🚀 $LUNC vs All Top L1 Blockchains:

2026 Deep Dive on Metrics, Yields & Decentralization. Terra Classic's community revival shines with 438.7B+ burns (supply: 6.47T total/5.48T circ), but it's an underdog at $200M MC—hyper-deflationary edge via 1.2% tx fees (partial burns) vs giants like ETH's $340B+ MC. v3.6.1 upgrade live with Cosmos SDK/IBC boosts; USTC/EUTC repeg tests ongoing.

Staking Yields (Feb '26):

- #LUNC : 2.5-6.3% APR (DPoS, 15.6% ratio, ~980B bonded)—rewards from fees/oracles, no hardware barriers.

- #ETH: 3-5%—mature ecosystem, but diluted by L2s & pools (Lido ~30-33% stake).

- #SOL: 6-8%—high but VC-heavy (top 10 ~40% stake), MEV boosts.

- #ADA: 3-5%—eco-friendly, no lock-up.

- #AVAX: 7-8%—subnet staking flexibility.

- #BNB: 4-6% (via PoSA)—retail focus, Binance backing.

- #TRX: 1-11%—low fees, high stablecoin utility.

- #NEAR: 7-10%—early incentives.

- #APT: 7-50% (varies)—flexible cycles.

- #SUI: 3-10%—high throughput focus.

Decentralization (Nakamoto Coefficient):

- #LUNC: 5-6 (improved post-upgrades, 100% DAO gov).

- #ETH: 7-10—500k+ validators, but pool dominance.

- #SOL: 19—~1.9k validators, but outages/VC flak.

- #ADA: 21—3k+ pools, top decentralization.

- #AVAX: 25—strong validator spread.

- #BNB: 7—centralized via Binance validators.

- #NEAR: 19—balanced distribution.

- #APT: 17—emerging, solid.

- #SUI: 18—efficient execution.

- #TRX: ~20-30 (est.)—27 super reps, but elected.

Who's Better & In What?

- **Scale/TVL:** ETH crushes with DeFi dominance; SOL/BNB/TRX for activity/liquidity. LUNC lags but offers pure DAO vibes.

- **Decentralization:** ADA/AVAX/NEAR/SOL top NC; LUNC mid-pack, beats BNB's centralization.

- **Yields:** AVAX/NEAR/APT/SOL for higher rewards; LUNC competitive for low-entry deflation play.

- **Innovation:** ETH for settlements/RWAs; SOL for speed/gaming; LUNC's edge: Burns (no new mints) vs ETH's EIP-1559 (~5-10% burn).