In a significant procedural defeat, the U.S. House of Representatives rejected Speaker Mike Johnson’s attempt to prevent votes on amendments related to former President Trump’s tariff policies. The decision highlights growing bipartisan willingness to reassert Congress’s authority over trade — a power granted under the Constitution.

What Happened?

Speaker Johnson tried to advance a rule that would block certain tariff-related amendments from reaching the House floor. However, lawmakers from both parties voted against the move. As a result, the House can now debate and potentially vote on measures that could modify or limit existing tariff authority.

While this does not repeal any tariffs, it opens the door for legislative changes.

Why It Matters

For decades, Congress has delegated significant tariff-setting authority to the President through laws like:

Section 232 (Trade Expansion Act of 1962) — allows tariffs for national security reasons

Section 301 (Trade Act of 1974) — used in trade disputes such as with China

The House vote signals that lawmakers may be seeking to reclaim greater oversight over trade policy — especially after years of debate over economic impacts, inflation, and supply chain disruptions.

Political Dynamics

The vote saw a coalition of Democrats and some Republicans — particularly those representing agricultural and manufacturing districts affected by retaliatory tariffs — join forces to allow debate.

This reflects broader divisions within Congress over protectionism vs. free trade, as well as concerns about limiting floor debate through procedural rules.

Economic Impact

Recent tariff actions have affected hundreds of billions of dollars in imports. Markets and global partners are closely watching whether Congress will:

Require economic impact assessments before new tariffs

Exempt specific goods

Narrow executive authority

For international allies, the decision suggests Congress could play a more active role in future trade negotiations.

What’s Next?

The House will now consider specific amendments related to tariff authority. Any legislation would still need Senate approval and the President’s signature to become law.

This vote doesn’t change trade policy immediately — but it marks a rare and meaningful assertion of congressional power in shaping U.S. economic strategy.