Htp96
Verified Creator
We are the Vietnamese non-profit crypto community that helps Vietnamese people
X (Twitter) : @htp96_community
Open Trade
BNB Holder
Frequent Trader
7.8 Years
104 Following
23.4K+ Followers
12.8K+ Liked
1.0K+ Shared
Posts
Portfolio
All
Quotes
Videos
Live
PINNED
Below is the information I want to share with you HTP96 about Binance commissions
Currently, you can receive a commission of up to 50%, instead of the default level as before. If you want to transfer the referral to me, just read this article for about 1 minute and it's done.
READ NOW
Instead of receiving a default commission before, now Binance will set it according to the level of 30-40-50% depending on the level you achieve.
Commission upgrade: Can occur daily – just meet the criteria, and the system will automatically upgrade the next day.
READ NOW
Instead of receiving a default commission before, now Binance will set it according to the level of 30-40-50% depending on the level you achieve.
Commission upgrade: Can occur daily – just meet the criteria, and the system will automatically upgrade the next day.
Is Vanar directly competing with Ethereum's L2s?
The question @Vanarchain is whether it is directly competing with Ethereum's L2s? sounds simple, but for me, it depends on how we define 'competition'.
If competition is understood as vying for the same group of developers, the same liquidity line, and the same pure DeFi use case, then the answer may not be completely yes.
Most Ethereum L2s are designed with a very clear goal: to expand Ethereum's processing capability, maintain EVM compatibility, inherit security, and attract the existing DeFi/NFT ecosystem. They optimize for lower fees, higher throughput, but still maintain the core assumption: the more activities that take place on-chain, the better.
If competition is understood as vying for the same group of developers, the same liquidity line, and the same pure DeFi use case, then the answer may not be completely yes.
Most Ethereum L2s are designed with a very clear goal: to expand Ethereum's processing capability, maintain EVM compatibility, inherit security, and attract the existing DeFi/NFT ecosystem. They optimize for lower fees, higher throughput, but still maintain the core assumption: the more activities that take place on-chain, the better.
Fear & Greed Index Drops to Level 9: Is the Crypto Market Nearing the Cycle Bottom?
The Fear & Greed Index of the crypto market has dropped sharply to a level of 9 – the “extreme fear” zone, reflecting a negative sentiment that envelops almost the entire market.
When the index falls into the single-digit range, it often indicates that investors are being driven by fears of losses, macro bad news, or short-term liquidation pressures.
In this context, most behaviors in the market are no longer strategic but tend toward emotional reactions: selling to reduce risk, narrowing positions, standing aside to observe. Therefore, many strong sell-offs often occur when the index is in the extremely low range.
When the index falls into the single-digit range, it often indicates that investors are being driven by fears of losses, macro bad news, or short-term liquidation pressures.
In this context, most behaviors in the market are no longer strategic but tend toward emotional reactions: selling to reduce risk, narrowing positions, standing aside to observe. Therefore, many strong sell-offs often occur when the index is in the extremely low range.
Vanar can become the backend for Web2 applications
@Vanarchain can become the backend for Web2 applications with me not being about technical compatibility, but about the level of intervention in the user experience.
If a Web2 application forces users to understand wallets, gas, or tokens, then no matter what the backend is, it is no longer Web2. Therefore, to truly become a backend, blockchain must be almost 'invisible'. Most behaviors still occur in the traditional model, while the chain only appears when it needs to record rights, assets, or distribute value.
In my view, the architecture that clearly separates off-chain and on-chain of Vanar $VANRY goes in this direction. Developers can keep a familiar stack for the main logic part, and only use blockchain as the final layer of validation and settlement. That significantly reduces friction.
However, the backend for Web2 is not just a technology issue, but also about stability, cost, and the ability to scale in the long term.
If Vanar can prove that blockchain can operate as foundational infrastructure, without complicating the product, then that possibility exists. If not, it will only remain a narrative.
@Vanarchain #vanar $VANRY
@Vanarchain can become the backend for Web2 applications with me not being about technical compatibility, but about the level of intervention in the user experience.
If a Web2 application forces users to understand wallets, gas, or tokens, then no matter what the backend is, it is no longer Web2. Therefore, to truly become a backend, blockchain must be almost 'invisible'. Most behaviors still occur in the traditional model, while the chain only appears when it needs to record rights, assets, or distribute value.
In my view, the architecture that clearly separates off-chain and on-chain of Vanar $VANRY goes in this direction. Developers can keep a familiar stack for the main logic part, and only use blockchain as the final layer of validation and settlement. That significantly reduces friction.
However, the backend for Web2 is not just a technology issue, but also about stability, cost, and the ability to scale in the long term.
If Vanar can prove that blockchain can operate as foundational infrastructure, without complicating the product, then that possibility exists. If not, it will only remain a narrative.
@Vanarchain #vanar $VANRY
What is the difference between Plasma and Solana in payment stablecoin?
Today I tried to place @Plasma next to Solana, but not to compare TPS or market cap.
The question I am interested in is: if we are talking about payment stablecoin, how do these two differ in design layers?
Solana is very fast. That is clear. Stablecoins on Solana run smoothly, with thick liquidity, and a bustling ecosystem. If I were a startup needing to quickly deploy a crypto payment app, Solana is almost a safe choice because everything is already available.
But Solana was not created just for payment. It was created for throughput. DeFi, meme, bot, NFT, all share the same highway. When the market is hot, the network is hot too. Payment does not have any special priority.
The question I am interested in is: if we are talking about payment stablecoin, how do these two differ in design layers?
Solana is very fast. That is clear. Stablecoins on Solana run smoothly, with thick liquidity, and a bustling ecosystem. If I were a startup needing to quickly deploy a crypto payment app, Solana is almost a safe choice because everything is already available.
But Solana was not created just for payment. It was created for throughput. DeFi, meme, bot, NFT, all share the same highway. When the market is hot, the network is hot too. Payment does not have any special priority.
What advantages does Plasma have if stablecoins become the backbone of crypto?
What if most transactions in crypto eventually revolve around stablecoins? Not memes, not farming. Just money coming in and out, payments, capital circulation.
If stablecoins truly become the 'backbone', then the requirements will be different. No one wants the foundation of the financial system to operate in a way that is sometimes fast and sometimes slow, sometimes cheap and sometimes expensive. It must be consistent.
And it must be predictable. At that point, @Plasma has an advantage because it is designed around stablecoins from the very beginning.
Not having to share space with too many other use cases. Less conflict, less dependence on speculative behavior.
Major chains may still handle stablecoins well. But they always have to balance many things at once. Plasma $XPL does not. It accepts a narrower focus in exchange for stability.
In my opinion, if stablecoins truly become the backbone, will the market prioritize that concentration, or will it still want a versatile infrastructure for all needs?
@Plasma #Plasma $XPL
What if most transactions in crypto eventually revolve around stablecoins? Not memes, not farming. Just money coming in and out, payments, capital circulation.
If stablecoins truly become the 'backbone', then the requirements will be different. No one wants the foundation of the financial system to operate in a way that is sometimes fast and sometimes slow, sometimes cheap and sometimes expensive. It must be consistent.
And it must be predictable. At that point, @Plasma has an advantage because it is designed around stablecoins from the very beginning.
Not having to share space with too many other use cases. Less conflict, less dependence on speculative behavior.
Major chains may still handle stablecoins well. But they always have to balance many things at once. Plasma $XPL does not. It accepts a narrower focus in exchange for stability.
In my opinion, if stablecoins truly become the backbone, will the market prioritize that concentration, or will it still want a versatile infrastructure for all needs?
@Plasma #Plasma $XPL
BTC Realized Loss exceeds $2.3B — Signal of capitulation or foundation for new volatility?
🔥 BTC Realized Loss exceeds $2.3B — Signal of capitulation or foundation for new volatility?
On-chain data has just recorded one of the strongest stress signals of the current cycle. The Bitcoin Realized Loss (7DMA) has surpassed the $2.3 billion mark — a value range that historically tends to appear only during panic sell-offs or final trend shakeouts.
Realized Loss reflects the total value of losses 'locked in' when investors sell below their cost basis. When this index surges, it indicates that psychological pressure is peaking and a large number of short-term positions are forced to exit.
On-chain data has just recorded one of the strongest stress signals of the current cycle. The Bitcoin Realized Loss (7DMA) has surpassed the $2.3 billion mark — a value range that historically tends to appear only during panic sell-offs or final trend shakeouts.
Realized Loss reflects the total value of losses 'locked in' when investors sell below their cost basis. When this index surges, it indicates that psychological pressure is peaking and a large number of short-term positions are forced to exit.
CME Gap Resurfaces: Is BTC Facing a New Downtrend Cycle?
In 2022, I remember very clearly a detail that not many people paid attention to at the time: the CME gap on the weekly chart of
. At that time, the market still had hope for a recovery.
But this gap appeared at a sensitive position and later became a milestone that marked the beginning of a prolonged downtrend.
Looking back, I realize that it was not just a simple technical 'gap', but a signal of a larger supply-demand imbalance.
. At that time, the market still had hope for a recovery.
But this gap appeared at a sensitive position and later became a milestone that marked the beginning of a prolonged downtrend.
Looking back, I realize that it was not just a simple technical 'gap', but a signal of a larger supply-demand imbalance.
Is the Market Cycle Scenario Repeating?
February is often the phase when the market erodes emotions. Prices do not crash violently, but they are negative enough and prolonged to weaken confidence.
For me, this is the most uncomfortable time not necessarily because of significant losses, but because the ambiguity constantly makes me doubt my own decisions.
March, technical structure begins from Peak Excitement to Collapse of Confidence: Is the Market Cycle Scenario Repeating? Improving. $BTC breaks the previous downtrend, creating expectations for a clearer reversal.
For me, this is the most uncomfortable time not necessarily because of significant losses, but because the ambiguity constantly makes me doubt my own decisions.
March, technical structure begins from Peak Excitement to Collapse of Confidence: Is the Market Cycle Scenario Repeating? Improving. $BTC breaks the previous downtrend, creating expectations for a clearer reversal.
Does Vanar depend on the market narrative to survive?
One thing I've noticed through many cycles: many projects do not fail due to weak technology, but because the narrative disappears. When the market stops talking about a topic, liquidity and attention withdraw very quickly.
So the question “
does it depend on the market narrative to survive?” for me is not a marketing question, but a question about the structural survival of the ecosystem.
Most chains in the EVM ecosystem grow thanks to narratives. Sometimes it's DeFi summer, sometimes it's NFTs, then GameFi, then AI, then modular. Narratives help attract developers, capital, and users very quickly. But it also creates a dangerous feedback loop: when the narrative cools off, the ecosystem contracts accordingly. If the core architecture and use case are not strong enough to stand on their own, the chain must find a new narrative to replace it.
So the question “
does it depend on the market narrative to survive?” for me is not a marketing question, but a question about the structural survival of the ecosystem.
Most chains in the EVM ecosystem grow thanks to narratives. Sometimes it's DeFi summer, sometimes it's NFTs, then GameFi, then AI, then modular. Narratives help attract developers, capital, and users very quickly. But it also creates a dangerous feedback loop: when the narrative cools off, the ecosystem contracts accordingly. If the core architecture and use case are not strong enough to stand on their own, the chain must find a new narrative to replace it.
Can Plasma survive if the bull market doesn't return?
There was a time I sat back and looked at my wallet, seeing that most of my stablecoin transactions took place during quite calm market phases. No bull, no FOMO. Just transferring money between platforms, or withdrawing to wait.
Stablecoins in those moments are very 'on point'. No one talks about them. No one expects them to generate profit. They are just there, holding value, waiting for the next decision.
When thinking about @Plasma , I don't think about the bull market first. I think about periods like that. The market is quiet. Few narratives. Little hot money. The question is: if the bull market doesn't return for a long time, can Plasma survive?
Stablecoins in those moments are very 'on point'. No one talks about them. No one expects them to generate profit. They are just there, holding value, waiting for the next decision.
When thinking about @Plasma , I don't think about the bull market first. I think about periods like that. The market is quiet. Few narratives. Little hot money. The question is: if the bull market doesn't return for a long time, can Plasma survive?
What Does BTC Need to Start a Real Bull Cycle?
On the weekly frame,
is creating a quite familiar “countdown” if one looks broadly enough. The price seems to be fluctuating, but in reality, it still follows a repeating structure: strong increase, short pause, then increase again.
In the previous phase, the upward momentum was very clear – shallow correction, quick rebound, with the momentum almost uninterrupted. This type of movement usually appears at the end of a cycle, when both the funds and expectations are pushed to their highest levels.
is creating a quite familiar “countdown” if one looks broadly enough. The price seems to be fluctuating, but in reality, it still follows a repeating structure: strong increase, short pause, then increase again.
In the previous phase, the upward momentum was very clear – shallow correction, quick rebound, with the momentum almost uninterrupted. This type of movement usually appears at the end of a cycle, when both the funds and expectations are pushed to their highest levels.
Does Vanar have a value accumulation strategy in a bear market?
In my experience, the bear market always reveals one thing: most value strategies are actually just cyclical strategies. When liquidity dries up and attention decreases significantly.
So does @Vanarchain have a value accumulation strategy in a bear market?
In my view, if Vanar still relies on speculative activities or short-term incentives, then the bear market will cause the ecosystem to contract very quickly.
But if they truly position themselves around entertainment, digital content, and PayFi—areas with repeated behaviors and slow value realization—then the bear market is actually an appropriate time to accumulate.
Value here is not TVL or volume, but the number of products with real users, the number of developers continuing to build when there is no hype, and the consistency in architecture.
In my opinion, if Vanar maintains design discipline and does not pivot according to the new narrative every cycle, that is already a form of value accumulation.
@Vanarchain #vanar $VANRY
In my experience, the bear market always reveals one thing: most value strategies are actually just cyclical strategies. When liquidity dries up and attention decreases significantly.
So does @Vanarchain have a value accumulation strategy in a bear market?
In my view, if Vanar still relies on speculative activities or short-term incentives, then the bear market will cause the ecosystem to contract very quickly.
But if they truly position themselves around entertainment, digital content, and PayFi—areas with repeated behaviors and slow value realization—then the bear market is actually an appropriate time to accumulate.
Value here is not TVL or volume, but the number of products with real users, the number of developers continuing to build when there is no hype, and the consistency in architecture.
In my opinion, if Vanar maintains design discipline and does not pivot according to the new narrative every cycle, that is already a form of value accumulation.
@Vanarchain #vanar $VANRY
$C98 How are you doing lately? If you guys have noticed, the market is breaking down, C98 is fluctuating a lot.
I am watching for an entry
around 0.024-0.026
Target scalp 20-30%
Stl: 10%
With the approaching Tet holiday, the likelihood of waves will be less, so let's just scalp, okay guys?
THIS IS MY PERSONAL ASSESSMENT, DYOR OK?
Buy and trade here 👇
$C98
I am watching for an entry
around 0.024-0.026
Target scalp 20-30%
Stl: 10%
With the approaching Tet holiday, the likelihood of waves will be less, so let's just scalp, okay guys?
THIS IS MY PERSONAL ASSESSMENT, DYOR OK?
Buy and trade here 👇
$C98
Sourced by user sharing on Binance
Is Plasma directly competing with Tron?
The last time I used Tron to transfer USDT was because… everyone uses it. Fast, familiar, thick liquidity. I don't need to think much, just need to be sure the address is correct.
But that feeling is different from when I tried @Plasma . Tron feels like a big city. The stablecoin there is very convenient, but it is still part of a broader ecosystem. Everything coexists in a common space.
Plasma is much narrower. It doesn't try to become the center of all activities. It revolves only around stablecoins. Few things to do, few things to compete with.
So saying it's direct competition isn't necessarily true. Tron is optimized for scale and established habits. Plasma $XPL is optimized for predictability and concentration.
If users just need a cheap and crowded place, Tron is good enough. If they start to care about stablecoins not being dragged down by other things, Plasma has its place.
In my opinion, does the market want familiarity, or does it want a more specialized infrastructure for money?
@Plasma #Plasma $XPL
The last time I used Tron to transfer USDT was because… everyone uses it. Fast, familiar, thick liquidity. I don't need to think much, just need to be sure the address is correct.
But that feeling is different from when I tried @Plasma . Tron feels like a big city. The stablecoin there is very convenient, but it is still part of a broader ecosystem. Everything coexists in a common space.
Plasma is much narrower. It doesn't try to become the center of all activities. It revolves only around stablecoins. Few things to do, few things to compete with.
So saying it's direct competition isn't necessarily true. Tron is optimized for scale and established habits. Plasma $XPL is optimized for predictability and concentration.
If users just need a cheap and crowded place, Tron is good enough. If they start to care about stablecoins not being dragged down by other things, Plasma has its place.
In my opinion, does the market want familiarity, or does it want a more specialized infrastructure for money?
@Plasma #Plasma $XPL
The medium-sized investor group begins to distribute when BTC prices are high
Recent on-chain data caught my attention not because of a major shock, but due to a quite subtle change happening beneath the surface.
The group of medium-sized investors – commonly referred to as 'dolphins' – is beginning to gradually reduce the amount of $BTC held. Notably, this is happening against a backdrop of prices still being high, while the 30-day change rate has turned negative.
In history, I have always viewed dolphins as the group leading the rhythm for short to medium-term fluctuations. They react faster than whales, but have a trading volume large enough to create a real impact, unlike small retail investors.
The group of medium-sized investors – commonly referred to as 'dolphins' – is beginning to gradually reduce the amount of $BTC held. Notably, this is happening against a backdrop of prices still being high, while the 30-day change rate has turned negative.
In history, I have always viewed dolphins as the group leading the rhythm for short to medium-term fluctuations. They react faster than whales, but have a trading volume large enough to create a real impact, unlike small retail investors.
Altcoins signal positive technical indicators after a period of being oversold
The market capitalization of altcoins has just shown a golden crossover signal — a technical signal that is not new, but worth stopping to take a closer look.
In previous cycles, such crossovers often marked the early stage of strong upward trends, not the most euphoric moments, but the time when the market was still in doubt. When most participants were still busy looking at $BTC , altcoins often began to recover from a state of neglect.
In previous cycles, such crossovers often marked the early stage of strong upward trends, not the most euphoric moments, but the time when the market was still in doubt. When most participants were still busy looking at $BTC , altcoins often began to recover from a state of neglect.
How will Vanar be affected when the market is in downtrend?
Today, looking back at the market in the context of downtrend, I think more about a question that not many like to ask when prices are weak:
How will it be affected when the market goes down?
For me, this is not a question about token price, but a question about the durability of the design assumptions that Vanar is pursuing.
The downtrend is always the truest test for any infrastructure. When liquidity shrinks, the narrative cools down, and incentives disappear, what remains is: will the dev continue to build, and will the product continue to be used?
How will it be affected when the market goes down?
For me, this is not a question about token price, but a question about the durability of the design assumptions that Vanar is pursuing.
The downtrend is always the truest test for any infrastructure. When liquidity shrinks, the narrative cools down, and incentives disappear, what remains is: will the dev continue to build, and will the product continue to be used?
ETH/BTC hits a key support zone, altcoin enters a decisive phase
I am closely watching ETH/BTC, as this pair is currently in the important support zone of 0.029–0.03. It is not a zone to predict the bottom, but rather a zone that reflects the true sentiment of the market towards ETH.
If it bounces up from here, ETH could temporarily maintain its pace, at least reducing the pressure on the rest of the altcoins in the short term.
It is not a major bullish scenario, but rather a phase of 'holding on'. In the context of cautious cash flow, just $ETH not continuing to weaken is enough for the market to breathe easier.
If it bounces up from here, ETH could temporarily maintain its pace, at least reducing the pressure on the rest of the altcoins in the short term.
It is not a major bullish scenario, but rather a phase of 'holding on'. In the context of cautious cash flow, just $ETH not continuing to weaken is enough for the market to breathe easier.
Login to explore more contents