Hey My Binance Square Family 💸🎗

Today's 24 February 2026

I remember the first time I studied Michael Saylor’s Bitcoin strategy. I couldn’t decide if it was bold vision or controlled madness. There was no middle ground. Today, with Bitcoin trading near the low-60K range and billions in unrealized losses sitting on his company’s balance sheet, that same debate is back — only now the pressure is real.

On paper, the drawdown is heavy. Anyone who has held a large position through volatility understands that feeling. I’ve watched trades go deep red before. The mind starts negotiating with itself. “It will bounce.” “Just hold.” “Average down.” That psychological battle is harder than the market itself.

Saylor, however, hasn’t flinched publicly. He continues to frame the downturn as part of Bitcoin’s long adoption cycle. To him, volatility is structural, not emotional. That consistency is rare.

But experience has taught me something important: conviction only works when the time horizon matches the strategy. Institutions can survive deep drawdowns because they operate on multi-year capital plans. Retail traders using leverage cannot play that same game safely.

This is where many people misunderstand his approach. Long-term treasury allocation is different from emotional averaging down. One is balance-sheet strategy. The other is reactive trading.

Right now, Bitcoin remains under pressure. The losses are real. The volatility is real. The belief remains strong.

The real question isn’t whether Saylor is right or wrong today.

It’s whether you understand which game you’re playing.

Long-term conviction requires patience and capital discipline. Short-term trading requires structure and strict risk control.

Confuse the two — and the market will correct you quickly.