Last year, I accompanied a friend who doesn't engage with cryptocurrencies to a Web3 event. He curiously downloaded a well-known metaverse application, but after twenty minutes, he couldn't get in—his wallet plugin wouldn't install, he miswrote the mnemonic phrase twice, and the browser was incompatible. He handed me his phone and said, 'Is this thing meant for people?'
At that moment, I didn't know how to respond.
Later, I saw the Virtua metaverse created by @Vanarchain , and my first reaction was: that friend should be able to manage it on his own. There were no pop-ups asking him to install a wallet, no need to write down any words; he just clicked to log in with his social account and could customize his avatar, explore exhibitions, and watch performances—all seamlessly like any regular mobile game.
This difference is quite fundamental.
Most crypto projects take 'users learning the technology' for granted—if you won't even memorize the mnemonic phrase, why should you enjoy the benefits of decentralization? But Vanar's approach seems to be the opposite: users have no obligation to learn about blockchain; if you can't make it painless for an ordinary person to use, that's your problem, not theirs.
So, it abstracts the account to the underlying layer, makes asset storage an invisible backend service, and connects the game engine incredibly smoothly. This work isn't glamorous; no one will award it a geek badge, but that friend who couldn't even install a wallet might gain a digital space to wander around in.
Sometimes, making a technology 'uncool,' 'ordinary,' or 'not worth discussing' is when it truly starts to serve the majority.
