Regarding the recent hot topics, let's make a comment. Recently, He Yi has been acting out again, liking AI parody videos and playing the tired meme of 'attacking the bright top,' actively tagging relevant parties to appear nonchalant. She has long mastered this art of dodging heavy topics. 1 Back in the day, her friend relied on her connections to cut in line for coin listings, engaged in insider trading and reaped profits while a large number of users lost everything. She only held a 6-hour AMA, choked up while selling her tragic story and shifted the blame with malicious smear tactics, ultimately providing neither compensation nor rectification, and the matter was left unresolved. 2 The platform has frequently crashed, employees have been involved in corruption and bribery, and chaos in coin listings has become rampant. Junk coins and air coins have been launched in bulk, yet she never publicly addresses the details, relying instead on memes and irony to divert attention, treating users' losses as a joke. 3 Binance has faced regulatory investigations in multiple countries and was fined $4.3 billion for money laundering and illegal operations, yet she remains silent on compliance issues, instead using AI parody videos to downplay the matter, adopting a nonchalant attitude while the core problems remain unaddressed.

On the other hand, Zhao Changpeng has been repeatedly mentioning his past of working odd jobs and selling his house to buy coins during recent live streams, portraying himself as a weathered entrepreneur, but in reality, he is cut from the same cloth as He Yi. 4 He has previously pleaded guilty and resigned, been fined heavily, and apologized for misappropriating user funds. After being pardoned by Trump, he quietly resumed his role related to Binance, holding controlling shares but avoiding discussions about the user complaints and financial risks left by the platform. 5 The two of them play off each other; He Yi is responsible for being tough and shifting blame, using entertainment to cover their dark history, while Zhao Changpeng sells a persona and downplays his own guilt. From the friend coin, employee corruption to regulatory fines and user liquidations, all issues are covered up by their performances, and no real solutions have ever been provided. Ultimately, both of them are irresponsible opportunists, only caring about their own interests and reputation. The survival of users and the compliance of the platform are worthless in their eyes; being nonchalant and selling a tragic story is merely a cover for evading responsibility.