22coin_S
Verified Creator
一起学习，一起进步
High-Frequency Trader
1.9 Years
337 Following
43.0K+ Followers
20.4K+ Liked
1.9K+ Shared
Posts
All
Quotes
Videos
Live
This is also the official invitation received, which can grant people the permission to open chat rooms. If you need my help to open it, you can leave a message below.
One thing that Plasma is most worth remembering is that it treats stablecoin settlement as a long-term main line rather than a temporary narrative. It does not rush to please the market with fancy features but aims to make the most basic, frequent, and friction-prone action of transferring money as smooth as possible. For the cash layer, speed, cost, and certainty are more important than any buzzwords. You won't be excited about a one-time convenience, but you'll stay because of repeated convenience.
The real moat of a settlement network is not its popularity but its default path. Once users get used to a particular route, the migration cost is not just the transaction fee, but also the learning and psychological costs. What Plasma aims to do is to minimize these costs, turning stablecoins from a 'tool' into 'everyday infrastructure.' When more funds treat this as a commonly used channel, network effects will slowly grow, and the value of XPL will also find it easier to shift from emotional pricing to structural pricing.
@Plasma
$XPL
#plasma
One thing that Plasma is most worth remembering is that it treats stablecoin settlement as a long-term main line rather than a temporary narrative. It does not rush to please the market with fancy features but aims to make the most basic, frequent, and friction-prone action of transferring money as smooth as possible. For the cash layer, speed, cost, and certainty are more important than any buzzwords. You won't be excited about a one-time convenience, but you'll stay because of repeated convenience.
The real moat of a settlement network is not its popularity but its default path. Once users get used to a particular route, the migration cost is not just the transaction fee, but also the learning and psychological costs. What Plasma aims to do is to minimize these costs, turning stablecoins from a 'tool' into 'everyday infrastructure.' When more funds treat this as a commonly used channel, network effects will slowly grow, and the value of XPL will also find it easier to shift from emotional pricing to structural pricing.
@Plasma
$XPL
#plasma
Prices will fluctuate, but the key to Vanar Chain is "Can it become a habit?"
It's hard to predict how the market will move in the short term, but whether the project can create a "habit" is something we can observe. Vanar Chain follows a tool and workflow path, focusing on turning memories and context into reusable units, making actions like retrieval, combination, authorization, and verification become everyday high-frequency behaviors. As long as the high frequency comes from real workflows, on-chain activities do not need to rely on market fluctuations to ignite them.
For VANRY, the most important things are not the price changes on any given day, but three things: whether the average daily calls per person can still grow during dull periods, whether subscriptions and renewals can generate compound interest, and whether the proportion of higher-value workflow actions continues to increase. Once a habit is formed, the pricing logic will gradually shift from being driven by emotions to being driven by usage.
@Vanarchain $VANRY
#Vanar
It's hard to predict how the market will move in the short term, but whether the project can create a "habit" is something we can observe. Vanar Chain follows a tool and workflow path, focusing on turning memories and context into reusable units, making actions like retrieval, combination, authorization, and verification become everyday high-frequency behaviors. As long as the high frequency comes from real workflows, on-chain activities do not need to rely on market fluctuations to ignite them.
For VANRY, the most important things are not the price changes on any given day, but three things: whether the average daily calls per person can still grow during dull periods, whether subscriptions and renewals can generate compound interest, and whether the proportion of higher-value workflow actions continues to increase. Once a habit is formed, the pricing logic will gradually shift from being driven by emotions to being driven by usage.
@Vanarchain $VANRY
#Vanar
While others are still chasing narrative waves, Plasma has already made stablecoin settlement the main line.
The difficulty of the Plasma route does not lie in how cool the technical terms are, but rather in its choice of a track that is most easily underestimated. Stablecoin settlement. It sounds like backend work, even a bit boring, but once you shift your perspective from price fluctuations to the real flow of funds, you will understand why it deserves to be monitored in the long term. Because stablecoins are not about excitement; they are the cash layer. Once the cash layer becomes habitual, the market's attention can shift to other topics, but the path of funds will not easily change.
Many chains are doing things by bringing assets in and then finding ways to make the assets move. Plasma, on the other hand, assumes that funds will definitely move and that they will move more frequently, so it prioritizes reducing friction, shortening paths, and increasing certainty. In simpler terms, it cares more about whether you can smoothly transfer money from point A to point B, rather than whether you can play a thousand different tricks on the chain.
Many chains are doing things by bringing assets in and then finding ways to make the assets move. Plasma, on the other hand, assumes that funds will definitely move and that they will move more frequently, so it prioritizes reducing friction, shortening paths, and increasing certainty. In simpler terms, it cares more about whether you can smoothly transfer money from point A to point B, rather than whether you can play a thousand different tricks on the chain.
Stop reading public chains with emotions; read the next narrative of Vanar Chain with business metrics.
Many people tend to look at the price first when checking the chain, then backtrack the story. The problem is that the noise in the price is too great, especially during market fluctuations when risk appetite is volatile; a few candlesticks can tear any narrative apart. A more stable approach is to study Vanar Chain as a developing product-type infrastructure, using business metrics to dissect its growth logic and employing supply-demand structures to explain the long-term anchor points of the tokens.
First, put the conclusion up front. The key to Vanar Chain's success is not in 'who is faster' or 'who is cheaper', but in whether it can turn the high-frequency operational actions of the agent era into on-chain behaviors that are budgetable, auditable, and reusable, and ensure that such behaviors continue to occur even during quiet market periods. As long as this holds true, the network will have a base that does not rely on bull markets, and the demand for tokens is more likely to shift from being driven by emotions to being driven by usage.
First, put the conclusion up front. The key to Vanar Chain's success is not in 'who is faster' or 'who is cheaper', but in whether it can turn the high-frequency operational actions of the agent era into on-chain behaviors that are budgetable, auditable, and reusable, and ensure that such behaviors continue to occur even during quiet market periods. As long as this holds true, the network will have a base that does not rely on bull markets, and the demand for tokens is more likely to shift from being driven by emotions to being driven by usage.
Binance is giving away tens of millions of dollars, just click and you can get it, I received $5.8
Short Review: The most verified aspect of Vanar Chain is actually its "sustainable use".
When discussing Vanar Chain, don't rush to conclusions based on price fluctuations. It is more like creating a set of infrastructure aimed at agents and teams, with the core being to turn memory and context into callable objects, and then make actions like retrieval, combination, authorization, and verification become everyday high-frequency behaviors. As long as high-frequency activities are established, on-chain activities do not need to rely on market trends to ignite.
The key to VANRY lies here. What truly drives repricing is not short-term emotions, but whether three things continue to happen: whether the average daily calls during flat periods can still grow, whether subscriptions and renewals form compound interest, and whether the proportion of high-value workflow actions continues to increase. Understanding these three points is closer to the answer than just watching candlestick charts.
@Vanarchain $VANRY
#Vanar
When discussing Vanar Chain, don't rush to conclusions based on price fluctuations. It is more like creating a set of infrastructure aimed at agents and teams, with the core being to turn memory and context into callable objects, and then make actions like retrieval, combination, authorization, and verification become everyday high-frequency behaviors. As long as high-frequency activities are established, on-chain activities do not need to rely on market trends to ignite.
The key to VANRY lies here. What truly drives repricing is not short-term emotions, but whether three things continue to happen: whether the average daily calls during flat periods can still grow, whether subscriptions and renewals form compound interest, and whether the proportion of high-value workflow actions continues to increase. Understanding these three points is closer to the answer than just watching candlestick charts.
@Vanarchain $VANRY
#Vanar
Understanding how to view Vanar Chain as a measurable agent infrastructure and how it turns usage into token demand
Most of the time, the market evaluates public chains using the same set of criteria: praising the narrative when prices rise and criticizing the bubble when they fall. However, once you shift your perspective from price to usage, you will realize that the evaluation method for projects like Vanar Chain must change. What it truly strives for is not the market's preference for a concept during a certain cycle, but rather to leave verifiable traces of the daily behaviors of agents and teams on the chain, and to stably convert these traces into predictable costs, compounding revenues, and sustainable token demand.
If a chain is to support the workflow of agents, the first thing it needs to address is a very 'counterintuitive' issue. Agents do not answer questions once; they continuously process tasks. Continuity means repeated calls. Repeated calls mean that costs must be budgetable. Budgetable does not equate to being cheaper is better, but rather that you can know in advance how much it will cost to complete a process, allowing you to confidently write it into automation scripts, and to make it a subscription quota without fearing it will suddenly spiral out of control. Vanar Chain emphasizes fixed-cost layering, with the underlying intention of transforming the language of chain costs from miner bidding to product pricing, enabling developers, teams, and enterprises to budget and price in conventional ways. As long as this holds true, on-chain behavior can transform from sporadic to habitual, and from habitual to scalable.
If a chain is to support the workflow of agents, the first thing it needs to address is a very 'counterintuitive' issue. Agents do not answer questions once; they continuously process tasks. Continuity means repeated calls. Repeated calls mean that costs must be budgetable. Budgetable does not equate to being cheaper is better, but rather that you can know in advance how much it will cost to complete a process, allowing you to confidently write it into automation scripts, and to make it a subscription quota without fearing it will suddenly spiral out of control. Vanar Chain emphasizes fixed-cost layering, with the underlying intention of transforming the language of chain costs from miner bidding to product pricing, enabling developers, teams, and enterprises to budget and price in conventional ways. As long as this holds true, on-chain behavior can transform from sporadic to habitual, and from habitual to scalable.
The core of Plasma is not 'more gameplay', but to make the most realistic demand for stablecoins more like infrastructure. Stablecoins are the cash layer, and what the cash layer truly needs is certainty: transfers must be fast, costs stable, paths short, and experiences worry-free. Plasma prioritizes these aspects, essentially competing for the default settlement route; once a route becomes a habit, users find it hard to revert to more troublesome paths.
This path does not rely on excitement for survival but on a continuous low-friction experience. You may not be thrilled by a smooth transfer once, but you will stay due to repeated convenience. The moat of a settlement network often grows this way—not from a single explosive moment, but from each migration experiencing less resistance.
So if we only talk about the project itself, Plasma's value lies in making stablecoin transfers seamless actions, hiding complexity in the background, and leaving the choice to users. Market conditions may change, narratives may shift, but money will always seek the path of least resistance.
@Plasma
$XPL
#plasma
This path does not rely on excitement for survival but on a continuous low-friction experience. You may not be thrilled by a smooth transfer once, but you will stay due to repeated convenience. The moat of a settlement network often grows this way—not from a single explosive moment, but from each migration experiencing less resistance.
So if we only talk about the project itself, Plasma's value lies in making stablecoin transfers seamless actions, hiding complexity in the background, and leaving the choice to users. Market conditions may change, narratives may shift, but money will always seek the path of least resistance.
@Plasma
$XPL
#plasma
While others are still chasing narrative waves, Plasma has already made stablecoin settlement the main storyline.
The difficulty of Plasma's path does not lie in how cool the technical terms are, but in its choice of the most easily underestimated track. Stablecoin settlement. It sounds like backend work, even a bit boring, but once you shift your perspective from price fluctuations to the real flow of funds, you will understand why it is worth keeping an eye on in the long term. Because stablecoins are not about excitement; they are the cash layer. Once the cash layer becomes habitual, the market's attention can shift topics, but the path of funds will not easily change.
Many chains are doing things to bring assets in and then find ways to make those assets move. Plasma, on the other hand, assumes that funds will definitely move and will do so more frequently, thus prioritizing reducing friction, shortening paths, and increasing certainty. To put it more straightforwardly, it cares more about whether you can smoothly transfer money from point A to point B, rather than whether you can play a thousand tricks on the chain.
Many chains are doing things to bring assets in and then find ways to make those assets move. Plasma, on the other hand, assumes that funds will definitely move and will do so more frequently, thus prioritizing reducing friction, shortening paths, and increasing certainty. To put it more straightforwardly, it cares more about whether you can smoothly transfer money from point A to point B, rather than whether you can play a thousand tricks on the chain.
The recent rebound in the US stock market can ease panic, but it feels more like pulling the market back from a "full retreat" to "begin picking." If subsequent volatility decreases and interest rates no longer surge, risk appetite will have the opportunity to continue to recover, and Bitcoin is more likely to transition from severe fluctuations to a more stable upward trend; otherwise, the rebound may just be a pullback, and altcoins will still passively amplify volatility.
At this stage, funds are more willing to look for two types of things: first, projects that have real use even during periods of calm in the market; second, infrastructure that has budgetable costs and can be integrated into processes. The Vanar Chain project team has recently focused more on tool-oriented actions, continuously refining entry products around memory and workflows to make deposits and calls smoother and more transparent, while emphasizing budgetable expenses to support high-frequency activities. When the market shifts from "rescue" to "expansion," these projects with delivery rhythms and closed-loop usage are more likely to be re-priced.
@Vanarchain $VANRY
#Vanar
At this stage, funds are more willing to look for two types of things: first, projects that have real use even during periods of calm in the market; second, infrastructure that has budgetable costs and can be integrated into processes. The Vanar Chain project team has recently focused more on tool-oriented actions, continuously refining entry products around memory and workflows to make deposits and calls smoother and more transparent, while emphasizing budgetable expenses to support high-frequency activities. When the market shifts from "rescue" to "expansion," these projects with delivery rhythms and closed-loop usage are more likely to be re-priced.
@Vanarchain $VANRY
#Vanar
The US stock market rebound gave the market a breath of relief, but the real watershed for Bitcoin and altcoins lies in who can turn usage into cash flow.
Last night, the rebound of the US stock market was very noticeable, with the index and tech stocks recovering together. The S&P-related funds closed around $695, up about 0.65 percentage points during the day, while the Nasdaq-related funds closed around $615, up about 0.95 percentage points during the day. Meanwhile, Bitcoin returned to about $70,200, with a daily high of about $72,000 and a low of about $68,400. The volatility remains significant, but at least it indicates that risk assets have not continued to collapse indiscriminately. VANRY is still oscillating in the low range, with a price of about $0.00615, fluctuating between approximately $0.00601 and $0.00642 during the day.
Many people like to use memes as a reference point, thinking that as long as the popularity comes, everything can turn around. Indeed, the strongest aspect of memes is the leverage of attention; when emotions warm up, prices can bounce back. But the problem lies here: its turnaround resembles a lottery; popularity comes quickly and leaves just as fast, without leaving a real structure.
The route of dusk_foundation is completely different; its turnaround does not rely on the rebound of popularity, but on the continuous advancement of compliant asset links, turning complex matters into reusable processes. To closely observe the project, you should focus on whether there are continuous actions in three areas.
First, is the end-to-end framework for compliant assets becoming more 'able to run'?
It's not about shouting RWA, but whether issuance, trading, settlement, and data release can be connected. Institutions are not short of stories; what they lack is whether the processes can be reconciled, audited, and run long-term. As long as this link runs smoother and smoother, the value of Dusk will shift from narrative to a business loop.
Second, is privacy transitioning from a concept to usable capabilities at the execution level?
Dusk emphasizes that sensitive information can be protected and rules can be verified. If privacy is just a slogan, it is meaningless; but once it becomes a module that developers can directly invoke, applications can create product forms that are closer to real finance around it, which will lead to longer-term adoption and more stable interactions.
Third, is the ecological channel preventing the mainnet from becoming an island?
Bidirectional bridges and cross-ecosystem scheduling determine whether funds and users are willing to flow frequently. The clearer the channel and the more predictable the costs, the easier it becomes to normalize scheduling. Normalization will pull DUSK from being a trading chip to becoming a system resource, as demand comes from repeated real actions.
So my understanding of 'turnaround' is very simple. Meme turnarounds look at popularity, while Dusk turnarounds look at continuity. As long as the compliant asset link has continuous actions, privacy capabilities have real adoption, and cross-ecosystem scheduling shows signs of normalization, then Dusk's turnaround is not luck; it is progress.
@Dusk $DUSK #Dusk
The route of dusk_foundation is completely different; its turnaround does not rely on the rebound of popularity, but on the continuous advancement of compliant asset links, turning complex matters into reusable processes. To closely observe the project, you should focus on whether there are continuous actions in three areas.
First, is the end-to-end framework for compliant assets becoming more 'able to run'?
It's not about shouting RWA, but whether issuance, trading, settlement, and data release can be connected. Institutions are not short of stories; what they lack is whether the processes can be reconciled, audited, and run long-term. As long as this link runs smoother and smoother, the value of Dusk will shift from narrative to a business loop.
Second, is privacy transitioning from a concept to usable capabilities at the execution level?
Dusk emphasizes that sensitive information can be protected and rules can be verified. If privacy is just a slogan, it is meaningless; but once it becomes a module that developers can directly invoke, applications can create product forms that are closer to real finance around it, which will lead to longer-term adoption and more stable interactions.
Third, is the ecological channel preventing the mainnet from becoming an island?
Bidirectional bridges and cross-ecosystem scheduling determine whether funds and users are willing to flow frequently. The clearer the channel and the more predictable the costs, the easier it becomes to normalize scheduling. Normalization will pull DUSK from being a trading chip to becoming a system resource, as demand comes from repeated real actions.
So my understanding of 'turnaround' is very simple. Meme turnarounds look at popularity, while Dusk turnarounds look at continuity. As long as the compliant asset link has continuous actions, privacy capabilities have real adoption, and cross-ecosystem scheduling shows signs of normalization, then Dusk's turnaround is not luck; it is progress.
@Dusk $DUSK #Dusk
After the sharp decline of Bitcoin, it quickly rebounded, making people realize that what is truly scarce in the market is time; meanwhile, the doubling of the probability of 'Jesus Christ appearing in 2026' on Polymarket makes one aware that attention can also be traded. One is a reality shock that pulls you out of your position, while the other is an emotional outlet that wraps absurdity into odds. The two overlap, as if saying the same thing: the more uncertain the market, the more people crave two things: asymmetric imaginative space and faster action paths.
The bizarre contracts in prediction markets seem to offer astonishing returns, but they are more like prices driven by attention rather than evidence of changes in the world. They can give small investors the thrill of 'buying a big story at a very low cost,' but they struggle to support genuine large-scale capital migration. The real big money does something more straightforward between crashes and rebounds: it first withdraws to stablecoins and then seeks a window to re-enter the market. Thus, stablecoins become the cash base, and the settlement channels become invisible battlegrounds.
The significance of Plasma here becomes clearer; it does not attract people with outrageous topics but instead makes stablecoin settlements smoother, reducing friction when funds switch between fear and excitement. Hot searches can change daily with new spectacles, but the movement of funds will not stop. Whoever builds the smoother road is more likely to leave behind true users in the next rebound after a sharp decline.
@Plasma
$XPL
#plasma
The bizarre contracts in prediction markets seem to offer astonishing returns, but they are more like prices driven by attention rather than evidence of changes in the world. They can give small investors the thrill of 'buying a big story at a very low cost,' but they struggle to support genuine large-scale capital migration. The real big money does something more straightforward between crashes and rebounds: it first withdraws to stablecoins and then seeks a window to re-enter the market. Thus, stablecoins become the cash base, and the settlement channels become invisible battlegrounds.
The significance of Plasma here becomes clearer; it does not attract people with outrageous topics but instead makes stablecoin settlements smoother, reducing friction when funds switch between fear and excitement. Hot searches can change daily with new spectacles, but the movement of funds will not stop. Whoever builds the smoother road is more likely to leave behind true users in the next rebound after a sharp decline.
@Plasma
$XPL
#plasma
If memes can make a comeback, then what justifies these slower players rising to the top?
Many people, when they mention a comeback, immediately think of memes. Indeed, memes are best at suddenly reviving when emotions warm up, even pulling a bunch of people out of the shadows of a bear market. But I want to put it more sharply: the essence of a meme's comeback is essentially the return of attention, not the realization of value. It relies on the speed of dissemination and the pulse of liquidity; the highs come quickly, and the tides retreat just as fast.
So the question arises, if memes can make a comeback, then projects that take a hardline approach are even less likely to succeed, right? On the contrary. Precisely because memes have pushed the matter of attention to the extreme, it has given us a clearer comparative template. You will find that a true comeback that can transcend cycles is often not a wave of heat, but rather a set of repeatable, scalable, and explainable links being established. For me, the recent rhythm of the dusk foundation feels more like preparing for this kind of comeback, and it’s the kind of preparation that becomes more valuable as it progresses.
So the question arises, if memes can make a comeback, then projects that take a hardline approach are even less likely to succeed, right? On the contrary. Precisely because memes have pushed the matter of attention to the extreme, it has given us a clearer comparative template. You will find that a true comeback that can transcend cycles is often not a wave of heat, but rather a set of repeatable, scalable, and explainable links being established. For me, the recent rhythm of the dusk foundation feels more like preparing for this kind of comeback, and it’s the kind of preparation that becomes more valuable as it progresses.
Bitcoin first scares people awake and then lulls them to sleep, while Polymarket turned Jesus into a doubling yield.
The market in the past few days has been like an emotional rollercoaster. Bitcoin quickly rebounded from a low of around sixty thousand dollars to the seventy thousand dollar mark, with sharp rises and falls that hardly gave anyone time to adapt. It reminds every participant that what is called right or wrong judgment is just surface-level; what truly determines whether you can keep up with the rhythm is whether you can timely reduce risks at the moment of a crash and whether you can timely redeploy funds at the moment of a rebound.
At the same time window, another seemingly more absurd event suddenly grabbed attention. On the prediction market Polymarket, a contract about whether Jesus Christ will appear in 2026 saw its implied probability double in a very short time, rising from less than 2 percentage points to about 4 percentage points, with a trading volume close to one million dollars. Many people compared its increase to that of Bitcoin, claiming it had a better stage return.
At the same time window, another seemingly more absurd event suddenly grabbed attention. On the prediction market Polymarket, a contract about whether Jesus Christ will appear in 2026 saw its implied probability double in a very short time, rising from less than 2 percentage points to about 4 percentage points, with a trading volume close to one million dollars. Many people compared its increase to that of Bitcoin, claiming it had a better stage return.
The rebound of the US stock market will indeed improve market sentiment, but it is more like "giving risk assets a breath of air"; it does not mean that all cryptocurrencies can take off immediately. What truly determines how far Bitcoin and altcoins can go is whether risk appetite can continue to repair and whether funds are willing to continue sinking from large-cap weights into high-volatility assets. If sentiment does not continue, the rebound is just a pullback; if sentiment continues, it may lead to a more trend-like recovery.
At this stage, selecting projects is more important than chasing rallies. The logic of Vanar Chain is more tool-oriented, with the project team continuously refining entry products around memory and workflows, making organization and calling lighter and more transparent, attempting to make usage a daily habit; at the same time, they aim to reduce friction in high-frequency calls using a budgetable cost approach. When the market shifts from "rescue" to "expansion", funds are often more willing to return to targets that have a delivery rhythm and a closed loop of usage.
@Vanarchain $VANRY
#Vanar
At this stage, selecting projects is more important than chasing rallies. The logic of Vanar Chain is more tool-oriented, with the project team continuously refining entry products around memory and workflows, making organization and calling lighter and more transparent, attempting to make usage a daily habit; at the same time, they aim to reduce friction in high-frequency calls using a budgetable cost approach. When the market shifts from "rescue" to "expansion", funds are often more willing to return to targets that have a delivery rhythm and a closed loop of usage.
@Vanarchain $VANRY
#Vanar
After the recent crash of Bitcoin, it quickly rebounded, resembling a public lesson that teaches you that what the market truly competes for is not emotions, but time. When it falls, do you have enough speed to reduce your risk positions? When it rises, can you quickly redeploy your funds? Many people think they lose due to judgment, but in fact, they lose due to the speed and cost of settlement. A moment too slow, and the opportunity becomes someone else's profit.
During high volatility phases, stablecoins become more like a cash base. Everyone withdraws while observing; money first returns to stablecoins for a pause, then searches for new attack points. As a result, the frequency of capital movement increases, with more intense switching across platforms, chains, and different products. At this time, what is most valuable is not shouting long or short, but making the process of moving as few steps, less waiting, and less uncertainty as possible.
The significance of Plasma lies here. It focuses on stablecoin settlement, reducing the friction of basic transfers, allowing funds to withdraw more smoothly during crashes and to enter more smoothly during rebounds. The market may fluctuate repeatedly, but funds will always choose the easiest path. Whoever smooths this path will find it easier to retain genuine users in the next severe volatility.
@Plasma
$XPL
#plasma
During high volatility phases, stablecoins become more like a cash base. Everyone withdraws while observing; money first returns to stablecoins for a pause, then searches for new attack points. As a result, the frequency of capital movement increases, with more intense switching across platforms, chains, and different products. At this time, what is most valuable is not shouting long or short, but making the process of moving as few steps, less waiting, and less uncertainty as possible.
The significance of Plasma lies here. It focuses on stablecoin settlement, reducing the friction of basic transfers, allowing funds to withdraw more smoothly during crashes and to enter more smoothly during rebounds. The market may fluctuate repeatedly, but funds will always choose the easiest path. Whoever smooths this path will find it easier to retain genuine users in the next severe volatility.
@Plasma
$XPL
#plasma
Login to explore more contents