$ETH $UNI $SOL
🧨Basant, Walsh who will become the "scapegoat"?
Trump strongly advocates for a "weak dollar", while Treasury Secretary Basant and Federal Reserve nominee Walsh insist on a "strong dollar", leading to an imminent policy rift! The president welcomes the depreciation of the dollar, calling it "beneficial for business", but Basant urgently tries to put out the fire, and Walsh also emphasizes that the dollar's status must be "earned", making the contradictions public.
Washington is brewing a "dual-track strategy": using tariffs to exert pressure, and currency market intervention to lower the dollar, while defending financial hegemony. Even more surprising, Basant and Walsh may push for a "new agreement" between the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department—where the Treasury intervenes in exchange rates, and the Federal Reserve supports the bond market, effectively coordinating control.
But the danger lies in: once the dollar is out of control and inflation rebounds, who will take responsibility? Basant focuses on stability, while Walsh controls inflation, creating an inherent conflict of goals. On the surface, it seems to maintain stability, but in reality, undercurrents are surging.
When the economy reverses, the White House will surely seek a "scapegoat". Is it the Treasury Secretary? Or the central bank chief? A storm is approaching, and the suspense awaits resolution!
#非农意外强劲 #美国零售数据逊预期 #When to bottom out?
