I am just puzzled. We talk about AI agents every day, yet we are still using 'antique wallets' designed for humans to serve robots. When you let an AI Agent run tens of thousands of on-chain interactions daily, and the gas fees jump around like an EKG, how does it calculate ROI? The costs are uncontrollable, and this business is simply not viable.
I conducted an in-depth study of the underlying logic of Vanar and found that its most impressive operation is turning blockchain into a comfort zone for the machine economy.
//
▶ Industrial-grade determinism of fees
I value its fixed fee model. I think this is not just about saving a few cents but about providing a cost-predictable environment for AI agents. I believe that when AI realizes it might get unexpectedly high gas fees on other chains but can remain stable here, the migration to lower-friction zones will begin.
▶ Equipping on-chain data with a semantic web
Today's chains only store data, not read it. I found that Vanar's Neutron layer is teaching smart contracts how to understand assets. I think this is the data nurturing ground that AI entities truly need. This logic of treating the chain as a machine hard drive is much more sustainable than those projects that only focus on TPS.
//
To be fair, VANRY's market cap is only a little over ten million dollars, which seems unreal compared to the machine finance scale it aims to take on. But I still believe that the conclusion in 2026 won't depend on who has more traffic, but on who can withstand the flood of the machine economy. I suggest keeping an eye on whether its subscription-based burning mechanism has been implemented, as that will be the true switch for value return.
//
Anna | A rational Web3 explorer
This is just my personal experience and understanding and does not constitute investment advice. DYOR and take responsibility for your own decisions. @Vanarchain #vanar $VANRY
