Explain - this is the decision area, not the signal. I focus on confirmation or failure, as well as risk control. What key points are you focusing on?

The breakthrough trader is about to be tested.
This is the trap zone, not the celebration zone.

$BTC # is approaching the resistance zone above 68.4K, while the selling pressure on the order book is clearly weighted.

After the liquidity sweep at 65.7K, the price has regained the middle track structure.
That dip may have cleared out the weak bulls.
Now the real question is not "Will it surge?"

But rather—Is this effective acceptance, or a distribution of liquidity?

The 1-hour structure is forming higher lows.
But the real expansion has not yet been confirmed.

If the bulls truly take control here, we should see:
• A sustained close above recent highs
• Continued volume
• Shallow pullbacks without breaking structure

If this is a liquidity harvest:
• An upper spike
• A quick drop back into the range
• Momentum divergence

Large funds do not make money by chasing candlesticks.
Instead, they wait for liquidity to be released and follow confirmed expansions.

High-level oscillation compression often indicates impending volatility—
But the direction depends on "acceptance," not hope.

Trading thoughts / Decision framework:
If the price effectively stabilizes above recent highs with increased volume, the continuation logic strengthens.
If it falls back into the previous range, it belongs to liquidity rejection.
Risk is defined by structure, not emotion.
Positioning follows confirmation, not prediction.

Do you see the true acceptance above?
Or is it a pullback after a liquidity test?

Not investment advice. Just structural interpretation.
{spot}(BTCUSDT)