binancepizzavn

✨ Until next time, every May, our community comes together to celebrate a special event called Bitcoin Pizza Day.
This year's anniversary, Binance Vietnam is giving the community a "🍕" gift worth 1000 $FDUSD for us to enjoy and enjoy.
Are you ready to receive a yummy gift from us? Bonus fund worth $1000 with the highest reward 💥$300💥 with extremely simple tasks!

Over the past few weeks, I spent time researching algorithmic trading on Binance, trying to understand how it actually works in real market conditions—not just in theory.

At first, algo trading felt like something only professionals or institutions would use. But as I dug deeper, things became much clearer. These tools are not magic. They’re simply smarter ways to place trades, especially when trade size or liquidity becomes a problem.

In this article, I’ll walk you through what I learned, using simple language and real case-study insights, so even someone new to trading can follow along easily.

Key Takeaways (In Plain Words)

From my research, here’s what really matters:

Algorithmic trading means letting a system place trades for you based on rules you set.

Binance mainly offers two algo types: TWAP and POV.

These algos are most useful when trades are large or the asset is illiquid.

Small trades on popular coins often don’t need algos at all.

How you configure the algo (time, size, limit price) can completely change the result.

Why Algo Trading Exists in the First Place

When I started learning about this, one question kept coming up:

Why not just use a market order?

The answer is simple. When you place a big order all at once, you push the price against yourself. This is called slippage.

Algo trading exists to solve this problem. Instead of hitting the market with one huge order, the algorithm breaks it into smaller pieces and spreads them out. The goal is simple:
Get a better average price and avoid moving the market too much.

Understanding the Two Algo Types

TWAP – Time Weighted Average Price

TWAP is the easiest to understand.

If I place a TWAP order for 1 hour, the system splits my trade evenly across that hour. It doesn’t care much about volume spikes—it just keeps executing steadily.

Why people use it:

Predictable

Easy to control

Good for calm markets

Downside I noticed: If the market moves quickly, TWAP doesn’t react. It just keeps going.

POV – Percentage of Volume

POV is more dynamic.

Here, the algo tries to trade only a certain percentage of the market’s volume. If the market becomes active, it trades faster. If things slow down, it slows down too.

Why it works well:

Moves with the market

Reduces impact during high activity

Very effective for large trades

Trade-off: The execution time is unpredictable. Sometimes it finishes quickly. Other times, it can take hours.

What the Case Studies Were Based On

During my research, I came across analysis using around 25,000 real, anonymized Binance algo trades.

The idea was simple:

Compare algo trades vs normal market orders

Measure slippage

See where algos actually help—and where they don’t

The key metric used was called edge:

Positive edge = algo performed better

Negative edge = market order did better

Near zero = no real difference

Case Study 1: Overall Performance

TWAP vs Market Orders

Market orders: -0.17% slippage

TWAP algo: -0.18% slippage

Result? Almost no difference. TWAP had a tiny negative edge.

POV vs Market Orders

Market orders: -2.37% slippage

POV algo: -0.56% slippage

This really surprised me. POV showed a strong positive edge, meaning it clearly reduced slippage compared to market orders.

Liquid vs Illiquid Assets

To simplify things, BTC and ETH were treated as liquid, while most other coins were considered illiquid.

Here’s what stood out in my search:

Liquid assets already have deep order books

Illiquid assets react badly to big orders

Algo trading showed:

Almost no benefit for small liquid trades

Clear benefits for illiquid coins

This explained why some TWAP results looked slightly negative overall—it was often used where it wasn’t really needed.

Case Study 2: Trade Size Matters (A Lot)

This part made everything click for me.

Big Trades = Big Problems

For trades above 2 million USDT, market orders experienced slippage as bad as -7.4%.

That’s massive.

Where Algos Shine

Large trades

Illiquid assets

Situations where timing matters

In some cases, algo orders delivered up to 13% better execution than market orders.

That’s not a small improvement—that’s the difference between profit and loss.

Case Study 3: TWAP vs POV in Real Conditions

Large Trades

When trade size increased, POV consistently outperformed TWAP.

Why? Because POV adjusts speed based on real market volume. It doesn’t blindly execute.

Duration Trade-Off

POV’s biggest downside is time. Some trades took up to 8 hours to complete.

So it becomes a choice:

Need speed and certainty → TWAP

Want best possible price → POV

Case Study 4: Configuration Can Make or Break Everything

This was one of the most important lessons I learned.

TWAP Duration Mistakes

For liquid assets, setting TWAP for too long (over 1 hour) actually made results worse.

The market had enough liquidity to fill fast—but the algo dragged execution while prices moved.

The Power of a Limit Price

Adding a limit price changed everything.

When traders used a limit:

Median performance improved significantly

Trades paused during bad price moves

Execution resumed automatically when conditions improved

This simple setting acted like a safety net against volatility.

What I Personally Took Away From This Research

After going through all this, here’s how I now see it:

Algo trading is not for every trade

It becomes powerful when size and liquidity become problems

POV is great for large, sensitive trades

TWAP works best when configured carefully

A limit price should almost always be used

Small traders on liquid coins are often better off using market orders

Algo orders also help in ways charts don’t show—like hiding large positions and avoiding panic reactions from the market.

Final Thoughts

From everything I researched, one thing became very clear to me:

Algo trading is not about being fancy—it’s about being smart.

When used correctly, Binance’s algo tools help traders:

Reduce slippage

Control market impact

Trade large sizes more safely

But like any tool, results depend on how you use it.

If you understand your trade, your asset, and your timeframe, algo trading can quietly do a lot of heavy lifting for you—without the stress of manual execution.
$BTC $ETH

#BinanceSquareTalks #BinancePizzaVN