Sajjad Ahmad 466

·

--

$BTC
🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁 🎒🎒🎒🎒💳♦️♦️♦️
Which is your favorite
coin in in crypto? #StrategyBTCPurchase #btc

·

--

Welldone. Achieved already

Shahroz ALI

·

--

Ανατιμητική

$SUI target 0.9600 to 1$
{spot}(SUIUSDT)

·

--

Ανατιμητική

Ethereum Makes a Strong Comeback, Eyes $2,150 Next!

Great news for Ethereum enthusiasts! Ted, a well-known crypto influencer, recently announced on X that Ethereum has successfully reclaimed the $2,000 level. This is a significant milestone, and the excitement doesn’t stop there. The next target to watch is $2,150. If Ethereum manages to break through this barrier, we could see a rally all the way up to $2,400! Keep your eyes peeled—there's a lot of potential ahead for ETH!

ETH

Αθροιστικό PNL

+0.09%

·

--

Thats a very honest opnion basically

AZHAR PK Rai

·

--

#DCR Today I want to share my experience in the market. I don’t have a lot of experience, so I have seen both profit and loss. But one thing I can say for sure is that the profit I made from DCR, I didn’t make from any other coin — with DCR I only gained profit and did not face any loss.
Whenever I invested in other coins based on someone’s advice, I mostly faced losses. So if you want, you can check DCR once.
But remember, this is the market — nothing is confirmed here. Prices can go up or down anytime, and everything depends on news and market conditions.
The final decision is yours, but do take a look at DCR once.$DCR 👌

·

--

Ανατιμητική

反转？

还是又一次拉升挤空，然后才是真正的痛苦？

$BTC 回补了 CME 缺口 → 直接拉到区间高点 → 现在大家又开始喊牛市。
冷静一点。
4H 先扫 62.4K 流动性 → 强势位移到 69.9K。
这是明显的低周期强势冲动。
但整体仍处于更大级别的修正结构之中。
现在在区间顶部。

最大痛苦逻辑：

• 突破并站稳 72.3K 之上 → 空头被持续挤压。
• 若在 69.7K 附近被拒绝 → 跌破 66.4K → 64.6K 缺口磁吸启动。
下方那个新的缺口不是随机的。
那是尚未完成的结构。

⸻

🎯 交易思路 / 决策框架

若 70K–72K 上方形成有效接受 → 结构才真正转强。
若跌破 66.4K → 64K 区域流动性将重新成为目标。
我关注的是“接受还是失败”，而不是情绪。

不是信号。
只是仓位认知。

支持我们请点个 👍

并在下方留言你的关键价位 👇🏻

BTC

Αθροιστικό PNL

+2,55 USDT

·

--

Now it will be ok on the charts

雅曼丽 Salma

·

--

过去几个月，$BTC 几乎每天都在美东时间 10:00 被精准压制。
这不是偶发，而是机械式、重复性、带有规律的行为。
瞬间下砸 → 多单爆仓 → 散户恐慌 → 随后缓慢修复。
这更像流动性工程，而不是情绪波动。
随后，Terraform Labs 起诉 Jane Street，
涉及与 Terra/Luna 崩盘相关的 400 亿美元指控，
包括所谓的内幕信息与对冲行为。
Jane Street 否认相关指控。
但关键在于——
在法律压力出现的第二天，
“10 点下砸”突然消失。
$BTC 迎来了数月以来最强单日上涨，
干净利落地上涨 7%，没有熟悉的“早盘砸盘”。
巧合？也许。
但当一个固定时间的压制模式，在监管审视下突然消失——
你至少应该重新评估当前的市场结构。
问题不在阴谋论。
而在于流动性。
• 有多少爆仓是被引导的？
• 有多少恐慌是被制造的？
这不代表“立刻暴涨”。
但波动环境可能正在发生变化。
如果“被设计的弱势”暂停了——
真正自然的买盘，会是什么样子？
欢迎点赞 👍 并留言交流你的看法。
#StrategyBTCPurchase #BTC
{spot}(BTCUSDT)

·

--

I recommend

Aaron Vail BQgt

·

--

are you sure. Please tell me. I have to buy eth

·

--

Ανατιμητική

$BTC 扫掉 62.5K 流动性 → 强势位移 → 重新夺回结构。
那不是恐慌性见底。
那是筹码重新布局。

现在价格正压向 69.5K–70K 供应区。

下一个明显的流动性磁铁？
71K–72K。

但关键在这里：

如果 72K 没有被压制——
如果价格突破并在上方“站稳”——

那就意味着更大的行情正在打开。

⸻

🟢 日内做多关注
回踩区间：65.8K–66.2K（若给到）
上方磁铁：71K–72K
突破并站稳 72K → 进入扩张阶段

一旦站上 72K，上方流动性会迅速变薄。

78K–80K 就不再遥远。

⸻

🔴 什么会破坏这条偏多路径？

突破 72K
但迅速跌回下方
并且重新被前高区间压制

那意味着分配，而不是扩张。

但在那种情况出现之前——
结构依然偏向延续。

⸻

这不是喊单。
这是结构逻辑。

66K = 价值区
72K = 关口
站稳之上 = 趋势加速

如果 72K 守住……

80K 不是幻想。
而是结构推动的必然结果。

请点赞👍并留言支持我们！
#JaneStreet10AMDump #StrategyBTCPurchase #trading

·

--

Ανατιμητική

几个月以来，$BTC 几乎每天都在美东时间 10:00 被精准打压。
不是偶发，而是机械、重复、可预测。

瞬间砸盘 → 多头清算 → 散户恐慌 → 然后慢慢回拉。

这不像情绪。
更像流动性工程。

随后，Terraform Labs 起诉 Jane Street，
涉及 400 亿美元的 Terra/Luna 崩盘相关指控。

声称存在提前信息与避损行为。
Jane Street 否认。

但关键在于——

法律压力出现后的第二天，
10 点砸盘消失。

$BTC 迎来数月最强单日上涨，
干净 7% 拉升，没有“早盘铁锤”。

巧合？也许。

但当一个固定时间的压制模式，在监管关注下突然消失——
你至少该重新审视结构。

问题不是阴谋。
而是流动性。

• 有多少清算是被引导的？
• 有多少恐慌是被制造的？

这不代表“马上暴涨”。
而是波动环境可能正在改变。

如果工程化的弱势暂停——
真正的自然买盘，会是什么样子？

请点赞👍并留言支持我们！

#StrategyBTCPurchase #btc #JaneStreet

BTC

Αθροιστικό PNL

+2,54 USDT

·

--

Ανατιμητική

$ETH 目前在 2,050 附近。
不在低点。
不在突破位。
而是在结构的正中间。

而情绪最容易变贵的地方，往往就是这里。
我们已经扫过 1,800 流动性 → 强势位移到 2,148。
现在价格正在回落，靠近 2,000–1,970。
这个区域很关键。
在 2,050 买入并不是错误。
只是并不理想。
那是动能追随，而不是价值布局。
如果 2,000 守住并形成更高低点，
继续上攻 2,148 是合理预期。
但如果 1,970 被干净跌破，
结构就会转变——
你将从“增长资金”变成“防守资金”。
这就是“反应”和“提前判断”的区别。
就我个人而言？
我更倾向于分批，而不是一次性压 25%。
如果一定要参与，可以小仓位先试。
重点仓位留给关键结构。
确认后再加仓——不是基于希望。
因为本周不是比谁判断对。

而是比谁不会被套。

⸻

交易思考 / 决策框架

中间区间入场，风险回报比通常较弱。
决策区间 = 2,000–1,970。
站稳 2,148 上方 = 延续偏多。
跌破 1,970 = 结构翻转。

仓位大小应与清晰度匹配。

⸻

入场区间：
2,000 – 1,980

止损：
1,945

止盈：
• TP1: 2,148（前高）
• TP2: 2,200（整数关口 + 流动性）
• TP3: 2,260–2,280（4小时级别供应区）

如果入场在 1,990–2,000 附近，
风险回报结构是健康的。

请用您的点赞👍和评论来支持我们！

#ETH #StrategyBTCPurchase #trading

Α

ETH/USDT

Τιμή

2.069,33

·

--

Ανατιμητική

$ETH 扫掉了 1,750 的流动性，并且出现了位移行情。现在价格正在重新站上 2,000–2,060。这不是随机波动。这是结构修复。MA(7) 开始拐头向上。MA(25) 已被收复。动能指标回到中性区域。这是筑底行为，而不是衰竭。

🟢 $ETH 波段偏向 — 结构收复
偏向：站稳 1,980–2,000 之上看多
失效：日线收盘有效跌破 1,900
上方流动性：2,150 → 2,300

我不是在追涨绿K。我在观察是否真正站稳。如果 2K 被守住 → 延续上涨的概率提升。如果失守 → 那就是一个更低高点陷阱。风险已定义。反应大于预测。

你更看重结构收复的强度，还是 2.1K 上方的流动性吸引？

我已经开始买入了，你呢？

请仅通过点赞👍和评论来支持我。#StrategyBTCPurchase #eth #BinanceSquare

Α

ETH/USDT

Τιμή

2.069,33

·

--

$BTC

A famouse saying : The crowd is right during the trend, but wrong at both ends.

BTC just displaced from 62.4K → straight into the 69.5K prior high liquidity pocket. Funding is negative. OI climbing. Sellers pressing aggressively.

That’s not confidence.
That’s positioning imbalance.

4H structure:
• Clean higher-low sequence from 62.4K
• Strong displacement through MA cluster
• Stoch RSI overheated (momentum extreme)
• Now probing 69.5K prior high

When price pushes into liquidity while funding stays negative, you don’t ignore it. That’s fuel if acceptance happens.

1) July 2021 – The 30K “Dead Cat Bounce” That Wasn’t. BTC had crashed from 64K → 30K.
Everyone was calling for 20K.

2) January 2023 – The “Bull Trap” Narrative. After the 15.5K bottom (FTX collapse), BTC reclaimed 21K.

3) October 2023 – 25K → 35K Expansion. BTC was stuck under 28K–30K for months.

If 69.5K accepts with continuation → squeeze potential toward 71K+ opens fast.
If this fails and loses 67.5–68K → then the trap flips the other way.

Trade Thought / Decision Framework:
I’m not predicting. I’m watching acceptance vs rejection at 69.5K. Above it with structure holding = squeeze conditions. Failure and reclaim below prior range = fade setup. Risk is defined by structure, not bias.

Everyone feels confident here.

That’s usually when the market decides who’s stubborn.I don’t know if you will keep your #BTC or just sell it here

23 Months After ATH. Every Cycle. Coincidence?Across cycles, Bitcoin has printed its bear market bottom almost exactly 23 months after its ATH. Not 12. Not 18. Roughly 23. Let’s break it down structurally. 2013 cycle → ATH late 2013 → bottom January 2015 → ~25 months. 2017 cycle → ATH December 2017 → bottom December 2018 → ~12 months crash, but full structural base + reclaim phase extended into late 2019 (~23–24 months post-ATH before real expansion). 2021 cycle → ATH November 2021 → final low November 2022 → 12 months crash, but broader accumulation and reclaim phase stretched deep into 2023 (~23 months before sustainable expansion). Here’s what most traders misunderstand: the “bottom” isn’t just the wick low. It’s the structural repair phase. The market doesn’t only crash — it rebuilds. And that rebuilding window keeps clustering around that 23-month timing zone. Why 23 months? It aligns with liquidity reset, miner capitulation cycles, macro tightening/loosening shifts, and most importantly — crowd memory decay. By month 20+, hope is gone. Narratives die. Participation drops. That’s when supply is fully transferred. Now apply it to the current cycle. Across cycles, Bitcoin has printed its bear market bottom almost exactly 23 months after its ATH. Not 12. Not 18. Roughly 23. Let’s break it down structurally. 2013 cycle → ATH late 2013 → bottom January 2015 → ~25 months. 2017 cycle → ATH December 2017 → bottom December 2018 → ~12 months crash, but full structural base + reclaim phase extended into late 2019 (~23–24 months post-ATH before real expansion). 2021 cycle → ATH November 2021 → final low November 2022 → 12 months crash, but broader accumulation and reclaim phase stretched deep into 2023 (~23 months before sustainable expansion). Here’s what most traders misunderstand: the “bottom” isn’t just the wick low. It’s the structural repair phase. The market doesn’t only crash — it rebuilds. And that rebuilding window keeps clustering around that 23-month timing zone. Why 23 months? It aligns with liquidity reset, miner capitulation cycles, macro tightening/loosening shifts, and most importantly — crowd memory decay. By month 20+, hope is gone. Narratives die. Participation drops. That’s when supply is fully transferred. Now apply it to the current cycle. $BTC ATH: November 2021. 23-month timing window: October–November 2023. What happened there? Aggressive base formation. Structural shift. Displacement. That’s not random. That’s cyclical behavior. But here’s the nuance: cycles don’t repeat — they rhyme. Timing clusters, but structure confirms. If price accepts higher highs and protects higher lows on HTF, that supports the thesis. If structure fails, timing alone means nothing. Trade Thought / Decision Framework: Timing gives context, not confirmation. I watch acceptance vs failure around HTF structure. If higher-timeframe higher lows continue to hold, expansion bias remains valid. If we lose structural support, the cycle thesis weakens. Risk management always overrides cycle theory. So the real question isn’t “Did we bottom?” It’s: Is structure behaving like a post-23-month accumulation or not? Cycles reward patience. Structure confirms reality. $BTC ATH: November 2021. 23-month timing window: October–November 2023. What happened there? Aggressive base formation. Structural shift. Displacement. That’s not random. That’s cyclical behavior. But here’s the nuance: cycles don’t repeat — they rhyme. Timing clusters, but structure confirms. If price accepts higher highs and protects higher lows on HTF, that supports the thesis. If structure fails, timing alone means nothing. Trade Thought / Decision Framework: Timing gives context, not confirmation. I watch acceptance vs failure around HTF structure. If higher-timeframe higher lows continue to hold, expansion bias remains valid. If we lose structural support, the cycle thesis weakens. Risk management always overrides cycle theory. So the real question isn’t “Did we bottom?” It’s: Is structure behaving like a post-23-month accumulation or not? Cycles reward patience. Structure confirms reality. #BTC #ETH

·

--

23 Months After ATH. Every Cycle. Coincidence?

Across cycles, Bitcoin has printed its bear market bottom almost exactly 23 months after its ATH. Not 12. Not 18. Roughly 23.

Let’s break it down structurally.

2013 cycle → ATH late 2013 → bottom January 2015 → ~25 months.

2017 cycle → ATH December 2017 → bottom December 2018 → ~12 months crash, but full structural base + reclaim phase extended into late 2019 (~23–24 months post-ATH before real expansion).

2021 cycle → ATH November 2021 → final low November 2022 → 12 months crash, but broader accumulation and reclaim phase stretched deep into 2023 (~23 months before sustainable expansion).

Here’s what most traders misunderstand: the “bottom” isn’t just the wick low. It’s the structural repair phase. The market doesn’t only crash — it rebuilds. And that rebuilding window keeps clustering around that 23-month timing zone.

Why 23 months? It aligns with liquidity reset, miner capitulation cycles, macro tightening/loosening shifts, and most importantly — crowd memory decay. By month 20+, hope is gone. Narratives die. Participation drops. That’s when supply is fully transferred.

Now apply it to the current cycle.
Across cycles, Bitcoin has printed its bear market bottom almost exactly 23 months after its ATH. Not 12. Not 18. Roughly 23.

Let’s break it down structurally.

2013 cycle → ATH late 2013 → bottom January 2015 → ~25 months.

2017 cycle → ATH December 2017 → bottom December 2018 → ~12 months crash, but full structural base + reclaim phase extended into late 2019 (~23–24 months post-ATH before real expansion).

2021 cycle → ATH November 2021 → final low November 2022 → 12 months crash, but broader accumulation and reclaim phase stretched deep into 2023 (~23 months before sustainable expansion).

Here’s what most traders misunderstand: the “bottom” isn’t just the wick low. It’s the structural repair phase. The market doesn’t only crash — it rebuilds. And that rebuilding window keeps clustering around that 23-month timing zone.

Why 23 months? It aligns with liquidity reset, miner capitulation cycles, macro tightening/loosening shifts, and most importantly — crowd memory decay. By month 20+, hope is gone. Narratives die. Participation drops. That’s when supply is fully transferred.

Now apply it to the current cycle.

$BTC ATH: November 2021.

23-month timing window: October–November 2023.

What happened there? Aggressive base formation. Structural shift. Displacement.

That’s not random. That’s cyclical behavior.

But here’s the nuance: cycles don’t repeat — they rhyme. Timing clusters, but structure confirms. If price accepts higher highs and protects higher lows on HTF, that supports the thesis. If structure fails, timing alone means nothing.

Trade Thought / Decision Framework:

Timing gives context, not confirmation. I watch acceptance vs failure around HTF structure. If higher-timeframe higher lows continue to hold, expansion bias remains valid. If we lose structural support, the cycle thesis weakens. Risk management always overrides cycle theory.

So the real question isn’t “Did we bottom?”

It’s: Is structure behaving like a post-23-month accumulation or not?

Cycles reward patience.

Structure confirms reality.

$BTC ATH: November 2021.

23-month timing window: October–November 2023.

What happened there? Aggressive base formation. Structural shift. Displacement.

That’s not random. That’s cyclical behavior.

But here’s the nuance: cycles don’t repeat — they rhyme. Timing clusters, but structure confirms. If price accepts higher highs and protects higher lows on HTF, that supports the thesis. If structure fails, timing alone means nothing.

Trade Thought / Decision Framework:

Timing gives context, not confirmation. I watch acceptance vs failure around HTF structure. If higher-timeframe higher lows continue to hold, expansion bias remains valid. If we lose structural support, the cycle thesis weakens. Risk management always overrides cycle theory.

So the real question isn’t “Did we bottom?”

It’s: Is structure behaving like a post-23-month accumulation or not?

Cycles reward patience.

Structure confirms reality.
#BTC #ETH

·

--

Happy traders 👇🏻

Sajjad Ahmad 466

·

--

$DOGE 扫了 0.0899 的流动性 → 强势冲高 → 现在正压在 0.103–0.104 前高位置。

这里是决策区，不是随便追涨的地方。

4小时结构：
• 干净的位移拉升
• 站上均线簇
• Stoch RSI 过热
• 正在测试前高（0.1034）

如果 0.104 被有效接受 → 0.108–0.112 很快会打开空间。
如果被拒绝 → 大概率回踩 0.097–0.095。

这是冲进供应区的扩张。

不是追涨的位置。

我只买回调，只卖反弹。
那你在这里会怎么做？
{spot}(DOGEUSDT)
#doge #StrategyBTCPurchase #trading

DOGE

·

--

$DOGE 扫了 0.0899 的流动性 → 强势冲高 → 现在正压在 0.103–0.104 前高位置。

这里是决策区，不是随便追涨的地方。

4小时结构：
• 干净的位移拉升
• 站上均线簇
• Stoch RSI 过热
• 正在测试前高（0.1034）

如果 0.104 被有效接受 → 0.108–0.112 很快会打开空间。
如果被拒绝 → 大概率回踩 0.097–0.095。

这是冲进供应区的扩张。

不是追涨的位置。

我只买回调，只卖反弹。
那你在这里会怎么做？
#doge #StrategyBTCPurchase #trading

DOGE

·

--

$ETH 并没有“真正突破”。它是在扫掉 1,800 流动性之后，垂直拉升进入 4H 级别的前期供应区。这个上涨不是建立在结构之上，而是建立在失衡之上。快速扩张、没有打底，直接冲进 2,070–2,086 阻力区。

看看整体背景：1,800 的流动性被清扫 → 强势位移上涨 → 直接突破 MA(7) 和 MA(25) → 现在价格远离均值大幅延伸。Stoch RSI 已经顶在 100。这不是新的动能，而是过热。

垂直阳线看起来很强势，但从结构上看是脆弱的。

这正是追多者容易被收割的位置。

如果价格无法在 2,080 上方形成接受并构建结构，回归均值至 1,950–1,900 的概率将上升。如果买方能够在供应区上方站稳、压缩整理并形成延续结构，那么上涨才算有效。在那之前，这只是反应区，而不是确认。

交易思路 / 决策框架：
我不会在冲入供应区时追涨。我只观察“接受”还是“拒绝”。如果 2,070 失守，下行回撤风险增加；如果在其上方建立结构，偏向才会调整。先看反应，再谈情绪。

这是一个决策点，而不是庆祝时刻。
你是在卖给他们，还是继续持有？
#eth #StrategyBTCPurchase #trading

·

--

Ανατιμητική

$BTC Bulls Holding Strong, Momentum Building 🚀

Entry Zone: $67,000 – $67,400

Target 1 (TP1): $68,800
Target 2 (TP2): $69,500
Target 3 (TP3): $71,200

Stop Loss (SL): $65,800

Structure holding above 4H support.
Momentum still strong — dips getting bought.

Don’t miss the move 🔥 #StrategyBTCPurchase #BTC

Like the post to support us

Trade wisely 🤝 $BTC

Trade here 👇🏻

Δ

BTC/USDT

Τιμή

67.000

·

--

It looks like this when you buy the dip and sell the bounce . #StrategyBTCPurchase #btc #binancesquare

Δ

BTC/USDT

Τιμή

67.000