supremecourt
362,932 visningar
494 diskuterar
Rekommenderas
Senaste
🚨 JUST IN: Goldman Sachs Says Tariffs Aren’t Going Away After Supreme Court Ruling
Goldman Sachs analysts say that even though the U.S. Supreme Court recently struck down President Trump’s use of the emergency powers tariff authority, this is not the end of U.S. tariff policy.
They expect the administration to pursue alternative legal authorities to continue imposing tariffs on imports.
⸻
🧠 What’s Happening
■ The Supreme Court ruled that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) did not empower the president to impose broad tariffs without clear congressional authorization — and struck down many of the tariffs enacted under that law.
■ Despite this setback, Goldman Sachs analysts say the ruling is unlikely to stop tariffs altogether. The administration can, in their view, shift to other statutory tools that allow tariff authority even if IEEPA is ruled invalid.
⸻
📌 What Alternative Authorities Could Be Used
According to legal and market analysis, the administration might turn to:
• Trade Act provisions such as Section 301 (retaliatory tariffs on unfair trade practices)
• Section 232 (national security-linked tariffs)
• Section 122 (temporary tariffs on balance-of-payments grounds)
• Section 338 (rarely used tariffs on discriminatory trade practices)
These tools have different scopes and limitations compared with IEEPA, but could still be used to exert trade pressure on foreign imports.
⸻
🧩 Why It Matters
✔ Court limited the legal basis Trump tried to use for sweeping tariffs
✔ Goldman argues tariffs won’t disappear — they’ll just be reorganized under different laws
✔ Markets may see continued trade uncertainty and volatility
✔ This could influence economic forecasts, consumer prices, supply chains, and diplomatic relations
#SupremeCourt #Tariffs #GoldmanSachs #TradePolicy $XAU $XAG
Goldman Sachs analysts say that even though the U.S. Supreme Court recently struck down President Trump’s use of the emergency powers tariff authority, this is not the end of U.S. tariff policy.
They expect the administration to pursue alternative legal authorities to continue imposing tariffs on imports.
⸻
🧠 What’s Happening
■ The Supreme Court ruled that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) did not empower the president to impose broad tariffs without clear congressional authorization — and struck down many of the tariffs enacted under that law.
■ Despite this setback, Goldman Sachs analysts say the ruling is unlikely to stop tariffs altogether. The administration can, in their view, shift to other statutory tools that allow tariff authority even if IEEPA is ruled invalid.
⸻
📌 What Alternative Authorities Could Be Used
According to legal and market analysis, the administration might turn to:
• Trade Act provisions such as Section 301 (retaliatory tariffs on unfair trade practices)
• Section 232 (national security-linked tariffs)
• Section 122 (temporary tariffs on balance-of-payments grounds)
• Section 338 (rarely used tariffs on discriminatory trade practices)
These tools have different scopes and limitations compared with IEEPA, but could still be used to exert trade pressure on foreign imports.
⸻
🧩 Why It Matters
✔ Court limited the legal basis Trump tried to use for sweeping tariffs
✔ Goldman argues tariffs won’t disappear — they’ll just be reorganized under different laws
✔ Markets may see continued trade uncertainty and volatility
✔ This could influence economic forecasts, consumer prices, supply chains, and diplomatic relations
#SupremeCourt #Tariffs #GoldmanSachs #TradePolicy $XAU $XAG
yellowclawXBT:
goldman saying tariffs stay?
Trump lashes out at Supreme Court justices over tariffs ruling
US President #DonaldTrump lashed out in unusually personal terms against the six #SupremeCourt justices who handed him one of the biggest setbacks of his second term in office by striking down the administration's global #Tariffs .
The court's Friday ruling was "deeply disappointing". The justices who joined the majority opinion should be "absolutely ashamed" and lacked the courage to "do the right thing", Trump said, turning his response into a sweeping attack against a co-equal branch of government.
The broadside was remarkable even for a president known for blowing past political norms and publicly berating those who challenge his authority.
"I'm ashamed of certain members of the court. Absolutely ashamed for not having the courage to do what's right for our country," $TRUMP said at the start of a press conference at the White House, which was held a few hours after the decision was released.
Trump did not mince words from there as he assessed the decision, which held that presidents do not have inherent authority to impose sweeping tariffs on any country.
For the next 45 minutes, Trump criticised the ruling and made the case that he would find other methods to continue imposing tariffs on other countries. But throughout he repeatedly returned to the justices in ways that made clear he felt personally slighted by the decision.
The president did not discriminate against Republican and #Democratic appointees, either.
The six justices who struck down Trump's tariffs were equally divided among the court's liberal and conservative wings. Three - Justices ElenaKagan, Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson - were appointed by Democratic presidents. The other three were appointed by Republicans. ChiefJustice John Roberts is a George W Bush pick who wrote the majority opinion, and Justices Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett were appointed by #trump in his first term in office.
The court's Friday ruling was "deeply disappointing". The justices who joined the majority opinion should be "absolutely ashamed" and lacked the courage to "do the right thing", Trump said, turning his response into a sweeping attack against a co-equal branch of government.
The broadside was remarkable even for a president known for blowing past political norms and publicly berating those who challenge his authority.
"I'm ashamed of certain members of the court. Absolutely ashamed for not having the courage to do what's right for our country," $TRUMP said at the start of a press conference at the White House, which was held a few hours after the decision was released.
Trump did not mince words from there as he assessed the decision, which held that presidents do not have inherent authority to impose sweeping tariffs on any country.
For the next 45 minutes, Trump criticised the ruling and made the case that he would find other methods to continue imposing tariffs on other countries. But throughout he repeatedly returned to the justices in ways that made clear he felt personally slighted by the decision.
The president did not discriminate against Republican and #Democratic appointees, either.
The six justices who struck down Trump's tariffs were equally divided among the court's liberal and conservative wings. Three - Justices ElenaKagan, Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson - were appointed by Democratic presidents. The other three were appointed by Republicans. ChiefJustice John Roberts is a George W Bush pick who wrote the majority opinion, and Justices Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett were appointed by #trump in his first term in office.
Tariff Refund Battle Moves to Trade Court
The Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) cannot be used to impose tariffs a decision that could open the door to massive refund claims.
More than 1,500 import and export firms have reportedly filed lawsuits seeking up to $170 billion in tariff repayments. Claimants include major corporations such as Costco and Alcoa, alongside hundreds of small and mid-sized businesses.
However, the Court stopped short of explicitly granting refunds. That key question now shifts to the United States Court of International Trade (CIT), where the next legal phase will unfold.
Why this matters:
• Potential multi-billion dollar fiscal impact
• Corporate balance sheet adjustments if refunds materialize
• Renewed scrutiny on executive tariff authority
• Trade policy uncertainty returning to markets
If refunds are approved, it could reshape precedent on emergency economic powers and materially affect U.S. trade enforcement tools going forward.
$BTC
$ETH
$XRP
#SupremeCourt
#tarrif
More than 1,500 import and export firms have reportedly filed lawsuits seeking up to $170 billion in tariff repayments. Claimants include major corporations such as Costco and Alcoa, alongside hundreds of small and mid-sized businesses.
However, the Court stopped short of explicitly granting refunds. That key question now shifts to the United States Court of International Trade (CIT), where the next legal phase will unfold.
Why this matters:
• Potential multi-billion dollar fiscal impact
• Corporate balance sheet adjustments if refunds materialize
• Renewed scrutiny on executive tariff authority
• Trade policy uncertainty returning to markets
If refunds are approved, it could reshape precedent on emergency economic powers and materially affect U.S. trade enforcement tools going forward.
$BTC
$ETH
$XRP
#SupremeCourt
#tarrif
THE SUPREME COURT TARIFF REVERSAL $BTC ⚖️🚀
THE TARIFFS HAVE BEEN STRUCK DOWN! 🏛️🚫
$BTC / $ETH SUPREME COURT RULES 6-3 AGAINST BROAD DUTIES! 🏛️⚖️
A historic victory for the markets today! 🌍 The U.S. Supreme Court has officially ruled that the broad, unilateral tariffs imposed over the last year exceeded presidential authority under the IEEPA.
While the White House is already planning a more limited 10% "temporary" duty, the immediate removal of the broad trade barriers has sent Bitcoin and Tech stocks into a relief rally! 📈 Bitcoin immediately jumped nearly 2% to reclaim the $68,500 level, proving once again that it thrives when global trade friction decreases. We are seeing a massive "Risk-On" rotation as the legal cloud over global supply chains finally begins to clear. 🛡️✨
"Is this the start of the 'Legal Relief' rally for BTC and the alts? 🚀🤔"
#TrumpNewTariffs #SupremeCourt #bitcoin #MarketRally #Write2Earn
THE TARIFFS HAVE BEEN STRUCK DOWN! 🏛️🚫
$BTC / $ETH SUPREME COURT RULES 6-3 AGAINST BROAD DUTIES! 🏛️⚖️
A historic victory for the markets today! 🌍 The U.S. Supreme Court has officially ruled that the broad, unilateral tariffs imposed over the last year exceeded presidential authority under the IEEPA.
While the White House is already planning a more limited 10% "temporary" duty, the immediate removal of the broad trade barriers has sent Bitcoin and Tech stocks into a relief rally! 📈 Bitcoin immediately jumped nearly 2% to reclaim the $68,500 level, proving once again that it thrives when global trade friction decreases. We are seeing a massive "Risk-On" rotation as the legal cloud over global supply chains finally begins to clear. 🛡️✨
"Is this the start of the 'Legal Relief' rally for BTC and the alts? 🚀🤔"
#TrumpNewTariffs #SupremeCourt #bitcoin #MarketRally #Write2Earn
Prediction markets are on fire 🔥 after the Supreme Court ruled that President Trump overstepped his authority under the 1977 IEEPA by imposing sweeping “emergency” tariffs on imports. 📉⚖️ Now, traders are placing bold bets on what his next move will be in this high-stakes political showdown. 🎲🇺🇸 Will new trade strategies emerge, or is another legal battle ahead? All eyes are watching. 👀💼
#SupremeCourt #TRUMP #Tariffs #PredictionMarkets #MarketNews
#SupremeCourt #TRUMP #Tariffs #PredictionMarkets #MarketNews
🚨 BREAKING: U.S. Supreme Court Rules Against Trump’s Tariffs
The Supreme Court of the United States has issued a major ruling striking down a significant portion of former President Donald Trump’s global tariffs imposed under emergency powers.
In a 6-3 decision, the Court determined that the administration exceeded its legal authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) when implementing broad tariffs on imported goods.
⸻
💥 What the Ruling Means
• The Court ruled that Trump’s use of emergency powers to impose sweeping tariffs was illegal and beyond presidential authority.
• A large share (about 75%) of the tariffs imposed in 2025 has been invalidated.
• This decision limits future presidential authority over trade policy without specific congressional authorization.
⸻
💵 Billions at Stake
The ruling raises the possibility that businesses and importers – including U.S. companies that paid these duties – could seek refunds for tariffs collected while the laws were in force.
Economists estimate that over $175 billion in tariff revenue is at risk of being refunded if the Court’s decision leads to reimbursement claims.
⸻
🧠 Why It Matters
✔ It marks a major judicial check on executive power in U.S. trade policy.
✔ It could trigger a complex legal and administrative process for refunds to importers. 
✔ The decision underscores the importance of Congressional authority in setting tariffs and trade laws.
✔ Financial markets and businesses that relied on tariff strategy may face significant uncertainty.
⸻
🚨 Supreme Court strikes down most of Trump’s emergency tariffs, ruling them illegal and putting billions in tariff refunds at risk.
#SCOTUS #TradeLaw #Tariffs #SupremeCourt #USPolitics $XAU $XAG
The Supreme Court of the United States has issued a major ruling striking down a significant portion of former President Donald Trump’s global tariffs imposed under emergency powers.
In a 6-3 decision, the Court determined that the administration exceeded its legal authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) when implementing broad tariffs on imported goods.
⸻
💥 What the Ruling Means
• The Court ruled that Trump’s use of emergency powers to impose sweeping tariffs was illegal and beyond presidential authority.
• A large share (about 75%) of the tariffs imposed in 2025 has been invalidated.
• This decision limits future presidential authority over trade policy without specific congressional authorization.
⸻
💵 Billions at Stake
The ruling raises the possibility that businesses and importers – including U.S. companies that paid these duties – could seek refunds for tariffs collected while the laws were in force.
Economists estimate that over $175 billion in tariff revenue is at risk of being refunded if the Court’s decision leads to reimbursement claims.
⸻
🧠 Why It Matters
✔ It marks a major judicial check on executive power in U.S. trade policy.
✔ It could trigger a complex legal and administrative process for refunds to importers. 
✔ The decision underscores the importance of Congressional authority in setting tariffs and trade laws.
✔ Financial markets and businesses that relied on tariff strategy may face significant uncertainty.
⸻
🚨 Supreme Court strikes down most of Trump’s emergency tariffs, ruling them illegal and putting billions in tariff refunds at risk.
#SCOTUS #TradeLaw #Tariffs #SupremeCourt #USPolitics $XAU $XAG
Another Opportunity
Gold and Silver can rise again due to this News... 🚀
🇺🇸 Supreme Court has ruled that President Trump's tariffs are illegal in a 6-3 decision, potentially costing the US over $150 billion in refunds. 👀
#SupremeCourt #GOLD #Silver #TRUMP #TokenizedRealEstate
Gold and Silver can rise again due to this News... 🚀
🇺🇸 Supreme Court has ruled that President Trump's tariffs are illegal in a 6-3 decision, potentially costing the US over $150 billion in refunds. 👀
#SupremeCourt #GOLD #Silver #TRUMP #TokenizedRealEstate
SUPREME COURT DECLARES TRUMP TARIFFS ILLEGAL!
The market is now pricing in an 82% chance the courts DENY Trump's tariff refund by July 2026. This is NOT a drill. The highest court in the land just struck down his trade tax policy. IEEPA does NOT grant this power. Trump's alternative plans are now under massive scrutiny. This is a seismic shift.
#TrumpTariffs #SupremeCourt #MarketShock #LegalNews
💥
The market is now pricing in an 82% chance the courts DENY Trump's tariff refund by July 2026. This is NOT a drill. The highest court in the land just struck down his trade tax policy. IEEPA does NOT grant this power. Trump's alternative plans are now under massive scrutiny. This is a seismic shift.
#TrumpTariffs #SupremeCourt #MarketShock #LegalNews
💥
🚨🇺🇸 BREAKING:
Donald Trump and JD Vance have sharply criticized “lawless” Supreme Court justices following a major ruling on tariff authority.
The decision — handed down by the Supreme Court of the United States — reportedly limits executive power over certain trade measures, triggering strong backlash from Trump and his allies. ⚖️
Trump and Vance argue the ruling undermines presidential authority to protect American industries, while critics say the Court is reinforcing constitutional checks and balances.
The clash sets the stage for a deeper political battle over trade policy and executive power heading into a heated election season. 🇺🇸
#SupremeCourt #Tariffs #Trump #JDVance
$BTC $XAU $XAG
Donald Trump and JD Vance have sharply criticized “lawless” Supreme Court justices following a major ruling on tariff authority.
The decision — handed down by the Supreme Court of the United States — reportedly limits executive power over certain trade measures, triggering strong backlash from Trump and his allies. ⚖️
Trump and Vance argue the ruling undermines presidential authority to protect American industries, while critics say the Court is reinforcing constitutional checks and balances.
The clash sets the stage for a deeper political battle over trade policy and executive power heading into a heated election season. 🇺🇸
#SupremeCourt #Tariffs #Trump #JDVance
$BTC $XAU $XAG
🔥"Tariff Takedown: The Supreme Court Just Blocked Trump’s Global Trade Plan"
📢Huge news today: The Supreme Court just blocked Trump’s global tariffs in a 6–3 ruling! ⚖️ The Court ruled that only Congress has the power to tax, not the President. While some sector-specific tariffs stay, the "Liberation Day" duties are officially invalid. A major win for the separation of powers! 🇺🇸
✍🏻The Decision: The Court found the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) doesn't give the President the right to impose taxes/tariffs.
✍🏻The Split: Chief Justice Roberts was joined by the liberal wing plus Trump-appointees Gorsuch and Barrett.
✍🏻What's Next: Trump has already announced a "Plan B" using the Trade Act of 1974 to impose a new 10% global tariff, so the trade battle is far from over.
#SupremeCourt #TrumpTariffs #breakingnews
#TradeWar #EconomicNews
$SXP
$ESP
$SENT
📢Huge news today: The Supreme Court just blocked Trump’s global tariffs in a 6–3 ruling! ⚖️ The Court ruled that only Congress has the power to tax, not the President. While some sector-specific tariffs stay, the "Liberation Day" duties are officially invalid. A major win for the separation of powers! 🇺🇸
✍🏻The Decision: The Court found the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) doesn't give the President the right to impose taxes/tariffs.
✍🏻The Split: Chief Justice Roberts was joined by the liberal wing plus Trump-appointees Gorsuch and Barrett.
✍🏻What's Next: Trump has already announced a "Plan B" using the Trade Act of 1974 to impose a new 10% global tariff, so the trade battle is far from over.
#SupremeCourt #TrumpTariffs #breakingnews
#TradeWar #EconomicNews
$SXP
$ESP
$SENT
🚨 🇺🇸 ILLINOIS DEMANDS $8.6B REFUND AFTER SUPREME COURT STRIKES DOWN TRUMP TARIFFS
Illinois Governor JB Pritzker sent an official invoice to President Donald Trump demanding $8.6 billion for the state’s residents, following a 6-3 Supreme Court ruling that struck down the “Liberation Day” tariffs as unconstitutional.
The refund was calculated at roughly $1,700 per household for Illinois’ 5.1 million families. The document was marked “PAST DUE - DELINQUENT” and framed as reimbursement for “stolen” funds from higher grocery and hardware prices.
President Trump responded by imposing a temporary 10% global tariff under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. Other states are taking similar action: Nevada’s Treasurer requested $2.1 billion, and California Governor Gavin Newsom demanded the federal government “pay the piper.”
Experts warn that while the ruling could pave the way for over $160 billion in national refunds, the process will be legally complex and likely tied up in courts for years.
#SupremeCourt #TRUMP #tarrif
Illinois Governor JB Pritzker sent an official invoice to President Donald Trump demanding $8.6 billion for the state’s residents, following a 6-3 Supreme Court ruling that struck down the “Liberation Day” tariffs as unconstitutional.
The refund was calculated at roughly $1,700 per household for Illinois’ 5.1 million families. The document was marked “PAST DUE - DELINQUENT” and framed as reimbursement for “stolen” funds from higher grocery and hardware prices.
President Trump responded by imposing a temporary 10% global tariff under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. Other states are taking similar action: Nevada’s Treasurer requested $2.1 billion, and California Governor Gavin Newsom demanded the federal government “pay the piper.”
Experts warn that while the ruling could pave the way for over $160 billion in national refunds, the process will be legally complex and likely tied up in courts for years.
#SupremeCourt #TRUMP #tarrif
📈 Crypto News 📰
Supreme Court Blocks Trump Tariffs ⚖️🚫
The U.S. Supreme Court has blocked President Trump’s tariffs, ruling against certain trade measures. This decision impacts global trade dynamics and highlights the ongoing legal debates surrounding tariffs and economic policy.
#TradeWar #SupremeCourt #Tariffs #GlobalTrade #EconomicPolicy
Supreme Court Blocks Trump Tariffs ⚖️🚫
The U.S. Supreme Court has blocked President Trump’s tariffs, ruling against certain trade measures. This decision impacts global trade dynamics and highlights the ongoing legal debates surrounding tariffs and economic policy.
#TradeWar #SupremeCourt #Tariffs #GlobalTrade #EconomicPolicy
JUST IN:40% chance the #SupremeCourt forces President #TRUMP to refund $175,000,000,000 in #TARIFF revenue.
#TrumpNewTariffs #USJobsData
$USDC $BTC $ETH
#TrumpNewTariffs #USJobsData
$USDC $BTC $ETH
🚨 BREAKING: Goldman Sachs Says U.S. Tariffs Likely to Continue Despite Supreme Court Ruling
Goldman Sachs analysts note that even though the U.S. Supreme Court recently struck down President Trump’s emergency powers as a basis for tariffs, this does not signal the end of U.S. tariff policy. They expect the administration to use other legal avenues to continue imposing import tariffs.
What Happened
The Supreme Court ruled that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not give the president authority to impose broad tariffs without explicit congressional approval, invalidating many tariffs under that law.
Despite this, Goldman Sachs believes tariffs are unlikely to disappear. The administration can rely on other statutory tools to maintain trade pressure.
Possible Alternative Authorities
Section 301 of the Trade Act (retaliatory tariffs for unfair trade practices)
Section 232 (tariffs tied to national security)
Section 122 (temporary tariffs on balance-of-payments grounds)
Section 338 (rarely used tariffs on discriminatory trade practices)
These alternatives have different limitations but could still allow the U.S. to influence foreign imports.
Why It Matters
The court limited Trump’s chosen legal route for sweeping tariffs
Goldman argues tariffs will continue under different laws
Markets could face ongoing trade uncertainty and volatility
This may impact economic forecasts, consumer prices, supply chains, and international relations
#SupremeCourt #Tariffs #GoldmanSachs #TradePolicy $XAU $XAG
Goldman Sachs analysts note that even though the U.S. Supreme Court recently struck down President Trump’s emergency powers as a basis for tariffs, this does not signal the end of U.S. tariff policy. They expect the administration to use other legal avenues to continue imposing import tariffs.
What Happened
The Supreme Court ruled that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not give the president authority to impose broad tariffs without explicit congressional approval, invalidating many tariffs under that law.
Despite this, Goldman Sachs believes tariffs are unlikely to disappear. The administration can rely on other statutory tools to maintain trade pressure.
Possible Alternative Authorities
Section 301 of the Trade Act (retaliatory tariffs for unfair trade practices)
Section 232 (tariffs tied to national security)
Section 122 (temporary tariffs on balance-of-payments grounds)
Section 338 (rarely used tariffs on discriminatory trade practices)
These alternatives have different limitations but could still allow the U.S. to influence foreign imports.
Why It Matters
The court limited Trump’s chosen legal route for sweeping tariffs
Goldman argues tariffs will continue under different laws
Markets could face ongoing trade uncertainty and volatility
This may impact economic forecasts, consumer prices, supply chains, and international relations
#SupremeCourt #Tariffs #GoldmanSachs #TradePolicy $XAU $XAG
U.S. Supreme Court's decision on Trump's tariffs may not rock crypto
The U.S. Supreme Court just struck down President Trump's sweeping tariffs in a 6-3 ruling, declaring they exceeded his authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). Markets reacted positively overall, with $BTC briefly popping ~2% above $68K before settling around $67K a relief bounce as trade war fears eased.
But here's the key for crypto: The immediate impact may be limited. The decision halts these specific tariffs (for now), reducing short-term economic uncertainty that could have pressured risk assets like $BTC .
Crypto didn't crash it saw a modest lift alongside stocks showing resilience amid macro noise.
Longer term? The bigger story is political. Trump's team is already eyeing alternative trade tools (and he quickly announced a new 10% global tariff push). This could shift focus in Washington, potentially affecting broader policy like crypto regulation or fiscal moves that influence liquidity.
For now, crypto traders breathe easier no major rock to the boat from this ruling. But keep watching: Political ripple effects could matter more down the line.
What do you think short-term win for $BTC or just noise? 🚀
#crypto #bitcoin #TrumpTariffsffs #SupremeCourt #BinanceSquare
But here's the key for crypto: The immediate impact may be limited. The decision halts these specific tariffs (for now), reducing short-term economic uncertainty that could have pressured risk assets like $BTC .
Crypto didn't crash it saw a modest lift alongside stocks showing resilience amid macro noise.
Longer term? The bigger story is political. Trump's team is already eyeing alternative trade tools (and he quickly announced a new 10% global tariff push). This could shift focus in Washington, potentially affecting broader policy like crypto regulation or fiscal moves that influence liquidity.
For now, crypto traders breathe easier no major rock to the boat from this ruling. But keep watching: Political ripple effects could matter more down the line.
What do you think short-term win for $BTC or just noise? 🚀
#crypto #bitcoin #TrumpTariffsffs #SupremeCourt #BinanceSquare
Breaking news 🚨 The US Supreme Court has struck down Trump’s tariffs 🇺🇸💥
This decision could shake up trade and markets overnight. Companies that relied on those tariffs will have to rethink strategies, and consumers might see changes faster than expected.
Traders and investors are watching closely 👀 Stocks could jump or tumble as the fallout spreads. The next few days are going to be wild ⚡📈📉
#USTrade #SupremeCourt #TrumpTariffs #MarketUpdate #BreakingNews
$EDEN
$STG
$VVV
This decision could shake up trade and markets overnight. Companies that relied on those tariffs will have to rethink strategies, and consumers might see changes faster than expected.
Traders and investors are watching closely 👀 Stocks could jump or tumble as the fallout spreads. The next few days are going to be wild ⚡📈📉
#USTrade #SupremeCourt #TrumpTariffs #MarketUpdate #BreakingNews
$EDEN
$STG
$VVV
It felt like that dead-quiet moment right before a breaker trips — and then the Supreme Court snapped the switch: on Feb. 20, 2026, the justices ruled 6–3 that Trump’s sweeping “global/reciprocal” tariffs can’t stand because the emergency law he used (IEEPA, 1977) doesn’t authorize tariffs.
The core gut-punch: tariffs are taxes, and the Court said Congress holds that power — you don’t get to rewrite trade policy with an “emergency” label when the statute never even mentions duties. The majority leaned on the idea that for moves this huge, presidents need clear congressional permission (the “major questions” logic). 
Now comes the chaos layer: the government had already collected $133B+ in these import taxes as of December, and outside estimates say refund exposure could top $175B — but the Court didn’t say how refunds should work, basically warning it could be a “mess.”
And of course, the counterpunch landed fast: Trump blasted the ruling and signaled a replacement 10% global tariff using Section 122 (Trade Act of 1974) — a tool that can run up to 150 days and caps around 15% — while other tariff paths remain on the table. 
Markets caught the scent immediately: stocks jumped on the headline — but the bigger signal is louder than the price action: the Court just narrowed the “emergency powers” lane for tariffs, hard.
#Tariffs #SupremeCourt #TradeWar
The core gut-punch: tariffs are taxes, and the Court said Congress holds that power — you don’t get to rewrite trade policy with an “emergency” label when the statute never even mentions duties. The majority leaned on the idea that for moves this huge, presidents need clear congressional permission (the “major questions” logic). 
Now comes the chaos layer: the government had already collected $133B+ in these import taxes as of December, and outside estimates say refund exposure could top $175B — but the Court didn’t say how refunds should work, basically warning it could be a “mess.”
And of course, the counterpunch landed fast: Trump blasted the ruling and signaled a replacement 10% global tariff using Section 122 (Trade Act of 1974) — a tool that can run up to 150 days and caps around 15% — while other tariff paths remain on the table. 
Markets caught the scent immediately: stocks jumped on the headline — but the bigger signal is louder than the price action: the Court just narrowed the “emergency powers” lane for tariffs, hard.
#Tariffs #SupremeCourt #TradeWar
BREAKING: TRUMP'S ROME SPEECH + SUPREME COURT DISASTER
🇺🇸 ROME, GA – Just HOURS after Supreme Court ruled his tariffs ILLEGAL (6-3 decision), Trump landed in Georgia & delivered an EXPLOSIVE speech at Coosa Steel Corporation !
🗣️ WHAT HE SAID:
🔥 "Tariffs are my favorite word in the dictionary!" – Used it 28 times!
🔥 "I've won affordability!" – Despite 72% Americans rating economy fair/poor
🔥 On Supreme Court: "A DISGRACE. I have to do something about these courts."
💥 THE NUMBERS:
• $129 BILLION+ tariffs collected – now ILLEGAL
• Average tariff rate to DROP from 16.9% to 9.1%
• 57% DISAPPROVE of Trump's economy handling
📊 MARKET IMPACT:
✅ SHORT TERM: Tariffs gone = costs down = BULLISH?
⚠️ BUT: Trump fighting back = UNCERTAINTY = VOLATILITY
🚀 CRYPTO: Hedge play incoming?
🤔 WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?
👇 VOTE & COMMENT
MY TAKE: The market hates uncertainty. Trump fighting back means volatility ahead. Good for traders. Stay nimble!
Like & Follow for real-time updates!
#Trump #RomeSpeech #SupremeCourt #Tariffs #GloriousTechs
🇺🇸 ROME, GA – Just HOURS after Supreme Court ruled his tariffs ILLEGAL (6-3 decision), Trump landed in Georgia & delivered an EXPLOSIVE speech at Coosa Steel Corporation !
🗣️ WHAT HE SAID:
🔥 "Tariffs are my favorite word in the dictionary!" – Used it 28 times!
🔥 "I've won affordability!" – Despite 72% Americans rating economy fair/poor
🔥 On Supreme Court: "A DISGRACE. I have to do something about these courts."
💥 THE NUMBERS:
• $129 BILLION+ tariffs collected – now ILLEGAL
• Average tariff rate to DROP from 16.9% to 9.1%
• 57% DISAPPROVE of Trump's economy handling
📊 MARKET IMPACT:
✅ SHORT TERM: Tariffs gone = costs down = BULLISH?
⚠️ BUT: Trump fighting back = UNCERTAINTY = VOLATILITY
🚀 CRYPTO: Hedge play incoming?
🤔 WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?
👇 VOTE & COMMENT
MY TAKE: The market hates uncertainty. Trump fighting back means volatility ahead. Good for traders. Stay nimble!
Like & Follow for real-time updates!
#Trump #RomeSpeech #SupremeCourt #Tariffs #GloriousTechs
🟢 BUY the dip
58%
🔴 SELL the news
17%
⚪ HODL and wait
25%
🔵 STABLECOINS until clarity
0%
12 röster • Omröstningen avslutad
#BREAKING 🇺🇸 BLACKROCK DUMPED CRYPTO FAST AHEAD OF THE SUPREME COURT TARIFF RULING TODAY.
THEY JUST FLIPPED $250 MILLION OF $BTC AND $ETH IN UNDER 10 MINUTES AND THE SELL-OFF WALLS ARE STILL GROWING.
LOOKS LIKE THE INSIDERS ALREADY KNEW THE BAD NEWS WAS COMING...
–––––---
👀 👉 > $KITE |$ENSO
#BlackRock #Bitcoin #SupremeCourt
THEY JUST FLIPPED $250 MILLION OF $BTC AND $ETH IN UNDER 10 MINUTES AND THE SELL-OFF WALLS ARE STILL GROWING.
LOOKS LIKE THE INSIDERS ALREADY KNEW THE BAD NEWS WAS COMING...
–––––---
👀 👉 > $KITE |$ENSO
#BlackRock #Bitcoin #SupremeCourt
#Bitcoin stays range-bound even as the U.S. #SupremeCourt strikes down key Trump tariffs and legal discussions swirl around a potential $150B+ refund liability for illegal duties.
Macro shock? Maybe. Market shrug? Definitely. $BTC resilience in focus amid policy noise.
Macro shock? Maybe. Market shrug? Definitely. $BTC resilience in focus amid policy noise.
Logga in för att utforska mer innehåll