donaldtrump

There are growing reports that China is buying nearly 90% of Iran’s oil exports, despite ongoing sanctions imposed by the United States. While the exact percentage can shift from month to month, the broader reality is clear: China has become the largest and most consistent buyer of Iranian crude in recent years.
After many Western countries reduced or completely stopped importing Iranian oil, China stepped in to fill the gap. This didn’t happen openly. Because of sanctions, much of this trade reportedly flows through indirect channels — including third-party traders, ship-to-ship transfers at sea, rebranded cargoes, and discounted pricing structures.
From China’s perspective, this strategy makes sense. Securing stable and affordable energy supplies is essential to support its massive industrial and manufacturing economy. Energy security is not optional — it’s strategic.
For Iran, these oil sales are a financial lifeline. Under heavy economic pressure, continued exports provide crucial government revenue and help sustain the country’s economy despite international restrictions.
What this situation clearly shows is how global energy markets adapt under sanctions. Even when political pressure increases, oil rarely disappears from the market — it simply finds new routes and new buyers.
To me, this highlights a bigger truth: geopolitics and energy are inseparable. As long as global demand remains strong and alternative supply routes exist, these relationships will continue to influence global power dynamics and economic alignments.
This isn’t just about oil — it’s about how the world really works behind the headlines.
⚙️ Feature Set — Key Points at a Glance
🔹 China is reportedly purchasing up to ~90% of Iran’s oil exports
🔹 Trade continues despite U.S. sanctions
🔹 Oil is moved via indirect channels (third parties, ship-to-ship transfers)
🔹 Iranian crude is often sold at discounted prices
🔹 China prioritizes energy security over political pressure
🔹 Iran relies on oil exports as a critical revenue source
🔹 Sanctions reshape trade routes but do not eliminate demand
🔹 Energy trade continues to shape global geopolitics and power balance

Bitcoin rallies, but nerves remain
Bitcoin traded near $68,000 on Friday, showing resilience despite the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to strike down President #DonaldTrump ’s global tariff regime. The ruling, delivered in a 6-3 split, declared that Trump lacked authority to impose sweeping tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). Yet, after an initial 2% surge that briefly pushed #Bitcoin❗ above $68,000, the price quickly slipped back below $67,000 before recovering. This pattern mirrored the broader market’s cautious optimism—Wall Street’s S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 indices rose 0.9% and 0.7%, respectively.
On paper, a major legal shakeup might have rattled crypto markets more decisively; in reality, Bitcoin and its peers appeared largely unfazed by the high court’s intervention.
The Final Word
The U.S. Supreme Court struck down Trump's global tariffs in a 6-3 decision, leaving refund processes for "tens of billions" unclear.Bitcoin briefly rose 2% above $68,000 after the ruling on Friday but quickly dropped back below $67,000.Altcoins like Solana ($SOL ), Dogecoin ($DOGE at $0.1001), and Cardano ($ADA at $0.2835) gained 3%-4% in 24 hours.
Supreme Court leaves tariff refunds murky
While the Supreme Court halted Trump’s previous approach to tariffs, it left key questions unanswered about what happens to the billions already collected from import duties. The Cato Institute estimates that “tens of billions” in customs duties may now be subject to litigation and complex refund processes—a burden likely to fall hardest on small importers. Senator Elizabeth Warren highlighted that there is currently no legal mechanism for consumers or small businesses to reclaim tariff payments, despite an estimated per-household cost of $1,300 this year according to the Tax Foundation.
It remains uncertain whether any meaningful refunds will materialize soon.
See Also
Trump, Crypto, and the Wyoming Bet: A New Era of Political Finance
Altcoins outpace Bitcoin after ruling
As Bitcoin recovered from its brief dip, several major altcoins posted stronger gains. Solana (SOL), Dogecoin (DOGE), Binance Coin (BNB), and Cardano (ADA) all advanced between 3% and 4% over the past 24 hours. DOGE hovered at $0.1001 and ADA at $0.2835 as of Friday morning in Asia. The CoinDesk 20 Index—a broad measure of crypto performance—rose by 2.5%, outpacing Bitcoin’s single-session move.
Gold also found support amid geopolitical jitters, holding near $5,000 an ounce after two days of gains. Meanwhile, Ether dipped slightly below $2,000 even as other digital assets rallied. This divergence suggests traders are recalibrating portfolios in response not only to legal news but also to shifting Federal Reserve signals and renewed U.S.-Iran tensions.
Trump vows swift new tariffs
Undeterred by the Supreme Court setback, Trump announced at a Friday press conference that he would order a new 10% global tariff using different legal authorities under Section 122. He indicated this fresh round would be implemented within three days and last for roughly five months as his administration seeks another route for tariff policy. Notably, no president has previously invoked Section 122 for tariffs on this scale or scope.
Lawmakers remain divided: Senator Bernie Moreno criticized the court’s decision on X (formerly Twitter), while Warren publicly supported it but acknowledged its limitations for affected households and businesses.
U.S. economic data added further complexity—core personal consumption expenditures rose by 3% year-over-year in the final quarter of 2025, outpacing forecasts and marking an uptick from prior readings. At the same time, GDP growth slowed to just 1.4% for Q4 and 2.2% annually—the slowest pace since 2020.
Small traders buy Bitcoin dip
Despite institutional hesitancy—large holders trimmed their Bitcoin positions by 0.8% since October’s all-time high—retail investors have increased their BTC holdings by 2.5%. Santiment data shows these smaller wallets have steadily accumulated coins even as volatility returned following both macroeconomic data releases and the Supreme Court ruling.
CryptoQuant reports record inflows of Bitcoin from large holders to Binance during this period of legal uncertainty and shifting policy signals.
For now, crypto markets appear more focused on central bank policy and geopolitical risk than on U.S. trade law drama—even as traders brace for further surprises from Washington.
As reported by coindesk.com, neither the Supreme Court decision nor Trump’s renewed tariff threats have fundamentally altered crypto’s upward trajectory so far this week.
Key developments still ahead
If President Trump’s newly announced 10% global tariff, set to take effect in three days, is implemented as scheduled, markets will immediately face fresh trade policy uncertainty, while the fate of "tens of billions" in previously collected tariff revenue remains unclear and may require further litigation according to the Cato Institute.

US President #DonaldTrump lashed out in unusually personal terms against the six #SupremeCourt justices who handed him one of the biggest setbacks of his second term in office by striking down the administration's global #Tariffs .
The court's Friday ruling was "deeply disappointing". The justices who joined the majority opinion should be "absolutely ashamed" and lacked the courage to "do the right thing", Trump said, turning his response into a sweeping attack against a co-equal branch of government.
The broadside was remarkable even for a president known for blowing past political norms and publicly berating those who challenge his authority.
"I'm ashamed of certain members of the court. Absolutely ashamed for not having the courage to do what's right for our country," $TRUMP said at the start of a press conference at the White House, which was held a few hours after the decision was released.
Trump did not mince words from there as he assessed the decision, which held that presidents do not have inherent authority to impose sweeping tariffs on any country.
For the next 45 minutes, Trump criticised the ruling and made the case that he would find other methods to continue imposing tariffs on other countries. But throughout he repeatedly returned to the justices in ways that made clear he felt personally slighted by the decision.
The president did not discriminate against Republican and #Democratic appointees, either.
The six justices who struck down Trump's tariffs were equally divided among the court's liberal and conservative wings. Three - Justices ElenaKagan, Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson - were appointed by Democratic presidents. The other three were appointed by Republicans. ChiefJustice John Roberts is a George W Bush pick who wrote the majority opinion, and Justices Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett were appointed by #trump in his first term in office.

🔥 What’s Happening Right Now
Donald Trump says he may decide within 10–15 days whether the U.S. will strike Iran. #ABCNews
He is considering limited military strikes mainly as leverage to force a nuclear deal.
At the same time, indirect nuclear negotiations are ongoing, and Iran says a draft proposal could come within days.
The🇺🇲 U.S. has already boosted military presence in the Middle East, raising fears of imminent action.
$AZTEC X $INIT
🌍🇺🇲 If the U.S. Strikes — Possible Global Impact
High probability effects:
🚀 Oil prices spike sharply
📉 Global markets become volatile
🪖 Middle East proxy conflicts escalate
₿ Crypto could see short-term volatility (often pumps during geopolitical fear)
#Warnig⚠️⚠️ 🔮💥 Most Likely Scenarios (Next 2 Weeks)
Scenario A — Deal Breakthrough (moderate probability)
Limited concessions
Military pressure eases
Markets calm
Scenario B — Limited U.S. Strike (real risk)
Targeted military sites
Iran retaliates indirectly
Regional tension surges
Scenario C — Prolonged Standoff (very possible)
Deadlines extended
Military buildup continues
No immediate war but persistent fear

#MarketCapRace #IRANIANPRESIDENT #MarketFalling

U.S. President Donald Trump announced Friday that he intends to impose a 10% global tariff on imports, escalating trade tensions after the Supreme Court rejected his authority to enact tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). Trump criticized the ruling as “unreasonable” and signaled his administration will pursue alternative legal pathways to implement the tariffs.
The decision has sparked debate across financial markets, with analysts warning that renewed protectionist measures could influence global trade flows, inflation trends, and risk sentiment across equities and digital assets.
Legal Dispute Centers on Executive Authority
The Supreme Court ruled that the executive branch does not have the authority to impose tariffs under IEEPA during peacetime, emphasizing that the U.S. Constitution grants taxation powers to Congress.
In response, Trump stated his administration would rely on other legal mechanisms, including:
Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 (national security tariffs)
Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 (trade retaliation authority)
Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, which allows temporary tariffs to address balance-of-payments concerns
According to Trump, existing national security tariffs remain in effect, and a new executive order could soon formalize the additional 10% tariff.
Background: Previous Tariffs and National Security Justification
Trump previously imposed:
25% tariffs on imports from Canada and Mexico
10% tariffs on goods from China
These measures were justified under national security provisions, a rationale that has remained controversial among trade partners and legal experts.
The administration argues that tariffs protect domestic industries and strengthen supply chain resilience, while critics contend they increase consumer costs and disrupt global commerce.
Potential Market Impact: Trade Friction and Risk Sentiment
A universal tariff could have wide-ranging economic consequences:
🌍 Global Trade
Increased import costs may pressure multinational supply chains
Trade partners could retaliate with countermeasures
Export-driven economies may face reduced demand
📉 Inflation & Monetary Policy
Higher import prices could add inflationary pressure
Central banks may delay rate cuts if inflation persists
📊 Financial Markets & Crypto
Risk-off sentiment may increase short-term volatility
Safe-haven assets could see renewed demand
Crypto markets may react to macro uncertainty and currency volatility
Historically, periods of trade conflict have driven fluctuations across global markets, influencing liquidity flows and investor risk appetite.
Constitutional Debate: Separation of Powers in Focus
The ruling underscores a broader constitutional issue: the balance of power between Congress and the executive branch.
The Court reaffirmed that tariff authority rests with Congress, limiting the executive’s ability to invoke emergency economic powers in the absence of a national emergency.
Legal analysts suggest the ruling may shape future trade policy strategies and constrain unilateral tariff actions by any administration.
What Comes Next?
Market participants are closely monitoring:
✔ Whether the administration proceeds under Sections 232, 301, or 122
✔ Potential retaliation from major trading partners
✔ Impacts on inflation and Federal Reserve policy outlook
✔ Shifts in global risk sentiment affecting equities and crypto
If implemented, a global tariff could mark a significant escalation in protectionist policy and reshape the global trade landscape.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Readers should conduct independent research before making financial decisions.
💬 Will global tariffs protect economies — or trigger a new trade war?
Share your thoughts below 👇
👉 Follow for daily macro & crypto market insights.
#DonaldTrump #USTariffs #BTC