Vanar has the potential to become backend infrastructure for Web2 applications — and this isn’t mainly about technical compatibility. It’s about how much blockchain interferes with the user experience.
If a Web2 app forces users to deal with wallets, gas fees, or tokens, then regardless of what runs in the background, it stops feeling like Web2. To truly function as backend infrastructure, blockchain must be almost invisible. Most user interactions should remain within familiar, traditional frameworks. The chain should only surface when it’s necessary to record ownership, validate assets, or handle value distribution.
From that perspective, Vanar’s ($VANRY) architecture — with its clearer separation between off-chain logic and on-chain settlement — moves in the right direction. Developers can maintain a conventional tech stack for core application logic, while using the blockchain as a final layer for verification and settlement. That separation meaningfully reduces friction.
But becoming a backend for Web2 isn’t just about design elegance. It’s also about reliability, predictable costs, and long-term scalability.
If Vanar can demonstrate that blockchain can operate as foundational infrastructure without complicating the product experience, then the opportunity is real. If it cannot, the idea will remain more narrative than reality.
