as finance, healthcare, enterprise coordination and digital identity it will likely need to evolve beyond the idea that transparency on blockchain alone solves every problem on blockchain. The future may belong to systems that can combine verification security and privacy on blockchain in a balanced way. That is why the direction projects like Midnight are exploring feels particularly interesting right now. The challenge on blockchain is no longer building decentralized networks on blockchain. The real challenge on blockchain is building networks on blockchain that people businesses and institutions can realistically use on blockchain. That means designing systems on blockchain where transparency creates trust without turning privacy into a casualty on blockchain. @MidnightNetwork #NIGHT #night $NIGHT
They are also tested by how decisions they have to make at the same time.
When a lot of things are happening at once the autonomous systems have to figure out what is most important and they have to share resources and work together which can be very hard to do.
For systems like ROBO within Fabric Foundation the big problem is not just getting things done.
The big problem is being able to handle a lot of decisions being made all at the time without any help from people.
Because the autonomous systems do not fail just because they make one decision.
The autonomous systems fail when they have to make many decisions all at once and that is what really causes the problems, for the autonomous systems. @Fabric Foundation #ROBO #robo $ROBO
Most of the time when we talk about machines that can work on their own we focus on how smart they're we look at how they can do things and how accurately they can respond to things there is something else that is very important and people do not talk about it very much decision density.
Decision density is about how important decisions a system has to make in a very short time when things are quiet this is not a problem things happen slowly the machine can make decisions one after the other without any trouble.
When things start to happen more quickly decisions start to overlap many tasks want to use the resources at the same time what is important can change while the machine is still working on something.
The machine has to react to signals that are happening at the same time.
Suddenly the machine is not just doing tasks it is also managing a lot of decisions.
This is where many machines that can work on their start to have trouble.
They were made to do tasks not to make decisions at the same time.
When decision density increases several things start to happen:
Resource conflicts
Delayed scheduling
Competing priorities
People have to step in to help the machine make decisions
None of these problems are very serious.
They slow down the machines ability to work on its own.
That is why systems like ROBO within Fabric Foundation are interesting.
The challenge is not just making machines that can do things.
It is making sure the system can handle decisions at the same time without needing people to help.
Good systems can handle decisions well.
They prevent problems before they happen and make sure the machine is working within boundaries.
Bad systems look like they are working well until things get busy.
Then the machine has trouble with many decisions and people have to help.
People who buy and sell things often look at how fast and how much a system can do.
But how well a system that can work on its really works often comes down to something that is not easy to see:
How many decisions can the system handle without people helping.
Because when a machine can work on its own it does not stop working when one decision's wrong.
It stops working when many decisions happen at the same time.
ROBO and decision density are very important to think about.
ROBO has to be able to handle decision density to work well.
Decision density is a problem for machines that can work on their own.
Why Ecosystem Growth Could Define the Future of Midnight Network
I have learned something from watching the crypto industry for a years now technology is not enough to make a project successful. Many blockchain projects start with ideas good technology and big plans people get excited about these projects because they promise to solve problems. Every project gets to a point where people stop talking about what the technology can do and start talking about what people are actually using the network for. This is where things get really interesting. When a blockchain starts to attract developers apps and real people people start to see the project in a way it is not another idea in the crypto world it is part of a growing community or that is why I am interested in Midnight Network. People often talk about Midnight Network in terms of privacy and keeping data safe what could make a big difference in the long run is how the community around it grows. If developers start making apps that need data the network could become a place where people actually make new things that care about privacy. That is a big deal. Because in the blockchain world the networks that last are not always the ones with the ideas they are the ones where people want to stay and keep building. That is why the next few stages for Midnight Network could be really interesting. As more people start to look at the network and what it can do the big question will not be about what could happen and about how the community grows and if the technology gets used by real people in crypto that is often when you see what a project is really worth. What do you think is more important for a blockchain network to be successful in the run good technology or a strong community of developers and users? @MidnightNetwork #night #NIGHT $NIGHT
In the world of crypto what really makes a project strong is not the tech behind it but the whole ecosystem that forms around it. A lot of blockchain projects start out with claims but only a few actually manage to create a community of people who make things people who use them and real life uses for the project this is why I have been looking into Midnight Network lately or what I find interesting about it is not just that it is designed with privacy in mind but the possibility that a whole ecosystem could grow around it. If people start making apps that really need to keep data secure then Midnight Network could become something more than just another new blockchain. At the end of the day the tech is what gets things started. It is the people actually using it that will decide what happens next. @MidnightNetwork #NİGHT #night $NIGHT
Autonomy is not about how a system works when people are paying attention. It is really about what happens when no one's around if tasks keep getting done decisions keep being made and nothing needs to be fixed then the system is working as it should that is the idea behind ROBO in @Fabric Foundation Building a system that keeps working in the background strong systems do not need to be watched all the time. They just keep on running. #robo $ROBO
ROBO and the Night the System Didn’t Need Anyone
At 2:17 AM nobody was watching. No operator dashboards were open. No engineers were reviewing logs. No one was waiting for alerts. Yet the ROBO system was busy. Tasks were being scheduled by the ROBO system. Dependencies were resolving on their own in the ROBO system. Agents were negotiating priorities and allocating resources within the ROBO system. Hundreds of decisions were happening quietly in the background of the ROBO system. In systems moments like this were really risky. A delayed signal could stall a process in the systems. A conflict between tasks could require arbitration in the older systems. A small mistake could cascade through the network before anyone noticed what was happening in the systems. This time with the ROBO system nothing bad happened. No alerts were sent out. No escalations were needed. No human intervention was required for the ROBO system. The ROBO system simply continued operating on its own. That’s the moment when the infrastructure of the ROBO system proves itself. Not when engineers are actively monitoring the ROBO system. Not when dashboards are full of activity for the ROBO system. When nobody needs to be there to watch the ROBO system. This is the idea behind systems like ROBO within Fabric Foundation. Autonomy of the ROBO system isn’t about automation of tasks. Automation of the ROBO system executes tasks. Autonomy of the ROBO system carries responsibility when humans step away from the ROBO system. The real test of any coordinated system like the ROBO system is simple: Can the ROBO system operate correctly when no one is paying attention to it? Most platforms still depend on supervision by humans. Operators quietly watch dashboards for platforms. Engineers stay ready to intervene in platforms. The system looks autonomous human attention remains part of the architecture of most platforms. True autonomy of the ROBO system changes that equation. It reduces the need for observation of the ROBO system. It resolves conflicts before they escalate in the ROBO system. It keeps processes moving even when nobody's there to guide the ROBO system. The goal of the ROBO system isn’t to remove humans It’s to design systems like the ROBO system that don’t require human presence to remain reliable because the strongest infrastructure is not the one that works while people watch it. It’s the one that keeps working while everyone sleeps like the ROBO system. @Fabric Foundation #ROBO $ROBO
Bardzo cieszę się, że mogę być częścią kampanii Binance i każdego dnia uczę się nowych rzeczy! 🚀 Ale wiem, że wciąż jest wiele do nauczenia się o kampaniach, strategiach i jak wszystko działa w szczegółach.
Jeśli jakiś doświadczony twórca lub członek społeczności może mnie poprowadzić, podzielić się wskazówkami lub pomóc mi lepiej zrozumieć rzeczy, byłbym naprawdę wdzięczny. 🙌
Proszę, skomentuj poniżej lub podziel się swoimi radami. Twoje wskazówki mogą naprawdę pomóc mi poprawić się i rozwijać w tej podróży.
Systemy autonomiczne są oceniane na podstawie tego, co robią, ale rzeczywisty koszt często ukryty jest w tym, czego systemy autonomiczne nie robią. Systemy autonomiczne mają zadania, które są bezczynne, a systemy autonomiczne mają zależności, które nie są widoczne, i systemy autonomiczne mają opóźnienia, które są ciche. Te rzeczy cicho obciążają $ROBO pod @Fabric Foundation Dobre systemy autonomiczne przekształcają okresy, gdy są bezczynne, w czasy, kiedy mogą się uczyć i sprzątać. Systemy autonomiczne, które nie są zdrowe, po prostu pozwalają, by niewidoczne problemy narastały. To nie wystarczy, by systemy autonomiczne po prostu wykonywały zadania. Systemy autonomiczne muszą także zarządzać niewidocznym obciążeniem. Systemy autonomiczne potrzebują tego, aby być naprawdę autonomiczne. #ROBO #robo $ROBO