Iran–US Tensions and Market Impact
Escalating Iran–USA tensions in early 2026 sent shockwaves through financial markets. Risk sentiment has swung sharply between “risk-off” and calm as traders weigh the prospects of a sudden military clash versus diplomatic progress. Safe-haven assets like the U.S. dollar, gold (XAU) and silver (XAG) jumped on war fears, while equities and high-beta assets like Bitcoin (BTC) sold off��. Oil prices (WTI/Brent) spiked on supply disruption risk in the Strait of Hormuz, even as OPEC+ signaled plans to ease production cuts in April�. Below we review the key geopolitical developments and how markets have reacted:
binance.com
fxstreet.com
reuters.com
Recent Geopolitical Developments
Protests and Sanctions (Jan 2026): Nationwide demonstrations in Iran (late 2025 – Jan 2026) prompted a brutal government crackdown. The U.S. responded in January with fresh sanctions on Iranian oil traders and tanker networks, tying them to protest repression�. President Trump even warned of strikes (later backing off) as protests waned�. Concurrently the U.S. deployed additional naval forces – including multiple carrier groups and warships – to the Gulf, marking the largest U.S. force posture in the region since 2003��.
aljazeera.com
aljazeera.com
think.ing.com
ubs.com
Nuclear Talks in Geneva (Feb 16–17): On Feb 16–17, indirect U.S.–Iran nuclear negotiations (mediated by Oman) produced “guiding principles” for a deal, easing fears of imminent conflict�. Iran’s FM Araghchi announced a general framework agreement�. Even so, Iran’s media simultaneously reported temporarily closing parts of the Strait of Hormuz for drills�, keeping oil and gas shipping risk on traders’ minds.
reuters.com
reuters.com
reuters.com
Naval Incidents and Drills: On Feb 3, Iranian gunboats tried to intercept the U.S.-flagged tanker Stena Imperative in the Strait of Hormuz; the tanker escaped under U.S. escort�. A week later, semi-official reports noted joint Iran–Russia naval drills in the Gulf of Oman (north of Hormuz)��. These episodes underscored the ever-present threat of shipping disruptions: Iran has repeatedly warned it could choke off Hormuz (through which ~20% of global oil flows transit�) if attacked.
reuters.com
reuters.com
fxstreet.com
reuters.com
Ratcheting Rhetoric (Feb 18–20): In mid-February, headlines shifted back toward conflict. President Trump set a roughly “10 to 15 day” deadline for Iran to strike a deal or face dire consequences�. Israel reportedly raised its alert level, preparing for possible joint strikes�, and U.S. officials publicly warned of limited airstrikes if talks fail. By Feb 20, Reuters reported that hopes for diplomacy were fading and conflict looked “more likely than a settlement,” as U.S./Israeli forces massed near Iran��. (Israel’s government also quietly prepared for a contingency military operation�.) Throughout, oil producers in the Gulf braced for spillover, and traders cited a ~65% chance of U.S. strikes by spring�.
fxstreet.com
reuters.com
reuters.com
thenationalnews.com
reuters.com
reuters.com
Market Risk Sentiment & Volatility
The Iran news toggled markets between relief and panic. When talks progress, risk sentiment briefly improves (e.g. mid-Feb price pullbacks); when war fears mount, volatility surges. Global stocks and “risk-on” assets fell during peak tension – e.g. emerging markets and U.S. tech showed weakness in February, while government bonds rallied (yields fell) as investors sought safety�. The VIX volatility index remains near long-term averages� – indicating calm so far – but analysts warn it could spike if conflict erupts (one note projects VIX above 40 in a full-blown war scenario�).
thenationalnews.com
thenationalnews.com
seekingalpha.com
Traditional safe havens have benefited. The U.S. dollar, for instance, has regained its haven status amid the oil shock��. Currencies of oil-importers (EUR, JPY) weakened as crude rallied��. ING and Bitget research note that USD/EUR could tumble to ~1.16 if tensions deepen, as higher oil prices erode EUR’s energy-dependent economy��. Meanwhile the Swiss franc and Japanese yen have also seen safe-haven bids�.
think.ing.com
bitget.com
think.ing.com
bitget.com
think.ing.com
bitget.com
thenationalnews.com
On commodities and indices, safe-haven inflows (to bonds, gold, crypto) alternated with sell-offs when diplomatic news surfaced. For example, gold slid to a one-week low in mid-February after talk breakthroughs� but then recouped losses as Iran’s threats intensified�. Commodity-focused traders have cited headlines as the main driver of oil and metal moves�.
reuters.com
fxstreet.com
reuters.com
Crude Oil – Supply Concerns & OPEC+
Oil has been the most directly impacted commodity. Even before the February crisis peak, traders were jittery: on Feb 16, Brent crude and WTI oil were already rallying into the U.S.–Iran talks (Brent ~$68.65/bbl, WTI $63.75/bbl, each up ~1.3% for the day�). Supply fears from tensions helped stabilize oil prices despite OPEC+ plans to raise output in April�. Analysts warned that escalating conflict could easily push Brent to $80 or higher�.
reuters.com
reuters.com
reuters.com
After initial talk progress, oil briefly eased: on Feb 17, U.S. crude was ~$62.33 and Brent ~$67.42, slipping 0.9–1.8% after Iran’s negotiator announced “understanding” with the U.S. on guiding principles��. But the rally resumed on war alarms. By Feb 18, amid reports of U.S./Israeli military prep, oil surged over 4% (Brent closing ~$70.35/bbl, WTI $65.19/bbl – highest settlements since late January�). This jump roughly priced in the risk of Hormuz disruption; one analyst noted prices “were being solely driven by geopolitics”�.
reuters.com
reuters.com
reuters.com
reuters.com
Shipping chokepoint risks loomed large. Iran’s temporary drills had earlier prompted a short-term closure of part of Hormuz�. If Iran were to blockade the strait – which carries roughly 20% of world oil exports – even for days, oil could spike dramatically. Lombard Odier warns that a closure could catapult Brent into triple digits�, though Iran itself would forfeit its oil revenue by doing so. For now, markets are partly pricing a moderate risk: sentiment-tracking tools saw the probability of U.S. military action vs. Iran climb to ~60% by late Feb, consistent with Brent trading in the low $70s�.
reuters.com
thenationalnews.com
think.ing.com
OPEC+ is an additional factor. Saudi-led producers have kept oil well-supplied and plan to resume gradual output hikes from April�. Thus the shale of the Iran factor is partly offset by easing OPEC discipline – a dynamic analysts note may limit the rally’s duration. (One note: declining non-OPEC output, especially U.S. inventory draws, may interplay with any Iran shocks to tilt prices even higher��.)
reuters.com
reuters.com
reuters.com
�
46 *Figure: Market commentary reflecting Iran–US war fears. Commodities like gold, silver and oil surged on supply-risk concerns, while Bitcoin and risk assets fell4748.*
Asset
Price Before
Price After
Change
Brent Crude
$68.65 USD (Feb 16)�
reuters.com
$70.35 USD (Feb 18)�
+2.6 (+4.3%)
reuters.com
WTI Crude
$63.75 USD (Feb 16)�
reuters.com
$65.19 USD (Feb 18)�
+1.44 (+4.6%)
reuters.com
Bitcoin (BTC)
$67,724 USD (Feb 17)�
reuters.com
$66,384 USD (Feb 18)�
−1,340 (−2.0%)
binance.com
Gold (XAU)
$4,882 USD/oz (Feb 17)�
reuters.com
$5,030 USD/oz (Feb 20)�
+148 (+3.0%)
fxstreet.com
Data sources: Reuters and market reports�����.
reuters.com
reuters.com
reuters.com
fxstreet.com
binance.com
Bitcoin – A Risk Asset in Conflict
Far from acting as “digital gold,” Bitcoin has behaved more like a risk asset during the Iran–U.S. standoff. Crypto traders note that on news of war, Bitcoin tends to “flash crash” as investors liquidate volatile holdings to cover losses elsewhere��. Indeed, in mid-February, Bitcoin fell from the mid-$67k’s to ~$66k as safe-haven flows picked up��. (On Feb 17 it was ~$67,723; by Feb 18 it had slipped to ~$66,384��.) This mirrors previous crises: for example, when Iran attacked Israel in April 2024, BTC plunged ~8% in a day�; after Israel’s 2025 strikes on Iran, BTC fell ~6%�.
cryptoticker.io
cryptoticker.io
binance.com
reuters.com
reuters.com
binance.com
cryptoticker.io
cryptoticker.io
Institutional traders still see crypto as high-beta. The CryptoTicker analysis notes that major Iran-related news triggers immediate crypto sell-offs (typically 5–15%) followed by recoveries once conflict fears abate��. In short, current data show Bitcoin falling on geopolitical risk aversion – the opposite of a safe-haven hedge. That said, some analysts argue a sharp dip might be followed by a rebound (the so-called “springboard” effect) if the conflict does not escalate fully�. For now, traders should treat Bitcoin’s drop as a warning sign of risk-off sentiment (similar to equities)��.
cryptoticker.io
cryptoticker.io
cryptoticker.io
binance.com
cryptoticker.io
Precious Metals – Safe-Haven Surge
Gold and silver have been primary beneficiaries of the Iran scare. As tensions ratcheted up, investors poured into bullion. Gold climbed above the $5,000/oz mark (in local currency terms) – trading around $5,030/oz by Feb 20�, up from about $4,882 on Feb 17�. Silver similarly jumped, reaching ~$78/oz during Feb 17–19 as “safe-haven demand rises amid ongoing US–Iran tensions”�. Kitco and FXStreet commentary confirm that geopolitics drove a strong bid in gold/silver, even as the U.S. dollar remained firm; safe-haven metal demand “retraced almost all of the week’s losses” during the latest flare-up��.
fxstreet.com
reuters.com
mitrade.com
fxstreet.com
mitrade.com
Inflation and Fed policy are also factors. Surging oil in particular fuels inflation fears, reinforcing metals’ appeal as inflation hedges��. For example, U.S. core PCE inflation recently surprised on the upside, keeping real interest rates relatively low and gold attractive�. However, a strong dollar or hawkish Fed would normally cap precious-metals gains: FXStreet notes that the firm USD and hints of delayed Fed rate cuts could constrain silver and gold despite the geopolitical boost��.
fxstreet.com
thenationalnews.com
fxstreet.com
mitrade.com
fxstreet.com
Central banks have also been active buyers of gold. World Gold Council data show record demand in 2025, and many analysts (UBS, etc.) expect reserves to keep growing. In fact, UBS forecasts gold may continue higher (to ~$6,200/oz) as Fed easing resumes later in 2026, though that outlook assumes no sustained inflation surge�. The key is that war premiums are now an extra bullish factor: as UBS observes, even if geopolitics don’t have lasting market impact, they can temporarily spike volatility and fund flows into hedges like gold�.
ubs.com
ubs.com
In summary, Iran–US tensions in early 2026 have injected a pronounced geopolitical risk premium into FX and commodity markets. Oil prices have jumped on supply fears and military risk, while gold and silver have rallied on safe-haven demand��. Bitcoin and equities have moved opposite this safe-haven trade, underscoring their risk-asset status. Traders are watching key developments – carrier movements, Strait of Hormuz incidents, OPEC+ decisions, and diplomacy – to gauge how long this premium will last. Volatility spikes appear likely to persist as long as $BTC conflict risk remains, meaning both hedges (oil, gold, USD) and risk strategies (crypto, carry trades) require careful positioning.$ETH