#plasma $XPL I just want to ask one question: When transferring USDT, why do you require users to understand Gas first?
This is how ridiculous it would be in Web2: You go to a convenience store to buy water, and the cashier first makes you learn the 'fee model', then asks you to go next door to exchange for a 'fuel voucher', otherwise you can't even press the payment button.
So for stablecoin payments to truly break the mold, the core issue is not 'higher TPS', but cutting this process down to just two steps: having money → being able to pay.
I’m willing to pay attention to Plasma for a simple reason: it treats 'stablecoin experience' as the default protocol, rather than letting each wallet/application create its own patch.
• USDT transfers can be done with zero fees: not a slogan-based subsidy, but locking the behavioral boundaries, combined with authentication + speed limits, pursuing 'controllable costs, preventable fraud, and accountable transactions'.
• Stablecoins can also pay Gas: directly removing the need to 'buy native coins first', users do not need to complete side quests to transfer.
• Second-level certainty of finality: once received, it counts, and what’s most lacking in payment scenarios is this sense of certainty.
What you need to do is wallet entry, cross-border settlement, merchant payments, and foreign exchange clearing, so stop training users like engineers. Payment is not an education industry.