Something I’ve slowly realized watching crypto ecosystems: liquidity often settles where building feels familiar. When tools align and workflows stop changing every week, people tend to stay instead of rotating quickly. That matters now because steady liquidity usually signals practical comfort, not short-term incentives. Lately, the quieter toolchain alignment signals around @Fogo Official feel more foundational than flashy.
A practical clue showed up during the $FOGO mainnet rollout phase earlier this year, when updated development references and workflow discussions began appearing more consistently across ecosystem channels. Launch cycles often reshape liquidity composition — fewer quick exits, more builders experimenting within stable environments. If liquidity keeps holding after incentives cool, could standardized tooling be encouraging contributors to commit longer term?
