Who is responsible for 10.10?

I’ve been in crypto long enough to recognize one thing instantly: this market doesn’t just move on charts, it moves on emotions. And whenever emotions get heavy, the community doesn’t always look for the real reason… it looks for a person.
Right now, that person is @CZ .
Crypto has a weird habit: if something breaks, it’s automatically “CZ did it”
I swear sometimes crypto feels like that meme:
Someone’s trade gets liquidated?
“CZ.”
Gold moves against someone’s position?
“CZ.”
Silver pulls back after a pump?
“CZ.”
Even if your internet disconnects mid-trade… people will still find a way to tweet:
“Binance manipulation.” 😭
And honestly, the most “crypto” thing I’ve seen recently is how people are blaming him not only for crypto volatility — but also for gold and silver moves. CZ even joked about it himself: “Damn, I am ‘responsible’ for silver & gold too?” That line is funny, yes… but it’s also painfully accurate. Because in this space, if something goes wrong, someone always wants a villain — and the biggest name becomes the easiest target.

The real problem isn’t CZ — it’s what bear markets do to people
When charts are green, everyone becomes calm, mature, and “long-term.” People talk about fundamentals. They talk about patience. They talk about building.
But when the market is red or sideways, everything changes. Suddenly:
every liquidation is “manipulation” every dump is “planned” every listing is “a trap” and every price move needs a conspiracy behind it
This is where the internet becomes a courtroom. And in that courtroom, CZ is the default defendant — because blaming a person feels easier than admitting the uncomfortable truth: a lot of losses come from leverage, FOMO entries, and no plan.
Crypto doesn’t only test your money. It tests your discipline. And when discipline fails, blame gets outsourced.

Why CZ specifically becomes the headline of the blame cycle
Because Binance isn’t just another exchange. It’s the platform that:
introduced millions of people to crypto trading became the liquidity and price reference point for many pairs built infrastructure that survives multiple cyclesstayed alive through the biggest industry shocks
When you become this large, you don’t get regular criticism. You get myth-level blame.
If your trade gets liquidated, some people don’t say:
“I used too much leverage.”
They say:
“Binance did it.”
If silver pulls back after pumping, some people don’t say:
“Markets retrace.”
They say:
“CZ touched it.”
It sounds ridiculous — but this is exactly why the memes spread so fast. The meme works because it mirrors the real psychology: when the market hurts, people need an external target.
What I’ve noticed: people blame Binance for things they would blame “the market” for anywhere else
If you trade stocks and lose money, you usually blame yourself or the market environment.
But in crypto, because everything is faster and more emotional, people blame platforms and personalities.
So you’ll see posts like:
“send him back to prison” “worse than SBF”“scammers”“structural harvesting”
That kind of language tells me one thing: the person posting isn’t in an analytical mood. They’re in a pain mood. They’re not trying to understand. They’re trying to release frustration.
And that’s why the anger becomes contagious.
The hard truth: most “victims” got hurt by the same mistakes
This might sound blunt, but it’s true.
A huge percentage of retail losses happen from:
chasing the first green candle after a listingbuying late when early wallets already got inrefusing stop-loss because “it will bounce” using leverage without a clear invalidation level thinking every new token will behave like a blue chip treating volatility like a personal attack
Now, do markets have unfair moments? Yes.
Do whales exist? Yes.
Is crypto rough? Absolutely.
But if we’re being honest, most people don’t lose because an exchange hates them — they lose because they enter without rules.
And instead of fixing the system inside themselves (risk management), they try to find a villain outside themselves.
But what about the serious criticisms?
I’m not someone who pretends “everything is perfect.” If people have questions about past volatility events, systems, listings, or transparency — asking those questions is fair. This industry grows when it faces hard topics.
But there’s a difference between:
valid criticism andturning a person into a cartoon villain for everything
When someone is blamed for $BTC volatility, altcoin dumps, and now apparently gold/silver moves too, it stops being criticism and becomes a psychological habit: “If I’m hurting, someone must be guilty.”
That’s not how markets work.
The competitor narrative: challengers rising doesn’t mean Binance is “finished”
Another part of the noise is competition. Some platforms are gaining attention, and people immediately try to convert that into a dramatic story: “Binance is over.”
I don’t buy that.
In every industry, challengers rise. That’s healthy. It pushes innovation. But Binance is not a small startup that can be replaced overnight by one trend. The biggest test is endurance:
through boring markets through ugly markets through regulatory pressure through social media campaigns through coordinated noise
And Binance has survived enough cycles to prove one thing: it’s built to last longer than the timeline’s mood swings.
What I respect about CZ (and why the hate doesn’t erase it)
Here’s my honest take:
CZ represents something rare in crypto — a builder who kept going even when the industry turned chaotic. He didn’t build a “perfect” system. Nobody does. But he built a global platform that changed how millions interact with crypto.
That alone is why he matters.
And the ironic part is: CZ being blamed so heavily is proof of his importance. Nobody blames irrelevant people. They blame whoever stands at the center of the ecosystem.
He’s the lightning rod because Binance is the tallest building.
The funniest part: people will forget all of this the moment the market goes green
This is the most predictable part of crypto.
When the market pumps:
the hate disappears the timeline becomes “W” people quote-tweet positivity everyone becomes polite again
Same people. Same accounts. Different candle color.
So I don’t take social media outrage as a permanent truth. I take it as a mood indicator. And right now, the mood is: frustrated, exhausted, and impatient.
If CZ actually reads this, here’s the respectful truth I’d say
You don’t need everyone to like you in a bear market. That’s impossible.
But in the long run, the strongest way to kill misinformation isn’t arguing with trolls — it’s structured clarity.
When people don’t understand, they assume.
When they assume, they accuse.
When they accuse, it becomes “truth” on social media.
The antidote is always the same: transparency that’s calm, direct, and consistent.
Because trust doesn’t get rebuilt by winning debates — it gets rebuilt by removing uncertainty.
My conclusion
No, CZ is not responsible for everyone’s bad entries.
No, he’s not controlling gold and silver.
No, he didn’t personally liquidate anyone’s leverage position.
What’s really happening is simpler: Crypto is in a stressful phase, and people need a target.
CZ is the biggest target available.
But I still respect builders more than timelines.
And whether people admit it or not, Binance has been one of the most important structures in crypto’s growth story — and CZ is a huge part of that legacy.
If someone has real questions, they should ask them. That’s fair.
But blaming CZ for every dip, every liquidation, every bad entry, and now apparently every move in gold and silver… that’s not analysis.
That’s therapy. In tweet form.
And to be honest, the fact he’s still standing and still joking, while the industry rotates through new heroes every month, is exactly why I still respect him.
Because memes come and go.Builders stay. 👑
#Binancesquare #CZ