加密飞龙

Leeks, there's more gossip to eat!!! Bullish on BTC also becomes "market manipulation"? Shorts retreat completely, retail investors' assets frozen for seven years, no matter how much attention is given, it's futile. "I just bullish on Bitcoin, how does it become 'market manipulation'?" In February 2026, a verified video exposed by the Twitter account @OKX517BTC brought the long-silent "OKX liquidation case" to the hot search. User Yang Xiuchun's 517 BTC (worth over 20 million USD at current market price) was frozen for seven years, and over 50,000 BTC long contracts were violently liquidated, with countless rights protection emails sinking into the sea, while the platform only used "rules" as a fig leaf, without even a proper explanation. Ironically, He Yi paid attention to this matter but still did not wait for a single positive response from OKX. Event Overview: A harvesting drama of "agreed to reduce positions, but turned around and liquidated". The essence of this matter is that OKX treated "risk control" as a sickle and retail investors as leeks to be cut. The complete process of this event is as follows: In 2018, BTC rose to 8,000 USD, Yang Xiuchun opened a 20x long position, OKX required a reduction in position, she agreed, but the platform directly froze the account and liquidated the contract. After that, 517 BTC was frozen for seven years, and Yang Xiuchun's rights protection emails sank into the sea, while the platform shifted the blame to "market manipulation". OKX's response announcement: The most disgusting part is saying Yang Xiuchun's "single account manual increase" is "market manipulation". Meanwhile, the shorts holding 22,000 BTC during the same period were able to profitably exit. Is the standard for "manipulation" based on "long or short direction"? Is it about "can you give the platform money"? Retail investors' single accounts are "malicious control", while large funds' shorts are considered "normal trading"? OKX's selective enforcement is clearly written on their face as "bullying the weak and fearing the strong". 517 BTC frozen for seven years, rights protection is just brushing off rules, if exposed, they play dead. OKX's operation is ancestral: In 2021, a failure caused users to be liquidated; in 2025, liquidity issues severely harmed market makers. It’s always "rules shifting blame + playing dead PR". OKX's "platform has rights" translates to retail investors having "no rights". I say you're violating the rules, you're violating them; I say freezing coins, then freezing them; rules are traps laid for harvesting. He Yi’s attention is just a hot search label. Retail investors should see clearly: this kind of platform where "rules are greater than users" never intended to be fair from the beginning. Finally, I want to ask everyone: If you were Yang Xiuchun, unable to recover over 20 million USD in assets after seven years, how would you endure it? Have you encountered platforms using "rules" to shift blame? Share your experiences in the comments~ #美国零售数据逊预期 #黄金白银反弹 $BTC