ParvezMayar
Επαληθευμένος δημιουργός
Crypto enthusiast | Exploring, sharing, and earning | Let’s grow together!🤝 | X @Next_GemHunter
Άνοιγμα συναλλαγής
Επενδυτής υψηλής συχνότητας
2.4 χρόνια
288 Ακολούθηση
41.4K+ Ακόλουθοι
76.4K+ Μου αρέσει
6.2K+ Κοινοποιήσεις
Δημοσιεύσεις
Χαρτοφυλάκιο
Όλες
Παραθέσεις
Βίντεο
Ζωντανά
This shows the growth of #BinanceSquare 💪🏻
CZ
·
--
Thanks to all the tippers. All of that will go to Giggle Academy.
Wow… $COAI really moved.
From 0.25 area to 0.46 without much hesitation, and now sitting around 0.45 still holding strong. That kind of follow-through isn’t random... buyers clearly stepping in on dips.
If $COAI stays calm above 0.42–0.43, this trend still looks healthy. Nice one.
From 0.25 area to 0.46 without much hesitation, and now sitting around 0.45 still holding strong. That kind of follow-through isn’t random... buyers clearly stepping in on dips.
If $COAI stays calm above 0.42–0.43, this trend still looks healthy. Nice one.
$SPACE is in a clean momentum run... higher highs, higher lows, and barely any meaningful pullbacks on the way up.
As long as $SPACE holds above the 0.0095–0.0098 breakout zone, dips look buyable; lose that and momentum likely cools before the next leg.
As long as $SPACE holds above the 0.0095–0.0098 breakout zone, dips look buyable; lose that and momentum likely cools before the next leg.
Α
FOGOUSDT
Διην.
Έκλεισε
PnL
+0,90USDT
$TAKE ran from 0.025 to 0.0616 and now cooling around 0.054... as long as it stays above 0.050 the structure still looks fine; lose that and it probably drifts back toward 0.045 where the last push started.
Guys... $NAORIS continues its steady bullish momentum all the way from $0.02 to $0.035+ still, strong momentum with short term vertical spikes.
Δ
DUSK/USDT
Τιμή
0,1065
Fogo and the Hour Geography Gets Voted In
Fogo Layer-1 doesn't let geography happen by accident.
The zone vote is open. Stake weight tallies are visible. No one pretends this is abstract. On Fogo, the geography is already picked when the epoch opens. No hiding. Zone A. Zone B. Different latency envelopes. Same chain.
You watch the numbers move. Then you stop watching for a second. Then you're back watching. Like that changes anything.
Single active zone per epoch. Not "preferred," not "recommended." Active. One cluster carries execution for the next 90,000 blocks — the whole 90,000-block epoch. The others aren't offline. They're bonded, alive, syncing. Just… not decisive.
I keep calling it "rotation." It's not rotation. It's selection.
The weight shifts, then stops. Someone's sitting on stake. Everyone knows it.
Stake-weighted zone voting doesn't feel like governance in the moment. It feels like waiting for a number to stop being polite. If enough $FOGO backs a zone and the supermajority approval line clears, the topology tightens around that geography. If it doesn't clear, nothing moves. Same validators, same racks, same latency… and the next hour is still unresolved.
Stake-weighted. My bad... stake-weighted enough. Until someone holds weight back late and the tally just sits there.
Someone dropped a screenshot in the channel: 66.9% again, same number, different epoch. Someone typed "don't post the latency yet" because the zone quorum wasn't locked and nobody wanted the screenshot used as leverage. When supermajority finally cleared, the first reply was just: "ok, now run Turbine stats again—same path, same racks."
The ledger doesn't blink. Slot cadence doesn't hesitate. But the physical center of block production moves. Validators in the chosen zone are already co-located under a validator co-location policy that's more rule than suggestion. Fewer cross-region hops. Tighter propagation loops. Multi-local consensus compresses distance before the first block of the epoch lands.
It feels restrictive the first time you model it. One active zone? On a public network? But latency isn't theoretical here. It shows up in milliseconds between leader broadcast and vote return. Scatter validators across continents and you inherit that delay. You don't argue it away. You schedule around it.
And yes, people call this centralization. Others call it coordination. Same racks either way. I'm not pretending the trade disappears.
Validator zone co-location isn't decorative somehow on @Fogo Official . It's enforced posture. And yeah, that sounds sterile until you're the one trying to get into a zone and can't. Participation isn't only about stake; it's about whether your infrastructure behaves inside a geographic cluster when timing gets tight. If the zone underperforms — missed timing, unstable propagation — stake-weighted zone voting can push execution elsewhere next epoch. That's the escape hatch. And nobody loves it.
While an epoch is live, the active zone holds the line.
No distributed averaging. No hope that latency evens out across hemispheres. The single active zone per epoch carries deterministic block production inside its physical boundary. Turbine propagation stays inside shorter paths. Votes return faster. The leader schedule doesn't wait on long-haul links. If a packet is late, it's late. The chain doesn't pause to be polite.
The threshold looked safe. Then it didn't. And it's never safe for long.
Supermajority isn't a vibe. It's the approval line. Cross it and the hour is committed. Miss it — and you just sit there. Watching. Everyone can see the stake, but nobody wants to be the one who makes the geography "official."
Built on the SVM-native Layer-1 Fogo's Multi-local consensus narrows the room to one ugly question: which physical cluster can keep slot discipline cleanest right now?
Nobody gets equal participation. Not this hour.
The vote count hovers near threshold again. One zone leads, but not by much. Supermajority zone approval hasn't locked yet. Until it does, execution for the next hour isn't settled. Validators inside the leading zone are ready though— machines aligned, links tested... but they're waiting on weight. Not on compute. On the decision.
When the threshold clears, there's still no ceremony. Zone activation protocol flips, the active zone becomes the execution surface, and the rest of the network adjusts around it.
Latency on Fogo drops... not magically, just mechanically. Fewer long-distance hops. More predictable vote aggregation. Fogo's Deterministic ledger extension continues without drift, but the physical layer underneath it tightens and the margin that chose it is sitting there in the vote history.
And the part that stays uncomfortable: a zone can be healthy and still lose. Not because it failed. Because it didn't win the stake.
Next epoch is already loading.
Someone's refreshing the tally again. 67.1% now. They don't believe it. #Fogo
#fogo
The zone vote is open. Stake weight tallies are visible. No one pretends this is abstract. On Fogo, the geography is already picked when the epoch opens. No hiding. Zone A. Zone B. Different latency envelopes. Same chain.
You watch the numbers move. Then you stop watching for a second. Then you're back watching. Like that changes anything.
Single active zone per epoch. Not "preferred," not "recommended." Active. One cluster carries execution for the next 90,000 blocks — the whole 90,000-block epoch. The others aren't offline. They're bonded, alive, syncing. Just… not decisive.
I keep calling it "rotation." It's not rotation. It's selection.
The weight shifts, then stops. Someone's sitting on stake. Everyone knows it.
Stake-weighted zone voting doesn't feel like governance in the moment. It feels like waiting for a number to stop being polite. If enough $FOGO backs a zone and the supermajority approval line clears, the topology tightens around that geography. If it doesn't clear, nothing moves. Same validators, same racks, same latency… and the next hour is still unresolved.
Stake-weighted. My bad... stake-weighted enough. Until someone holds weight back late and the tally just sits there.
Someone dropped a screenshot in the channel: 66.9% again, same number, different epoch. Someone typed "don't post the latency yet" because the zone quorum wasn't locked and nobody wanted the screenshot used as leverage. When supermajority finally cleared, the first reply was just: "ok, now run Turbine stats again—same path, same racks."
The ledger doesn't blink. Slot cadence doesn't hesitate. But the physical center of block production moves. Validators in the chosen zone are already co-located under a validator co-location policy that's more rule than suggestion. Fewer cross-region hops. Tighter propagation loops. Multi-local consensus compresses distance before the first block of the epoch lands.
It feels restrictive the first time you model it. One active zone? On a public network? But latency isn't theoretical here. It shows up in milliseconds between leader broadcast and vote return. Scatter validators across continents and you inherit that delay. You don't argue it away. You schedule around it.
And yes, people call this centralization. Others call it coordination. Same racks either way. I'm not pretending the trade disappears.
Validator zone co-location isn't decorative somehow on @Fogo Official . It's enforced posture. And yeah, that sounds sterile until you're the one trying to get into a zone and can't. Participation isn't only about stake; it's about whether your infrastructure behaves inside a geographic cluster when timing gets tight. If the zone underperforms — missed timing, unstable propagation — stake-weighted zone voting can push execution elsewhere next epoch. That's the escape hatch. And nobody loves it.
While an epoch is live, the active zone holds the line.
No distributed averaging. No hope that latency evens out across hemispheres. The single active zone per epoch carries deterministic block production inside its physical boundary. Turbine propagation stays inside shorter paths. Votes return faster. The leader schedule doesn't wait on long-haul links. If a packet is late, it's late. The chain doesn't pause to be polite.
The threshold looked safe. Then it didn't. And it's never safe for long.
Supermajority isn't a vibe. It's the approval line. Cross it and the hour is committed. Miss it — and you just sit there. Watching. Everyone can see the stake, but nobody wants to be the one who makes the geography "official."
Built on the SVM-native Layer-1 Fogo's Multi-local consensus narrows the room to one ugly question: which physical cluster can keep slot discipline cleanest right now?
Nobody gets equal participation. Not this hour.
The vote count hovers near threshold again. One zone leads, but not by much. Supermajority zone approval hasn't locked yet. Until it does, execution for the next hour isn't settled. Validators inside the leading zone are ready though— machines aligned, links tested... but they're waiting on weight. Not on compute. On the decision.
When the threshold clears, there's still no ceremony. Zone activation protocol flips, the active zone becomes the execution surface, and the rest of the network adjusts around it.
Latency on Fogo drops... not magically, just mechanically. Fewer long-distance hops. More predictable vote aggregation. Fogo's Deterministic ledger extension continues without drift, but the physical layer underneath it tightens and the margin that chose it is sitting there in the vote history.
And the part that stays uncomfortable: a zone can be healthy and still lose. Not because it failed. Because it didn't win the stake.
Next epoch is already loading.
Someone's refreshing the tally again. 67.1% now. They don't believe it. #Fogo
#fogo
Vanar and the Absence of a Retry Button
On Vanar ( @Vanarchain ), built for real-time interaction, the scariest button is the one you never see.
Retry.
During a Virtua countdown drop, someone hit Claim once, got a half-second spinner, and hit it again. Two seconds later a Discord mod typed, “stop double tapping... wait,” like that’s a normal sentence in a plaza that never really empties.
That’s the leak. Not the transaction.
The habit.
In Vanar chain's Ai agentic Virtua metaverse, nobody stands still to be reassured. Sessions overlap, inventory keeps ticking, emotes keep looping while the world changes under them. A branded cosmetic appears. A reward resolves. A trade clears mid-gesture. If the UI asks for patience, people don’t “wait.”
They protect themselves.
Second tap. Inventory toggle. Quick relog. Clip it “just in case.”
And once a player learns that move, they carry it everywhere... across VGN titles, across shared progression, across anything that smells like a live moment.
I used to tell myself it was harmless.
It isn’t.
Because a retry isn’t just an input. It’s a little permission slip that says the first one might not have been real.
The ugly version shows up when the same wallet is in two places at once. Match ends in one VGN title, the badge animation is still doing its victory lap, and the player is already queued in another. Same account. Two screens. One inventory tab already ticking forward.
Vanar closes the progression event.
One client admits it.
The other hesitates for a breath.
A breath is enough.
Someone posts: “reward didn’t count.” Someone replies with a screenshot. Now the room is negotiating identity while Vanar is already finalizing the next thing, like a referee who doesn’t stop play for arguments.
Deterministic. Correct.
Still losing the moment.
We tried the “responsible” UI early. Error copy. Gentle prompts. A fallback button. It made Support feel safer for about a day. Then players started using the fallback like a move: tap twice to be sure, clip if it looks weird, accuse if the other screen disagrees.
We taught them “verify.”
That’s when we removed the visible retry path.
Not heroically. Quietly. I remember the internal thread more than the deploy. Support asked, “what do we tell them if it stalls?” Ops asked for a modal anyway. Someone suggested adding a spinner with a “Try Again” link at three seconds.
Three seconds is an eternity in a live plaza.
So we pushed the uncertainty inward.
If a claim is accepted, it commits once. If it’s not accepted, the UI doesn’t ask the player to guess which reality they’re in. It holds the interaction in a way that still feels like play, not paperwork. Stretch the animation. Delay the celebration. Let the world keep breathing while the system closes the seam.
Because the seam is where the second tap gets born.
And Vanar, as a consumer-grade Layer-1, doesn’t get the luxury of “tell users to slow down.” Mass eyes, live. Persistent worlds. Cross-title progression. Inventory and chat moving like they have somewhere to be. If you put ambiguity on the user, they’ll resolve it socially.
With clips.
With “refresh.”
With accusations that spread faster than anything you can ship to “clarify.”
So we started tracking the only thing that mattered here: the human window between resolution and recognition. Not block time. Not gas. The gap where a player decides whether to protect themselves.
Too wide, and the plaza invents a ritual.
Inventory toggle like a receipt. Relog like a prayer. “Clip it” as default.
Tighten it, and nothing interesting happens. No mods coaching “don’t double tap.” No side-by-sides. No one teaching the room how to doubt.
The absence of a retry button isn’t minimalism.
It’s refusal.
Refusal to train players to arbitrate settlement with their thumbs while Vanar is closing state underneath them.
The system absorbs the wobble. The user gets a predictable flow.
Equip once.
Claim once.
Move on.
And if the UI ever makes them wonder, if it ever invites that second tap... you won’t see it as “network issues.” You’ll see it as behavior. Inventory toggles. Relogs. “Clip it” becoming muscle memory.
That’s the real failure mode.
Not a reverted transaction.
A player learning that Vanar sometimes needs to be checked. #Vanar
$VANRY
Retry.
During a Virtua countdown drop, someone hit Claim once, got a half-second spinner, and hit it again. Two seconds later a Discord mod typed, “stop double tapping... wait,” like that’s a normal sentence in a plaza that never really empties.
That’s the leak. Not the transaction.
The habit.
In Vanar chain's Ai agentic Virtua metaverse, nobody stands still to be reassured. Sessions overlap, inventory keeps ticking, emotes keep looping while the world changes under them. A branded cosmetic appears. A reward resolves. A trade clears mid-gesture. If the UI asks for patience, people don’t “wait.”
They protect themselves.
Second tap. Inventory toggle. Quick relog. Clip it “just in case.”
And once a player learns that move, they carry it everywhere... across VGN titles, across shared progression, across anything that smells like a live moment.
I used to tell myself it was harmless.
It isn’t.
Because a retry isn’t just an input. It’s a little permission slip that says the first one might not have been real.
The ugly version shows up when the same wallet is in two places at once. Match ends in one VGN title, the badge animation is still doing its victory lap, and the player is already queued in another. Same account. Two screens. One inventory tab already ticking forward.
Vanar closes the progression event.
One client admits it.
The other hesitates for a breath.
A breath is enough.
Someone posts: “reward didn’t count.” Someone replies with a screenshot. Now the room is negotiating identity while Vanar is already finalizing the next thing, like a referee who doesn’t stop play for arguments.
Deterministic. Correct.
Still losing the moment.
We tried the “responsible” UI early. Error copy. Gentle prompts. A fallback button. It made Support feel safer for about a day. Then players started using the fallback like a move: tap twice to be sure, clip if it looks weird, accuse if the other screen disagrees.
We taught them “verify.”
That’s when we removed the visible retry path.
Not heroically. Quietly. I remember the internal thread more than the deploy. Support asked, “what do we tell them if it stalls?” Ops asked for a modal anyway. Someone suggested adding a spinner with a “Try Again” link at three seconds.
Three seconds is an eternity in a live plaza.
So we pushed the uncertainty inward.
If a claim is accepted, it commits once. If it’s not accepted, the UI doesn’t ask the player to guess which reality they’re in. It holds the interaction in a way that still feels like play, not paperwork. Stretch the animation. Delay the celebration. Let the world keep breathing while the system closes the seam.
Because the seam is where the second tap gets born.
And Vanar, as a consumer-grade Layer-1, doesn’t get the luxury of “tell users to slow down.” Mass eyes, live. Persistent worlds. Cross-title progression. Inventory and chat moving like they have somewhere to be. If you put ambiguity on the user, they’ll resolve it socially.
With clips.
With “refresh.”
With accusations that spread faster than anything you can ship to “clarify.”
So we started tracking the only thing that mattered here: the human window between resolution and recognition. Not block time. Not gas. The gap where a player decides whether to protect themselves.
Too wide, and the plaza invents a ritual.
Inventory toggle like a receipt. Relog like a prayer. “Clip it” as default.
Tighten it, and nothing interesting happens. No mods coaching “don’t double tap.” No side-by-sides. No one teaching the room how to doubt.
The absence of a retry button isn’t minimalism.
It’s refusal.
Refusal to train players to arbitrate settlement with their thumbs while Vanar is closing state underneath them.
The system absorbs the wobble. The user gets a predictable flow.
Equip once.
Claim once.
Move on.
And if the UI ever makes them wonder, if it ever invites that second tap... you won’t see it as “network issues.” You’ll see it as behavior. Inventory toggles. Relogs. “Clip it” becoming muscle memory.
That’s the real failure mode.
Not a reverted transaction.
A player learning that Vanar sometimes needs to be checked. #Vanar
$VANRY
#Vanar $VANRY
Calendar block: "Virtua Brand Drop — 18:00–00:00."
Midnight came. And went.
I watched the clock flip like that meant something.
Inside Vanar's Virtua metaverse games, nobody logged off in unison. Avatars lingered by the gate. Someone reopened the drop "just to see." Inventory resolved again—session never cooled.
Brand ops says the window closes. Persistent worlds don't.
On Vanar, live updates don't wait for calendars to breathe. Experience-safe finality means clean closes. But consumer-grade execution? It just keeps resolving whatever's still moving.
00:07. Another receipt.
00:12. Someone in chat: "thought this ended?"
Technically, yeah. Banner gone. Tile rotated out. But session flows? Still callable. Still resolving. Still final.
I refreshed the sheet. Status: complete.
In the plaza, someone late triggered the same doorway. Same clean close.
No error. No warning. Just one more landing after the brand team sent "thanks everyone."
We built for continuity . Whatever.
Midnight passed. The chain ( @Vanarchain ) didn't. Still live. Just not on the calendar.
Calendar block: "Virtua Brand Drop — 18:00–00:00."
Midnight came. And went.
I watched the clock flip like that meant something.
Inside Vanar's Virtua metaverse games, nobody logged off in unison. Avatars lingered by the gate. Someone reopened the drop "just to see." Inventory resolved again—session never cooled.
Brand ops says the window closes. Persistent worlds don't.
On Vanar, live updates don't wait for calendars to breathe. Experience-safe finality means clean closes. But consumer-grade execution? It just keeps resolving whatever's still moving.
00:07. Another receipt.
00:12. Someone in chat: "thought this ended?"
Technically, yeah. Banner gone. Tile rotated out. But session flows? Still callable. Still resolving. Still final.
I refreshed the sheet. Status: complete.
In the plaza, someone late triggered the same doorway. Same clean close.
No error. No warning. Just one more landing after the brand team sent "thanks everyone."
We built for continuity . Whatever.
Midnight passed. The chain ( @Vanarchain ) didn't. Still live. Just not on the calendar.
Yesssa 💪🏻💛
Binance Announcement
·
--
Grab a Share of 2,000,000 FOGO Token Voucher Rewards on CreatorPad!
This is a general announcement. Products and services referred to here may not be available in your region.
Fellow Binancians,
Binance Square is pleased to introduce a new campaign on CreatorPad, verified users may complete simple tasks to unlock 2,000,000 Fogo (FOGO) token voucher rewards.
Activity Period: 2026-02-13 01:00 (UTC) to 2026-02-27 01:00 (UTC)
Unlock Your FOGO Token Rewards Today!
How to Participate:
During the Activity Period, click “Join now” on the activity page and complete the tasks in the table to be ranked on the leaderboard and qualify for rewards. By posting more engaging and quality content, you may earn additional points in the leaderboard of the campaign.
Type of TaskTask DetailsPostCreate posts on Binance Square and complete the share task listed on the campaign page. Only posts that fulfil the following criteria will be eligible:Minimum 100 characters about the project;Use the hashtag #Fogo, $FOGO and mention the project’s account;Content should be relevant to Fogo and original to be eligible.FollowFollow Fogo’s account on Binance Square and X via the Activity landing page.TradeTrade a minimum of $10 equivalent in FOGO in a single transaction on Binance Spot, Futures or Convert.
Notes:
Please complete the tasks above in accordance with the full requirements listed on the campaign page.Eligible users who have met the aforementioned criteria will earn points for each successfully completed task, which will be used to determine their rank on the leaderboard. Please be advised that trading fees may apply and are subject to the final execution of the transaction. These fees will not be included in the calculation of your trade volume. We recommend that you take these fees into account when planning your transactions and avoid placing trades of exactly $10 to ensure accurate processing.
Reward Structure:
Eligible users are ranked based on the leaderboard result to qualify for the 2,000,000 FOGO reward pool, as per the table below.
Note: The project leaderboard shows T+2 data. For example, data of 2026-02-13 will be displayed on the leaderboard page after 2026-02-15 09:00 (UTC).
Eligible WinnersLeaderboard snapshot date (T+2 Data) Amount of FOGO Rewards (in Token Voucher)Reward Pool AllocationTop 50 creators on the FOGO Global Project Leaderboard2026-02-29500,000 FOGOUser’s reward = (User’s points/Total points of top 50 creators) * 1,000,000 FOGOTop 100 eligible Chinese creators* on the FOGO Chinese Project Leaderboard2026-02-29500,000 FOGOUser’s reward = (User’s points/Total points of top 50 creators) * 1,000,000 FOGO
Note: *Chinese creators refer to users who predominantly (90%) produce content in Mandarin Chinese (Simplified and Traditional) within the last 90 days. For more information, please refer to the Terms and Conditions.
Unlock Your FOGO Token Rewards Today!
About Binance Square
Binance Square, formerly known as Binance Feed, aims to be the one-stop social platform for the latest trends in Web3. With a vast selection of content from renowned crypto experts, avid enthusiasts and trusted media sources, the platform serves as a bridge between content creators and their followers, customizing users’ feeds based on their respective engagement history.
For More Information
What Is Binance Square and Frequently Asked QuestionsBinance Square Creator Academy
Terms and Conditions
All eligible users are required to complete account verification (KYC) to receive rewards from this Activity.Illegally bulk-registered accounts or sub-accounts are not eligible to participate or receive any rewards. Users identified as risk users within 7 days following the Activity end date will be deemed ineligible for rewards. This ineligibility applies regardless of any changes to the user’s risk status after the rewards have been distributed. However, users identified as risk users during rewards distribution may submit an appeal via this form within 14 days from the date of reward distribution. If the appeal is successful, users can contact our customer service team to request a redistribution of rewards.The user’s language preference is determined based on the predominant language used in the content they have created over the past 90 days. Please note that this setting cannot be changed manually.There will be caps imposed on the amount of rewards available to eligible users per country/region.Posts involving Red Packets or giveaways will be deemed ineligible.Participants found engaging in suspicious views, interactions, or suspected use of automated bots will be disqualified from the Activity.Any modification of previously published posts with high engagement to repurpose them as project submissions will result in disqualification.Each X account can only be linked to one Binance Square account. Only data from Binance Square posts will be taken into account for rewards calculation. Participants are required to keep their campaign-related posts published for a minimum of 60 days following the Activity end date. Deleting posts within this period is not permitted.Any posts found to violate Binance’s Community or Content Guidelines will be deemed ineligible for Activity rewards.Only participation via Binance master accounts will be eligible for rewards. Winners will be notified via a push notification under Creator Center > Square Assistant. Voucher rewards will be distributed within 14 working days after the Activity ends. Users may check their voucher rewards via Profile > Rewards Hub. The validity period for the token voucher is set at seven days from the day of distribution. Learn how to redeem a voucher.Binance reserves the right to cancel a user’s eligibility in this Activity if the account is involved in any behavior that breaches the Binance Square Community Management Guidelines or Binance Square Community Platform Terms and Conditions.Binance reserves the right to disqualify any participants who tamper with Binance program code, or interfere with the operation of Binance program code with other software.Binance reserves the right at any time in its sole and absolute discretion to determine and/or amend or vary these terms and conditions without prior notice, including but not limited to canceling, extending, terminating or suspending this activity, the eligibility terms and criteria, the selection and number of winners, and the timing of any act to be done, and all participants shall be bound by these amendments.Binance reserves the right of final interpretation of this Activity and other, including the spotlighting of specific content from time to time.Additional promotion terms and conditions can be accessed here.In compliance with MiCA requirements, unauthorized stablecoins are subject to certain restrictions for EEA users. For more information, please click here.There may be discrepancies between this original content in English and any translated versions. Please refer to the original English version for the most accurate information, in case any discrepancies arise.
Thank you for your support!
Binance Team
2026-02-13
Fellow Binancians,
Binance Square is pleased to introduce a new campaign on CreatorPad, verified users may complete simple tasks to unlock 2,000,000 Fogo (FOGO) token voucher rewards.
Activity Period: 2026-02-13 01:00 (UTC) to 2026-02-27 01:00 (UTC)
Unlock Your FOGO Token Rewards Today!
How to Participate:
During the Activity Period, click “Join now” on the activity page and complete the tasks in the table to be ranked on the leaderboard and qualify for rewards. By posting more engaging and quality content, you may earn additional points in the leaderboard of the campaign.
Type of TaskTask DetailsPostCreate posts on Binance Square and complete the share task listed on the campaign page. Only posts that fulfil the following criteria will be eligible:Minimum 100 characters about the project;Use the hashtag #Fogo, $FOGO and mention the project’s account;Content should be relevant to Fogo and original to be eligible.FollowFollow Fogo’s account on Binance Square and X via the Activity landing page.TradeTrade a minimum of $10 equivalent in FOGO in a single transaction on Binance Spot, Futures or Convert.
Notes:
Please complete the tasks above in accordance with the full requirements listed on the campaign page.Eligible users who have met the aforementioned criteria will earn points for each successfully completed task, which will be used to determine their rank on the leaderboard. Please be advised that trading fees may apply and are subject to the final execution of the transaction. These fees will not be included in the calculation of your trade volume. We recommend that you take these fees into account when planning your transactions and avoid placing trades of exactly $10 to ensure accurate processing.
Reward Structure:
Eligible users are ranked based on the leaderboard result to qualify for the 2,000,000 FOGO reward pool, as per the table below.
Note: The project leaderboard shows T+2 data. For example, data of 2026-02-13 will be displayed on the leaderboard page after 2026-02-15 09:00 (UTC).
Eligible WinnersLeaderboard snapshot date (T+2 Data) Amount of FOGO Rewards (in Token Voucher)Reward Pool AllocationTop 50 creators on the FOGO Global Project Leaderboard2026-02-29500,000 FOGOUser’s reward = (User’s points/Total points of top 50 creators) * 1,000,000 FOGOTop 100 eligible Chinese creators* on the FOGO Chinese Project Leaderboard2026-02-29500,000 FOGOUser’s reward = (User’s points/Total points of top 50 creators) * 1,000,000 FOGO
Note: *Chinese creators refer to users who predominantly (90%) produce content in Mandarin Chinese (Simplified and Traditional) within the last 90 days. For more information, please refer to the Terms and Conditions.
Unlock Your FOGO Token Rewards Today!
About Binance Square
Binance Square, formerly known as Binance Feed, aims to be the one-stop social platform for the latest trends in Web3. With a vast selection of content from renowned crypto experts, avid enthusiasts and trusted media sources, the platform serves as a bridge between content creators and their followers, customizing users’ feeds based on their respective engagement history.
For More Information
What Is Binance Square and Frequently Asked QuestionsBinance Square Creator Academy
Terms and Conditions
All eligible users are required to complete account verification (KYC) to receive rewards from this Activity.Illegally bulk-registered accounts or sub-accounts are not eligible to participate or receive any rewards. Users identified as risk users within 7 days following the Activity end date will be deemed ineligible for rewards. This ineligibility applies regardless of any changes to the user’s risk status after the rewards have been distributed. However, users identified as risk users during rewards distribution may submit an appeal via this form within 14 days from the date of reward distribution. If the appeal is successful, users can contact our customer service team to request a redistribution of rewards.The user’s language preference is determined based on the predominant language used in the content they have created over the past 90 days. Please note that this setting cannot be changed manually.There will be caps imposed on the amount of rewards available to eligible users per country/region.Posts involving Red Packets or giveaways will be deemed ineligible.Participants found engaging in suspicious views, interactions, or suspected use of automated bots will be disqualified from the Activity.Any modification of previously published posts with high engagement to repurpose them as project submissions will result in disqualification.Each X account can only be linked to one Binance Square account. Only data from Binance Square posts will be taken into account for rewards calculation. Participants are required to keep their campaign-related posts published for a minimum of 60 days following the Activity end date. Deleting posts within this period is not permitted.Any posts found to violate Binance’s Community or Content Guidelines will be deemed ineligible for Activity rewards.Only participation via Binance master accounts will be eligible for rewards. Winners will be notified via a push notification under Creator Center > Square Assistant. Voucher rewards will be distributed within 14 working days after the Activity ends. Users may check their voucher rewards via Profile > Rewards Hub. The validity period for the token voucher is set at seven days from the day of distribution. Learn how to redeem a voucher.Binance reserves the right to cancel a user’s eligibility in this Activity if the account is involved in any behavior that breaches the Binance Square Community Management Guidelines or Binance Square Community Platform Terms and Conditions.Binance reserves the right to disqualify any participants who tamper with Binance program code, or interfere with the operation of Binance program code with other software.Binance reserves the right at any time in its sole and absolute discretion to determine and/or amend or vary these terms and conditions without prior notice, including but not limited to canceling, extending, terminating or suspending this activity, the eligibility terms and criteria, the selection and number of winners, and the timing of any act to be done, and all participants shall be bound by these amendments.Binance reserves the right of final interpretation of this Activity and other, including the spotlighting of specific content from time to time.Additional promotion terms and conditions can be accessed here.In compliance with MiCA requirements, unauthorized stablecoins are subject to certain restrictions for EEA users. For more information, please click here.There may be discrepancies between this original content in English and any translated versions. Please refer to the original English version for the most accurate information, in case any discrepancies arise.
Thank you for your support!
Binance Team
2026-02-13
I caught myself flexing the wrong number on Fogo layer-1: sub-40ms blocks.
It gets addictive. SVM execution fires, the book moves almost before your cursor lifts. You start trusting that first flash the way the UI wants you to.
But that is not ~1.3s finality.
Fogo's Firedancer keeps it tight, yeah. Blocks move. Spreads tighten inside the latency window. Great—until you remember finality is still the economic line. What’s bookable vs. what just looks booked.
That drift is where slippage hides. Not in block production. In the gap between "executed' and "can't be unwound".
You see speed.
Your risk engine waits.
Same chain. Two clocks running.
I've watched a fill look settled, then sit in that awkward in-between... no revert, no drama, just not actually anchored yet. If your strategy cancels fast or hedges late, that gap is the whole trade.
Real-time DeFi, on Fogo the SVM-native Layer-1. is not about fast. It's whether speed and finality quit arguing when you’re already in.
Sometimes they do.
Sometimes you’re just watching.
@Fogo Official #Fogo $FOGO #fogo
It gets addictive. SVM execution fires, the book moves almost before your cursor lifts. You start trusting that first flash the way the UI wants you to.
But that is not ~1.3s finality.
Fogo's Firedancer keeps it tight, yeah. Blocks move. Spreads tighten inside the latency window. Great—until you remember finality is still the economic line. What’s bookable vs. what just looks booked.
That drift is where slippage hides. Not in block production. In the gap between "executed' and "can't be unwound".
You see speed.
Your risk engine waits.
Same chain. Two clocks running.
I've watched a fill look settled, then sit in that awkward in-between... no revert, no drama, just not actually anchored yet. If your strategy cancels fast or hedges late, that gap is the whole trade.
Real-time DeFi, on Fogo the SVM-native Layer-1. is not about fast. It's whether speed and finality quit arguing when you’re already in.
Sometimes they do.
Sometimes you’re just watching.
@Fogo Official #Fogo $FOGO #fogo
Α
FOGOUSDT
Διην.
Έκλεισε
PnL
+0,90USDT
$AZTEC pushed from 0.016 to 0.0284 in a clean sequence of higher lows; now sitting around 0.0279, so as long as it holds above 0.026 the structure stays intact... lose that and it likely cools back toward 0.023–0.024.
Α
FOGOUSDT
Διην.
Έκλεισε
PnL
+0,90USDT
$AKE ran from 0.00019 to 0.00032 pretty cleanly
... now it’s sitting near the 0.000327 high, so either it builds above 0.00030 and keeps grinding, or this turns into a quick fade back toward 0.00028.
... now it’s sitting near the 0.000327 high, so either it builds above 0.00030 and keeps grinding, or this turns into a quick fade back toward 0.00028.
$SPACE pushing into 0.0067 after bouncing from 0.0048... clean intraday trend so far, just watch if it can hold above 0.0065 instead of slipping back into the prior range.
$ZKC just broke out of its recent range with a strong impulsive 4H candle, clearing the 0.10 area clean and tagging 0.12.
As long as $ZKC holds above the breakout zone around 0.105–0.11, momentum favors continuation toward fresh highs.
As long as $ZKC holds above the breakout zone around 0.105–0.11, momentum favors continuation toward fresh highs.
$KITE still grinding, now around 0.20 after holding higher lows from 0.12... no wild spike, just steady bids stepping up, which usually matters more than one big candle.
Α
VANRYUSDT
Διην.
Έκλεισε
PnL
+0,97USDT
Vanar and the Minute the Brand Couldn't Afford to Retry
On Vanar ( @Vanarchain ) , the failure wasn't technical.
It was visible.
There's no quiet reset inside a Vanar Virtua metaverse plaza that never really empties. The moment goes live with people already inside it.
The brand drop hit on schedule. Licensed IP front and center. Countdown clean. Sessions active before zero. Avatars parked early, inventory tabs open like they were waiting for a receipt.
We rehearsed permissioning all week. Asset gating tight. No rogue mints. No metadata drift. On paper, safe.
Paper doesn't get clipped.
The first five seconds were clean. Structure resolves. Emotes fire. Chat spikes.
Then someone types:
"Is this the final version?"
Not panic. Not hostile. Just doubt...public.
On a dashboard, you can survive that. In a live Virtua activation on Vanar layer-1 mass usage entertainment focused chain, you can't. Because that question isn't about state. It's about whether the brand just showed the wrong thing to ten thousand witnesses.
Vanar finalized the update. Deterministic. Closed. Done.
Chat didn't care.
A clip surfaced... twelve frames where the pre-drop environment lingered behind the branded asset before the new state resolved for one client. Another user posted a clean capture. Side-by-side. Red arrows drawn like evidence.
Same plaza. Same second. Different memory.
The brief didn't mention "two truths." It should have.
Social went quiet. Then Legal asked, in-thread, if we could roll it back.
Nobody answered for a beat. Not because we didn't know. Because typing "no" makes the constraint feel heavier.
Rollback isn't a consumer-grade reflex on a live Layer 1 like Vanar. There's no maintenance theater once the moment is canon. No relaunch that erases first impressions.
On Vanar, blocks close. The world keeps moving.
The problem isn't finality. It's which version the audience believes they met first.
Virtua doesn't freeze for enterprise comfort. Inventory ticks. Rewards resolve. Moderators say "refresh." Someone else says "clip it." Another says "it's fine."
That's the spiral.
Brand-safe sounds like a checklist until you're watching a licensed drop litigated in real time by people with screen capture and an audience.
Permissioning held. The rails held.
What didn't hold was silence.
If one user sees Version A and another sees Version B—even for a heartbeat, you now have two launch narratives. And the first one spreads faster than any clarification thread.
You don't get to choose which clip wins.
Someone suggested hard gating next time. Pause the plaza. Force alignment. Maintenance overlay before reveal.
That works for banking.
It kills entertainment.
Virtua sessions overlap. They stream. They bleed into each other. A brand activation inside that loop isn't a static NFT reveal... it is a world event, and worlds don't politely empty so Legal can feel comfortable.
So we stopped chasing explanations and started chasing seams.
Not louder confirmations. Fewer visible transitions.
We tightened the resolution window between environment update and inventory reflection. Not by adding badges. By removing delay. Shaving the moment between settlement and recognition until nobody feels invited to question it.
Because the second chat feels invited, you've already lost control of the narrative.
Brand risk on Vanar isn't hacks. It's hesitation.
If inventory updates before stage visuals, someone says "premature mint." If visuals update before inventory, someone says "bait." Either way, a screenshot exists.
The stack doesn't need perfect.
It needs unarguable.
Design so the brand never becomes the subject of reconciliation. So nobody toggles inventory like a receipt. So "is this the real version?" never gets typed under a licensed logo.
Because once that phrase exists, deterministic finality doesn't matter.
The room felt a seam.
And in a plaza that never empties, seams don't disappear. They get replayed. Annotated. Re-uploaded by people who weren't even there.
On Vanar, the brand moment doesn't get a retry.
The world is already moving... while someone, somewhere, is scrubbing frame twelve again, deciding which version was real.
#Vanar $VANRY
It was visible.
There's no quiet reset inside a Vanar Virtua metaverse plaza that never really empties. The moment goes live with people already inside it.
The brand drop hit on schedule. Licensed IP front and center. Countdown clean. Sessions active before zero. Avatars parked early, inventory tabs open like they were waiting for a receipt.
We rehearsed permissioning all week. Asset gating tight. No rogue mints. No metadata drift. On paper, safe.
Paper doesn't get clipped.
The first five seconds were clean. Structure resolves. Emotes fire. Chat spikes.
Then someone types:
"Is this the final version?"
Not panic. Not hostile. Just doubt...public.
On a dashboard, you can survive that. In a live Virtua activation on Vanar layer-1 mass usage entertainment focused chain, you can't. Because that question isn't about state. It's about whether the brand just showed the wrong thing to ten thousand witnesses.
Vanar finalized the update. Deterministic. Closed. Done.
Chat didn't care.
A clip surfaced... twelve frames where the pre-drop environment lingered behind the branded asset before the new state resolved for one client. Another user posted a clean capture. Side-by-side. Red arrows drawn like evidence.
Same plaza. Same second. Different memory.
The brief didn't mention "two truths." It should have.
Social went quiet. Then Legal asked, in-thread, if we could roll it back.
Nobody answered for a beat. Not because we didn't know. Because typing "no" makes the constraint feel heavier.
Rollback isn't a consumer-grade reflex on a live Layer 1 like Vanar. There's no maintenance theater once the moment is canon. No relaunch that erases first impressions.
On Vanar, blocks close. The world keeps moving.
The problem isn't finality. It's which version the audience believes they met first.
Virtua doesn't freeze for enterprise comfort. Inventory ticks. Rewards resolve. Moderators say "refresh." Someone else says "clip it." Another says "it's fine."
That's the spiral.
Brand-safe sounds like a checklist until you're watching a licensed drop litigated in real time by people with screen capture and an audience.
Permissioning held. The rails held.
What didn't hold was silence.
If one user sees Version A and another sees Version B—even for a heartbeat, you now have two launch narratives. And the first one spreads faster than any clarification thread.
You don't get to choose which clip wins.
Someone suggested hard gating next time. Pause the plaza. Force alignment. Maintenance overlay before reveal.
That works for banking.
It kills entertainment.
Virtua sessions overlap. They stream. They bleed into each other. A brand activation inside that loop isn't a static NFT reveal... it is a world event, and worlds don't politely empty so Legal can feel comfortable.
So we stopped chasing explanations and started chasing seams.
Not louder confirmations. Fewer visible transitions.
We tightened the resolution window between environment update and inventory reflection. Not by adding badges. By removing delay. Shaving the moment between settlement and recognition until nobody feels invited to question it.
Because the second chat feels invited, you've already lost control of the narrative.
Brand risk on Vanar isn't hacks. It's hesitation.
If inventory updates before stage visuals, someone says "premature mint." If visuals update before inventory, someone says "bait." Either way, a screenshot exists.
The stack doesn't need perfect.
It needs unarguable.
Design so the brand never becomes the subject of reconciliation. So nobody toggles inventory like a receipt. So "is this the real version?" never gets typed under a licensed logo.
Because once that phrase exists, deterministic finality doesn't matter.
The room felt a seam.
And in a plaza that never empties, seams don't disappear. They get replayed. Annotated. Re-uploaded by people who weren't even there.
On Vanar, the brand moment doesn't get a retry.
The world is already moving... while someone, somewhere, is scrubbing frame twelve again, deciding which version was real.
#Vanar $VANRY
Vanar Virtua metaverse ops checklist, line 7: "Deploy during low traffic".
I stared at that one for a while.
Vanar chain's Virtua Metaverse doesn’t really have "low traffic" anymore. The plaza stays warm. Avatars idle through event windows. Session-based transaction flows keep clearing even when nothing headline-worthy is happening on Vanar ( @Vanarchain ). Someone crafting. Someone trading. Someone mid-quest with a wallet open in another tab.
We waited ten minutes.
I refreshed twice. Like that would help.
Baseline didn’t dip.
I've got the release notes on one monitor and a Virtua ops view on the other. Cursor parked over confirm. And the world keeps doing small, final things... a reward pop, an inventory move that resolves while another Vanar game session is still touching the same slot, a VGN queue tick in the background every few seconds.
Vanar layer-1 Consumer-grade RPC stays responsive. Session receipts keep stacking. Fast state updates keep closing. None of it pauses for me.
In the ops thread, someone pastes the same question again: “Is this the quietest it’ll get?”
No one answers.
A few clients start doing the polite retry thing. Same action, twice, because the feedback landed half a beat late and nobody wants to be the one who "waited wrong'. No error. No banner. Just two clean closes and a chat line that reads, “did mine count?”
My finger hovers. Still.
Then I click.
Not into low traffic. Into a room that never empties, sessions that never really end on Vanar, and a checklist line that belongs to a different kind of night.
#Vanar $VANRY
I stared at that one for a while.
Vanar chain's Virtua Metaverse doesn’t really have "low traffic" anymore. The plaza stays warm. Avatars idle through event windows. Session-based transaction flows keep clearing even when nothing headline-worthy is happening on Vanar ( @Vanarchain ). Someone crafting. Someone trading. Someone mid-quest with a wallet open in another tab.
We waited ten minutes.
I refreshed twice. Like that would help.
Baseline didn’t dip.
I've got the release notes on one monitor and a Virtua ops view on the other. Cursor parked over confirm. And the world keeps doing small, final things... a reward pop, an inventory move that resolves while another Vanar game session is still touching the same slot, a VGN queue tick in the background every few seconds.
Vanar layer-1 Consumer-grade RPC stays responsive. Session receipts keep stacking. Fast state updates keep closing. None of it pauses for me.
In the ops thread, someone pastes the same question again: “Is this the quietest it’ll get?”
No one answers.
A few clients start doing the polite retry thing. Same action, twice, because the feedback landed half a beat late and nobody wants to be the one who "waited wrong'. No error. No banner. Just two clean closes and a chat line that reads, “did mine count?”
My finger hovers. Still.
Then I click.
Not into low traffic. Into a room that never empties, sessions that never really end on Vanar, and a checklist line that belongs to a different kind of night.
#Vanar $VANRY
Α
VANRYUSDT
Διην.
Έκλεισε
PnL
+0,97USDT
Συνδεθείτε για να εξερευνήσετε περισσότερα περιεχόμενα