📊 According to Artemis data, onchain trading platform Hyperliquid has surpassed Coinbase in trading volume.
In terms of notional volume, Coinbase recorded $1.4 trillion, while Hyperliquid reached $2.6 trillion, nearly twice as much. Year-to-date price performance shows a sharp divergence, with Hyperliquid up 31.7% and Coinbase down 27.0%, resulting in an approximately 58.7% gap in the short term.
📊 Hyperliquid vs Coinbase
1️⃣ Trading Volume
• Hyperliquid: ~$2.6T notional volume
• Coinbase: ~$1.4T notional volume
➡️ Hyperliquid handles ~2× more trading volume, driven mainly by on-chain perpetuals and high-frequency traders.
2️⃣ Performance Divergence (YTD)
• Hyperliquid: +31.7%
• Coinbase (COIN): -27.0%
➡️ ~58.7% performance gap, reflecting capital rotation from CEXs to DeFi trading venues.
3️⃣ Business Model
• Hyperliquid:
• Decentralized, on-chain order book
• Ultra-low fees → high volume, thinner margins
• Appeals to pro traders & leverage users
• Coinbase:
• Centralized & regulated
• Higher fees, stronger per-trade revenue
• Focus on custody, institutions, subscriptions
4️⃣ Market Trend
• Hyperliquid’s rise shows on-chain derivatives eating into CEX dominance
• Coinbase still leads in regulation, fiat access, and mainstream adoption, but is losing volume share
🧠 Bottom Line
Hyperliquid is winning on volume and trader activity, while Coinbase relies on fees, regulation, and institutional trust. The divergence highlights a structural shift toward DeFi-based trading, especially in derivatives.
#Hyperliquid #hype #CoinbaseExchange. #BinanceBitcoinSAFUFund #BitcoinGoogleSearchesSurge
