Many people have been asking:
Why has Web3, after so many years, still felt like a ghost town?
The chain is getting faster, the financing is getting larger, and the concepts are getting flashier—
But in reality, very few applications have remained.
Where is the problem?
It's not about funding.
It's not about technology.
It's not about storytelling.
But rather—
Web3 has never truly lowered the threshold for 'production'.
1. Why did the internet explode?
We are back to 20 years ago.
If you want to build a website, you need:
Buy servers
Write code
Connect to the database
Build the backend
This is very similar to today's Web3.
What happened later?
WordPress has appeared.
Shopify has appeared.
YouTube has appeared.
They did something extremely simple but revolutionary:
Transform ‘building websites’ from a programmer's job into an ordinary person's operation.
No coding? No problem
No deployment? No problem
No server? No problem
Drag, click, and send it out.
Lowering the threshold leads to an explosion of supply.
The true prosperity of the internet is not because the bandwidth has increased, but because the number of creators has grown exponentially.
Two, where is Web3 currently stuck?
Now if you want to create a chain game or NFT project, you need:
Find Solidity developers
Write smart contracts
Handle wallet access
Audit
Deployment
Maintain nodes
This is not entrepreneurship, this is a technical project.
The result is:
Creative people can't get in, those who can are all competing in technology.
The ecological structure of Web3 is 'technology-led',
And not 'content-led'.
This is essentially a kind of supply-side blockage.
Three, Vanar's ambition is not to create a faster chain, but to create 'Web3's operating system'
Many people assess a chain by looking at TPS and consensus mechanisms.
But what truly changes the industry structure is never performance parameters, but —
Who can hide the complexity.
Vanar's idea is to turn blockchain into a 'tool layer'.
In simple terms:
Want to create a metaverse space?
→ Build with templates
Want to generate 1000 3D NFTs?
→ Use AI generation engine
Want to launch a trading market?
→ Call the ready-made Market module
The logic behind this is not 'public chain competition',
But rather the 'software tool revolution'.
What it tries to do is:
Transform blockchain from 'development language' to 'creation tool'.
Four, the real change is the change of productive relations
If Vanar's tool system is established, what it changes is not technology, but structure.
Who is the main force of Web3 now?
Programmer
Fund
VC
Speculators
If the threshold is lowered, who will become the main force?
Game designer
Screenwriter
Illustrator
IP creator
Independent studio
What will happen?
Ecosystem supply will come from 'dozens of projects'
Become 'tens of thousands of creators'.
And ecological prosperity has never depended on head projects, but on the long tail.
The greatness of Shopify is not in a few large merchants,
But it is about millions of small merchants.
What Web3 has been waiting for is not the next public chain bull market,
But rather the next 'moment of productivity release'.
Five, selling shovels is more stable than digging for gold
There is another deeper logic.
In the gold rush, the ones who truly make stable profits are not the prospectors, but the sellers of tools.
If Vanar becomes:
NFT generation tools
Metaverse building tools
Chain game rapid deployment platform
Then its positioning is not 'chains that participate in competition',
But rather, 'tools that all participants must use'.
This is a platform-level logic.
When creators are on it:
Build assets
Accumulate users
Form income
Migration costs will become very high.
This is the moat.
Not TVL,
Not subsidies,
But rather ecological dependence.
Six, but where is the real difficulty?
Must say a rational word.
‘Doing Shopify’ sounds beautiful, but is extremely difficult.
The difficulty lies in:
Tools must really be simple
Not a demo version, but something that can be used at scale
User experience must be seamless blockchain
Wallets, gas, and signatures must be abstracted
Creators must make money
If you can't make money, no matter how good the tools are, they won't retain people.
The reason Web3 has not yet seen the Shopify moment,
It's not that no one wants to make tools,
But no one has truly hidden 'complexity' completely.
Seven, the real criteria for judgment
If you want to judge whether Vanar is valuable, you shouldn't look at:
TPS
Market value
Promotion
But should look at three indicators:
How many non-technical creators are using it?
How many applications are completed by '1 person team'?
How many projects generate real income?
If these numbers start to grow,
That is the structural change.
Conclusion:
The future of Web3 does not belong to the fastest chain,
And belongs to the easiest to use chain.
The explosion of the internet has never come from technological breakthroughs,
But rather the result of lowering the threshold.
If Vanar is really doing 'Web3's Shopify',
Then its competition is not with other public chains,
But it's the complexity of the entire industry.
When the blockchain no longer needs to be understood,
Only then can it be widely used.
And the real bull market has never been driven by capital,
But rather the result of productivity release.
