VANAR TREATS MEV AS GAME DESIGN RISK, NOT TRADER OPPORTUNITY
If MEV is left unchecked, it stops being “free market” and becomes a hidden tax on normal users.It’s like building a multiplayer game where the fastest ping always wins, no matter how fair the rules look on paper.
Vanar’s framing treats MEV as a design risk: reduce the ways transactions can be reordered or exploited, and make execution feel predictable for builders shipping real apps. In simple terms, the goal is fewer “someone jumped the line” moments between you clicking send and the chain finalizing it. That matters more for gaming, commerce, and consumer flows than for pure trading.
VANRY’s utility fits the infrastructure loop: fees pay for execution, staking backs network security, and governance steers policy choices around network rules and trade-offs.MEV never fully disappears adversarial behavior just moves to the next soft spot in the stack.
Do you think users notice MEV only when it hurts, or can good design make it mostly invisible?
