“I want to see Apro more closely 👀”
In trading decisions, thrill doesn't play a role, which is why I set three veto conditions to test Apro.
First:
if the project runs solely on slogans and has no real mechanism, then blacklist. Apro passed here because it writes difficult questions into the mechanism.
Second:
if the project is easily replaceable without pain, then avoid. Apro focuses on “clarify issues,” which makes it costly to replace.
Third:
dependency on bull market projects is risky. Apro's reliance is on verifiable data and vouchers, which can create demand across cycles. The risk is still a rhythm issue, but this project deserves to be in the observation pool.
