[I do not hold $VANRY tokens, and have no cooperation or interest association with the Vanar Chain team. This content is an independent research analysis and does not constitute any investment advice; market risks are to be borne by oneself.]
Stop asking whether 'it can surpass Ethereum'. Asking this question indicates that you still haven't understood @vanar.
It never intended to squeeze into the already bloody 'general smart contract platform' race. Its blade has turned towards a larger, more 'blunt', but also more 'plump' prey: those global consumer brands yearning for digital innovation, yet suffocated by the three mountains of technology, law, and community management.
In simple terms, what Vanar wants to do is provide a plug-and-play 'Web3 Lego bricks' for LEGO, Starbucks, Universal Studios, or your favorite esports team. It allows them to easily build their own membership systems, digital collectibles, and ticketing systems like building blocks, without needing to understand obscure private keys, gas fees, or worrying about legal troubles.
Perspective penetration: From the paradigm shift of 'financial Legos' to 'brand Legos.'
The crypto world is used to 'financial Legos' (the composability of DeFi). What Vanar is doing is 'brand Legos.' This determines the underlying logic of all its designs:
User experience is absolutely prioritized: Users may not even realize they are using blockchain. They have simply bought a digital concert ticket, which can be transferred, redeemed for merchandise, or even unlock behind-the-scenes content. Behind all this smoothness is the Vanar chain supporting it. Its success metrics are not TVL (Total Value Locked) but UGC (User Generated Content) and brand interaction rates.
Cost structure optimized for bulk operations: A brand may need to airdrop digital certificates for 1 million members at once. On Ethereum, this is astronomical, and on many chains, it is also quite costly. Vanar's focus on 'approaching zero transaction costs' and speed is precisely tailored for such scenarios. Let's do the math: If a brand event is expected to generate 10 million on-chain interactions, the cost on other chains could be $100,000, while on Vanar it could only be a few hundred dollars. This cost difference is key to decision-making.
Ecosystem selection is more important than quantity: You will find that its ecosystem project list has very few pure DeFi projects. Instead, there are more AI content generation tools, 3D digital asset studios, and immersive event platforms. It is deliberately cultivating an upstream and downstream industrial chain that 'serves brands.' A healthy ecosystem is not a pile of lending and DEX, but a place where a brand can find corresponding service providers for everything from design and issuance to the operation of its digital assets on-chain.
Data hardcore: Who exactly does its 'performance' serve?
Setting aside dull technical terms, let's look at a few data points that lead to practical insights:
Parallel processing capability: The official claims its 'parallel chain' architecture can simultaneously handle various tasks such as gaming, streaming, and NFT markets without interference. To draw a comparison, it’s like having independent cinemas (gaming), dining areas (NFTs), and amusement parks (streaming) within a shopping mall (Vanar chain), each operating independently without cross-traffic congestion. This is crucial for games that require stable frame rates and instant streaming.
Storage solutions: Unlike traditional on-chain storage, which is expensive, Vanar integrates decentralized storage. This means that 3D digital fashion and high-definition music videos issued by brands can be directly linked on-chain, and costs are controllable. This is the infrastructure that supports 'high-quality digital goods.'
Ecological fund direction: Its $100 million ecological fund is clearly directed towards gaming, AI, immersive experiences, and social interaction. Where the money flows is where the future lies. This clearly indicates that it is not subsidizing liquidity mining but is purchasing and nurturing 'quality content production capacity.'
Risk integrity assessment: Ideals are abundant, but the challenges are tough.
Under this grand blueprint, there are hidden reefs everywhere:
The market education cycle is long: Convincing a high-level executive of a traditional brand to understand and adopt blockchain is 100 times harder than persuading a crypto player. The sales cycle is extremely long and highly uncertain.
'Bridging' role vulnerability: Vanar acts as a 'translator' and 'bridge' between Web2 and Web3. Once large cloud service providers (like AWS, Tencent Cloud) launch more user-friendly blockchain module services, or certain consumer internet giants personally enter the chain, Vanar's intermediary value will be directly impacted.
The delay and indirectness of token value capture: Brands may primarily pay fiat service fees rather than directly consuming a large amount of $VANRY. Token value needs to be indirectly realized through the prosperity of the entire ecosystem, driving the growth of on-chain native transactions (such as peer-to-peer second-hand digital goods trading). This transmission chain is long and subject to attenuation.
Conclusion: A gamble about 'entry points.'
So, @vanar is essentially making a gamble: betting that the core assets of the next generation of the internet will be 'digital experiences and identities,' betting that the issuance and circulation of these assets will generally be based on blockchain, and more importantly, betting that it can become the 'preferred entry point' favored by mainstream brands in this transition.
It does not seek to disrupt anyone but rather to be needed by someone. Its battle is not in the price charts of cryptocurrency but in brand boardrooms, fan events, and the smooth experience of virtual goods.
For investors, what you need to judge is not whether its technology is the best, but whether the chosen path of 'empowering tradition' is a broad avenue or a rugged path. How would you determine this?
Welcome to follow me and track those blockchain projects attempting to connect two worlds.
