Stacking code boys make money fiercely

The KOLs who earn the most commissions should have the worst character. Let me explain the logic.

In the entire market, among those who trade spot, if they deal with altcoins, 90% will incur losses. If they deal with mainstream coins, 50% to 60% will incur losses.

In the entire market, among those who trade contracts, if they deal with altcoins, more than 95% will incur losses. If they deal with mainstream coin contracts, 75% will incur losses.
The characteristic of contract losses is that one can earn money for a day but suffers losses continuously over time.

Spot losses occur when holding mainstream coins for a long time, but the profit margin is not much different from that of legal market stocks. It’s a constant trickle of losses that one cannot hold onto.

Therefore, the KOLs who earn the most commissions must be the ones who bring in the most new users, and the vast majority of these individuals inevitably end up with losses.
The measurement of morality is actually about the relationship of interests and the ratio of self-benefit to the detriment of others. The relationship of interests is most favorable to oneself while harming others the most, even if their usual rhetoric is very positive, it is merely a pursuit of self-interest and a small act of kindness to comfort their inner moral sense amid great evils.
However, this is a logical issue that most people cannot comprehend. But I am very sure that the KOLs who earn the most commissions are very clear about their inner thoughts.
Therefore, I never pay attention to people's statements; language exists to deceive. I only look at the relationship of interests and the ratio of personal and others' gains and losses. On a logical level, the boundary of morality is very clear. On the level of language and sensory perception, the boundary of morality has always been an illusion.

Thus, a person's choices have already determined the trade-off between their morality and relationship with interests, reflecting which side they are more genuinely inclined to on the balance of morality and interests.

I have seen too many public opinion struggles on this platform. To be frank, the existence of morality is unlikely, only the need for personal image and environmental roles. Whoever says someone is not good is unworthy.

But it’s not just this environment; it's similar in other environments as well, only that most do not have such low standards. That’s why I keep my distance from crowds, because the social significance of morality is more about order and rules. Everyone finds their own role and lives within their own interests. Those who believe in morality and faith, I actually think it’s better for such fools to be destroyed. If you do not deceive, someone will. Their existence is to be deceived, and they possess all the traits of being deceived. It’s merely a matter of being deceived a little more or a little less. Gossip.