A project has been heavily criticized

Current logic behind the criticism

1. It took over 3 years to build and the token issuance is slow

2. Airdrops haven't made significant profits

3. The 3U qualification check hasn't refunded those who are ineligible (although the community has announced a refund arrangement)

4. Previous projects like Alpha have declined

Currently, working on projects is extremely difficult

@wardenprotocol Although it's not a Tier 1 performing project, the building over these years has involved the team's internal members investing over $6 million of their own savings. The market is so bad, and so many proportions of tokens have been airdropped, yet the launch price remains strong.

A simple truth: in a bear market, the launch price can't be too high. With 100M at launch and so many interactions, it's impossible for everyone to make a significant profit. With 1 billion at launch, there's a 10x profit to be made, but who will take the risk?

I just saw @CoinMarketCap showing Warden as the top trend (although I'm quite surprised)

Starting a business is extremely difficult now, and in a bear market, there's criticism about how to proceed

🤣

@wardenprotocol I believe the team still has a lot of room for optimization, such as making aiagent trading smoother, expanding product use cases and token scenarios, and needing more degen approaches

However, after more than 3 years, the entire team has funded their own research and built for three years, and now the ai agent that can be traded is out, with the current launch price not experiencing the same dumping as other projects. I don't know who to apologize to like this

🤣