banking

📅 February 6 - United States | A technical proposal from the Federal Reserve has become a new battleground between traditional banks and the crypto sector. The so-called “skinny master account”, limited access to the central bank's payment systems, has sparked heated debate in public opinion: for some, it's a necessary modernization; for others, a systemic risk that breaks decades of established rules.

📖 It all revolves around master accounts, accounts that grant direct access to the Fed’s payment rails and, in practice, to the heart of dollar liquidity. Today, many entities—including crypto firms—rely on correspondent banks.
With innovation accelerating, the Fed proposed a "skinny" access model: no interest on balances, no discount window, and with operational limits. The idea, presented by Governor Christopher Waller in October, seeks to mitigate risks without closing the door to new models.
The debate erupted when nearly 30 comment letters arrived. Anchorage Digital Bank, the first crypto bank with a federal charter, supported the initiative but warned about a critical point: the overnight balance limit.
The Fed is considering a cap of $500 million or 10% of the account holder's assets. For Anchorage, this cap forces them to "sweep" funds to correspondent banks every night, reintroducing risks that the scheme intends to eliminate and weakening operational continuity.
From within the blockchain ecosystem, the Blockchain Payment Consortium —driven by foundations such as Solana and Sui— described the proposal as “overdue but necessary”.
They argue that the new legal framework for stablecoins, the GENIUS Act, requires access to central bank cash settlement to function properly. If the U.S. has already regulated it, it must now enable it.
The reaction of the community banks was much harsher. Associations in Colorado and Illinois warned that master accounts were always awarded to insured and low-risk institutions with robust supervision.
They fear unfair competitive advantages for “novel entities” and warn of harm to consumers and the system if access is expanded without the same compliance track record.

Topic Opinion:
The “skinny master account” is an imperfect but necessary compromise. If limits are set logically—especially caps—risks can be reduced today without hindering tomorrow's infrastructure.
💬 Should the Fed open the system with new rules or protect it as it has been doing?

Leave your comment...
#FederalReserve #Banking #Stablecoins #BTC #CryptoNews $BTC