Binance Square

web3hu77

Open Trade
High-Frequency Trader
4.8 Months
43 Following
7.7K+ Followers
1.5K+ Liked
177 Shared
Posts
Portfolio
PINNED
·
--
Sprinting towards the goal of 10,000 followers! Thank you to my brothers for their unwavering support! We have prepared a generous USDT red envelope rain 🧧🧧🧧 which has already been distributed! I hope my brothers can give me a boost!💡 #红包
Sprinting towards the goal of 10,000 followers!

Thank you to my brothers for their unwavering support!

We have prepared a generous USDT red envelope rain 🧧🧧🧧 which has already been distributed!

I hope my brothers can give me a boost!💡

#红包
PINNED
🥰🥰🥰 Sprinting towards the goal of 10K followers! Thank you to my brothers for their unwavering support! We have prepared a generous USDT red envelope rain 🧧🧧🧧 which has already been distributed! I hope my brothers can give me a boost!💡 #redenvelope #红包
🥰🥰🥰 Sprinting towards the goal of 10K followers!


Thank you to my brothers for their unwavering support!


We have prepared a generous USDT red envelope rain 🧧🧧🧧 which has already been distributed!

I hope my brothers can give me a boost!💡

#redenvelope #红包
Does Web3 really need the N-th payment chain? Let's take a look at the true intentions of Plasma.Many project parties like to complicate simple things with a bunch of obscure terms. But I, "web3hu77," don't buy this. Plasma ($XPL) has been gaining a lot of attention lately; some say it's the terminator of payments, while others say it's pure speculation. Let's not hype or criticize but directly look at the evidence. 1. Why does it dare to say it can "fight"? Current chains have slow transfers, high fees, and operations that are anti-human; how many Web3 applications have been crushed under these three mountains? Plasma's idea is very clear: since we can't change the old chain, I'll build a set of rules myself. • Technical advantages: It has built a high-performance execution layer under the security framework of Bitcoin. In simple terms, Bitcoin is responsible for "keeping money safe," while Plasma is responsible for "spending money quickly." I recognize this architecture because it allows each to do its own job without pretense.

Does Web3 really need the N-th payment chain? Let's take a look at the true intentions of Plasma.

Many project parties like to complicate simple things with a bunch of obscure terms. But I, "web3hu77," don't buy this. Plasma ($XPL ) has been gaining a lot of attention lately; some say it's the terminator of payments, while others say it's pure speculation. Let's not hype or criticize but directly look at the evidence.

1. Why does it dare to say it can "fight"?

Current chains have slow transfers, high fees, and operations that are anti-human; how many Web3 applications have been crushed under these three mountains? Plasma's idea is very clear: since we can't change the old chain, I'll build a set of rules myself.

• Technical advantages: It has built a high-performance execution layer under the security framework of Bitcoin. In simple terms, Bitcoin is responsible for "keeping money safe," while Plasma is responsible for "spending money quickly." I recognize this architecture because it allows each to do its own job without pretense.
·
--
Bullish
Plasma This project, is it a "payment remedy" or "another ecological island"? Recently researching Plasma ($XPL), my OCD has kicked in again. There are not less than eighty L1s out there, why does this guy dare to claim to be the payment terminator? First, let me mention some evidence (advantages): 1. This chain does not "lag": I went to check its technical documentation, it uses a parallel processing-like architecture. Transferring USDT is basically instant, this experience lives up to the phrase "speaking human language." 2. Endorsement is not to be taken lightly: It was previously mentioned that it's deeply bound with Aave (6.5 billion USD in deposits), this is not just a matter of money, but also of credit endorsement. Whales are not afraid of new things, they are afraid of lacking confidence, and Plasma seems to grasp this quite well. 3. Low-cost migration: For developers, EVM compatibility is a lifesaver. I tend to believe that its subsequent ecological explosion will come faster than expected, because developers do not need to relearn the code. My concerns (calm down): Brothers, we need to keep a close eye on our wallets. Although it boasts 0 fees, where does the exchange rate loss and node rewards come from? I am not sure if this closed loop will remain robust in the long run. Conclusion: Don't rush to invest all in. I will keep an eye on the launch data of its pBTC bridge, if Bitcoin's liquidity can truly flow in seamlessly, then I would be willing to call it the strongest dark horse of 2026. @Plasma $XPL #plasma
Plasma This project, is it a "payment remedy" or "another ecological island"?

Recently researching Plasma ($XPL ), my OCD has kicked in again. There are not less than eighty L1s out there, why does this guy dare to claim to be the payment terminator?

First, let me mention some evidence (advantages):

1. This chain does not "lag": I went to check its technical documentation, it uses a parallel processing-like architecture. Transferring USDT is basically instant, this experience lives up to the phrase "speaking human language."

2. Endorsement is not to be taken lightly: It was previously mentioned that it's deeply bound with Aave (6.5 billion USD in deposits), this is not just a matter of money, but also of credit endorsement. Whales are not afraid of new things, they are afraid of lacking confidence, and Plasma seems to grasp this quite well.

3. Low-cost migration: For developers, EVM compatibility is a lifesaver. I tend to believe that its subsequent ecological explosion will come faster than expected, because developers do not need to relearn the code.

My concerns (calm down):
Brothers, we need to keep a close eye on our wallets. Although it boasts 0 fees, where does the exchange rate loss and node rewards come from? I am not sure if this closed loop will remain robust in the long run.

Conclusion: Don't rush to invest all in. I will keep an eye on the launch data of its pBTC bridge, if Bitcoin's liquidity can truly flow in seamlessly, then I would be willing to call it the strongest dark horse of 2026.

@Plasma $XPL #plasma
·
--
Bullish
Criticism aside, Plasma's "0 transaction fee" logic is indeed something special. Many projects claim they want to overturn Ethereum, and I usually blacklist those. But Plasma ($XPL) is smart because it doesn't engage in empty talk; it focuses on one scenario: stablecoin payments. Why I think it has potential (advantage analysis): 1. Hits the pain point: Guys, transferring a few dollars on Ethereum incurs various messy Gas fees on some chains. Plasma has implemented a "Paymaster" mechanism, allowing USDT transfers with no fees, which is indeed a game changer for cross-border remittances and daily payments. 2. Security background: It is not an arbitrary dog coin; it anchors Bitcoin's security while being compatible with EVM. This means the migration cost for developers is extremely low. I looked at its integration data with Aave, and the deposit peak can stabilize at 6.5 billion dollars, indicating that big money is willing to enter. 3. Real-world application: Its Plasma One wallet has already laid the groundwork in Southeast Asia and the Middle East; this is not just vaporware, as there are real users utilizing it. But I'm not completely sold yet (risk warning): I prefer to observe its token model a bit longer. There will be a large-scale unlocking in July 2026, around 3.5 billion XPL. Although the official claims they will implement staking and EIP-1559 burning to hedge against price drops, sufficient evidence has not yet been provided. My operational verification suggestion: Don't rush to shout "yyds". I will first test cross-border transfers on its mainnet to see if the latency can really reach millisecond levels. If its pBTC bridge goes live and liquidity doesn't dry up, then this project really has potential. @Plasma $XPL #plasma {spot}(XPLUSDT)
Criticism aside, Plasma's "0 transaction fee" logic is indeed something special.
Many projects claim they want to overturn Ethereum, and I usually blacklist those. But Plasma ($XPL ) is smart because it doesn't engage in empty talk; it focuses on one scenario: stablecoin payments.
Why I think it has potential (advantage analysis):
1. Hits the pain point: Guys, transferring a few dollars on Ethereum incurs various messy Gas fees on some chains. Plasma has implemented a "Paymaster" mechanism, allowing USDT transfers with no fees, which is indeed a game changer for cross-border remittances and daily payments.
2. Security background: It is not an arbitrary dog coin; it anchors Bitcoin's security while being compatible with EVM. This means the migration cost for developers is extremely low. I looked at its integration data with Aave, and the deposit peak can stabilize at 6.5 billion dollars, indicating that big money is willing to enter.
3. Real-world application: Its Plasma One wallet has already laid the groundwork in Southeast Asia and the Middle East; this is not just vaporware, as there are real users utilizing it.
But I'm not completely sold yet (risk warning):
I prefer to observe its token model a bit longer. There will be a large-scale unlocking in July 2026, around 3.5 billion XPL. Although the official claims they will implement staking and EIP-1559 burning to hedge against price drops, sufficient evidence has not yet been provided.
My operational verification suggestion:
Don't rush to shout "yyds". I will first test cross-border transfers on its mainnet to see if the latency can really reach millisecond levels. If its pBTC bridge goes live and liquidity doesn't dry up, then this project really has potential.
@Plasma $XPL #plasma
Finding a reasonable position for XPL between 'survival' and 'getting rich'To be honest, the project names in Web3 these days are getting more and more bizarre. The term Plasma has been heard by many veterans, as it was an early scaling solution for Ethereum. But the Plasma ($XPL) being discussed today is a Layer 1 specifically focused on payments. Recently, I've seen quite a few people hyping it up on Twitter, and today I'm flipping through the white paper while criticizing it to help my brothers understand. 1. Don't brag, first look at the project's 'hard flaws' and 'confidence' Most chains try to be 'all-rounders', but end up becoming 'all-waste'. Plasma is smart because it only does 'specialization'. Its core logic is very simple: make stablecoin transactions as cheap as sending an email.

Finding a reasonable position for XPL between 'survival' and 'getting rich'

To be honest, the project names in Web3 these days are getting more and more bizarre. The term Plasma has been heard by many veterans, as it was an early scaling solution for Ethereum. But the Plasma ($XPL ) being discussed today is a Layer 1 specifically focused on payments. Recently, I've seen quite a few people hyping it up on Twitter, and today I'm flipping through the white paper while criticizing it to help my brothers understand.

1. Don't brag, first look at the project's 'hard flaws' and 'confidence'

Most chains try to be 'all-rounders', but end up becoming 'all-waste'. Plasma is smart because it only does 'specialization'. Its core logic is very simple: make stablecoin transactions as cheap as sending an email.
2026 Payment Transformation: Between the Technical Ideal of $XPL and the Local Tyrant Rule of TronLast night, staring at the cross-chain transaction that repeatedly jumped around on the congested mainnet, with Gas fees creating a ridiculous parabolic curve, I suddenly realized the 'elephant in the room': we have hundreds of chains claiming to change the world, yet we still cannot transfer a USDT without the psychological burden like using WeChat Pay. This sense of frustration led me to revisit @Plasma's white paper. This is not only to find the next wealth code but also to confirm: whether this project, which still thrives in 2026 and debuted under the L1 name, is truly an arrogance about bias or a severely underestimated grassroots revolution?

2026 Payment Transformation: Between the Technical Ideal of $XPL and the Local Tyrant Rule of Tron

Last night, staring at the cross-chain transaction that repeatedly jumped around on the congested mainnet, with Gas fees creating a ridiculous parabolic curve, I suddenly realized the 'elephant in the room': we have hundreds of chains claiming to change the world, yet we still cannot transfer a USDT without the psychological burden like using WeChat Pay.

This sense of frustration led me to revisit @Plasma's white paper. This is not only to find the next wealth code but also to confirm: whether this project, which still thrives in 2026 and debuted under the L1 name, is truly an arrogance about bias or a severely underestimated grassroots revolution?
·
--
Bullish
Technical Archaeology After a 90% Plunge: Is XPL a Dead End or an Undervalued New Payment Darling? Staring at the nearly “guillotine-style” retracement K-line of XPL, panic is instinctual, but peeling away the price fog to reveal the underlying logic may be the truth. 1. Interactive Revolution: Eliminate the “Anti-Human” Gas Threshold We shout all day about Mass Adoption, yet even among the leading L2 camps, the need for constant ETH for Gas during transfers remains a “Berlin Wall” obstructing user entry. The Paymaster mechanism of @Plasma truly addresses the pain point: it supports stablecoin payments for Gas, achieving zero friction in interactions. This silky experience even creates the illusion of operating Web2 applications—not only is it cost-saving, but it fundamentally reconstructs the interaction logic of Web3. 2. Security Philosophy: “It’s Nice to Be Under the Big Tree” Backed by BTC XPL has not painted a grand vision on self-built consensus but has opted to periodically anchor its state to the Bitcoin network. Using BTC's top-tier computing power for final confirmations, this “leg-holding” approach is evidently more fundamentally certain than new public chains that pursue extreme performance yet often crash in the current turbulent macro environment. 3. Data Speaks: The “Honest Vote” of Institutional Funds • Fund Accumulation: The SyrupUSDT lending pool on Maple Finance has over 1.1 billion dollars in TVL, proving institutional-level funding's endorsement of liquidity safety. • Payment Channels: Rain cards and Oobit access the Visa network, combined with the EUROP stablecoin compliant with MiCA regulations, meaning XPL has completed a practical “encirclement” from protocol to millions of merchants. 4. Calm Reflection: The Weakness of a Specialist Of course, XPL is still a “serious specialist” at the moment. The high concentration of verification nodes hangs over it like the sword of Damocles, and the lack of ecological applications makes it appear somewhat solitary. Summary: Amidst the shouts of zeroing out, I instead see a “tough guy” focused on the underlying payment, not telling stories but doing practical work. After the bubble bursts, projects that solve real pain points often have the strongest rebound potential. @Plasma #plasma $XPL
Technical Archaeology After a 90% Plunge: Is XPL a Dead End or an Undervalued New Payment Darling?

Staring at the nearly “guillotine-style” retracement K-line of XPL, panic is instinctual, but peeling away the price fog to reveal the underlying logic may be the truth.
1. Interactive Revolution: Eliminate the “Anti-Human” Gas Threshold
We shout all day about Mass Adoption, yet even among the leading L2 camps, the need for constant ETH for Gas during transfers remains a “Berlin Wall” obstructing user entry. The Paymaster mechanism of @Plasma truly addresses the pain point: it supports stablecoin payments for Gas, achieving zero friction in interactions. This silky experience even creates the illusion of operating Web2 applications—not only is it cost-saving, but it fundamentally reconstructs the interaction logic of Web3.

2. Security Philosophy: “It’s Nice to Be Under the Big Tree” Backed by BTC
XPL has not painted a grand vision on self-built consensus but has opted to periodically anchor its state to the Bitcoin network. Using BTC's top-tier computing power for final confirmations, this “leg-holding” approach is evidently more fundamentally certain than new public chains that pursue extreme performance yet often crash in the current turbulent macro environment.

3. Data Speaks: The “Honest Vote” of Institutional Funds
• Fund Accumulation: The SyrupUSDT lending pool on Maple Finance has over 1.1 billion dollars in TVL, proving institutional-level funding's endorsement of liquidity safety.
• Payment Channels: Rain cards and Oobit access the Visa network, combined with the EUROP stablecoin compliant with MiCA regulations, meaning XPL has completed a practical “encirclement” from protocol to millions of merchants.
4. Calm Reflection: The Weakness of a Specialist
Of course, XPL is still a “serious specialist” at the moment. The high concentration of verification nodes hangs over it like the sword of Damocles, and the lack of ecological applications makes it appear somewhat solitary.
Summary: Amidst the shouts of zeroing out, I instead see a “tough guy” focused on the underlying payment, not telling stories but doing practical work. After the bubble bursts, projects that solve real pain points often have the strongest rebound potential.
@Plasma
#plasma $XPL
Advantages and Challenges of Plasma—Standing Behind the TechnologyThe world of Web3 has been evolving, with more and more technological innovations emerging, but have you noticed that many projects, despite gaining significant attention in the market, fail to truly address the existing bottleneck issues of blockchain—speed, cost, and scalability? Today, let's talk about Plasma, a concept you may have heard several times, and see if it can indeed become a key breakthrough for the future of Web3. The basic principle of Plasma: balancing scalability and decentralization In simple terms, Plasma is a protocol proposed to improve the scalability of blockchain. It was first introduced by Ethereum co-founders Joseph Poon and Vitalik Buterin, aiming to alleviate congestion on the main chain by distributing the blockchain’s load across multiple 'child chains'. For example, imagine the main chain as a highway; if all vehicles are concentrated on it, traffic congestion is inevitable. Plasma establishes multiple branch roads on the main chain, allowing vehicles to travel through different routes, thereby improving overall transportation efficiency.

Advantages and Challenges of Plasma—Standing Behind the Technology

The world of Web3 has been evolving, with more and more technological innovations emerging, but have you noticed that many projects, despite gaining significant attention in the market, fail to truly address the existing bottleneck issues of blockchain—speed, cost, and scalability? Today, let's talk about Plasma, a concept you may have heard several times, and see if it can indeed become a key breakthrough for the future of Web3.

The basic principle of Plasma: balancing scalability and decentralization

In simple terms, Plasma is a protocol proposed to improve the scalability of blockchain. It was first introduced by Ethereum co-founders Joseph Poon and Vitalik Buterin, aiming to alleviate congestion on the main chain by distributing the blockchain’s load across multiple 'child chains'. For example, imagine the main chain as a highway; if all vehicles are concentrated on it, traffic congestion is inevitable. Plasma establishes multiple branch roads on the main chain, allowing vehicles to travel through different routes, thereby improving overall transportation efficiency.
·
--
Bullish
Plasma——Stand Firm and Move Forward Brothers, today let's talk about Plasma. Everyone knows that the term Web3 has become quite popular, and many projects can be seen in the streets and alleys. People are used to various boastful promotions, which inevitably brings some skepticism. However, we cannot just listen to the hype; we need to do some homework to see if Plasma can truly break some bottlenecks of Web3 and provide a relatively reliable direction. First of all, the design of Plasma is relatively complex. One of the biggest pain points of blockchain right now is throughput, especially for high-frequency trading chains like Ethereum. As the number of users increases, transaction fees rise, and the speed slows down, making one want to give up. However, Plasma proposes to handle this by splitting data and transactions into multiple sub-chains, effectively reducing the burden on the main chain and enhancing the overall processing capability of the system. That said, while Plasma looks perfect, there are significant issues. The first is that its implementation and maintenance require a lot of development resources, which may not be fully compatible for smaller projects with lower technical requirements. The second is that the security of Plasma still needs to be validated, after all, this is a new type of solution, and it's difficult to fully verify its reliability through short-term data. To summarize, I tend to believe that Plasma indeed has considerable potential in the scalability of Web3. At least it proposes a promising idea aimed at addressing the current core issues of blockchain—throughput and cost. It is not a 'universal' solution, but it provides a reference direction for subsequent technological innovation. If you are still somewhat skeptical about Plasma, I suggest you continue to follow its development and actual application, because in this race, often, only after seeing the evidence can one truly convince oneself. First, ensure survival, then talk. Don't rush into it. Keep observing, do your homework, and verify more facts. @Plasma $XPL #plasma {spot}(XPLUSDT)
Plasma——Stand Firm and Move Forward

Brothers, today let's talk about Plasma. Everyone knows that the term Web3 has become quite popular, and many projects can be seen in the streets and alleys. People are used to various boastful promotions, which inevitably brings some skepticism. However, we cannot just listen to the hype; we need to do some homework to see if Plasma can truly break some bottlenecks of Web3 and provide a relatively reliable direction.

First of all, the design of Plasma is relatively complex. One of the biggest pain points of blockchain right now is throughput, especially for high-frequency trading chains like Ethereum. As the number of users increases, transaction fees rise, and the speed slows down, making one want to give up. However, Plasma proposes to handle this by splitting data and transactions into multiple sub-chains, effectively reducing the burden on the main chain and enhancing the overall processing capability of the system.

That said, while Plasma looks perfect, there are significant issues. The first is that its implementation and maintenance require a lot of development resources, which may not be fully compatible for smaller projects with lower technical requirements. The second is that the security of Plasma still needs to be validated, after all, this is a new type of solution, and it's difficult to fully verify its reliability through short-term data.

To summarize, I tend to believe that Plasma indeed has considerable potential in the scalability of Web3. At least it proposes a promising idea aimed at addressing the current core issues of blockchain—throughput and cost. It is not a 'universal' solution, but it provides a reference direction for subsequent technological innovation. If you are still somewhat skeptical about Plasma, I suggest you continue to follow its development and actual application, because in this race, often, only after seeing the evidence can one truly convince oneself.

First, ensure survival, then talk. Don't rush into it. Keep observing, do your homework, and verify more facts.

@Plasma
$XPL
#plasma
·
--
Bullish
In the world of cryptocurrency, the Plasma project stands out like a breath of fresh air, focusing on the construction of stablecoin infrastructure, making it eye-catching. As a Layer-1 blockchain, it is not a jack of all trades, but is dedicated to optimizing stablecoin payment scenarios. Just think about it, daily transfers of USDT can actually have zero fees and sub-second confirmations, which is almost a luxury on other chains. Plasma's PlasmaBFT consensus mechanism ensures high throughput, exceeding 1000 TPS, and is EVM compatible, allowing Ethereum developers to migrate applications seamlessly. This is not just a technical advantage; it also paves the way for a global payment system. From recent developments, Plasma's partner lineup is impressive: in collaboration with YuzuMoneyX, the TVL soared to $70 million in just four months; teaming up with MapleFinance provides institutional-level yields; and the integration with Aave has led to deposits surging to $6.6 billion within 48 hours. These partnerships are not just talk; they are substantial ecological expansions that help emerging financial applications land in cash-dominated markets like Southeast Asia. The zero gas fee design is particularly thoughtful, allowing users to operate without holding extra tokens, lowering the threshold and truly promoting mass adoption. The project team's proactive attitude is also commendable. They do not chase trends but instead take steady steps, focusing on performance optimization and real usability. For example, integrating NEAR Intents enables large cross-chain settlements at prices comparable to CEX; the integration of ConfirmoPay allows businesses to process $80 million in payments per month with zero gas fees. Even cooler is the local BTC bridging, directly connecting Bitcoin liquidity to smart contracts, opening new doors for DeFi. Overall, Plasma's advantages lie in its focus and practicality. It is not about creating narratives but about solving pain points with engineering thinking and building sustainable infrastructure. In the future, as the stablecoin market expands from $250 billion to the trillion-dollar level, Plasma is likely to become a core settlement layer. I am optimistic that it can reshape the flow of money! @Plasma $XPL #plasma {spot}(XPLUSDT)
In the world of cryptocurrency, the Plasma project stands out like a breath of fresh air, focusing on the construction of stablecoin infrastructure, making it eye-catching. As a Layer-1 blockchain, it is not a jack of all trades, but is dedicated to optimizing stablecoin payment scenarios. Just think about it, daily transfers of USDT can actually have zero fees and sub-second confirmations, which is almost a luxury on other chains. Plasma's PlasmaBFT consensus mechanism ensures high throughput, exceeding 1000 TPS, and is EVM compatible, allowing Ethereum developers to migrate applications seamlessly. This is not just a technical advantage; it also paves the way for a global payment system.

From recent developments, Plasma's partner lineup is impressive: in collaboration with YuzuMoneyX, the TVL soared to $70 million in just four months; teaming up with MapleFinance provides institutional-level yields; and the integration with Aave has led to deposits surging to $6.6 billion within 48 hours. These partnerships are not just talk; they are substantial ecological expansions that help emerging financial applications land in cash-dominated markets like Southeast Asia. The zero gas fee design is particularly thoughtful, allowing users to operate without holding extra tokens, lowering the threshold and truly promoting mass adoption.

The project team's proactive attitude is also commendable. They do not chase trends but instead take steady steps, focusing on performance optimization and real usability. For example, integrating NEAR Intents enables large cross-chain settlements at prices comparable to CEX; the integration of ConfirmoPay allows businesses to process $80 million in payments per month with zero gas fees. Even cooler is the local BTC bridging, directly connecting Bitcoin liquidity to smart contracts, opening new doors for DeFi.

Overall, Plasma's advantages lie in its focus and practicality. It is not about creating narratives but about solving pain points with engineering thinking and building sustainable infrastructure. In the future, as the stablecoin market expands from $250 billion to the trillion-dollar level, Plasma is likely to become a core settlement layer. I am optimistic that it can reshape the flow of money!
@Plasma $XPL #plasma
Plasma adopts the PlasmaBFT consensus mechanism, which is an optimized version of HotStuffThe Plasma project stands out in the cryptocurrency field; it is not a generic blockchain that follows the crowd, but a high-performance Layer-1 infrastructure specifically designed for stablecoins. This focus is admirable, and the project team meticulously hones the underlying capabilities around the core needs of stablecoins, avoiding the bulkiness and inefficiency of other chains. In simple terms, Plasma allows money to flow as easily as sending a message: USDT transfers with zero fees, sub-second block confirmations, and a throughput of over 1000 TPS. These features are not just gimmicks; they are real advantages tailored to the global payment pain points.

Plasma adopts the PlasmaBFT consensus mechanism, which is an optimized version of HotStuff

The Plasma project stands out in the cryptocurrency field; it is not a generic blockchain that follows the crowd, but a high-performance Layer-1 infrastructure specifically designed for stablecoins. This focus is admirable, and the project team meticulously hones the underlying capabilities around the core needs of stablecoins, avoiding the bulkiness and inefficiency of other chains. In simple terms, Plasma allows money to flow as easily as sending a message: USDT transfers with zero fees, sub-second block confirmations, and a throughput of over 1000 TPS. These features are not just gimmicks; they are real advantages tailored to the global payment pain points.
·
--
Bullish
Plasma: A foundational infrastructure solution continuously deepening around stablecoin demand In the context of the cryptocurrency industry gradually moving towards a pragmatic stage, Plasma's development path has become clearer. From the content of the official account @plasma, it can be seen that the project is not in a hurry to create topics, but is continuously promoting the underlying network construction around the usage demands of stablecoins, which lays a stable development foundation for it. Plasma's core goal is very clear: to provide more efficient and stable infrastructure support for stablecoin payments and settlements. Although stablecoins are already widely used, issues such as unstable transaction fees and limited confirmation efficiency still exist in practice. Plasma starts from the underlying architecture, specifically optimizing performance and cost models to make stablecoin transfers smoother and cost-controllable. At the technical level, Plasma is deeply compatible with EVM, providing developers with a mature and friendly development environment, lowering the threshold for ecological participation. Meanwhile, the interactive optimizations around payment scenarios also make it more intuitive and natural for ordinary users when using stablecoins. As the application scenarios for stablecoins continue to expand, Plasma's route of being demand-driven and continuously refining its infrastructure is gradually forming its long-term advantages. @Plasma $XPL #plasma {spot}(XPLUSDT)
Plasma: A foundational infrastructure solution continuously deepening around stablecoin demand

In the context of the cryptocurrency industry gradually moving towards a pragmatic stage, Plasma's development path has become clearer. From the content of the official account @plasma, it can be seen that the project is not in a hurry to create topics, but is continuously promoting the underlying network construction around the usage demands of stablecoins, which lays a stable development foundation for it.

Plasma's core goal is very clear: to provide more efficient and stable infrastructure support for stablecoin payments and settlements. Although stablecoins are already widely used, issues such as unstable transaction fees and limited confirmation efficiency still exist in practice. Plasma starts from the underlying architecture, specifically optimizing performance and cost models to make stablecoin transfers smoother and cost-controllable.

At the technical level, Plasma is deeply compatible with EVM, providing developers with a mature and friendly development environment, lowering the threshold for ecological participation. Meanwhile, the interactive optimizations around payment scenarios also make it more intuitive and natural for ordinary users when using stablecoins.

As the application scenarios for stablecoins continue to expand, Plasma's route of being demand-driven and continuously refining its infrastructure is gradually forming its long-term advantages.

@Plasma
$XPL
#plasma
Plasma: An Attempt for Stablecoin Infrastructure to Prioritize UsabilityAs the crypto industry gradually cools down and the market begins to return to a rational phase, the value of infrastructure projects is being re-evaluated. Plasma, in this context, has chosen to focus on stablecoins as the most practically significant direction for continued advancement. From the long-term content of the official account @undefined , the project has not frequently switched narratives, but instead has steadily progressed around a clear goal. Stablecoins have become the core vehicle for on-chain capital flow. Whether for transaction settlement, cross-border transfers, or future broader payment scenarios, stablecoins bear high-frequency and rigid demand. However, in real-world usage, the experience of stablecoins is often constrained by the performance and fee structure of the underlying public chain. Fluctuations in transaction fees, confirmation delays, and operational complexity are significant factors hindering the further popularization of stablecoins.

Plasma: An Attempt for Stablecoin Infrastructure to Prioritize Usability

As the crypto industry gradually cools down and the market begins to return to a rational phase, the value of infrastructure projects is being re-evaluated. Plasma, in this context, has chosen to focus on stablecoins as the most practically significant direction for continued advancement. From the long-term content of the official account @undefined , the project has not frequently switched narratives, but instead has steadily progressed around a clear goal.

Stablecoins have become the core vehicle for on-chain capital flow. Whether for transaction settlement, cross-border transfers, or future broader payment scenarios, stablecoins bear high-frequency and rigid demand. However, in real-world usage, the experience of stablecoins is often constrained by the performance and fee structure of the underlying public chain. Fluctuations in transaction fees, confirmation delays, and operational complexity are significant factors hindering the further popularization of stablecoins.
Plasma: As the Market Cools, the Value of Infrastructure Begins to EmergeAs the crypto market gradually shifts from emotion-driven to rationality, projects that truly solve problems begin to reveal their value. Plasma is such an infrastructure project that leans more towards 'slow construction.' From the long-term content of the official account @undefined , the team has consistently focused on advancing development based on the actual usage needs of stablecoins, rather than frequently switching narrative directions. This focus itself is worth noting. Stablecoins have become one of the most important components of on-chain activities. They undertake high-frequency functions such as transaction settlement, fund transfer, and cross-border payments, with requirements for the underlying network far exceeding those of ordinary asset transfers. However, the reality is that many public chains emphasized versatility at the design stage rather than payment efficiency, making it difficult to balance transaction fees, confirmation speed, and stability in high-frequency use scenarios for stablecoins.

Plasma: As the Market Cools, the Value of Infrastructure Begins to Emerge

As the crypto market gradually shifts from emotion-driven to rationality, projects that truly solve problems begin to reveal their value. Plasma is such an infrastructure project that leans more towards 'slow construction.' From the long-term content of the official account @undefined , the team has consistently focused on advancing development based on the actual usage needs of stablecoins, rather than frequently switching narrative directions. This focus itself is worth noting.

Stablecoins have become one of the most important components of on-chain activities. They undertake high-frequency functions such as transaction settlement, fund transfer, and cross-border payments, with requirements for the underlying network far exceeding those of ordinary asset transfers. However, the reality is that many public chains emphasized versatility at the design stage rather than payment efficiency, making it difficult to balance transaction fees, confirmation speed, and stability in high-frequency use scenarios for stablecoins.
Walrus does not wrap itself in complex narratives, but instead directly approaches from the structure.If you stay in this industry long enough, you will discover a rule: the projects that can truly succeed often do not make a lot of noise at the beginning. They are not in a hurry to prove how great they are, but first think clearly about whether they can survive in the long term. The Walrus Protocol gives me this feeling. Walrus does not wrap itself in complex narratives, but instead directly approaches from the structure. Decentralized storage combined with verifiable smart contracts allows the key data and execution logic in the protocol to be checked. This sounds very technical, but for users, it is actually very realistic: you do not need to fully trust anyone, just trust the results on the chain.

Walrus does not wrap itself in complex narratives, but instead directly approaches from the structure.

If you stay in this industry long enough, you will discover a rule: the projects that can truly succeed often do not make a lot of noise at the beginning. They are not in a hurry to prove how great they are, but first think clearly about whether they can survive in the long term. The Walrus Protocol gives me this feeling.

Walrus does not wrap itself in complex narratives, but instead directly approaches from the structure. Decentralized storage combined with verifiable smart contracts allows the key data and execution logic in the protocol to be checked. This sounds very technical, but for users, it is actually very realistic: you do not need to fully trust anyone, just trust the results on the chain.
Plasma: Infrastructure Solutions Under the Demand for Stablecoins In the current phase of the cryptocurrency industry gradually deflating, the value of infrastructure is being reassessed. Plasma chooses to focus on stablecoins, which have the most realistic demand, and continues to advance the construction of the underlying network. From the content of the official account @plasma, one can clearly feel the project's emphasis on long-term usability. The positioning of Plasma is not complicated: to provide more efficient and stable underlying support for stablecoin payments and settlements. Stablecoins have been widely used, but in real scenarios, there is still significant room for improvement in transaction fees, confirmation efficiency, and user experience. Plasma approaches from an architectural level, specifically optimizing performance and fee structures to make stablecoin transfers smoother and cost-controlled. In terms of technology selection, Plasma is deeply compatible with EVM, providing developers with a mature and familiar development environment, lowering the threshold for ecological construction. Meanwhile, the interaction design optimized around payment scenarios also allows ordinary users to more easily use stablecoins for transfer operations. As the application of stablecoins continues to expand, Plasma's approach of continuously refining products around a single core demand is gradually forming a clear and solid long-term value. @Plasma $XPL #plasma {spot}(XPLUSDT)
Plasma: Infrastructure Solutions Under the Demand for Stablecoins

In the current phase of the cryptocurrency industry gradually deflating, the value of infrastructure is being reassessed. Plasma chooses to focus on stablecoins, which have the most realistic demand, and continues to advance the construction of the underlying network. From the content of the official account @plasma, one can clearly feel the project's emphasis on long-term usability.

The positioning of Plasma is not complicated: to provide more efficient and stable underlying support for stablecoin payments and settlements. Stablecoins have been widely used, but in real scenarios, there is still significant room for improvement in transaction fees, confirmation efficiency, and user experience. Plasma approaches from an architectural level, specifically optimizing performance and fee structures to make stablecoin transfers smoother and cost-controlled.

In terms of technology selection, Plasma is deeply compatible with EVM, providing developers with a mature and familiar development environment, lowering the threshold for ecological construction. Meanwhile, the interaction design optimized around payment scenarios also allows ordinary users to more easily use stablecoins for transfer operations.

As the application of stablecoins continues to expand, Plasma's approach of continuously refining products around a single core demand is gradually forming a clear and solid long-term value.

@Plasma
$XPL
#plasma
Some projects you can tell at a glance are prepared for the market; others are clearly preparing for the future. Walrus Protocol is closer to the latter. It is not in a hurry to expand the narrative, but instead focuses on security, transparency, and structural stability. Through decentralized storage and verifiable smart contracts, Walrus writes the rules on-chain rather than in announcements. This at least lets users know how the protocol operates and where the risks lie. This certainty is very scarce in today's crypto environment. The existence of $WAL is not meant to create short-term stimulation, but to connect governance and ecological participation. You are not just 'in and out', but can participate in how it evolves next. This relationship naturally forms a longer-term community. #Walrus may still be in the early stages, but in terms of structure and pace, it resembles a protocol willing to take its time. If you value long-term logic over immediate feedback, Walrus Protocol is worth adding to your watchlist. @WalrusProtocol $WAL #Walrus {spot}(WALUSDT)
Some projects you can tell at a glance are prepared for the market; others are clearly preparing for the future. Walrus Protocol is closer to the latter. It is not in a hurry to expand the narrative, but instead focuses on security, transparency, and structural stability.

Through decentralized storage and verifiable smart contracts, Walrus writes the rules on-chain rather than in announcements. This at least lets users know how the protocol operates and where the risks lie. This certainty is very scarce in today's crypto environment.

The existence of $WAL is not meant to create short-term stimulation, but to connect governance and ecological participation. You are not just 'in and out', but can participate in how it evolves next. This relationship naturally forms a longer-term community.

#Walrus may still be in the early stages, but in terms of structure and pace, it resembles a protocol willing to take its time. If you value long-term logic over immediate feedback, Walrus Protocol is worth adding to your watchlist.
@Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL #Walrus
Plasma: A public chain infrastructure continuously refined around stablecoin scenarios In the current environment where narratives in the crypto industry frequently change, Plasma demonstrates a relatively rare stable rhythm. From the content of the official account @plasma, it can be seen that the project is not in a hurry to chase market hotspots, but instead continues to advance underlying construction around the actual usage needs of stablecoins. This pragmatic attitude has laid a clear development logic for it. Plasma's core positioning is very clear: to provide more efficient and lower-cost infrastructure support for stablecoin payments and settlements. Although stablecoins are already widely used, in practical operations, transaction fees, confirmation efficiency, and stability remain key factors affecting the experience. Plasma starts from the underlying architecture, optimizing performance and fee structures to make stablecoin transfers smoother and more predictable. On the technical level, Plasma is deeply compatible with EVM, allowing developers to quickly migrate existing applications and lower the barriers for ecological construction. At the same time, the Gas model designed around payment scenarios also reduces understanding costs for ordinary users when using stablecoins, making it closer to everyday payment experiences. As the application of stablecoins continues to expand, Plasma's focus on a single core scenario and continuous construction is gradually forming its own long-term competitive advantage. @Plasma $XPL #plasma {spot}(XPLUSDT)
Plasma: A public chain infrastructure continuously refined around stablecoin scenarios

In the current environment where narratives in the crypto industry frequently change, Plasma demonstrates a relatively rare stable rhythm. From the content of the official account @plasma, it can be seen that the project is not in a hurry to chase market hotspots, but instead continues to advance underlying construction around the actual usage needs of stablecoins. This pragmatic attitude has laid a clear development logic for it.

Plasma's core positioning is very clear: to provide more efficient and lower-cost infrastructure support for stablecoin payments and settlements. Although stablecoins are already widely used, in practical operations, transaction fees, confirmation efficiency, and stability remain key factors affecting the experience. Plasma starts from the underlying architecture, optimizing performance and fee structures to make stablecoin transfers smoother and more predictable.

On the technical level, Plasma is deeply compatible with EVM, allowing developers to quickly migrate existing applications and lower the barriers for ecological construction. At the same time, the Gas model designed around payment scenarios also reduces understanding costs for ordinary users when using stablecoins, making it closer to everyday payment experiences.

As the application of stablecoins continues to expand, Plasma's focus on a single core scenario and continuous construction is gradually forming its own long-term competitive advantage.

@Plasma
$XPL
#plasma
If we had to summarize the characteristics of the Walrus Protocol in one sentence, it would be: it is more like a protocol that lays a solid foundation rather than a project in a hurry to tell a story. It does not use high subsidies to gain popularity, but focuses on security, transparency, and long-term usability. Through decentralized storage and verifiable smart contracts, Walrus exposes both rules and data on-chain, allowing users to see and verify it. This design reduces trust costs and minimizes the space for human intervention. In the current industry environment where security issues are frequent, this structure itself is a competitive advantage. The role of $WAL is also very clear; it is not an isolated token, but a core tool that connects governance, incentives, and ecological collaboration. Participating in Walrus is not just about "using a product," but about being involved in how the protocol continues to develop. As the #Walrus ecosystem gradually expands, more and more rational participants are starting to pay attention to its long-term potential. Perhaps it won’t give you the fastest feedback, but from a structural and directional perspective, the Walrus Protocol is more like a project willing to walk further with users. @WalrusProtocol $WAL #Walrus {spot}(WALUSDT)
If we had to summarize the characteristics of the Walrus Protocol in one sentence, it would be: it is more like a protocol that lays a solid foundation rather than a project in a hurry to tell a story. It does not use high subsidies to gain popularity, but focuses on security, transparency, and long-term usability.

Through decentralized storage and verifiable smart contracts, Walrus exposes both rules and data on-chain, allowing users to see and verify it. This design reduces trust costs and minimizes the space for human intervention. In the current industry environment where security issues are frequent, this structure itself is a competitive advantage.

The role of $WAL is also very clear; it is not an isolated token, but a core tool that connects governance, incentives, and ecological collaboration. Participating in Walrus is not just about "using a product," but about being involved in how the protocol continues to develop.

As the #Walrus ecosystem gradually expands, more and more rational participants are starting to pay attention to its long-term potential. Perhaps it won’t give you the fastest feedback, but from a structural and directional perspective, the Walrus Protocol is more like a project willing to walk further with users.
@Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL #Walrus
Login to explore more contents
Explore the latest crypto news
⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
💬 Interact with your favorite creators
👍 Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs