G R I F F I N's Profile | Binance Square

·

--

Vanar is building Web3 from a consumer-first angle, focusing on places where users already spend time—games, entertainment, and digital experiences. Instead of forcing people to learn crypto workflows, the chain is designed to stay in the background while products do the talking. With EVM compatibility and an ecosystem that includes gaming and immersive platforms, $VANRY functions as the network’s core asset for fees, staking, and incentives. The goal isn’t noise or hype, but steady, real usage driven by products people actually enjoy using.

@Vanarchain $VANRY #Vanar

VANRY

G R I F F I N

·

--

Vanar, and the Quiet Work of Making Web3 Feel NormalMost blockchains try to win by sounding impressive. Vanar seems to be playing a different game: getting Web3 into environments where people already show up every day, without asking them to become “crypto people” first. That’s why its story keeps circling back to gaming, entertainment, and brands. In those spaces, the product experience matters more than the chain’s buzzwords, and the fastest way to lose users is friction—confusing wallets, weird fee moments, or interfaces that feel like a cockpit. What makes Vanar interesting is that it doesn’t feel built around one narrow audience. It tries to be a base layer that can support consumer-facing products without forcing everything to look like DeFi. Virtua is a good example of that direction: digital collectibles and immersive experiences that can pull in people who care about culture and content more than they care about transactions. If onboarding is going to happen at scale, it’s usually through things like this—where the “why” is obvious before the user ever asks how the blockchain works. VGN sits in a different part of the same puzzle. Games don’t survive on launch-day excitement; they survive on retention, loops, and economy design that doesn’t implode the moment incentives get gamed. A lot of Web3 gaming experiments have felt like reward systems wearing a game costume. Vanar’s ecosystem positioning around VGN reads like an attempt to reverse that: make the game feel like the main point, while ownership and token incentives stay supportive instead of taking over the entire experience. On the technical side, Vanar’s choices lean practical rather than performative. EVM compatibility is one of those decisions that doesn’t sound exciting, but it reduces the distance between an idea and a live product. Teams that already know Ethereum tooling don’t have to re-learn everything just to ship, and that matters if you’re aiming for real-world adoption through a steady flow of apps rather than one big moment. Then there’s the way Vanar talks about AI and broader “consumer stack” needs. The grounded interpretation is simple: real consumer products aren’t just smart contracts. They’re data-heavy, messy, and constantly evolving. If Vanar wants to be the chain under entertainment and gaming experiences, it has to support apps that feel dynamic and personal without making every feature an onchain headache. In that whole structure, $VANRY isn’t just there to exist—it’s meant to be the network’s working asset. Fees, staking, governance, and ecosystem incentives all route through it, which is important because consumer environments don’t run on occasional activity; they run on constant micro-actions. The real question, over time, is whether usage stays genuine enough that the token remains connected to actual product demand instead of drifting into a purely speculative identity. If Vanar succeeds, it won’t be because it convinced people to love blockchain. It’ll be because people used products they enjoyed, and the chain simply did its job quietly in the background. @Vanar $VANRY #Vanar

Vanar, and the Quiet Work of Making Web3 Feel Normal

Most blockchains try to win by sounding impressive. Vanar seems to be playing a different game: getting Web3 into environments where people already show up every day, without asking them to become “crypto people” first. That’s why its story keeps circling back to gaming, entertainment, and brands. In those spaces, the product experience matters more than the chain’s buzzwords, and the fastest way to lose users is friction—confusing wallets, weird fee moments, or interfaces that feel like a cockpit.

What makes Vanar interesting is that it doesn’t feel built around one narrow audience. It tries to be a base layer that can support consumer-facing products without forcing everything to look like DeFi. Virtua is a good example of that direction: digital collectibles and immersive experiences that can pull in people who care about culture and content more than they care about transactions. If onboarding is going to happen at scale, it’s usually through things like this—where the “why” is obvious before the user ever asks how the blockchain works.

VGN sits in a different part of the same puzzle. Games don’t survive on launch-day excitement; they survive on retention, loops, and economy design that doesn’t implode the moment incentives get gamed. A lot of Web3 gaming experiments have felt like reward systems wearing a game costume. Vanar’s ecosystem positioning around VGN reads like an attempt to reverse that: make the game feel like the main point, while ownership and token incentives stay supportive instead of taking over the entire experience.

On the technical side, Vanar’s choices lean practical rather than performative. EVM compatibility is one of those decisions that doesn’t sound exciting, but it reduces the distance between an idea and a live product. Teams that already know Ethereum tooling don’t have to re-learn everything just to ship, and that matters if you’re aiming for real-world adoption through a steady flow of apps rather than one big moment.

Then there’s the way Vanar talks about AI and broader “consumer stack” needs. The grounded interpretation is simple: real consumer products aren’t just smart contracts. They’re data-heavy, messy, and constantly evolving. If Vanar wants to be the chain under entertainment and gaming experiences, it has to support apps that feel dynamic and personal without making every feature an onchain headache.

In that whole structure, $VANRY isn’t just there to exist—it’s meant to be the network’s working asset. Fees, staking, governance, and ecosystem incentives all route through it, which is important because consumer environments don’t run on occasional activity; they run on constant micro-actions. The real question, over time, is whether usage stays genuine enough that the token remains connected to actual product demand instead of drifting into a purely speculative identity. If Vanar succeeds, it won’t be because it convinced people to love blockchain. It’ll be because people used products they enjoyed, and the chain simply did its job quietly in the
background.

@Vanarchain $VANRY #Vanar

VANRY

G R I F F I N

·

--

Good 👍

Binance Square Official

·

--

“Write to Earn” Open to All — Earn Up to 50% Commission + Share 5,000 USDC!

To celebrate the “Write to Earn” Promotion now open to all creators on Binance Square, every KYC-verified user can automatically enjoy the benefits—no registration required!
Join our limited-time celebration and earn double rewards when you post on Binance Square:
✅ Up to 50% trading fee commission
✅ Share a limited-time bonus pool of 5,000 USDC!
Activity Period: 2026-02-09 00:00 (UTC) to 2026-03-08 23:59 (UTC)
*This is a general campaign announcement and products might not be available in your region.
1. New Creator Kickoff (3,000 USDC Pool)
👉 Eligible Participants: New users participating in Write to Earn for the first time, and creators with cumulative Write to Earn earnings of 0 USDC
💰 Rewards:

2. Active Creator Sprint (1,500 USDC Pool)
👉 Eligible Participants: All Write to Earn participants
💰 Rewards:

3. Top Content Rewards (500 USDC Pool)
👉 Eligible Participants: All Write to Earn participants
💰Rewards for Top 10 Single-Content Earnings:

Zero entry threshold, effortless content monetization — Don’t wait, start earning now!
For More Information
Pro Tips to Boost Your Write to Earn RewardsFrequently Asked Questions on Binance Square “Write to Earn” Promotion
Terms and Conditions
This Promotion may not be available in your region. Only Binance Square creators who complete account verification (KYC) will be eligible to participate in this Promotion, except those who are in countries which have specific Binance Product blocks.Participants must comply with the Write to Earn Promotion terms and conditions.
Users can earn rewards simultaneously in Activities 1, 2, and 3. In Activity 3, the same user can receive multiple rewards. For Activities 1 and 2, each user’s individual reward is capped at 5 USDC respectively.If your content generates any commission on a given day, you will receive a Square Assistant notification the next day with the detailed amount. Please note that rewards will be distributed on a weekly basis, by the following Thursday at 23:59 (UTC). Once you accumulate at least 0.1 USDC of commission rewards each week, Binance Square will update your weekly performance on the promotion page by the following Thursday at 23:59 (UTC). The Binance Square team will review all content for compliance with campaign guidelines and select final winners according to campaign rules.All 5,000 USDC rewards will be distributed in the form of USDC token vouchers to eligible users within 21 working days after the Activity ends. Users will be able to log in and redeem their voucher rewards via Profile > Rewards Hub. Binance reserves the right to cancel a user’s eligibility in this promotion if the account is involved in any behavior that breaches the Binance Square Community Guidelines or Binance Square Terms and Conditions.Binance reserves the right at any time in its sole and absolute discretion to determine and/or amend or vary these terms and conditions without prior notice, including but not limited to canceling, extending, terminating, or suspending this promotion, the eligibility terms and criteria, the selection and number of winners, and the timing of any act to be done, and all participants shall be bound by these amendments.Binance reserves the right of final interpretation of this promotion.Additional promotion terms and conditions can be accessed here.There may be discrepancies in the translated version of this original article in English. Please reference this original version for the latest or most accurate information where any discrepancies may arise.
Disclaimer: Content on Binance Square includes information, views and opinions posted by Users and or other third parties, which may be sponsored. Content on Binance Square may also include AI generated content with the use of Binance AI or User AI in User Content, subject to the AI Policy. Content on Binance Square may be original or sourced, or in combination. Such content is presented to viewers on an “as is” basis for general information purposes only, without representation or warranty of any kind. Such content is not to be used or considered as any kind of advice. Insights and opinions expressed in these content belong to the relevant poster and do not purport to reflect the views of Binance. Content on Binance Square, is not intended to be and shall not be construed as an endorsement by Binance of such views or a guarantee of the reliability or accuracy of such content. Viewers and users are reminded to do your own research (DYOR). Furthermore, the content and Binance Square’s availability is not guaranteed. Digital asset prices vary in volatility. The value of your investment may go down or up and you may not get back the amount invested. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions and Binance is not liable for any losses you may incur. For more information, see our Terms of Use, Risk Warning, and Binance Square Terms.

G R I F F I N

·

--

$UNI remains range-bound after the rejection near the 3.50 area, with price continuing to respect the same structural levels. The pullback into 3.32 was defended cleanly, and the rebound back toward 3.40 shows buyers are still active, though not yet aggressive enough to force a breakout.

Trade Setup (Long):
Entry: 3.32 – 3.38
Targets: 3.55 — 3.80 — 4.20
Stop-Loss: 3.15

Price action reflects balance rather than weakness. RSI is hovering in the mid-zone and attempting to curl higher, indicating fading downside momentum without overextension. MACD remains near the baseline with a slight positive bias, consistent with consolidation. Volume is steady, suggesting accumulation rather than distribution. As long as 3.32 holds as support, the structure stays constructive and favors a move back toward the upper range and previous resistance.

UNI

G R I F F I N

·

--

$UNI is trading inside a corrective range after the rejection from the 3.50 area. The recent push was met with supply, leading to a pullback toward the 3.32 low, which acted as a clear demand reaction. Price has since rebounded but remains range-bound, indicating balance rather than a decisive trend.

Trade Setup (Long):
Entry: 3.32 – 3.38
Targets: 3.55 — 3.80 — 4.20
Stop-Loss: 3.15

Momentum is neutral to slightly constructive. RSI is holding below the midpoint but curling up, suggesting downside pressure is easing without entering overbought territory. MACD is hovering near the baseline, reflecting consolidation rather than trend continuation. Volume remains steady, supporting the idea of accumulation within the range. As long as price holds above the 3.32 support zone, the structure favors a potential move back toward the upper range and prior resistance levels.

UNI

G R I F F I N

·

--

$CHESS is trading in a compressed range after the sharp sell-off from the 0.0088 area. The breakdown was impulsive, but the move into the 0.0049 low was followed by stabilization rather than continuation, suggesting selling pressure has largely been absorbed. Price is now holding around 0.0053, forming a short-term base.

Trade Setup (Long):
Entry: 0.0050 – 0.0053
Targets: 0.0059 — 0.0065 — 0.0072
Stop-Loss: 0.0046

The structure shows a classic sell-off followed by range compression. RSI remains in the lower zone, indicating downside momentum has cooled, while MACD is flattening near equilibrium, reflecting reduced bearish pressure. Volume expanded on the drop and has since normalized, which supports consolidation rather than further acceleration down. Holding above the 0.0049 support keeps the structure intact for a potential recovery toward the upper range.

CHESS

G R I F F I N

·

--

$DF shows a highly volatile reaction following the sharp spike into the 0.00388 region, which was immediately rejected. That move appears to be an exhaustion wick rather than sustainable continuation. Price has since retraced aggressively and is now stabilizing around the 0.00240 area, close to the prior base formed near 0.00200–0.00220.

Trade Setup (Long):
Entry: 0.00220 – 0.00240
Targets: 0.00280 — 0.00320 — 0.00380
Stop-Loss: 0.00195

Structure reflects a classic spike-and-retrace pattern. Volume expanded heavily during the impulsive move and has since dropped off, indicating the volatility phase is cooling. RSI has reset back toward neutral, and MACD is flattening near the baseline, signaling that downside momentum is losing strength. As long as price holds above the 0.00220 support zone, the structure allows for another volatility-driven push toward the upper range.

DF

G R I F F I N

·

--

$OG is in a corrective consolidation after the sharp rejection from the 0.85 peak. The impulsive move up was followed by steady profit-taking, but the decline has been orderly rather than aggressive. Price is now stabilizing around the 0.64–0.65 region, which aligns with a prior demand zone and suggests selling pressure is weakening.

Trade Setup (Long):
Entry: 0.620 – 0.650
Targets: 0.700 — 0.760 — 0.850
Stop-Loss: 0.590

Momentum indicators are resetting. RSI has cooled into the mid-range, leaving room for upside expansion, while MACD is flattening near the baseline, indicating bearish momentum is fading. Volume has contracted during the pullback, which supports the view of consolidation rather than distribution. Holding above the 0.62 support keeps the structure constructive and favors a potential rotation back toward the previous highs.

OG

G R I F F I N

·

--

$TNSR is moving through a consolidation phase after the earlier push toward the 0.065 region. The rejection from that high led to a controlled pullback, and price is now stabilizing around the 0.054 area, suggesting equilibrium between buyers and sellers rather than aggressive distribution.

Trade Setup (Long):
Entry: 0.0520 – 0.0545
Targets: 0.0580 — 0.0620 — 0.0660
Stop-Loss: 0.0490

Momentum is neutralizing. RSI is hovering in the mid-range, indicating room for expansion without immediate exhaustion, while MACD is flattening near the baseline, signaling that downside momentum is fading. Volume has compressed after the impulse, which often precedes the next directional move. Holding above the 0.052 support keeps the structure constructive and favors a potential continuation toward the prior highs.

TNSR

G R I F F I N

·

--

$ME has completed a strong impulsive move from the 0.14 region, followed by a corrective pullback from the 0.2559 high. Price is now stabilizing around 0.20 after reclaiming short-term structure, indicating buyers are stepping back in rather than allowing continuation lower. The pullback appears corrective, not distributive.

Trade Setup (Long):
Entry: 0.190 – 0.205
Targets: 0.225 — 0.255 — 0.285
Stop-Loss: 0.172

Momentum is resetting in a healthy way. RSI has recovered from lower levels and is trending back toward neutral-bullish territory, while MACD is flattening, suggesting downside pressure is fading. Volume expanded on the initial breakout and has since normalized, which supports consolidation before the next move. As long as price holds above the 0.18 demand zone, continuation toward prior highs remains the dominant scenario.

ME

G R I F F I N

·

--

$BERA is undergoing a sharp corrective phase after failing to hold above the recent impulse high near 1.00. The rejection from that level triggered a strong sell-side reaction, and price has now retraced into a prior demand zone around 0.73–0.76. Despite the pullback, structure has not fully broken, and current price action suggests stabilization rather than panic selling.

Trade Setup (Long):
Entry: 0.730 – 0.760
Targets: 0.840 — 0.900 — 1.000
Stop-Loss: 0.690

Momentum indicators reflect short-term exhaustion on the downside, with RSI cooling into the lower range and selling pressure easing. Volume expanded on the impulse move and has since tapered, signaling distribution completion rather than continuation lower. As long as price holds above the 0.72 support region, the market remains positioned for a potential rebound toward the previous range highs.

BERA

G R I F F I N

·

--

$ESP has delivered an explosive bullish expansion, breaking out aggressively from the base near 0.0278 and printing a strong impulse move to the 0.082 area. The structure shows clear demand dominance, with price now consolidating above the breakout zone rather than retracing deeply, which keeps the bullish bias intact.

Trade Setup (Long):
Entry: 0.0720 – 0.0780
Targets: 0.0850 — 0.0950 — 0.1100
Stop-Loss: 0.0640

The vertical move was supported by a major volume spike, confirming genuine participation rather than a thin pump. Current price action suggests healthy consolidation after expansion, indicating absorption rather than distribution. As long as price holds above the 0.070 support region, continuation toward higher resistance levels remains the higher-probability scenario.

ESP

G R I F F I N

·

--

Bearish

Plasma is built for one job: stablecoin settlement.

Sub-second finality.
Full EVM compatibility.
Stablecoin-first gas.
Bitcoin-anchored security.

While others chase narratives, Plasma focuses on moving value fast, clean, and reliably.

$XPL isn’t about hype — it’s about infrastructure.

@Plasma $XPL #plasma

XPL

G R I F F I N

·

--

Plasma: Building Around Stability Instead of SpeculationMost blockchains try to sell you a universe. Plasma is easier to describe: it’s trying to be the kind of network you don’t have to think about, because the main thing it wants to move is already familiar—stablecoins. That focus changes the tone of everything around it. Instead of competing for attention with endless categories and narratives, Plasma leans into one job: settlement that feels clean, fast, and predictable. Stablecoins are where crypto stops feeling like a hobby for a lot of people. In many places, they’re used because local currency weakens, banking rails are slow, or moving money comes with needless fees and gatekeeping. People use them to pay, save, settle trades, and move value across borders with less drama. Those users don’t care about an ecosystem’s personality. They care about whether the transfer arrives, how quickly it settles, and whether the process is simple enough to repeat every day without friction. This is why sub-second finality isn’t just a technical detail. It’s a behavioral one. When confirmation is fast enough to feel immediate, the whole experience changes. Merchants can accept payments with less hesitation, services can deliver instantly without relying on trust, and institutions can reconcile flows without stacking layers of delay and human oversight. In settlement, time is exposure. The shorter it is, the closer the network feels to a real payment rail instead of a system you “hope” behaves. Plasma’s decision to stay fully EVM-compatible also reads like a practical bet, not a branding move. The EVM is already the most common working language for smart contracts. Teams have tooling, audit patterns, and operational habits built around it. If Plasma can support that world cleanly—without asking developers to re-learn everything—then adoption becomes less about ideology and more about convenience. The best infrastructure often wins by being easier to plug into, not by being more dramatic. Where Plasma seems most deliberate is in how it treats fees. With stablecoins, the worst user experience is being forced into a second asset just to do basic movement. It’s awkward to tell someone they can send a dollar-pegged token, but first they need to buy a volatile token to pay gas. It adds steps, risk, and confusion—exactly the things stablecoin users are trying to avoid. A stablecoin-first approach to gas, and the idea of gasless stablecoin transfers, is Plasma acknowledging that payments should feel like payments. The fee model shouldn’t turn a simple transfer into a mini onboarding ceremony. That design choice naturally makes people ask what the token is for. If the goal is to keep the user experience stablecoin-native, then $XPL can’t just be framed as “the coin you need to move money.” It shifts more toward the system layer—how validators are incentivized, how security is paid for, and how the chain keeps running reliably even when the market is cold and speculation is quiet. In a setup like this, the native asset matters less as a checkout requirement and more as the backbone of economic alignment. The Bitcoin-anchored security angle fits into the same mindset. If Plasma is serious about being settlement infrastructure, then it has to plan for pressure. Payment rails attract it by default. Anchoring to Bitcoin is an attempt to lean on a network that has built its reputation by being hard to rewrite and hard to bend quietly. It’s not a magic shield, but it’s a signal about priorities: durability, neutrality, and the ability to resist interference matter more here than flashy experimentation. Plasma’s whole thesis feels like an argument against distraction. Stablecoins are already one of the clearest products crypto has ever produced—boring, useful, and widely adopted for reasons that don’t depend on hype. Plasma is trying to build around that reality by making transfers settle fast, keeping EVM compatibility so builders don’t waste time, designing fees in a way that matches how stablecoin users actually behave, and framing security in a way that anticipates real-world friction. If it works, it won’t be because people fall in love with a story. It’ll be because the network does its job so smoothly that stablecoin settlement stops feeling like “crypto” and starts feeling li ke infrastructure. @Plasma $XPL #plasma

Plasma: Building Around Stability Instead of Speculation

Most blockchains try to sell you a universe. Plasma is easier to describe: it’s trying to be the kind of network you don’t have to think about, because the main thing it wants to move is already familiar—stablecoins. That focus changes the tone of everything around it. Instead of competing for attention with endless categories and narratives, Plasma leans into one job: settlement that feels clean, fast, and predictable.

Stablecoins are where crypto stops feeling like a hobby for a lot of people. In many places, they’re used because local currency weakens, banking rails are slow, or moving money comes with needless fees and gatekeeping. People use them to pay, save, settle trades, and move value across borders with less drama. Those users don’t care about an ecosystem’s personality. They care about whether the transfer arrives, how quickly it settles, and whether the process is simple enough to repeat every day without friction.

This is why sub-second finality isn’t just a technical detail. It’s a behavioral one. When confirmation is fast enough to feel immediate, the whole experience changes. Merchants can accept payments with less hesitation, services can deliver instantly without relying on trust, and institutions can reconcile flows without stacking layers of delay and human oversight. In settlement, time is exposure. The shorter it is, the closer the network feels to a real payment rail instead of a system you “hope” behaves.

Plasma’s decision to stay fully EVM-compatible also reads like a practical bet, not a branding move. The EVM is already the most common working language for smart contracts. Teams have tooling, audit patterns, and operational habits built around it. If Plasma can support that world cleanly—without asking developers to re-learn everything—then adoption becomes less about ideology and more about convenience. The best infrastructure often wins by being easier to plug into, not by being more dramatic.

Where Plasma seems most deliberate is in how it treats fees. With stablecoins, the worst user experience is being forced into a second asset just to do basic movement. It’s awkward to tell someone they can send a dollar-pegged token, but first they need to buy a volatile token to pay gas. It adds steps, risk, and confusion—exactly the things stablecoin users are trying to avoid. A stablecoin-first approach to gas, and the idea of gasless stablecoin transfers, is Plasma acknowledging that payments should feel like payments. The fee model shouldn’t turn a simple transfer into a mini onboarding ceremony.

That design choice naturally makes people ask what the token is for. If the goal is to keep the user experience stablecoin-native, then $XPL can’t just be framed as “the coin you need to move money.” It shifts more toward the system layer—how validators are incentivized, how security is paid for, and how the chain keeps running reliably even when the market is cold and speculation is quiet. In a setup like this, the native asset matters less as a checkout requirement and more as the backbone of economic alignment.

The Bitcoin-anchored security angle fits into the same mindset. If Plasma is serious about being settlement infrastructure, then it has to plan for pressure. Payment rails attract it by default. Anchoring to Bitcoin is an attempt to lean on a network that has built its reputation by being hard to rewrite and hard to bend quietly. It’s not a magic shield, but it’s a signal about priorities: durability, neutrality, and the ability to resist interference matter more here than flashy experimentation.

Plasma’s whole thesis feels like an argument against distraction. Stablecoins are already one of the clearest products crypto has ever produced—boring, useful, and widely adopted for reasons that don’t depend on hype. Plasma is trying to build around that reality by making transfers settle fast, keeping EVM compatibility so builders don’t waste time, designing fees in a way that matches how stablecoin users actually behave, and framing security in a way that anticipates real-world friction.

If it works, it won’t be because people fall in love with a story. It’ll be because the network does its job so smoothly that stablecoin settlement stops feeling like “crypto” and starts feeling li
ke infrastructure.

@Plasma $XPL #plasma

BTC

XPL

G R I F F I N

·

--

$XAU USDT – Trading around 5,065

Price is consolidating after rejection from 5,099 and a sharp drop toward 5,039–5,045 demand. Structure shows short-term range behavior inside a broader corrective move.

Momentum:
RSI ~54 — neutral with slight bullish tilt.
MACD recovering from negative zone — early upside momentum.
KDJ mid-high — controlled buying pressure.

Key Resistance:
5,076
5,089
5,100

Key Support:
5,049
5,039
5,022

Long Setup (range breakout)
EP: 5,058 – 5,065
TP1: 5,076
TP2: 5,089
TP3: 5,100
SL: 5,039

Short Setup (rejection zone)
EP: 5,089 – 5,100
TP1: 5,065
TP2: 5,049
TP3: 5,022
SL: 5,118

Holding above 5,049 keeps the recovery intact.
Loss of 5,039 shifts structure bearish toward 5,022.

XAU

G R I F F I N

·

--

$NIL trading around 0.0530 after sharp rejection from 0.0579 and a flush to 0.0508. Price has formed a short-term higher low and is now grinding upward.

Structure: intraday recovery inside a broader corrective range.

RSI near 63 — bullish pressure building.
MACD turning positive — momentum shifting upward.
KDJ elevated — short-term strength but nearing heat zone.

Key Levels

Resistance:
0.0536
0.0567
0.0579

Support:
0.0520
0.0508
0.0495

Long Setup (continuation)
EP: 0.0525 – 0.0532
TP1: 0.0536
TP2: 0.0567
TP3: 0.0579
SL: 0.0505

Short Setup (rejection play)
EP: 0.0565 – 0.0580
TP1: 0.0535
TP2: 0.0510
TP3: 0.0490
SL: 0.0595

Holding above 0.0520 keeps bullish momentum intact.
Loss of 0.0508 opens downside continuation.

NIL

G R I F F I N

·

--

$RIVER trading near 16.15 after sharp rejection from the 18.42 high. Price flushed aggressively to 15.07 and is now attempting a recovery bounce. Structure remains corrective within a broader intraday downtrend.

Momentum is mixed — short-term relief, not full reversal.

Key Levels

Resistance:
16.38
17.12
17.85

Support:
15.07
14.90
14.20

RSI around 55 — slight bullish pressure.
MACD turning positive but still shallow — recovery phase only.

Long Setup (reclaim continuation)
EP: 16.00 – 16.30
TP1: 17.10
TP2: 17.85
TP3: 18.40
SL: 15.00

Short Setup (trend continuation)
EP: 16.80 – 17.20
TP1: 15.10
TP2: 14.20
TP3: 13.50
SL: 17.90

Holding above 15.07 keeps bounce alive.
Break below that level shifts bias back toward continuation downside.

RIVER

G R I F F I N

·

--

$FHE trading around 0.0785 after a heavy breakdown from the 0.1478 region. Price flushed to 0.0705 and is now consolidating in a tight range — compression phase after strong distribution.

Short-term structure: sideways with slight recovery attempt.
Momentum: stabilizing, not fully bullish.

Key Levels

Resistance:
0.0835
0.0950
0.1006

Support:
0.0705
0.0660
0.0600

RSI near 51 — neutral.
MACD turning positive but still shallow — early shift only.

Long Setup (range breakout play)
EP: 0.079 – 0.083
TP1: 0.095
TP2: 0.100
TP3: 0.117
SL: 0.070

Short Setup (range rejection / continuation)
EP: 0.083 – 0.095
TP1: 0.070
TP2: 0.066
TP3: 0.060
SL: 0.102

Reclaim of 0.1006 shifts bias toward recovery structure.
Loss of 0.0705 opens continuation toward deeper support.

FHE

G R I F F I N

·

--

$STG trading around 0.1819 after a sustained 15m downtrend from the 0.2236 high. Price swept lows at 0.1778 and is attempting a minor bounce, but structure still shows lower highs.

Momentum is stabilizing, not yet bullish.

Key Levels

Resistance:
0.186
0.195
0.205

Support:
0.1778
0.170
0.160

RSI near 48 — neutral zone.
MACD slightly turning up, early recovery attempt.

Long Setup (scalp bounce from demand)
EP: 0.178 – 0.182
TP1: 0.186
TP2: 0.195
TP3: 0.205
SL: 0.170

Short Setup (trend continuation)
EP: 0.185 – 0.190
TP1: 0.178
TP2: 0.170
TP3: 0.160
SL: 0.200

Reclaim of 0.195 shifts short-term bias bullish.
Loss of 0.1778 opens continuation toward deeper support.

STG

G R I F F I N

Vanar, and the Quiet Work of Making Web3 Feel Normal

Plasma: Building Around Stability Instead of Speculation

Trending Topics

Latest News