🔆【Gold Standard Club】🔆The Founding Co-builder of Binance's Top Guild🌟Verify KOL on Binance Square| ChristianoViral On X |@StartSquareAcademy on TG |Streaming
ETH/USDT (perpetual) at 7:30 PM Colombia Time 🇨🇴 Current price: 1.951 USDT It is falling -3.7% from the peak of 2.031 The moving averages are very close together and the price is below → bearish signal. MACD has already crossed downward (more selling pressure). RSI neutral (~51), no panic or euphoria. Low volume = little strength to rise now. Short trend: BEARISH Watch the support at 1.900. If it breaks, it may continue to fall. If it bounces strongly above 1.987, the outlook changes. @Ethereum Classic $ETH $BNB
@CZ Nice to meet you, I am from Colombia🇨🇴. 1. What rewards do those of us who teach how to use the Binance platform in live broadcasts get? 2. Why has Latin America not yet enabled the chat group feature? Thank you.
Binance Square Official
·
--
Drop your questions for @CZ below in comment. Like and vote for the most interesting ones.
Operation in $BNB USDT Perpetual: Long with 30x isolated leverage. Entry at 600.65 USDT, margin 4.93 USDT, size ~150 USDT. Mark price 601.392, PnL +0.15 USDT (+3.09% ROI). Liq. at 583.817.
Chart: Down 4.73% in 24h (max 635.24, min 597.21). RSI ~33 (oversold), possible rebound. MACD bearish (-0.86), EMAs declining (7:601.97, 25:609.09). Volume 766K BNB.
$PIPPIN The movement of pippin as observed in the orange line is the MA of 60 and indicates a dynamic movement, signaling an upward trend, this evidently confirms a bullish momentum. The price started around 0.37 USDT at 11:00, experienced a drop to around 0.32 USDT from 12:00 to 13:00 hrs. Most of the green candles with large bodies and small wicks demonstrate buyer control, it seems like a bullish momentum with minimal consolidation.
If the price retraces, it could find support at the MA (25) 0.395 or MA (7) 0.399, a bearish crossover would be bearish, but for now, it is positive.
Excellent, very good. but Pippin apparently wants to continue rising or otherwise remain lateral, we need to analyze Pippin's movement carefully ✅📈 @MelaTrader
One thing I’ve learned from watching crypto flows: the real shifts often happen quietly. When liquidity stops jumping between chains and starts sitting comfortably in routing layers, infrastructure is usually improving. Lately, stablecoin balances feel less scattered. Following @Plasma , that steadier positioning looks less like trading activity and more like settlement behavior quietly taking shape.
An early-2026 integration update about smoother cross-chain routing stood out because it reduces repeated bridging steps. That small change affects behavior — fewer transfers usually mean liquidity providers withdraw less often and keep funds active longer. Discussion around #plasma has gradually leaned toward usability rather than visibility. If routing keeps simplifying, could cross-chain liquidity retention become the signal worth watching?
For builders and participants, it helps to observe where funds actually stay, how incentives influence exit timing, and whether integrations support routine usage. In that context, $XPL often feels more like connective infrastructure than a spotlight asset. Sometimes the clearest progress shows up quietly, long before it becomes obvious.
Don't keep being stubborn! Buying at a large scale for $60,000 - $70,000 makes no sense! #美国伊朗对峙 The core of bottom-fishing is value and safety margin, not just looking at the price drop. However, entering at $60,000 - $70,000 contradicts this basic logic. Firstly, the unpredictability of the bottom determines the risk of blindly entering — the so-called 'low price' may just be a continuation of the drop, as countless historical cases have proven; after a 50% drop, it may still drop another 50%. Bottom-fishing without fundamental support is just catching a falling knife. #Bitcoin谷歌搜索量暴升
Secondly, the iron rule of financial markets is 'do not predict the bottom, only confirm the trend.' Professional investors never fully invest in one go. Buffett's 'greed' is always accompanied by gradual accumulation and risk reservation, while entering at $60,000 - $70,000 in large scale is essentially a gambler's mentality rather than rational investment. More critically, bottom-fishing without valuation anchoring is meaningless. If the true value of the asset has not reached the price level, the so-called 'bottom-fishing' is merely self-comfort misled by the anchoring effect. #何时抄底?
Finally, liquidity risk and time cost are often overlooked. In a panic drop, funds may accelerate losses, and even if there is a fortunate rebound, the long wait will also consume capital efficiency. The real investment logic is to wait for trend confirmation and the emergence of safety margins, rather than entering solely based on price impulses — otherwise, what seems like picking up cheap is actually paying for illogical decisions with principal. #全球科技股抛售冲击风险资产 $BTC {spot}(BTCUSDT) $ETH {spot}(ETHUSDT) $USDC {spot}(USDCUSDT)
🧧🧧🧧Claim $BTC 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻$CHESS $FIL History has a pattern, loud top-down warnings often mark market peaks and quiet grassroots fear usually marks market bottoms. Now the market is split in two.. “Crypto is finished” vs “We’ve seen this movie before.”
Here’s the key point many are missing ⬇️ Regulation has never been about killing crypto itself. On-chain activity, wallets, DeFi, NFTs — the technology isn’t being shut down. The lines are simply being drawn more clearly.
🎯 The real focus? Stablecoins as financial bridges. They’ve become a major channel in cross-border flows, which puts them directly under regulatory scrutiny. What’s being tightened is the fiat on/off ramp, not the chain.
No chain halt. No blanket coin ban. No “crypto apocalypse.”
Just one message: The door between traditional finance and crypto is getting stricter — the world inside crypto still exists.
Markets don’t end because of rules. They evolve because of them.
When fear is loud, smart money listens quietly. History doesn’t repeat… but it often rhymes. 🧠📈