Recent AI concept coins seem more like just slides and stories. Real things are hard to find. Vanar Chain attracted me because it is not just making metaverse and AI data buzzwords. The verification layer they are creating for agent interactions shows actual substance. Projects like Render focus solely on rendering power, while Vanar is trying to solve the data trust problem between agents.

After integrating Virtua on the testnet, the response for props generation felt almost like a centralized server. It was a significantly better experience compared to the occasional congestion felt on Polygon. If future blockchain games are this smooth, they will truly feel playable, not just demos.

But the problem is also clear. Currently, Vanar feels a bit too niche and highbrow. No matter how strong the tech is, if there are no people in the ecosystem, everything is useless. The situation is such that it’s like a new city where the roads are wide, the buildings are shiny, but there are no crowds on the streets. There’s talk of partnerships, but for retail users, unless real usage or wealth effect is visible, the motivation to deeply get involved remains low. On top of that, the compatibility of the official wallet sometimes causes issues, and connecting DApps takes multiple tries. This is a basic thing that needs to be fixed quickly.

The market is currently hyper-volatile. Everyone is chasing meme coins, and projects that want to build serious infrastructure are being ignored. On the other hand, it is also true that if Vanar can actually bring in large Web2 IPs and handle traffic smoothly, it could become a current low valuation opportunity. However, this is only possible if execution and operations deliver on time.

In this competitive space, just having a tech moat is not enough. A killer feature is needed to retain users. Vanar seems to have a strong base, now it remains to be seen whether it can turn an empty city into a living ecosystem or not.

@Vanarchain

$VANRY

#Vanar